logo
Australia will recognise a Palestinian state. But what does that actually mean?

Australia will recognise a Palestinian state. But what does that actually mean?

Statehood would be unlikely to have an immediate effect for people in Gaza or on Israel's war with Hamas, but it could help influence conversations about the future of the Middle East.
Albanese said on Monday that a two-state solution was 'humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East, and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza'.
What is Palestine's current status?
Gaza and the West Bank form modern-day Palestine, officially referred to by the Australian government as the Occupied Palestinian Territories. It has no unified government, standing army or settled borders.
Professor Ben Saul, chair of international law at the University of Sydney, said Palestine met most of the requirements to be legally considered a state, including having a permanent population and the ability to enter into international relations, but it did not have an effective, independent government. He said that because of its disputed status, other countries' recognition carried more power in supporting Palestinians' right to self-determination.
Almost 150 of the 193 UN member states recognise Palestine as a state, including many developing countries.
Militant group Hamas, designated a terrorist organisation by countries including Australia, has run the Gaza Strip for almost 20 years.
The Palestinian Authority, through which Australia officially engages with Palestine, has limited autonomy in the West Bank. The Oslo Accords in the 1990s gave the authority direct control of about 20 per cent of the territory.
There are numerous Israeli settlements across the West Bank, and these have been expanding. Israel retains control of security in much of the West Bank. According to the CIA, about 468,300 Israeli settlers lived in the West Bank in 2022. The agency estimated that as of 2021, 236,600 Israelis lived in East Jerusalem, which Israel annexed in 1980.
Australia and most countries officially oppose the settlements on the basis they are illegal under international law. Israel disputes the illegality of the settlements.
The Palestinian Authority, which was formed in the 1990s as a result of the Oslo Accords, is the territory's representative at the UN, where it is a non-member observer state and has no vote in the 193-member General Assembly.
What will happen at the United Nations General Assembly session in September?
Australia has joined France, the UK, and Canada in saying it will separately recognise a Palestinian state and use the 80th session of the UN General Assembly, which opens September 9, as the stage for that move.
Professor Saul said the announcement at the UN was a political move rather than a legal one, but the choice of location was important.
Loading
'Recognition is just the political act. You could do it by press release … it's just that doing it in a high-level, multilateral forum like [the UN] is absolutely designed to have a much greater impact politically,' he said.
Saul said the declaration could come as a joint statement, but it was likely each leader would want to speak for their country.
'Some of these states have been issuing joint statements lately … so it could be done as a joint statement,' he said. 'I think it would more likely be that each leader, assuming they attend, would want to state their own government's position on it.'
Does that mean Palestine will become a member of the United Nations?
Probably not. Membership of the UN is separate from statehood and 'is open to all peace-loving states that accept the obligations contained in the United Nations charter.' The charter contains rules, including a prohibition on the use of force against other nations.
To join, a prospective member must submit a letter to the secretary-general of the UN, currently António Guterres, stating it will abide by the charter.
Then it requires the votes of at least nine of the 15 members of the UN Security Council. Any of the five permanent members – the US, China, Russia, France and the UK – is allowed to veto membership.
Of the five permanent Security Council member countries, Russia and China recognise Palestine. If France and the UK do as they have indicated, the US will be the sole member not to recognise Palestine.
The US has historically vetoed Palestinian applications.
Loading
If no state vetoed the application, the secretary-general would then present it to the full General Assembly of the UN, where it would require a two-thirds majority vote.
The United States vetoed a push in April for Palestinian statehood.
What conditions have been put on potential statehood?
Speaking to reporters in Canberra on Monday, Albanese said recognition was happening in part because of commitments the government had received from the Palestinian Authority.
Loading
'Our government has made it clear that there can be no role for the terrorists of Hamas in any future Palestinian state,' he said. 'This is one of the commitments Australia has sought and received from President [Mahmoud] Abbas and the Palestinian Authority.'
Albanese said the PA had committed to demilitarise and hold general elections, and reaffirmed its recognition of Israel's right to exist – commitments he said were bolstered by the Arab League's previous 'unprecedented demand' that Hamas disband and surrender its weapons to the authority.
'This is an opportunity to deliver self-determination for the people of Palestine in a way that isolates Hamas, disarms it and drives it out of the region once and for all,' Albanese said.
He and Foreign Minister Penny Wong did not say what Australia would do if the authority does not fulfil its promises.
Loading
The UK and Canada's recognition in September is also conditional.
The UK will recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza, stops building settlements in the West Bank and commits to a two-state solution. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long rejected such terms and almost certainly won't agree by the deadline.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his country's decision to recognise Palestine was predicated on the PA committing to 'much needed reform', the demilitarisation of the Palestinian state, and the release of the Israeli hostages still held by Hamas.
Do Palestinians support a two-state solution?
Support for a two-state solution sat at about 30 per cent for both Palestinians and Israelis in 2022, down from about 50 per cent in 2016, according to the Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research. Support has dropped even further in Israel since the October 7 attacks.
The Palestinian Liberation Organisation, a nationalist coalition then led by Yasser Arafat, recognised Israel's right to exist in peace at the start of the US-backed peace process in 1993 that set up the Palestinian Authority. It was hoped that it would be a step towards statehood.
Hamas' establishing charter called for the destruction of Israel, but in 2007, Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal said the group accepted the fact of an Israeli state but would not recognise it, according to the Wilson Centre.
In 2017, the group presented a new charter accepting a Palestine with borders as they were immediately before the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, signalling tacit acceptance of two states.
Loading
The Wilson Centre also records another Hamas leader, the late Ismail Haniyeh, saying after the October 7, 2023, massacres by the group that: 'All the normalisation and recognition processes, all the agreements that have been signed [with Israel] can never put an end to this battle.'
With Reuters, AP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What does recognising a Palestinian state mean?
What does recognising a Palestinian state mean?

