
Alive but weakened, Iran's Khamenei faces new challenges
After days of silence, Khamenei appeared on Thursday in a video address to proclaim 'victory' and prove he is still alive following the 12-day conflict with Israel which ended with a truce earlier this week.
But Khamenei, appointed Iran's number one and spiritual leader for life in 1989, spoke softly and hoarsely in the address, without the charismatic oratory for which he is known.
Whereas his regular interventions before the war usually took place in public in front of an audience, this message was filmed against a plain backdrop of curtains and a picture of revolutionary founder Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
This may indicate he could still be in hiding after Israel refused to rule out seeking to assassinate him.
On Thursday, Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz told media that the military would have killed Khamenei during the war if the opportunity had presented itself.
'If he had been in our sights, we would have taken him out,' Katz told Israel's public radio station Kan, adding that the military had 'searched a lot'.
But in the end, the conflict did not trigger the removal of the system that has ruled Iran since the 1979 revolution.
Still, it enabled Israel to demonstrate military superiority and deep intelligence penetration of Iran by killing key members of Khamenei's inner circle in targeted strikes.
The war was also the latest in a series of setbacks over the last year for Khamenei.
These include the downgrading of pro-Tehran militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah in conflicts with Israel and the fall of Iran's ally in Syria Bashar al-Assad, against the background of economic crisis and energy shortages at home.
'At this time, the regime does not seem to be on the verge of falling but it is certainly more vulnerable than it has been since the early years after the revolution,' said Thomas Juneau, professor at the University of Ottawa.
'Diminished figure'
'The authority of the supreme leader has therefore certainly been undermined,' Juneau told AFP.
'Even though his position remains secure, in that there is unlikely to be a direct challenge to his rule for now, he has lost credibility and bears direct responsibility for the Islamic republic's major losses.'
Khamenei is 86 and suffers the effects of a 1981 assassination attempt in Tehran which paralysed his right arm, a disability he has never made any attempt to hide.
But discussion of succession has remained taboo in Iran, even if Western analysts have long eyed his son Mojtaba as a possible – but far from inevitable – contender.
Supreme leader says Iran would strike back if attacked
Arash Azizi, visiting fellow at Boston University, said Khamenei looked 'frail and weak' in his televised message in 'a far cry from the grand orator we know'.
'It's clear that he is a diminished figure, no longer authoritative and a shadow of his former self,' he said.
'Power in Tehran is already passing to different institutions and factions and the battle for his succession will only intensify in the coming period.'
Khamenei has come through crises before, using the state's levers of repression, most recently during the 2022-2023 protests sparked by the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, an Iranian Kurd detained for allegedly breaching Iran's strict dress code for women.
'Sidelined'?
The New York Times and Iran International, a Persian-language television channel based outside Iran that is critical of the authorities, have said Khamenei spent the war in a bunker avoiding use of digital communication for fear of being tracked and assassinated.
Iran International reported that Khamenei was not even involved in the discussions that led to the truce which were handled by the national security council and President Masoud Pezeshkian. There has been no confirmation of this claim.
Jason Brodsky, policy director at the US-based United Against Nuclear Iran, said Khamenei appeared 'frail and hoarse' and also 'detached from reality' in insisting that Iran's nuclear programme did not suffer significant damage.
'Nevertheless, I remain sceptical of the theories that Khamenei has been sidelined,' he told AFP.
'I have no doubt the war will prompt a debate within the Islamic Republic's political elite as to how best to rebuild the system's capabilities, but in the end, the buck has always stopped with Khamenei,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
17 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Israel demands release of all hostages from Hamas
A senior Israeli official on Tuesday said the government stood firm on its call for the release of all hostages in any future Gaza ceasefire deal, after Hamas accepted a new truce proposal. Mediators are awaiting an official Israeli response to the plan, a day after Hamas signalled its readiness for a fresh round of talks aimed at ending nearly two years of war. Mediator Qatar expressed guarded optimism for the new proposal, noting that it was "almost identical" to an earlier version agreed to by Israel. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, a senior Israeli official told AFP the government's stance had not changed and demanded the release of all hostages in any deal. The two foes have held on-and-off indirect negotiations throughout the war, resulting in two short truces during which Israeli hostages were released in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, but they have ultimately failed to broker a lasting ceasefire. Qatar and Egypt, backed by the United States, have mediated the frequent rounds of shuttle diplomacy. Egypt said Monday that it and Qatar had sent the new proposal to Israel, adding "the ball is now in its court". Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said on Tuesday that Hamas had given a "very positive response, and it truly was almost identical to what the Israeli side had previously agreed to". "We cannot make any claims that a breakthrough has been made. But we do believe it is a positive point," he added. According to a report in Egyptian state-linked outlet Al-Qahera News, the latest deal proposes an initial 60-day truce, a partial hostage release, the freeing of some Palestinian prisoners and provisions allowing for the entry of aid. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has yet to publicly comment on the plan, but said last week that his country would accept "an agreement in which all the hostages are released at once and according to our conditions for ending the war". Senior Hamas official Mahmoud Mardawi said on social media that his group had "opened the door wide to the possibility of reaching an agreement, but the question remains whether Netanyahu will once again close it, as he has done in the past". Hamas's acceptance of the proposal came as Netanyahu faced increasing pressure at home and abroad to end the war. On Sunday, tens of thousands took to the streets in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv to call for an end to the war and a deal to free the remaining hostages still held captive.


