
Where Trump's tariffs will hurt most
Ramaphosa must do 'whatever it takes' to protect SA's exports, but an alternative trade deal is 'highly unlikely' as the ANC 'will not concede on any' of the contentious issues. Picture: Shutterstock
US President Donald Trump's 30% tariff of exports from SA to the US, effective from 1 August 2025, contains some notable exceptions.
Minerals considered critical to the US – notably platinum group metals (PGMs), gold, chrome and coal – will attract 0% tariffs. That accounts for about half of what SA exports to the US, so excluding these commodities is a major relief.
Where SA will really feel the pain is on the export of cars, already 25% (previously 0%), steel and aluminium, now 50% (previously 25% and 10%) and agricultural products at 30% (most products previously entered the US duty-free). That means SA wines in the US will be considerably more expensive.
Donald MacKay, CEO of XA Global Trade Advisors, says the new tariffs could impact up to 0.5% of SA's GDP.
'This is not nothing, but it's not massive either. I don't think the sky is falling. That doesn't mean to say our economy will contract by that amount (0.5%), but that's the potential scale of the impact.
'If the equivalent tariffs were applied by Europe, which is a larger trading bloc for us, it would be a different conversation.'
ALSO READ: Trump's new 30% tariff less about trade and more about power
The US tariffs imposed on fruit appear counterintuitive as SA's fruit production season is not in sync with that of the US, meaning SA producers do not compete with US farmers in these products.
'In the agricultural sector, we do compete against Chile and Peru. If lower tariffs are implemented for Chile and Peru, it will provide them with a massive competitive advantage since importing from SA would be much more expensive,' says Gerhard Papenfus, CEO of the National Employers' Association of South Africa (Neasa).
If Chile and Peru end up with lower duties than SA, this could really hurt, adds MacKay. 'But trade is fungible, so if Peru sells more oranges to America, their other markets will be deprived of citrus and we may be able to pick up some volume there.
'It might very well be worth meeting with countries in such positions to see if arrangements can be coordinated. It is clear that the most agile countries will win here.'
ALSO READ: IMF warns all countries will be caught in crossfire of trade war
MacKay says it appears Trump is using the tariff issue to apply maximum pressure on SA and other countries such as South Korea, Malaysia, Japan, and Kazakhstan) to move faster on their tariff offers.
Trump has also threatened a further 10% duty on all countries aligning themselves with Brics.
The US says the purpose of these duties is to reduce the trade deficit that it has with SA and is based on duties currently applicable on imports from the US. South Africa disputes this, saying the duty calculation is based on incorrect data.
'Our assumption is that the United States is utilising duties as a negotiating mechanism and that the issues up for negotiation are not only in the area of trade but may well include broader political issues,' adds Papenfus.
ALSO READ: Will Trump's tariffs have major negative effect on South Africa's economy?
Automotive hit will be hard, very hard
Trump's decision to impose 30% tariffs on the export of vehicles, components, tyres and parts exported from SA to the US will kill any possible economic growth in our country.
Dawie Roodt, chief economist of the Efficient Group, told the Motor Industry Staff Association (Misa) this week that Trump's figures are not based on actual figures, but everyone will feel the impact because it will hinder any economic growth.
These tariffs take away any competitive edge SA enjoyed in the global market.
Small retailers have already stopped manufacturing because it will not be feasible to continue with the new export tariffs or because of a reduced demand from US clients.
'We can now accept that Agoa [African Growth and Opportunity Act] is dead,' says Roodt.
'Under Agoa, more than 1 800 South African products and goods, including vehicles, components and parts, were exported to the US duty-free.'
ALSO READ: Wait-and-see to Trump's hardline
SA's official unemployment rate rose to 32.9% in the first quarter of 2025, the highest since the second quarter of 2024 (33.5%).
'The population has seen a steady increase year-on-year, with a growth rate of 1.33%. We live in a country where our population growth exceeds our economic growth. This makes job creation highly unlikely,' says Roodt.
The retail motor industry is already struggling with the uncertainties of Trump's tariff increases, which commenced when he took office in January.
Misa reports an increase in employers closing their doors, restructuring in terms of Section 189 of the Labour Relations Act, or embarking on short time.
