logo
You Don't Have to Combine Finances if You Get Married. Experts Offer Tips to Make It Work

You Don't Have to Combine Finances if You Get Married. Experts Offer Tips to Make It Work

CNET31-05-2025
JGI/Managing finances may not be a first-date topic but it's important to establish early on how you both want to approach money. As a married couple, managing money requires even more communication and shared decision-making. These negotiations can potentially be a bit more fraught if you want to maintain financial independence from your spouse.
Financial planner Uziel Gomez said many couples he's worked with start out approaching money differently and never decide on a clear plan.
"Clients often arrive with a system for managing their finances separately, which may have developed more by default than by design," said Gomez, a certified financial planner and accredited financial counselor.
Combining finances when you get married is not a foregone conclusion. In fact, if you and your partner each have your own money management methods that work for you individually, keeping finances separate can potentially help you divide your budget equitably.
Managing your own money can also offer you each more financial independence, which can become especially important if the relationship ends for any reason. We asked financial planners and legal experts to weigh in with tips to help manage separate finances when you're married.
Read more: More Couples Should Have the Money Talk. Here's Why (and How to Do It)
Discuss WHY you're keeping separate finances
Household money management might feel like a sensitive subject but avoiding these conversations could leave you unprepared to meet major financial or life goals together down the line.
Discuss why you each want to manage money the way you do, and set clear guidelines for what you'll each be responsible for and how you'll make big financial decisions like buying property and saving for retirement.
Consider the implications of income disparities
A difference in income could potentially lead to tension if one partner is reluctant to ask the other for help so it's best to get ahead of it, Gomez said.
An income disparity between spouses can create conflict in any marriage but it can be particularly challenging if you want to maintain separate finances.
One spouse might take on the responsibility of paying household costs while the other shoulders other responsibilities. But ask yourself:
What does that mean for your finances if the marriage ends?
How does it affect the way you plan for the future?
Can you build personal savings or a retirement account, even if you're not contributing to household expenses?
Discuss these questions with your spouse to make sure you're on the same page, especially as your incomes evolve over the years.
Keep a shared account (or more) for shared expenses
Gomez recommended that couples keep some shared funds even if most expenses are separate.
Feed money into a shared checking account to pay household bills so those can be automated or deducted electronically without added complications. He also noted that building a shared rainy day fund can help cover unexpected expenses or if one spouse is unable to pay their share.
It's important to discuss early on what the shared accounts will cover. Some common expenses you may want to include:
Mortgage or rent
Property taxes
HOA fees
Homeowners insurance
Utiltiies
Home maintenance
If you have a shared account, you can still build your own spending and savings accounts separate from your spouse. This not only lets you shop without the stress of shared decision-making, but it also helps you maintain financial independence if the relationship ends. And this doesn't necessarily mean divorce -- if the partner who always manages the money dies, it could create additional stress for the surviving spouse if they don't have control of the accounts or a credit history to help them rebuild their finances alone.
If you do share an account, make sure you both have access to review expenses and contributions to avoid any unwelcome surprises (like insufficient funds).
What to do if you have (or plan to have) children
If you're raising children (or plan to) with your spouse, keeping finances separated will likely require some additional work. This might be a good time to set up one of those combined accounts we just mentioned. The account could let you both contribute to day-to-day expenses as well as medical care, day care and education costs.
Some accounts, like a health savings account or 529 plan, can only be owned by one person. If you want to keep these separate for your children, you could each set up your own plan or have one plan that each partner contributes to.
If you don't have children yet but both want to have them in the future, setting up a "family" account for future child-care expenses is a smart move.
If either of you brings children from a previous relationship to the marriage, setting up a separate account for just their expenses will likely make sense, especially if the child's other parent is still involved.
Agree on how you'll file taxes
Financial experts tend to recommend filing taxes jointly if you're married because it gives you access to perks only available to married couples. But joint filing could be complicated if you want to maintain complete financial independence from your spouse.
Speak with an accountant about the tax implications of filing jointly versus separately so you and your spouse can decide together what works best for you. However you plan to file, also ask about tax deductions or credits tied to various household expenses, like mortgage interest, energy credits and home office costs, and take those into consideration as you decide who will pay for what.
Know who owns what under the law
Even if you maintain separate finances and purchase assets individually, those assets might be shared property under state law. Assets (and debts) acquired by either spouse while married are considered to be "community property" in nine states: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin.
"Clients often face challenges when they discover that accounts or assets they believed were separate are considered shared marital property," said Nicole Sodoma, a family and divorce attorney.
That could mean your savings, retirement accounts, home, and other assets and property belong equally to both spouses, regardless of who paid for them or whose name is on the account.
A few other states let spouses opt into treating assets as community property, so pay attention to that decision when you get married. Community property is usually split 50/50 in a divorce unless you come to a different agreement.
If you live in a community property state, Sodoma suggested that putting assets in a trust might offer some protection. But that depends on state-specific laws so work with a financial advisor and an attorney to make plans that work for you.
Keep lines of communication open
Your financial situation will change over the course of your marriage so maintain an ongoing discussion about money. Sodoma recommended a regular family meeting to check in on financial responsibilities, goals and priorities. This type of meeting makes space for conversations about money and it lets you keep the rest of your time with your spouse free from financial stress or questions.
"Open and honest communication is crucial in any marriage, particularly when it comes to managing separate finances," said Gomez. "Establishing clear expectations and defining the roles each partner will play is essential for building a strong foundation for their financial future together."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fed minutes: Most officials worried about inflation moving higher
Fed minutes: Most officials worried about inflation moving higher