Express Tribune
17 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Trump rules out US troops for Ukraine
President Donald Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending US troops to back up any Ukraine peace deal but suggested air support instead, as European nations began hashing out security guarantees ahead of a potential Russia summit. In a flurry of diplomacy aimed at ending the war, Trump brought Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders to the White House on Monday, three days after his landmark encounter with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. But while Trump said Putin had agreed to meet Zelensky and accept some Western security guarantees for Ukraine, those promises have been met with extreme caution by Kyiv and Western capitals, and many details remain vague. Putin proposed holding the summit with Zelensky in Moscow, three sources familiar with the Trump call told AFP. One source said Zelensky immediately said no to meeting in the capital of his country's invader. Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine since Russia invaded in 2022, said that European nations were "willing to put people on the ground" to secure any settlement. "France and Germany, a couple of them, UK, they want to have boots on the ground," Trump said in a Fox News interview. "We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air." Asked what assurances Trump had that US boots would not be on the ground, he replied: "Well, you have my assurance and I'm president." The White House later doubled down on Trump's statements -- but gave few new details on either the summit or the security guarantees. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump "has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine" and that the use of US air power was "option and a possibility." Leavitt insisted that Putin had promised Trump he would meet Zelensky, and said top US officials were "coordinating" with Russia on a summit. Trump had dramatically interrupted his meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans at the White House on Monday to call the Russian leader. Allies have expressed doubts that Putin will go through with the meeting. The Europeans are however seizing on the possibility of a peace deal following the Trump talks. French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer brought together around 30 of Ukraine's allies known as the "Coalition of the Willing" for virtual consultations. Starmer told them coalition teams and US officials would meet in the coming days to "prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended," a Downing Street spokesperson said. The military chiefs of staff of all 32 nations in the NATO military alliance will meet by video Wednesday to discuss Ukraine, officials said. Russia has warned that any solution must also protect its own "security interests" and has ruled out Ukraine joining NATO. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov added that any meeting between the leaders "must be prepared very thoroughly." Lavrov's comments, and Putin's offer of Moscow as a summit venue, reinforced European fears that Russia was once again stalling.


Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan: retrospect and prospect—II
Gen Ziaul Haq promised elections within 90 days; they actually exceeded 1000 days. He put Bhutto to the gallows on trumped charges of conspiracy to murder. In a split decision of the Supreme Court, 4-3 verdict, he was still hanged. Zia knew Bhutto alive would be a danger to him, little did he know, that the ghost of Bhutto would continue to prevail over the politics of Pakistan. Gen Zia irrevocably damaged Pakistan. Gen Zia moved quickly to install himself as President while still donning the uniform of COAS. The decade of 1978-88 can best be described as the 'dark ages'. He ruthlessly ruled for 11 long years, destroying every single state institution. Fate and destiny removed him in August, 1988. The air crash was fatal. The Soviets had earlier invaded Afghanistan in 1979. We chose to become a frontline state. The consequences we continue to face. The social fabric of Pakistan was badly affected. We saw the rise of drugs and gun culture. The decade of 1988-98 gave to Pakistan a taste of sham democracy. Elections held regularly were engineered and stage managed. For the first time a female in Pakistan and the Islamic countries became the prime minister. Benazir Bhutto was a promise, a hope and an assurance. She fell victim to palace intrigues. During the entire decade Article 58-2B was liberally used by the President to dismiss elected government. The president seemed to be playing Russian roulette. Benazir and Nawaz Sharif alternated as prime minister with as many caretakers. All governments were dismissed on unproven charges of corruption. Pakistan: retrospect and prospect—I In October, 1999, in a suicidal move, the COAS was dismissed, by the Prime minister, while he was airborne on a flight from Colombo. The armed forces on ground in reaction enforced a military takeover, without the declaration of martial law. The Constitution was held in abeyance. The decade until 2008 was largely ruled by the military in accompaniment with a civilian facade. President Musharraf, who started off as Chief Executive, was elected President by the assembly. This period was where our economy grew by almost 7 percent every single year. The tragic event of 9/11 happened and the USA launched a full scale attack on Afghanistan in pursuit of Osama bin Laden. Pakistan again with little choice got embroiled in this war, that was to