logo
To whom it may concern: We are living in a collective madness

To whom it may concern: We are living in a collective madness

Observer07-08-2025
It is important to emphasise that the inhabitants of this planet, Earth, are not part of a WhatsApp family group, nor are they content creators on TikTok or Instagram. They are real individuals who deserve to benefit from the natural wealth that the planet provides, and they should be treated with dignity.
Instead, we witness the destruction of forests, the pollution of rivers and oceans, the disappearance of flora and fauna, and the degradation of human beings. One doesn't need to be smart to recognise that using explosive weapons has serious consequences for the environment. The destruction of nature and the degradation of humanity are interconnected.
Our existence is swinging on a pendulum controlled by rhetoric. By disagreeing with any of the prevailing narratives, one risks being ostracised within the dynamics of social media and the evolving tactics of political and diplomatic engagements.
The mental health of the inhabitants of this planet is exhausted. We are living in a constant state of anxiety. Bombardments, 'tactical pauses', blockades, famine and killings are not only acts of psychological terrorism; they are tactics designed to extinguish any hope that remains. Utter cruelty.
The indiscriminate bombings of civilians and medical, cultural and educational infrastructures point to a process of erasure of Gaza's social fabric and its historical and cultural identity. Memories and collective remembrance are being erased – while the world observes the unfolding aggressions on FB, TikTok, X, or YouTube.
The international effort to airdrop food aid is an immoral act that humiliates and strips away any sense of dignity from those still alive in Gaza.
It is such a sadistic strategy to use hunger and starvation as weapons against women, children, adolescents and elderly people forced into besieged enclaves. It is a systematic approach that transcends physical violence.
Genocide and killings are being normalised in the 21st century, framed by puzzling narratives. At the same time, diplomacy appears ineffective — not because diplomacy can't work, but rather because some prefer its failure. Additionally, the growing involvement of non-state actors as political players in the global sphere adds another layer of complexity.
There are so many absurdities happening at once that it is hard to tell right from wrong or fake from real. We live in collective madness and are forced to keep on with whatever pressures us. The inhabitants of this beautiful planet endure a form of 'slow violence' — a gradual, incremental, and often less obvious forms of harm.
In a time of noise, confusion, spin, global systems collapsing and natural catastrophes, we are witnessing an increase in armed conflicts, social unrest, instability and other types of crises. Violence is employed to assert dominance; control is used to humiliate. The world has been taken over by people full of hate.
In a broad sense, we can draw parallels with diplomacy, which has always been the art of persuasion. Communication is crucial in decision-making because negotiations aim to secure concessions and compensation. However, in the current context, these efforts are likely to fail, as conflicts of interest and power dynamics undermine diplomatic initiatives.
The shifts in the geopolitical landscape and the methods countries are employing in their diplomatic efforts point to worrying scenarios. Realpolitik is getting rough, often to the point of absurdity. The severity of ongoing instances of genocide suggests that diplomatic engagement, whether through social media or other means, is unlikely to halt either occurrence. However, everybody is 'seeing' as if they are 'doing something'.
The planet Earth is rotating faster, and its inhabitants cling to the edges as though they might fall into the abysm of inexistence at any moment. Despite the myriad challenges and struggles, a profound sense of resilience and hope remains — something that no social media platform can truly capture.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The consequences of not banning AI in schools
The consequences of not banning AI in schools