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fed minutes: Most officials worried about inflation moving higher

WASHINGTON (AP) — Most Federal Reserve officials said last month that the threat of higher inflation was a greater concern than the potential for job losses, leading the central bank to keep its key rate unchanged. According to the minutes of the July 29-30 meeting, released Wednesday, members of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee 'assessed that the effects of higher tariffs had become more apparent in the prices of some goods but that their overall effects on economic activity and inflation remained to be seen.' The minutes underscored the reluctance among the majority of the Fed's 19 policymakers to reduce the central bank's short-term interest rate until they get a clearer sense of the impact of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on inflation. So far inflation has crept up in the past couple of months but hasn't risen as much as many economists feared when Trump unveiled some of his duties. The Fed left its key interest rate unchanged last month at about 4.3%, though two members of its governing board dissented in favor of a rate cut. Both dissenters — Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman — were appointed to the board during Trump's first term. At a news conference after the meeting, Chair Jerome Powell signaled that it might take significant additional time for the Fed to determine whether Trump's sweeping tariffs are boosting inflation. When the Fed changes its rate, it often — though not always — affects borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards. The Fed typically keeps its rate high, or raises it, to cool borrowing and spending and combat inflation. It often cuts its rate to bolster the economy and hiring when growth is cooling. Christopher Rugaber, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Tech, chip stock sell-off continues as AI bubble fears mount
Tech, chip stock sell-off continues as AI bubble fears mount

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tech, chip stock sell-off continues as AI bubble fears mount

