What you might not know about insurance in a natural disaster
A recent survey shows more than half (56%) of insured New Zealand homeowners expect full insurance compensation for natural hazard land damage.
The Natural Hazards Commission (NHC) - which used to be called the EQC - said the national scheme provided up to $300,000 for house damage and some limited cover for damage to land.
NHC chief executive Tina Mitchell said the land cover was standalone and could not be topped up with private insurance.
"Land cover is specifically designed as a contribution payment, not full cover.
"The limits of cover available ensures every homeowner across the country gets access to some protection, and helps keep the scheme affordable as it is funded by homeowners.
People needed to understand there were limits to Crown-owned insurer scheme before a disaster occurred, Mitchell said.
"When you understand that your landcover is limited, you can take action.
"We recommend learning about the risks to your property and seeking expert advice from builders or engineers about how to protect your land from damage. For example, strengthening retaining walls and considering how waterways might impact your property are good things to check regularly.
"If you do think your house is in a risky zone, you may want to allow for possible recovery costs in your financial planning. The scheme is a good contribution, but it is not designed to cover all costs." NHC's suggestions
• Learn about the risks to the property and how the land might be affected.
• Check the limits of cover for the house and the land.
• Reduce risk by seeking expert advice from builders or engineers.
• Plan for how to manage after an event.
The commission's chief strategy officer, Michala Beacham, told RNZ's Morning Report programme today that properties were only covered for land damage within eight metres of the home, or 60 metres of the land needed to access the home.
"It is a horribly stressful time dealing with a natural hazard event, it effects people homes, families and livelihoods, and then having an unexpected cost on top of that is really, you know, not a good time for anyone.
"So that's why we are just trying to help people understand beforehand."
Beacham said settlements for land were based on the cost of repair - within eight metres of the home - or the value of the land damage, but said under legislation NHC paid whatever was less.
"So if your cost of repair is greater than the value of the land then you are going to face a shortfall... A number of people do find themselves with less than they expected or less than they might otherwise need to make a repair."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
What you might not know about insurance in a natural disaster
The Natural Hazards Commission is warning homeowners they are only covered for partial land damage under the Crown-owned insurer. A recent survey shows more than half (56%) of insured New Zealand homeowners expect full insurance compensation for natural hazard land damage. The Natural Hazards Commission (NHC) - which used to be called the EQC - said the national scheme provided up to $300,000 for house damage and some limited cover for damage to land. NHC chief executive Tina Mitchell said the land cover was standalone and could not be topped up with private insurance. "Land cover is specifically designed as a contribution payment, not full cover. "The limits of cover available ensures every homeowner across the country gets access to some protection, and helps keep the scheme affordable as it is funded by homeowners. People needed to understand there were limits to Crown-owned insurer scheme before a disaster occurred, Mitchell said. "When you understand that your landcover is limited, you can take action. "We recommend learning about the risks to your property and seeking expert advice from builders or engineers about how to protect your land from damage. For example, strengthening retaining walls and considering how waterways might impact your property are good things to check regularly. "If you do think your house is in a risky zone, you may want to allow for possible recovery costs in your financial planning. The scheme is a good contribution, but it is not designed to cover all costs." NHC's suggestions • Learn about the risks to the property and how the land might be affected. • Check the limits of cover for the house and the land. • Reduce risk by seeking expert advice from builders or engineers. • Plan for how to manage after an event. The commission's chief strategy officer, Michala Beacham, told RNZ's Morning Report programme today that properties were only covered for land damage within eight metres of the home, or 60 metres of the land needed to access the home. "It is a horribly stressful time dealing with a natural hazard event, it effects people homes, families and livelihoods, and then having an unexpected cost on top of that is really, you know, not a good time for anyone. "So that's why we are just trying to help people understand beforehand." Beacham said settlements for land were based on the cost of repair - within eight metres of the home - or the value of the land damage, but said under legislation NHC paid whatever was less. "So if your cost of repair is greater than the value of the land then you are going to face a shortfall... A number of people do find themselves with less than they expected or less than they might otherwise need to make a repair."
RNZ News
31-07-2025
- RNZ News
Some receive 'tsunami' of emergency alerts following massive quake
Some people received a tsunami of emergency alerts following the powerful earthquake that struck off the eastern coast of Russia yesterday with one man reporting nearly 50 of the sirens ringing out of his phone in the past 24 hours or so. Minister Mark Mitchell said the system hasn't been used in sometime and the problems will be taken seriously, with Emergency Management investigating what caused the glitches. Chen Liu reports. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Otago Daily Times
30-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
'A glitch with the system': What's up with the tsunami phone alerts?