West Australian

time10 minutes ago

  • West Australian

What does recognising a Palestinian state mean?

Anthony Albanese is now among a growing list of Western leaders vowing to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. The Prime Minister heralded the decision as a step toward breaking 'the cycle of violence in the Middle East' and bringing 'an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza'. Though, not everyone agrees. Since making his Palestine declaration on Monday, Mr Albanese has been both accused of 'rewarding' Hamas and praised for joining global push to realise the rights of Palestinians. His more mild critics have argued it will do nothing to end the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. For better or worse, it is historic. So, why now and how will it all work? Why now? The 'momentum towards two states', as Foreign Minister Penny Wong described it, comes amid outrage over severe civilian suffering in Gaza, where Israeli forces have spent nearly two years relentlessly pursuing Islamist militants behind the October 7 attacks in 2023. Hamas, the group responsible, runs Gaza and its operations riddle the densely populated Palestinian territory, with tunnels and armouries nestled in civilian zones. More than 60,000 have been killed in the 22 month-long conflict, according to Gazan health officials. How many of those are Hamas fighters is unclear and because foreign reporters cannot enter Gaza, figures are hard for media to independently verify. But the death toll stacks up with assessments from independent monitors and local journalists working for trusted international agencies. So too do reports that nearly 200 have starved to death due to Israel's chokehold on aid. With the Israeli government rejecting that people were starving, French President Emmanuel Macron said in late July that it was time to break the status quo and make meaningful steps toward a two-state solution – Israelis and Palestinians living within sovereign, internationally recognised borders. The UK and Canada quickly followed suit, paving the way for Australia. Though, Donald Rothwell, a leading international law expert, said 'it's clear the Albanese government had been laying the groundwork' since 2024. 'There was obviously a significant intensity about how the government sought to build and prosecute its case over the course of the last 16 days or so,' he told NewsWire. Mr Rothwell pointed to three key developments that he said likely 'accelerated' Mr Albanese's decision. The first was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announcing plans to occupy all of Gaza. Australia joined several Western countries in condemning the plans in a statement, saying that actioning them would 'aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages, and further risk the mass displacement of civilians'. The second development was Israeli settlers stepping up efforts to annex land in West Bank – the second Palestinian enclave and only territory controlled by the Palestinian Authority. The final development was a vote in Israel's parliament that showing overwhelming opposition to Palestinian statehood. Mr Netanyahu mentioned the vote in a press conference on Sunday. He told reporters the 'Jewish public is … against the Palestinian state for the simple reason that they know it won't bring peace'. 'It'll bring war,' he said. Mr Rothman said 'all those factors combined' drove the urgency. How will it work? Mr Albanese named four key commitments he secured from Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority (PA). The first two include Hamas having 'no role' in a future Palestinian state and the PA recognising 'Israel's right to exist in peace and security'. While Mr Albanese said Mr Abbas 'reaffirmed' his support for the second point, the PA has no presence in Gaza and no control over Hamas. As Mr Rothwell said, 'It's not clear to me at all as to how the Palestinian Authority can achieve that, given that it has no control or authority over Hamas in Gaza.' The PA itself is commonly criticised for its corruption, ineffectiveness and lack of elections. The last presidential vote was in 2005. It also has a radicalisation problem in West Bank and pays families of 'martyrs' – Palestinians wounded or killed in flare ups with Israel. The 'Martyrs Fund' has been heavily criticised as supporting terrorism. Mr Albanese said Mr Abbas also committed to demilitarising and holding elections, and scrapping the payments to martyrs' families as part of broader transparency reforms. On election, Mr Rothwell said he could not see how the PA could hold 'fair and free elections' before the UNGA next month. Instead, he said the Albanese government and others promising to recognise Palestine are 'really trying to hold Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority to … free and true elections sometime towards the end of 2025 or early 2026'. In terms of how Australia recognises Palestine, Mr Rothwell said the Albanese government has taken an 'exceptional' pathway. A government can recognise a state at any time – it does not need to be at the UN General Assembly (UNGA). He said that in 'most instances' recognition is made official via a statement, so Mr Albanese announcing it to reporters from the prime ministerial courtyard on Monday 'was quite exceptional'. 'But then to have a two-step process, effectively saying in Canberra on the 11th of August, we're going to recognise, but then we're formally going to recognise that the UNGA … just falls into the notion of a Palestinian exception,' Mr Rothwell said. When Mr Albanese travels to the UN in New York next month, he will vote, alongside the leaders of France, the UK, Canada and several other countries, to join the 147 nations that already recognise Palestine. 'It's obviously a peak forum at which these matters can be discussed,' Mr Rothwell said. 'And in recent years, that peak forum in September has set aside some time for debate and discussion about Palestinian membership of the United Nations.' But he noted that 'the General Assembly vote is just one part of a two part process for a state becoming a member of the United Nations'. 'In the second part of that process is endorsement of that UN General Assembly vote by the Security Council,' Mr Rothwell said. Last year, a vote passed the General Assembly but was vetoed by the US in the Security Council. This has happened several times and the Trump administration is staunchly against Palestinian statehood while Hamas controls Gaza. But Mr Rothwell pointed out that statehood does not require UN membership. For example, Australia recognises Kosovo even though it is not a UN member. 'It's not exceptional that Australia recognises a state which is not a member of the United Nations,' Mr Rothwell said. 'Secondly, there are some states out there that Australia recognises who are not UN members and then membership may well be delayed or deferred or constantly blocked for a number of political reasons.' He added that 'throughout the history of the United Nations, that's not necessarily been exceptional'.