Tiekie Mocke, manager of Misa's legal department, says the reduced demand for exports has already forced one company cut its workweek from five to four days.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa disputes Trump's 30% tariff claim as 'not accurate'
Ramaphosa must do 'whatever it takes'
Martlé Keyter, Misa CEO for operations, says President Cyril Ramaphosa and his delegation need to do whatever it takes to restore South Africa's strained relationship with the US.
This is not about who is right or wrong, but about what is in the best interest of South Africa.
'Our assumption is that the US is utilising duties as a negotiating mechanism and that the issues up for negotiation are not only in the area of trade but may well include broader political issues,' adds Papenfus.
The 30% tariff imposed by the US may be punishment for SA's cosy relationships with US adversaries Russia, China and Iran.
SA may also be singled out for retaliation over its case launched against Israel in the International Court of Justice.
Papenfus recently returned to SA from a meeting with White House officials and says the ANC's race-based transformation agenda is another factor standing in the way of the normalisation of trade with the United States.
'The ANC will not concede on any of these issues, making it highly unlikely that an alternative trade deal will be concluded.'
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump says Armenia, Azerbaijan commit to end fighting 'forever'
Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed to a lasting peace after decades of conflict, US President Donald Trump said after the South Caucasus rivals signed a deal welcomed on Saturday by Iran and Western nations. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijan's long-time President Ilham Aliyev said Trump's mediation should earn him a Nobel Peace Prize -- an award the US leader has been vocal about seeking. The two former Soviet republics "are committing to stop all fighting forever, open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity," Trump said at a White House signing event on Friday. However, the fine print and binding nature of the deal between the long-time foes remained unclear. The two leaders would have a "great relationship," Trump said. "But if there's conflict... they're going to call me and we're going to get it straightened out," he said. AFP | ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan have feuded for decades over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. They went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. - 'Historic signature' - The Azerbaijan and Armenian leaders shook hands under the satisfied gaze of Trump before all three signed a document the White House called a "joint declaration." Aliyev hailed the "historic signature" between two "countries which were at war for more than three decades." "We are today establishing peace in the Caucasus," he said. Aliyev offered to send a joint appeal, along with Pashinyan, to the Nobel committee recommending Trump receive the Peace Prize. "Who, if not President Trump, deserves a Nobel Peace Prize?" he said. Aliyev also thanked Trump for lifting restrictions on US military cooperation with Azerbaijan, which was announced on Friday. Pashinyan said the "initialing of (the) peace agreement will pave the way to end decades of conflict between our countries and open a new era." The Armenian leader said the "breakthrough" would not have been possible without "peacemaker" Trump. "Today, we can say that peace has been achieved," Pashinyan told a news conference after signing the deal. The agreement includes establishing a transit corridor passing through Armenia to connect Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan, a longstanding demand of Baku. The United States will have development rights for the corridor -- dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" -- in the strategic and resource-rich region. Iran, which has long opposed the corridor over fears it would cut the country off from the Caucasus, welcomed the deal on Saturday. However, it also expressed "concern over the negative consequences of any foreign intervention in any way and form, especially in the vicinity of common borders." The foreign ministry in Turkey, a longtime supporter of Azerbaijan, hailed the "progress achieved towards establishing a lasting peace". UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy congratulated the two countries "on the bold steps taken in Washington." European Union chiefs said it would pave the way to "lasting, sustainable peace for both countries and across the entire region." - 'Strategic' partner - Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed on the text of a comprehensive peace deal in March. However, Azerbaijan later outlined a host of demands -- including amendments to Armenia's constitution to drop territorial claims for Karabakh -- before signing the document. Pashinyan has announced plans for a constitutional referendum in 2027, but the issue remains deeply divisive among Armenians. Asked what Armenia stood to gain from Friday's deal, a White House official said it was "an enormous strategic commercial partner, probably the most enormous and strategic in the history of the world: the United States of America." "The losers here are China, Russia, and Iran," he said, speaking on condition of anonymity. The disputed mountainous enclave of Karabakh is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, but was controlled by pro-Armenian separatists for nearly three decades after a war following the break-up of the Soviet Union. DC POOL/AFP |


eNCA
9 hours ago
- eNCA
Putin-Trump summit: what we know so far
