
Fox News Host Confronts Trump Adviser on Bill Adding Trillions to US Debt
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Fox News co-anchor Bill Hemmer confronted Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Friday about concerns that President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" could add trillions of dollars to the nation's debt.
Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. Treasury for comment via email.
Why It Matters
The legislation extended Trump's 2017 tax cuts, reducing taxes for individuals and corporations and adding new exemptions for tipped workers and overtime pay.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the bill would add $3.8 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years, drawing criticism from Democrats and some Republicans who warn the spending cuts included in the bill would be insufficient to pay for the tax cuts and other spending priorities. The potential increase to the country's $36.2 trillion deficit was the primary source of opposition from certain House Republicans.
What to Know
Hemmer pressed Bessent about the CBO's report during an interview on America's Newsroom Friday morning.
"This bill adds trillions to our debt. How is that acceptable to this administration?" Hemmer asked.
Bessent responded: "You're referring to the CBO scoring, I believe, which is 10-year scoring, and it's D.C.-style scoring. So, we think that we can both grow the economy and control the debt. And what's important, Bill, is that the economy grows faster than the debt."
The treasury secretary added: "So, what I would tell your viewers to focus on is what I'm focused on, is what [former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen] was focused on, is what is the total debt to GDP [gross domestic product] because we can grow our way out of this. That if we change the growth trajectory, of the country, of the economy, then we will stabilize our finances and grow our way out of this."
The bill passed the House of Representatives early Thursday morning by a 215-214 vote. Two Republicans, Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio, voted against the bill, along with every House Democrat. Both congressmen had raised concerns about the bill's impact on the deficit.
"While I love many things in the bill, promising someone else will cut spending in the future does not cut spending. Deficits do matter and this bill grows them now. The only Congress we can control is the one we're in. Consequently, I cannot support this big deficit plan. NO," Davidson wrote in a post to X, formerly Twitter, Thursday morning.
The bill, if signed into law in its current form, could have implications for education, defense and health care.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks during a news conference in Geneva on May 12.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks during a news conference in Geneva on May 12.
FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images
What People Are Saying
Representative Thomas Massie said on the House floor: "I'd love to stand here and tell the American people 'we can cut your taxes and increase spending and everything is going to be fine.' But I can't because I'm here to deliver a dose of reality. This bill dramatically increases deficits in the near term but promises our government will be fiscally responsible five years from now. Where have we heard that before? How do you bind a future Congress to these promises? This bill is a debt bomb ticking."
Senator Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, recently told reporters: "I couldn't care less if he's [Trump] upset. I'm concerned about my children, my grandchildren and the fact that we are stealing from them. We are stealing from our children and our grandchildren. $37 trillion in debt and we're going to add to it as Republicans? That is unacceptable."
Senator Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, wrote on X on Friday: "Republicans promised Americans we would rein in wasteful spending and tackle the national debt if they gave us control of all three branches of government. Instead, my colleagues want to tack on more to our national debt instead of making necessary cuts."
President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social: "'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' has PASSED the House of Representatives! This is arguably the most significant piece of Legislation that will ever be signed in the History of our Country!"
What Happens Next?
The bill now heads to the Senate, where it may be reworked to pass, as several Republicans have already raised concerns about it.
Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have questioned whether it would cut Medicaid benefits. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota has indicated the "goal and aspiration" is to get the bill passed by July 4.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
DC police support Trump's federal takeover — are Dems and the media clueless on crime?
National Democratic politicians and mainstream media commentators have spent the last 24 hours blasting President Donald Trump for announcing a federal takeover of Washington, D.C., police. For liberal and progressive critics of the president, this is undoubtedly yet more evidence of his authoritarian tendencies. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, for instance, condemned the president's move as a deliberate distraction from his incompetence and accused him of hypocrisy because his failure to deploy the National Guard four years ago is what contributed to January 6 th — even though former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund has repeatedly clarified that Pelosi herself was the person responsible for failing to enlist the guard. And on CNN, Abby Phillip described Trump's takeover of the police as akin to Batman coming to save Gotham, as if that's a bad thing? I don't know about you, but I'm sold! Now in all seriousness, there's plenty of reason to be generally suspicious of getting the feds more involved in local issues, so I understand a certain level of reflexive distrust at what Trump is doing here. I also think it's important to tell the truth and be mindful of the facts, not feelings. Just because D.C. feels unsafe to some people doesn't necessarily mean that it is. We should be mindful of statistics that show that crime in the nation's capital has thankfully gone down since 2023, although let's add a little asterisk to that — I'll circle back in a minute. All that said, whether crime is technically down or technically up, it's crystal clear that Washington, D.C., has too much crime, from gangland shootings to mentally ill people attacking pedestrians to flash mobs of teenagers stealing cars and vandalizing convenience stores. That's why I find it very, very interesting that, at the local level, the relevant political authorities are not echoing the comments by national Democrats and the media. Consider, for instance, the stance of Muriel Bowser, D.C.'s incumbent Democratic mayor. Bowser issued a face-saving statement that the federal takeover was 'unprecedented and unsettling.' But she did not vow to fight it or to oppose it, and in fact, seems to be sending positive vibes to Trump that she wants to work with him rather than against him on this. That's because she knows city residents are tremendously frustrated with what's happening in the district, and more police could make a difference. Moreover, D.C.'s police union straightforwardly supports Trump on this, though the union thinks full staffing of the local police department is more important as a long-term solution. Indeed, the things that would really go a long way toward solving the crime problem in D.C. have to do with budgeting, staffing and government competence. The major problem — the single biggest problem impacting the justice system in D.C. — is the lack of a working crime lab. D.C.'s forensics lab was de-accredited due to various problems several years back, and while it's now up and running again, it has no means of processing ballistics evidence. That significantly hampers the ability of prosecutors to charge criminals effectively. As a result, D.C. has a very low prosecution rate, and a very low conviction rate, for serious crime. We need more resources for homicide detectives and prosecutors, and also we need the backlog of superior court judges to be addressed. If you don't have the system working to investigate, prosecute and convict criminals, you will have more crime. It's that simple. Now let's return to that asterisk: It may not be the case that D.C.'s crime statistics are even accurate. I'll let former Rep. Peter Meijer make the case: 'I think Mayor Bowser may also know that there's an ongoing investigation in her police department over the potentially manipulation of those statistics, that there have been a down classing of some of the crimes. There has been a massaging of the numbers in the reporting in order to fit them more beneficially into the FBI crime stats,' said the Michigan Republican. 'So, she may know some things that national Democrats are not paying attention to.' Food for thought.

