Unity must be part of presidential election debate, says former SDLP leader
unification of Ireland
debate will be a key issue in coming years and must be part of the
presidential campaign
because the next officeholder could serve for 14 years, former Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) leader
Colum Eastwood
has declared.
The Derry MP has made clear his interest in running in the October election, though an overture to Fianna Fáil leader,
Micheál Martin
, in June met with a cool response, and no action since by the party.
However, Mr Eastwood appears still to believe that a nomination could be secured from four city and county councils in September, perhaps with a signal from Mr Martin to Fianna Fáil councillors to support him.
'We've had a lot of potential candidates and a lot of people talking about how great they would be as individuals, but not a lot of people are talking about their vision for the country,' he told The Irish Times.
READ MORE
'The next president could be there for 14 years. We need somebody in post who is prepared to talk about, think about and lead on the issue of bringing the people of Ireland back together again.
'Given how long the term is, potentially if it's two terms, the idea of not having somebody who has thought about that deeply, or is not prepared to lead on it as our president, would be pretty bizarre,' he said.
Speaking at the Féile an Phobail festival in west Belfast last weekend, Mr Eastwood said 'the cat is out of the bag' on the constitutional question: 'In my view, the United Kingdom is disintegrating before our very eyes.'
[
Irish unification would cost €152m annually to give Northern Irish civil servants pay parity, report says
Opens in new window
]
The biggest lesson he has learned from his time as an MP in Westminster is that large elements of British political and public opinion 'care if Scotland goes, but they don't care if we go'.
'In fact, if we left in the morning and caused no trouble, they'd be happy enough. I just don't believe that there is anything that can be done by any British government to stop that momentum,' he went on.
Saying that he wanted a united Ireland even if it meant he had 'to eat grass', Mr Eastwood accepted that middle ground opinion in
Northern Ireland
must be convinced that they are not putting their futures at risk by voting for it.
'There is a significant number of people in the middle who are unsure, or undecided, or just curious about it. We need to know who they are, and who they might vote for. We need to know what makes them tick, and what convinces them.
'We need to speak to them relentlessly over a period of years to convince them. If they tell us that they have concerns about pensions, we need to take that concern away by having the answer,' he said.
Mr Eastwood, who leads the
SDLP's
New Ireland Commission, added that unless they looked at 'every single thing that makes them worried or concerned and have an answer for that', they would lose.
Meanwhile, the
Alliance Party
, which declares itself as neutral on the constitutional question will 'not count' in future, even though people who currently vote for it will be central to the outcome of any referendum held, he said.
'I think their voters are the most important people in this conversation. But I think the Alliance Party, if they continue to say they have no position on the future of this island, will not count,' he declared.
Political parties 'have to have positions' on the important issues facing society: 'I don't think it's good enough, actually, to say that they are going to decide at some point in the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on infrastructure delivery: radical solutions are needed
The Government has promised to accelerate the delivery of infrastructure in Ireland as a vital element of its revised National Development Plan, which outlines State investment spending up to 2030. How to achieve this is the question. Reform in the way State cash is allocated is one change which we are told is already in train. And the new Planning Act may also help. But more will be needed. To help plan this, Minister for Public Expenditure, Jack Chamber, has appointed the Accelerating Infrastructure Taskforce , chaired by Sean O'Driscoll, the former chief executive of Glen Dimplex, to advise on how to proceed. Following the receipt of a report drawn up by his Department reflecting the views of interests involved in infrastructure delivery, the taskforce is getting to work. The analysis is clear enough. Infrastructure and housing projects are mired in regulations and increasingly threatened by judicial review. This has led the administrative and regulatory system to take an overly-cautious approach – in part for fear of not ticking all the boxes and facing legal challenges. Beyond that, there have been clear issues in terms of project planning and oversight, of which the National Children's Hospital is just one example. Finding the solutions is not straightforward, but there are a few guiding principles which the taskforce needs to abide by. READ MORE The first is a recognition that the whole system is now dysfunctional. The wider national interest is taking second place to that of objectors. A balance is needed, for sure, but as of now the impact of the system of regulation and previous legal decisions is to cause endless delay and uncertainty. A State in which it takes seven years to deliver an electricity substation is not an efficient one. The second and related imperative for the group is the need to be radical. Fiddling around at the edges will achieve little. Addressing some of the key issues is not straightforward in a common law system and the committee will need to consider to what extent legislation can help , particularly relating to major national projects. But these projects are so central to people's lives and to economic progress that delays are hugely costly. Ireland is, for example, judged as the slowest county in the EU for consents for renewable energy projects. Again, it is a question of balance. The third job for the taskforce will be to ruffle feathers - it needs to be unpopular. As it is composed of private and public sector appointees, consensus may not be easy. But successive governments, departments, State agencies, regulators , the legal system– and the private sector – have all come up short. Failures need to be called out. With billions extra to be spent in the years ahead , Ireland needs to recognise its shortcomings honestly and then address them .