later become another Vietnam for the US. Just as in the period of Gen Zia, the reaction of the Jihadis targeted civilian areas of Pakistan. Suicide bombings was the order of the decade. Innocent lives were lost. President Musharraf opened up electronic media, more than 50 channels were launched. Freedom of press gained momentum. Privatisation took a spiral. Banks and other key industries were denationalised. After 3-4 years of economic stability, political turmoil set in through the lawyers' movement. President Musharraf was negotiating a political deal with popular Benazir Bhutto. The deal fell through. Elections were announced. In a public meeting at Rawalpindi, where earlier a serving prime minister was gunned down, she too fell victim to an assassin's bullet. A great tragedy had struck. She was a leader who was this time more mature than before to lead effectively. But nature had other designs. Her assassination led to postponement of elections, but once held, expectedly, PPP swept the elections. Pakistan remained on the see-saw of uncertainty but it gained political stability. The government completed its term. A lot of credit must go to President Zardari for his political sagacity and foresight in initiating the revocation and annulment of section 58-2B. The President's office was defanged. A triumph for parliamentary democracy. During 2008-2018, peaceful transitions happened inspite of all elections being declared as controversial by independent analysts. The Panama leaks led to the replacement of the prime minister. During this time, a third potent force emerged as threat to the two dominating political parties. The 2018 elections were an Imran Khan (IK) phenomenon. The elections yet again were found to be not fair and highly controversial. The government of Imran Khan was removed through political engineering; his government lost the vote of confidence. IK's government was marred by ineffective decision making. In fact all the ministers appeared to receiving on-the-job training. Leadership is not merely about personal excellence, it is more about the ability to put together a team of the competent and to give them a direction; a vision of shared goals and objectives. IK failed to do that in-spite of his best efforts and intentions. He paid a price for having mediocrity surrounding him from all directions. Pakistan wasn't prepared for a honest but incompetent leadership. Corruption and competence universally move in tandem, albeit regrettably. We are in the midst of the decade that started from 2018 and will last till 2028. The government installed following yet another controversial elections (of year 2024) has been beset with the task to improve the economy. We came to a near miss of getting to be classified as a nation on default. The economic policies now being pursued are aiming at long-term gains. Elected governments must not focus on next elections but must have a very long-term view and vision for the country. Our economy is fledgling. We are living on borrowed money. Borrowing can be dangerously intoxicating for individuals as well as nations. The quickly we realise to live within means the better. No country has become rich or self-sufficient based on borrowings, we will have to learn to earn revenue for ourselves before we start to spend. The deficit of all types keep gnawing at our future. The country needs to adopt a growth strategy that is housed in the growth of exports of goods and services. Inward remittances are holding us up but these aren't reliable and sustainable sources of funding. The Special Economic Zones must receive attention. We have to direct our energies by seeking investment from overseas. Aids and grants are not the answer. Foreign exchange must be earned to beef up FX reserves. Deposits from friends will make us all parasites. Entrepreneurs should be encouraged through policies for setting up industries for finding new business avenues, for exploring new markets, for introducing high speed technology into processes and systems. We have thus far ignored sub-Sahara markets. There is an imperative need to make inroads into unexplored markets. CPEC cannot remain a slave to slogans of being 'game changer', there is need to take action to make it profitable for us. Generally speaking, there should be greater empowerment for decision making alongside strict accountability standards. The process of accountability must remain above board and not be subjected to become a medium of political harassment. In these columns where the imagination has to restricted by the number of words, it is painfully difficult to present a full and comprehensive picture of how things are and how things should be. In a score plus two years, Insha Allah, Pakistan will celebrate the 100th anniversary of its founding. Our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will have to be different than us. Of course only for better. Hope is a great elixir of life. Optimism is not an option but a necessity. As a tail-piece, my son who recently watched an old PTV program of Neelam Ghar on YouTube asked me how come the audience was able then to answers tough questions from Islamic history, Urdu and English literature; how come the audience seemed more disciplined, and how come they were 'happy' to receive a 'Water cooler' for the right answers? As against this he remarked, in some TV program of recent days he said, people are given scooters for correctly remembering the multiplication table of two, three and four? He was baffled, he said. I am speechless, is all I said, in response. Do we have an answer? Copyright Business Recorder, 2025