Business Insider
27 minutes ago
- Business Insider
MAGA to Elon Musk: We want you back
MAGA has a new message for Elon Musk: We want you back. "My hope is that by the time of the midterms, he's kind of come back into the fold," Vice President JD Vance told the Gateway Pundit in a recent interview. Despite Musk's fraught departure from DOGE, his epic feud with President Donald Trump over the "Big Beautiful Bill," and his threat to form a third party that could hurt the GOP's electoral chances, several prominent MAGA figures have begun urging a reconciliation with Musk. They argue that Musk was crucial to Trump's 2024 victory, and that having the resources of the world's richest man on their side will be crucial in midterm elections that are expected to be tough for the GOP. An influx of cash from Musk would be a boon for the GOP, which has already had a strong fundraising year. MAGA Inc, a super PAC tied to Trump, raised nearly $177 million in the first 6 months of 2025. "Musk is the perfect person to be the George Soros of the MAGA Right," wrote the MAGA-aligned political strategist Roger Stone in a Substack post on Monday. "It is time for MAGA to mend fences with Elon Musk for the greater good of saving the country and winning the midterm elections." Stone's post was later shared by the far-right radio host Alex Jones, who remains influential with much of Trump's base. "Without a doubt, you helped elect President Trump & provided immense support in our beloved Commonwealth of Pennsylvania," wrote MAGA activist Scott Presler in something of an open letter to Musk on X. "With the upcoming midterm elections, which will decide whether or not President Trump will be a four-year president, I'm asking (kindly) if we can bring the gang back together." It also helps the MAGA case that in the early months of Trump's presidency, Democrats aligned themselves against Musk, owing to their opposition to the firing of federal workers and the cancelling of foreign aid programs. Musk quickly became a boogeyman for Democrats — a key factor that's driving down interest in his proposed "America Party," according to polling. "My argument to Elon is like, you're not going to be on the left, right?" Vance said. "Even if you wanted to be — and he doesn't —they're not going to have you, back that ship has sailed." Both the White House and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. A full reconciliation could be a ways off. But something resembling a detente between Musk and Trump has already taken shape. Trump said in July that he would not seek to cut off subsidies to Musk's companies, writing on Truth Social that he wants "Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before!" Musk, meanwhile, hasn't spoken about the "America Party" in weeks. He also gave $15 million to the GOP as recently as late June, remaining one of the party's biggest donors even after he began feuding with Trump. He has also posted in support of Trump's move to federalize the District of Columbia's Metropolitan Police Department and deploy National Guard troops to the city after a former DOGE staffer was the victim of an alleged assault earlier this month. "It is time to federalize DC," Musk wrote in response to a Truth Social post from Trump that suggested he would do so. On Monday, Musk even directly praised Vance in a reply to a video of the vice president's appearance on former Musk aide Katie Miller's podcast.


Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
What Americans REALLY Thought of the Sweeney Jeans Ad...
That 'controversial' Sydney Sweeney jeans ad bothered almost nobody, a new poll found. I'm Tomi Lahren, more next. Liberals were OUTRAGED over that Sydney Sweeney 'good jeans' American Eagle ad, but what about everyday Americans? According to a recent Economist/YouGov poll, a meager 12% of Americans said they found the campaign offensive. Nearly 40% of respondents found the ad to be 'clever,' and another 39% said it was neither, 8% didn't know how to feel about it. Unsurprisingly, the survey also found that men were far less likely to find the ad offensive and more likely to label it 'clever.' Women were more likely to find it offensive, but even that total was only 17%. Unsurprisingly, Republican respondents viewed the ad more favorably than Democrats. All of this to say, the overblown media reaction to an ad about jeans was totally ridiculous. Those who were truly offended by a pretty girl and a play on words quite frankly need to get a grip. It's not worth getting your undies- or your jeans- in a twist! I'm Tomi Lahren and you can watch my show 'Tomi Lahren is Fearless' at Learn more about your ad choices. Visit