Observer

time11-08-2025

  • Observer

The consequences of not banning AI in schools

I received an overwhelming amount of response in the form of feedback via social media networks, instant messages (WhatsApp) and even direct calls on last week's article on banning AI in schools. I am truly grateful for the engagement that I received from the readers because this shows the importance as well as the alertness that the society has in store for the subject. Some shared their strong agreement and warned that unchecked AI could surely affect our children (the students) in schools. This includes but is not limited to their thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills, to name a few. Others, however, have expressed concern that banning AI in schools might limit their technological literacy, suggesting instead that schools should focus on teaching responsible and ethical use. My personal feedback that I continue to stand by is putting a framework and policy in place on the usage of AI in schools. This will help ensure AI is used correctly, potentially making it a powerful tool for personalised training. The situation today, however, is that there is not readily a policy and framework in place, and hence, the impact is inevitable. Let me focus this week on the consequences of not banning AI in schools. First, the students' critical thinking skills will be impacted. Why? The student simply uses a generative AI app (like ChatGPT) by asking a question (in the form of a prompt), and the answer arrives instantly (merely in seconds). The student doesn't struggle nor work hard but simply copies the answer/output and presents AI's work (not theirs). In the pre-AI era, a student would be required to critically think by searching and analysing different possibilities before finally presenting and solving a problem/question. Second, generative AI will be like a drug (an addiction) for the students. Without it, students will not be able to work on any assignment/problem due to being dependent on AI. Imagine tomorrow there is no connectivity and/or a plug is pulled off from ChatGPT and the like apps. Trust me, there will be zombies walking around the schools. Third, with dependency and addiction comes also a form of laziness. Students will see no reason to learn or work if AI can do everything for them. The mental resilience that the pre-generative AI era lived in will be shattered, trust me. Last but not least, originality (in terms of thoughts and creativity) will be lost. Outputs of an AI app are generated based on patterns in and from existing data. Students that depend on AI will ultimately lose the ability to create original content. We will eventually find the same generic work submitted by everyone, for they all rely on the same source, the AI machine. To conclude my article this week, I would like to emphasise that if this matter is not taken seriously, then the majority of the students (and no thanks to the continuous advancement of AI) will graduate without ever having written an essay, solved a math problem on their own, or struggled through a difficult assignment. Students will not only not have the skills that are required to join the workforce but also not have the basic knowledge to operate as well. Mark my words, quality education built on hard work will be erased in schools gradually. Diplomas and degrees will lose credibility, as no one can be certain whether the work was produced by the student or by a machine. We will create a new generation of graduates that knows where and how to find information but cannot function without constant access to AI. Until we catch up again next week, stay positive and upbeat, and never be too reliant on AI, as it may replace or break you too.

In Cuba, Castro's 'influencer' grandson causes a stir
In Cuba, Castro's 'influencer' grandson causes a stir

Observer

time11-08-2025

  • Observer

In Cuba, Castro's 'influencer' grandson causes a stir

Cuban influencer Sandro Castro has chosen a very different path to his revolutionary grandfather Fidel, using his name to pursue online fame while occasionally poking fun at the island's dire shortages of food, medicine, power and fuel. It is a pastime some find entertaining, even fair commentary, but the 33-year-old is coming under increasing scrutiny from those loyal to Cuba's communist project for disrespecting his ancestor's legacy. For others locked in a daily struggle for survival, the younger Castro's high-flying lifestyle and apparent lack of empathy is offensive on a whole different level. On his Instagram account, Sandro regales his 127,000 followers with images of him partying, at times with scantily-clad women, often with a beer in hand. He is sometimes dressed as a monk or a vampire, sporting cat whiskers or the jersey of the Barcelona football club. From time to time, he mocks the struggles engendered by the country's worst economic crisis in three decades. "I woke up today with my favorite recipe, chicken with beer... but there is no chicken,' he says in one post while holding up a bottle of the national lager, Cristal. He also jokes about the power outages that have plagued the island, suggestively addressing a woman with the words: "If I caught you like the UNE (electric company), I'd get you every four hours, Monday to Monday." The character entertains some, annoys others, but never fails to make a splash. Castro's followers jokingly refer to him as the "next president," but voices aligned with the communist government are demanding he be silenced. castro Loyalist historian and author Ernesto Limia complained on Facebook that Castro "does not respect the memory" of his famous grandfather, who led the revolution that toppled a dictatorship and installed a communist government. "El Necio," an online influencer, has argued that Sandro Castro "goes against the security of this country" and "against the ideals" of the revolution. Despite his famous name, some believe Castro may be pushing his luck. Activists and critics in Cuba are often rounded up for sharing anti-government views, and several are serving sentences for crimes such as "contempt" or disseminating "enemy propaganda." - 'Little toys' - Manuel Cuesta Morua, a dissident historian who has been detained multiple times for his democratic activism, said the Sandro phenomenon embodied "the distance of the grandchildren's generation from the original revolutionary project." It also put Castro in stark contrast to the rest of his family, who unlike him enjoy their privileged status "discreetly," he said. While Fidel Castro was alive, Cubans knew very little about his second wife Dalia Soto del Valle and their five sons -- one of whom is Sandro's father, Alexis Castro Soto del Valle, 63. The family lived out of the public eye in Punto Cero, an extensive wooded area west of Havana with access controlled by the military. In 2021, during the Covid-19 pandemic, Sandro came into the spotlight in a leaked video that showed him driving a luxurious Mercedes-Benz. "We are simple people, but every now and then we have to take out these little toys we have at home," he said in the clip that went viral and sparked public outrage, forcing him to apologize. Three years later, he caused another stir by celebrating his birthday at a bar he owns in the capital, burning massive neon lights and dancing on tables as the country reeled from the after-effects of a massive blackout. —AFP

Tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods
Tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods

Observer

time11-08-2025

  • Observer

Tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods

NEW DELHI - From McDonald's and Coca-Cola to Amazon and Apple, US-based multinationals are facing calls for a boycott in India as business executives and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's supporters stoke anti-American sentiment to protest against U.S. tariffs. India, the world's most populous nation, is a key market for American brands that have rapidly expanded to target a growing base of affluent consumers, many of whom remain infatuated with international labels seen as symbols of moving up in life. India, for example, is the biggest market by users for Meta's WhatsApp, and Domino's has more restaurants than any other brand in the country. Beverages like Pepsi and Coca-Cola often dominate store shelves, and people still queue up when a new Apple store opens or a Starbucks cafe doles out discounts. Although there was no immediate indication of sales being hit, there's a growing chorus both on social media and offline to buy local and ditch American products after Donald Trump imposed a 50% tariff on goods from India, rattling exporters and damaging ties between New Delhi and Washington. McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon, and Apple did not immediately respond to Reuters queries. Manish Chowdhary, co-founder of India's Wow Skin Science, took to LinkedIn with a video message urging support for farmers and startups to make "Made in India" a "global obsession," and to learn from South Korea, whose food and beauty products are famous worldwide. "We have lined up products from thousands of miles away. We have proudly spent on brands that we don't own, while our makers fight for attention in their own country," he said. Rahm Shastry, CEO of India's DriveU, which provides a car driver on call service, wrote on LinkedIn: "India should have its own home-grown Twitter/Google/YouTube/WhatsApp/FB -- like China has." To be fair, Indian retail companies give foreign brands like Starbucks stiff competition in the domestic market, but going global has been a challenge. Indian IT services firms, however, have become deeply entrenched in the global economy, with the likes of TCS and Infosys providing software solutions to clients worldwide. On Sunday, Modi made a "special appeal" for becoming self-reliant, telling a gathering in Bengaluru that Indian technology companies made products for the world but "now is the time for us to give more priority to India's needs." He did not name any company. Even as anti-American protests simmer, Tesla launched its second showroom in India in New Delhi, with Monday's opening attended by Indian commerce ministry officials and U.S. embassy officials. The Swadeshi Jagran Manch group, which is linked to Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, took out small public rallies across India on Sunday, urging people to boycott American brands. "People are now looking at Indian products. It will take some time to fructify," Ashwani Mahajan, the group's co-convenor, told Reuters. "This is a call for nationalism, patriotism." He also shared with Reuters a table his group is circulating on WhatsApp, listing Indian brands of bath soaps, toothpaste, and cold drinks that people could choose over foreign ones. On social media, one of the group's campaigns is a graphic titled "Boycott foreign food chains", with logos of McDonald's and many other restaurant brands. In Uttar Pradesh, Rajat Gupta, 37, who was dining at a McDonald's in Lucknow on Monday, said he wasn't concerned about the tariff protests and simply enjoyed the 49-rupee ($0.55) coffee he considered good value for money. "Tariffs are a matter of diplomacy, and my McPuff, coffee should not be dragged into it," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store