
"Not Just UP... Also Star Of Bihar": BJP Ally Om Prakash Rajbhar's Warning
Om Prakash Rajbhar isn't a familiar name to casual observers of Indian politics.
Yet Mr Rajbhar is a two-time MLA and a former Uttar Pradesh cabinet minister, who many will know as an outspoken personality and an influential grassroots leader in eastern UP.
And he is now turning his attention further east, to Bihar.
In a fiery and candid 15-minute exclusive with NDTV, Mr Rabjhar made a series of bold claims - including an intention to dominate - about the political landscape in the poll-bound state.
"I will contest 30 seats in Bihar. But, if we are not given a respectable number, then all options are open. My party is even prepared to contest 150 seats even if it helps or hurts the NDA."
Mr Rajbhar's Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party is a member of the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance that controls the federal and Bihar governments, and his declaration on NDTV signals an additional worry for the NDA ahead of the Bihar Assembly election in November.
The BJP is already grappling with a Chirag Paswan-sized problem.
Tthe Lok Janshakti Party leader - whose relationship with Chief Minister Nitish Kumar is tenuous - said last month his party intends to contest all 243 seats on its own, setting up a potential vote-cut situation.
There was a U-turn of sorts - likely after pressure from above, i.e., the BJP - this week after he said the ruling alliance would win and that Nitish Kumar would remain Chief Minister.
That issue settled, for now, the BJP will likely turn its attention to Mr Rajbhar and discontent brewing over seat-share talks for the Bihar election. It is unlikely, even improbable, that Om Prakash Rajbhar's SBSP will be allotted 30 (of Bihar's 243) seats outside its home state.
But the threat of going solo (or allying with another party, which, in effect, would mean joining the opposition Mahagathbandhan bloc) and the resulting splitting of votes, however, marginal, that will follow places pressure on the BJP and its alliance-handling before the election.
Remember, this is a state the BJP and its allies won by the narrowest of margins in 2020.
The BJP-Janata Dal United of Nitish Kumar finished just three seats over the majority mark after a strong show by the Tejashwi Yadav-led Rashtriya Janata Dal.
Mr Rajbhar did not tell NDTV which parties he was in talks with, but his tone suggested that negotiations have not, so far, yielded satisfactory results. So that's good news for the BJP.
However, his confidence also suggests the SBSP is prepped to contest solo.
Division within the BJP-led alliance in Bihar has been a recurring theme in the run-up to this election, with Nitish Kumar the frequent target. The BJP has insisted, repeatedly, the JDU boss remains its frontman, but that vote of confidence has been unsatisfactory.
Speaking to NDTV, Mr Rajbhar joined Chirag Paswan in criticising Nitish Kumar over the law and order situation in a state that has seen a shocking number of murders in the past weeks.
"Nitish Kumar should implement the Yogi (i.e., UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath) model in Bihar... the state's current governance model has failed," he declared.
The Nitish-Yogi comparison is significant.
Mr Rajbhar has seen the Yogi Adityanath administration from close quarters, but the praise has been seen as a nudge to the BJP - that he is willing to remain within the NDA fold.
But he also made it clear to NDTV the SBSP's support in Bihar will come at a cost.
Mr Rajbhar accused the BJP-JDU of neglecting Bihar's extremely backward communities. "I have come to change that..." he said, serving up a clear hint of his political pitch and platform.
In UP, the SBSP has traditionally positioned itself as representing the interests of backward and marginalised castes and communities. And Mr Rajbhar seems set to carry that over to Bihar.
His comments reflect simmering discontent among some communities in Bihar, who believe politicians seek their votes but do not provide proportional representation or policy benefits.
And Mr Rajbhar believes he can fill that gap, that disconnect.
In one of the interview's standout remarks, he told NDTV, "I am not just a leader of UP... I am not just a leader of Purvanchal. I am Bihar's actor - its star. I will prove that this election."
This is not, on the face of it, an assertion without reason.
Mr Rajbhar's appeal extends from eastern UP across the border to Bihar, particularly among economically disadvantaged groups. And this has grown over the past few years.
Consistent public outreach and fiery speeches have gained him a small but solid base.
By calling himself 'Bihar's star', he is also trying to push past a 'fringe player' tag.
'Om Prakash Rajbhar is in Bihar permanently', he wants to tell voters.
But there is one issue that needs to addressed for this to stick - criticism that he is a political opportunist, rising from his jump to the Samajwadi Party-led alliance in 2021/22.
"People call me 'turncoat'... but aren't all political parties the same?" he countered and pointed out an inescapable truth - that political alliances and ideologies are different beasts.
The former changes depending on complicated voter arithmetic.
He also pointed out that national parties routinely jump alliances.
Will the SBSP and Mr Rajbhar actually contest the Bihar election? Will he get 30 seats with the NDA or fight on 150 on his own? Unknown. What is clear is he wants to play it big in Bihar.