Tech stocks fell for a second day on Wednesday as investors sold off a slew of tech names amid concerns over the sustainability of the AI boom and a recent market rotation away from some of this year's biggest winners. Among the Magnificent Seven Big Tech stocks, Nvidia (NVDA) was down about 0.8%, and Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG) stock fell about 0.6%. Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), and Meta (META) shares fell over 1%. Chip stocks Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Broadcom (AVGO) dropped more than 2%; Micron (MU) shares plummeted more than 5%. CoreWeave (CRWV), the AI data center company that rents computing power to Microsoft (MSFT) and Meta — making it essentially an AI pure play — also dropped nearly 4%. Palantir (PLTR), a defense tech stock that's seen a major upswing from the AI boom, sank nearly 2%, extending its recent losing streak. The rotation out of AI-linked stocks comes as sentiment soured this week on the market for artificial intelligence, fueled in part by a recent report from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and commentary from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Researchers for MIT's Project NANDA authored a report released this week that said 95% of companies it studied are getting no return on AI. The findings of the report were first detailed by Fortune on Monday. That report followed commentary from OpenAI's Altman shortly after the ChatGPT-maker finished out its latest multibillion-dollar funding round, with the CEO telling reporters that he believes there's an AI bubble, a diversion from his prior characterizations. 'When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth,' he said. 'Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes." DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria likened the changing market sentiment to a pendulum. 'This is really just pendulum swinging back,' he told Yahoo Finance on Wednesday. AI stocks have taken off in recent months after a rocky start to the year. A new, cost-effective AI model from Chinese firm DeepSeek released in January cast doubt on the massive sums of money Big Tech was spending to build out AI infrastructure to power the technology — and sent tech stocks tumbling. Two rounds of earnings updates from some of the biggest AI plays in the market and more clarity on Trump's trade policies have since quelled those fears. Investors applauded recent quarterly reports from Big Tech firms Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon, which surpassed Wall Street's expectations as the companies said AI boosted their underlying businesses. That news overrode the fact that those companies also raised their forecasts for spending on AI infrastructure. 'The AI trade was getting so expensive that all it took was some comment from Sam Altman to make the investment community take some profits off the table,' Luria said. Luria added that 'the reality is that AI still has limited applications' beyond consumers talking to AI chatbots and using the tools as a search engine. Some AI bulls, however, maintain faith in the technology's ability to fuel markets to new highs. 'We are still in the early days of the AI Revolution as the use cases are just starting to massively expand as more companies recognize the value creation being driven by a handful of tech companies led by the Godfather of AI [Nvidia CEO] Jensen [Huang] and Nvidia,' wrote Wedbush analyst Dan Ives in a note to investors Wednesday. He added that 'the tech bull cycle will be well intact at least for another 2-3 years given the trillions being spent on AI.' More will be revealed when leading AI chipmaker Nvidia reports its quarterly earnings results after the bell next week on Aug. 27. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at

Federal funding cutoff is breeding concerns for local governments U of M survey finds
Federal funding cutoff is breeding concerns for local governments U of M survey finds

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal funding cutoff is breeding concerns for local governments U of M survey finds

Road construction in Lansing | Susan J. Demas Many Michigan localities expect to see harm from the loss of public funding, though few are preparing for cuts according to a recent survey from the University of Michigan Center for Local, State and Urban Policy. Released earlier this month, the survey examines city and county governments' plans as funding from several major streams enacted during the administration of former President Joe Biden, including the American Rescue Plan Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, come to an end, with federal cuts to housing and transportation championed by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans also on the table. The survey included county, city, township and village officials from 1,328 jurisdictions across the state, with a 72% response rate. In their responses, 40% of local government officials said the loss or pause of one type of federal or state funding would pose problems. Of that 40%, 72% of cities, 68% of counties, 46% of villages, and 30% of townships voiced concerns with the loss of funding. Concerns were greater in communities facing high fiscal stress, with 6% of jurisdictions with high fiscal stress reporting that the loss of American Rescue Plan Act Funding would pose a significant problem, compared to 2% of communities with low fiscal stress. MPPS Federal Funding Infographic Spring 2025 Through the American Rescue Plan Act, Michigan's counties received a collective $1.93 billion in federal funds, while 49 townships received $1.8 billion and a group of smaller cities, villages and townships received $664 million. Although governments were required to commit the funds to specific purposes by December 2024, and have until December 2026 to spend them, the Michigan Public Policy Survey has previously noted administrative challenges tied to procuring the funding and navigating bureaucracy. Despite these concerns, 60% of governments had not begun preparing for a loss of state or federal funding as of spring 2025. According to the survey, this includes 31% of counties, 42% of cities, 59% of villages and 66% of townships. 'Both uncertainty as well as other internal local governmental capacity challenges are hindering some local governments from girding themselves for the coming drop in revenues that will impact their budgets and their service provision,' Debra Horner, the survey's senior program manager, said in a statement. For local governments who are preparing for a loss in funding, 12% of jurisdictions focused on water and sewer infrastructure, with 14% focusing on other capital improvements, with both categories among the most commonly reported uses of ARPA funds. Eleven percent of jurisdictions were preparing for a loss of funding for public safety and economic development while 5% were preparing for a loss of funding on energy programs and infrastructure. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store