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on presidential aspirations: an uninspiring slate
Nature, it is said, abhors a vacuum. Politics often does too. Yet the slow bicycle race toward the presidential election has now reached its most lethargic phase, with little sign of urgency before the pace – hopefully – quickens in September. At present there are just two confirmed candidates certain to secure a nomination: Catherine Connolly and Maireád McGuinness. That raises the possibility of the first two-way contest since Erskine Childers defeated Tom O'Higgins in 1973. But seasoned observers expect more names to emerge, whether under the banners of Fianna Fáil or Sinn Féin, or as Independents. Peadar Tóibín of Aontú has publicly questioned whether an Independent can realistically gather the 20 Oireachtas votAes needed for nomination. If that route is blocked, the alternative is to secure backing from four local authorities. But time is short. Sean Gallagher, who came close to winning the presidency in 2011, has warned that the local authority route demands a long lead-in. Lobbying councillors, arranging votes, and then mounting a campaign cannot be done in a matter of weeks. His own experience suggests that those who have yet to start this process may already be too late. READ MORE As for those who have been mentioned as possible candidates, none has yet sparked much public enthusiasm. Some are virtually unknown outside small circles. Others either carry political baggage that would make them unelectable, or are plainly unfit to hold the office. The presidential race attracts many aspirants but the campaign itself tends to have a ruthlessly winnowing effect. This leaves the focus on Micheál Martin, Mary Lou McDonald and their respective parties. They must decide soon whether or not to allow the election to proceed as a head-to-head between Connolly and McGuinness. Neither woman is unbeatable, and each has a political record that opponents could effectively exploit. In politics, vacuums rarely last. By September, the parties will have to choose whether to fill this one or leave the electorate with a binary choice.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Unity must be part of presidential election debate, says former SDLP leader
The unification of Ireland debate will be a key issue in coming years and must be part of the presidential campaign because the next officeholder could serve for 14 years, former Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) leader Colum Eastwood has declared. The Derry MP has made clear his interest in running in the October election, though an overture to Fianna Fáil leader, Micheál Martin , in June met with a cool response, and no action since by the party. However, Mr Eastwood appears still to believe that a nomination could be secured from four city and county councils in September, perhaps with a signal from Mr Martin to Fianna Fáil councillors to support him. 'We've had a lot of potential candidates and a lot of people talking about how great they would be as individuals, but not a lot of people are talking about their vision for the country,' he told The Irish Times. READ MORE 'The next president could be there for 14 years. We need somebody in post who is prepared to talk about, think about and lead on the issue of bringing the people of Ireland back together again. 'Given how long the term is, potentially if it's two terms, the idea of not having somebody who has thought about that deeply, or is not prepared to lead on it as our president, would be pretty bizarre,' he said. Speaking at the Féile an Phobail festival in west Belfast last weekend, Mr Eastwood said 'the cat is out of the bag' on the constitutional question: 'In my view, the United Kingdom is disintegrating before our very eyes.' [ Irish unification would cost €152m annually to give Northern Irish civil servants pay parity, report says Opens in new window ] The biggest lesson he has learned from his time as an MP in Westminster is that large elements of British political and public opinion 'care if Scotland goes, but they don't care if we go'. 'In fact, if we left in the morning and caused no trouble, they'd be happy enough. I just don't believe that there is anything that can be done by any British government to stop that momentum,' he went on. Saying that he wanted a united Ireland even if it meant he had 'to eat grass', Mr Eastwood accepted that middle ground opinion in Northern Ireland must be convinced that they are not putting their futures at risk by voting for it. 'There is a significant number of people in the middle who are unsure, or undecided, or just curious about it. We need to know who they are, and who they might vote for. We need to know what makes them tick, and what convinces them. 'We need to speak to them relentlessly over a period of years to convince them. If they tell us that they have concerns about pensions, we need to take that concern away by having the answer,' he said. Mr Eastwood, who leads the SDLP's New Ireland Commission, added that unless they looked at 'every single thing that makes them worried or concerned and have an answer for that', they would lose. Meanwhile, the Alliance Party , which declares itself as neutral on the constitutional question will 'not count' in future, even though people who currently vote for it will be central to the outcome of any referendum held, he said. 'I think their voters are the most important people in this conversation. But I think the Alliance Party, if they continue to say they have no position on the future of this island, will not count,' he declared. Political parties 'have to have positions' on the important issues facing society: 'I don't think it's good enough, actually, to say that they are going to decide at some point in the future.'