US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin will hold talks in Alaska next Friday in a bid to end the war in Ukraine, which was triggered by Russia's February 2022 invasion. There was yet no mention of Ukraine's participation in the meeting, despite multiple calls from Kyiv and Europe that the war-torn country must be part of the negotiations. This has sparked fury in Kyiv, with President Volodymyr Zelensky saying his country "won't give land to the occupier" and that "any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace". Trump has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace -- after boasting he could end the war in 24 hours -- but multiple rounds of peace talks, phone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough. Here is what we know about the summit so far: - When and where - On his Truth Social site on Friday, Trump announced that his meeting with Putin would be held in the far-north US state of Alaska on August 15, which was later confirmed by the Kremlin. The announcement came after days of both sides indicating the two leaders would hold a summit next week. The Kremlin confirmed the summit in Alaska on Friday, calling it "quite logical." "They would like to meet with me, I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing," Trump said on Thursday, speaking of both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. At the White House Friday, Trump said "there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" Ukraine and Russia, without providing further details. - Why Alaska? - The meeting will be held in Alaska, which Russia sold to the United States in 1867. The western tip of the state is not far -- just across the Bering Strait -- from the easternmost part of Russia. "Alaska and the Arctic are also where our countries' economic interests intersect, and there are prospects for large-scale, mutually beneficial projects," Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said in a statement on Telegram. "But, of course, the presidents themselves will undoubtedly focus on discussing options for achieving a long-term peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis," he added. Ushakov also expressed hope that next time the two presidents would meet on Russian territory. "A corresponding invitation has already been sent to the US president," he added. An International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for Putin -- which obliges members to detain the Russian leader if he visits their country -- had been thought to narrow the potential number of venues. Putin had previously mentioned the United Arab Emirates as a possible host for the talks, while media speculated Turkey, China or India could be probable venues. - Ukraine not involved - Zelensky has been pushing to make it a three-way summit and has frequently said meeting Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. In his address hours after Moscow and Washington confirmed the meeting, Zelensky called any decisions made without Ukraine "stillborn". Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff proposed a trilateral meeting when he held talks with Putin earlier this week, but the Russian leader has appeared to rule out meeting his Ukrainian counterpart. At talks in Istanbul in June, Russian negotiators said a Putin-Zelensky meeting could only take place at the "final phase" of negotiations, once the two sides had agreed on terms for peace. Asked if Putin had to meet Zelensky as a prerequisite for their summit, Trump said on Friday: "No, he doesn't." - When did they last meet? - Trump and Putin last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since January. Putin previously held a summit with Trump in Helsinki in 2018. Trump raised eyebrows at the time by appearing to side with Putin over the US intelligence community's finding that Russia had interfered in the US election to support the New York tycoon. The last time Putin met a US president in the United States was during talks with Barack Obama at a UN General Assembly in 2015. - Negotiating positions - Despite the flurry of diplomacy and multiple rounds of peace talks, Russia and Ukraine appear no closer to agreeing on an end to the fighting. Putin has rejected calls by the United States, Ukraine and Europe for an immediate ceasefire. At talks in June, Russia demanded Ukraine pull its forces out of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, demanded Ukraine commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv wants an immediate ceasefire and has said it will never recognize Russian control over its sovereign territory -- though it acknowledged securing the return of land captured by Russia would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.


Eyewitness News
10 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
National Dialogue will go ahead as planned, says Ramaphosa
JOHANNESBURG - The African National Congress (ANC) is calling for an urgent resolution to disputes surrounding the upcoming National Dialogue after several legacy foundations withdrew from the preparatory task team. The party said the concerns, ranging from transparency and financial oversight to the need for a truly citizen-led process, must be addressed to preserve the dialogue's integrity and credibility. It has urged the foundations, including those of former presidents Thabo Mbeki and Kgalema Motlanthe, to reconsider their withdrawal, calling their experience "invaluable" to the success of the process. In a statement, the ANC said the National Dialogue must be rooted in inclusive participation, guided by the spirit of the constitution and liberation values. President Cyril Ramaphosa, speaking in Vereeniging, also weighed in, insisting that the event would go ahead as planned. He said that funds had been released, a venue secured, and an operation centre was already functioning with thousands of invites sent to community leaders, business, labour and government representatives. The ruling party added that it was ready to support improvements to the dialogue framework, including proper financial governance, transparent decision-making and clear accountability structures. It called on all stakeholders, including government, to work with urgency and humility to rebuild public trust, saying the initiative must rise above administrative shortcomings and focus on the collective good.