And his influence over grassroots voters, amplified by powerful rhetoric, makes him an interesting ally for either of the big blocs in this election.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Russian subs 'near US coast' video surfaces after Trump deploys nuclear subs; sparking war fears
US President Donald Trump has shown Russia that he is not one to take threats lying down, after the Republican swiftly reacted to Russian president Vladimir Putin's aide, Dmitry Medvedev's 'dead hand' threat, following the POTUS's remarks on the Indian and Russian economies. Russia has done its fair share of nuclear saber-rattling in the past, including sending a nuclear-powered submarine and warships to Cuba. Image for representation(Pixabay) Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to be deployed near Russia. The move has not gone down too well, with Hans Kristensen of the Federation of American Scientists noting that the US President was forming a 'commitment trap', fueling expectations nuclear weapons are on the cards if tensions escalate more with Russia. Amid these tensions, a video has surfaced claiming that Russian 'Borei Class submarines equipped with thermonuclear Bulava missiles are now close to the US coast.' Fears of war and fact-checking the Russian submarine claim First off, there is no news of any fresh Russian submarine activity off the US coast. The video that has been shared on X is from 2018 and was of a test Russia conducted in the White Sea. However, Trump's actions have sparked fears in many. One person said on X, ''I'll end the war before I even take office.' 6 months later 'Send in the nuclear subs.'' Another commented 'The odds of WW3 just went up dramatically'. 'Wake up dude, it's just more posturing. Do you really believe that those submarines weren't already being planned for months in advance for that deployment? Learn a little bit about how ballistic missile submarines are operated,' another opined on a thread related to the US deployment of nuclear subs. However, online trepiditon aside, experts don't believe this could actually lead to World War 3 or a nuclear war between Russia and US. Also Read | Trump says to fire US official over 'faked' employment data Evelyn Farkas, executive director of the McCain Institute, said 'It's really signaling. It's not the beginning of some nuclear confrontation and nobody reads it as such. And I would imagine the Russians don't either.' The Telegraph also noted that Trump's Truth Social post is more of a gesture, given that US nuclear submarines are in position to destroy Russia all the time. Russia-US tensions rise Trump's actions come after Medvedev on X wrote 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war.' On Telegram, the former Russian President also referred to 'dead hand', which some military analysts understood to be Russia's codename for the retaliatory nuclear strikes control system. Trump, then, on Truth Social responded saying "Based on the highly provocative statements of the former president of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions". He also said he acted 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Notably, Russia has done its fair share of nuclear saber-rattling in the past, including sending a nuclear-powered submarine and warships to Cuba, which is very close to the US coast. Kimball, the security expert, noted that the US has historically refrained from making threats regarding the use of its nuclear weapons. Trump's statements also come at a time when he is increasingly frustrated with Putin for not agreeing on a ceasefire with Ukraine, but McCain's Farkas noted that the nuclear sub deployment was unlikely to have any impact on Russia's course of action in the bordering country. (With Reuters inputs)


NDTV
4 minutes ago
- NDTV
AAP, BJP Play Blame Game Over Rising Dengue, Malaria Cases In Delhi
A blame game has started in Delhi between the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the BJP-led Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) on Friday over the rising cases of vector-borne diseases in the national capital. Both are trading accusations, while health experts warn of a potential surge if timely interventions are not implemented. To put the Rekha Gupta-led BJP government in the dock, the AAP has alleged that malaria cases in Delhi have broken a 10-year record. According to official figures, Delhi has reported 277 dengue cases, 124 malaria infections, and 18 cases of chikungunya so far this monsoon season. AAP Trains Guns At MCD AAP leader Saurabh Bharadwaj said the rising disease numbers reflected larger issues with civic infrastructure. "Malaria cases in Delhi have broken a 10-year record. This isn't just a number, it's a symptom of how deeply mismanaged the city is," he said during a press conference on Friday. Pointing to the instances of waterlogging in Connaught Place, Sadar Bazar, and Janpath, Mr. Bharadwaj said, "BJP ministers repeatedly claim there's no waterlogging, but the rising malaria cases tell a different story. The AAP has also said it will raise the matter in the Delhi Assembly session on August 4. मलेरिया के आंकड़े पिछले 10 साल में सबसे ज़्यादा‼️ BJP की सरकार ने कहा था कि इस बार दिल्ली में जलभराव नहीं होगा लेकिन इस बार CP और सदर बाजार समेत तमाम जगहों पर जलभराव हुआ लेकिन बीजेपी सरकार ने मानने से ही इनकार कर दिया। अब दिल्ली में मलेरिया के आंकड़े पिछले 10 साल के आंकड़े को… — Saurabh Bharadwaj (@Saurabh_MLAgk) August 1, 2025 Mayor Hits Back Responding to the allegations, Delhi Mayor Sardar Raja Iqbal Singh defended the MCD's efforts and questioned AAP's performance during its tenure at the municipal level. AAP ran the MCD for two-and-a-half years. Did they eradicate mosquito breeding? They didn't even release full data on dengue and malaria cases then," Mr Singh said. He also highlighted the civic body's recent initiatives to prevent mosquito breeding and vector-borne diseases, which include spraying at 49,718 locations, conducting 8.2 lakh home inspections, and issuing over 5,600 legal notices for mosquito breeding violations. "We're acting on a war footing. These baseless accusations by AAP are just a political diversion," Mr Singh said, adding that AAP leaders have not been active participants in health discussions. Between Politics and Public Health, Residents Want Solutions As political back and forth continues, residents say they're more concerned about on-ground response than party positions. "We don't want daily updates on blame. We want clean streets, regular spraying, and health camps," said a resident in West Delhi.


Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump slaps 25% tariff on all Indian goods; exports worth $85 billion at risk
The United States has levied high tariffs on India, potentially affecting a significant portion of Indian exports. This move places India among the most heavily penalized nations under the new tariff regime. Ongoing trade negotiations between India and the US aim to address these concerns. The Indian government downplays the impact, emphasizing its commitment to protecting national interests. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The US has imposed an across-the-board 25% tariff on all Indian-origin goods, effective August 7, along with penal duties on scores of other countries. The duties range from 10% to 41%. India 's competitors, including Pakistan, Vietnam, Bangladesh and Turkey, were levied lower tariffs of 15-20%. The steep duty could hurt nearly half of India's exports of more than $85 billion to the US. This measure, part of a new executive order issued by US President Donald Trump on July 31, places India among the most harshly treated countries in the new tariff regime, of fering no product-level exemptions even for sectors deemed critical, such as pharmaceuticals, energy and the order mentions that tariffs may be reduced once countries do a deal with the US. India and the US are currently in negotiations over a trade accord. Indian government officials played down the measure's impact and added that New Delhiwill not be pressured into giving any duty exemptions on agricultural, dairy and genetically modified (GM) products in trade pacts.'The impact (of the tariff) will not be very big. More than half of India's exports to the US are expected to remain unimpacted. Due to the Section 232 exemption of the US, exports worth about $40 billion would be impacted with these tariffs,' said an has been intensifying his rhetoric against India in the past few days. New Delhi, though, has said it will take all necessary steps to safeguard its national interest, besides pointing out that the country's economy—the fastest-growing major one —was a bright spot amid global Indian goods , such as pharma and electronic goods, are already in the exemption category of the US and would not attract any duty, he said the tariffs will not have any adverse effect on the economy and India will not come under pressure. 'The GDP loss likely to be less than 0.2% in the worst case scenario. Exports may fall slightly, but most of the goods exported to the US will not be subject to tariffs,' said the official.'India is giving top priority to its interests, There will be no compromise on agriculture, dairy, GM crops… (considering) religious sentiments. There will be no compromise on non-veg milk and beef,' said another official. 'No adverse effect will be allowed on the interests of Indian farmers.' Commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal will meet exporters from textiles, engineering, pharmaceuticals, steel, IT and chemicals, from August 2-3 in Mumbai to discuss the implications of the 25% tariff. Similar stakeholder consultations would be held in New Delhi the next have been seeking immediate rollout of Interest Equalisation Scheme for pre- and postshipment export credit, and market support for goods meant for the US. The government should absorb some of the cost disabilities due to the tariffs, said the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO).'We expect $45-47 billion of exports to get impacted by this move,' said Ajay Sahai, director general of FIEO. The US was India's largest export destination in FY25, with shipments valued at $87 billion, accounting for about a fifth of the $437 billion and the US have been negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) since March and aim to conclude the first tranche of talks by October. The US has been pressuring India to allow farm, dairy and GM imports as part of the pact. So far, five rounds of talks have been completed. The sixth round of talks will be held from August official cited earlier insisted that animal feed is used in the dairy sector in the US, and that New Delhi has never given any duty concessions in any of its earlier trade pacts on its imports. 'There are religious sentiments… so it is not acceptable,' the person said. 'There will be no compromise on these segments in any of India's trade pacts.'Another official said that certain segments, such as gems and jewellery, will not be impacted much as these are region-specific. 'If American consumers buy jewellery which is made in Rajasthan, then that demand would not get impacted much,' the official said that the new order puts India at a disadvantage relative to some of its rivals that face lower tariffs. Trump has also threatened an unspecified penalty levy to be imposed on India for doing business with Russia. 'The implications of the recent development are being examined. The ministry of commerce and industry is engaged with all stakeholders, including exporters and industry for taking feedback of their assessment of the situation,' commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal said in his statement in Parliament on per the order, countries have been subject to tariffs ranging from 10% to over 41% with differential rates based on geopolitical risk, economic alignment, and trade volume. 'Many trading partners have been constructive, bold, and visionary in their commitment to this fundamental change initiated by the President,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on the executive order. 'This new trading system will lower the US trade deficit and lead to better outcomes for American workers, their families, and their communities. In the coming weeks, this new system will begin to take shape, as the Trump administration works with trading partners on a common path to shared prosperity.'The EU has been granted a special concession. If the existing US most favoured nation tariff on an EU product is below 15%, total tariff will rise to 15%. However, if the MFN tariff is already 15% or higher, no additional duty will be charged. Those that have been hit by the highest Trump tariffs are Iraq and Serbia (35%), Switzerland (39%), Laos and Myanmar (40%), and Syria (41%).