Many New Zealanders were woken up by an emergency mobile alert sent out at 6.30am today, but for some the alerts have either come repeatedly or not at all. Officials say the risk of strong currents and unpredictable surges is still very high following Wednesday's big earthquake in Russia The threat to the Canterbury coast is likely to remain in place until noon. NEMA Civil Defence Emergency Management director John Price told Morning Report a technical glitch was to blame for issues with the alert. He said two official alerts had been sent out, one on Wednesday afternoon and one on Thursday morning. "We made the call to send out another emergency alert [Thursday morning] to remind New Zealanders, especially if they're on route to work, school or other activities, to avoid being near the coast because that is where the main threat [is]." Texts to RNZ from listeners show some people have received an alert multiple times, while others haven't received an alert at all. Helen from Christchurch said she didn't get any alert at all, while a woman in Levin didn't receive an alert Thursday morning despite others nearby getting them. A number of people said the alert disappeared from their phone before they were able to read it. RNZ has heard from one person who said she keeps getting the alert repeatedly and when she dismisses it it comes back up, draining the battery of her phone. Price said they were urgently looking into the problem. "There seems to have been a glitch with the system and we do send these alerts out and we're looking into this urgently. "It's a technical glitch and it's not something we, the software, we have a different software company, we use three cellphone providers because the way the system works, the message or the text is sent out, it goes to a cell tower, the cell tower then sends that message to phones that are in that designated area." Coastal areas were designated for this alert, he said. "As to why it has repeated itself or why it has taken time to get through, these are all good questions that we need to find out the answer to." Price said the emergency alert to phones was only one tool to let people know about an emergency. Radio and other media sources were also key. "Hence why we say to people, this is not foolproof, we have to have multiple ways of communicating and we pushed out those multiple communication networks." What exactly are emergency mobile alerts? You can read RNZ's full explainer on emergency alerts here. A warning broadcast to your mobile phone, they've been around in New Zealand since 2017. They come with a loud buzz that can usually be heard even if you're on silent mode and a banner notification detailing the emergency. They've been used for everything from tsunami warnings to dangerous fires to thunderstorms. Many other countries use them and they got a particularly good workout in New Zealand during the Covid-19 pandemic. How can they send messages to everyone's phones? And why are there glitches? Alerts use cell broadcast technology known as geotargeting to send alerts through cell towers in a selected area - which can be the entire country, as in Sunday's test, or down to a small section of a city. New Zealand's system was provided by Dutch company one2many, which is now a division of Everbridge Public Warning, an American software company that specialises in alert systems. In a description of their technology, Everbridge says "one message can be sent to millions of devices within a target area in seconds". "A really oversimplified way of putting it, it's like a signal that your phone picks up, which is almost like radio," NEMA communications manager Anthony Frith said. When an alert is issued, the agency involved will select how big a region is covered, depending on the specific crisis. "The operator who sends the emergency alert will draw a polygon around that area, a shape they need to make sure is big enough to capture cell phone towers in the perimeter," Frith said. Auckland Emergency Management general manager Adam Maggs said, while targeted messages work well, who gets them varies, depending on a variety of factors. "In terms of one person [in a household] receiving a message and another not, this could be due to being just outside of the geographically targeted area. The boundary for the geotargeted area is not a 'hard' boundary and there can be message leakage, depending on the location of cell towers. "Other reasons include having a phone that may be older or has missed a software update, or the phone may not have had mobile reception." How do they know my phone number, anyway? They don't. The system uses the cellphone network as a carrier of the notifications that NEMA or other emergency agencies send out. "Our system does not have any telephone numbers," Frith confirmed. "Once we've transmitted the message from our portal, it then goes to the cell towers." I hate that phone noise, can't I opt out? No. You can't choose not to receive an emergency alert - after all, the point is that it's meant to be used for an emergency. Because it's sent out over cell phone towers, there's no 'list' of names on it to be removed from. The flurry of alerts sent out in Auckland in April saw some backlash on social media. "We often receive feedback from Aucklanders asking to be removed from the EMA system [which is not possible]," Maggs said. "We get just as much feedback thanking us for an alert or update. This will always be the case and we are fine with that. "At the end of the day, our goal is to help Aucklanders stay as safe as possible in times of emergency and we will continue to work hard to ensure that."