‘Hostile:' Bishop hit with damning claims
‘Hostile:' Bishop hit with damning claims

Perth Now

time10 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

‘Hostile:' Bishop hit with damning claims

Australian National University Chancellor Julie Bishop has been accused in a Senate hearing of bullying a staff member to the point of 'near suicide' following a private meeting where the former Liberal minister allegedly laughed at her and blocked her from leaving the room. In an emotional statement to a Senate committee on the quality of governance at universities, former ANU council member Liz Allen accused Ms Bishop of threatening behaviour after she was wrongly accused of leaking information about ANU's leadership to the media. Dr Allen alleged the bullying she suffered due to senior leadership, including Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell and Ms Bishop, pushed her into contemplating suicide, and senior leadership failed to support her after she suffered a miscarriage. 'ANU leaders behave with impunity, keep counsel in the dark and fail to adequately disclose conflicts,' Dr Allen told the Senate committee. 'Since 2024 I've experienced threats, intimidation and bullying because I sought greater probity of council conduct. 'I was bullied into near suicide. I miscarried a much wanted baby. I've lost the opportunity of a promotion. I fear for my job, and my career has been derailed.' Former Australian Foreign Affairs Minister, Julie Bishop, is now the Chancellor of Australian National University. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Under university leadership structures, the council acts as an institution's governing body and is chaired by the chancellor. Dr Allen told the Senate committee during one council meeting in February, Ms Bishop specifically accused herself and another council member of leaking to the media – claims she rejects. 'I take my obligations extremely seriously and would never compromise my integrity,' she said. 'When I defended myself in this meeting, the chancellor suggested I defamed her. The repeated public allegations and increasing aggression was so distressing I cried and began to hyperventilate during the meeting.' She said Ms Bishop 'further berated me' and another elected council member in a private room following the meeting, in which Ms Bishop threatened a legal investigation, and said she would call 'a journalist to confirm I wasn't leaking' and blocked her from exiting the room. 'I became further distressed with the continued pursuit of false leaking allegations,' she said. 'Chancellor Bishop laughed incredulously at my emotional response, and at one point blocked me leaving the room. 'I was so distressed I couldn't breathe and struggled walking.' ANU demographer Dr Liz Allen said she had been bullied into 'near suicide'. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Dr Allen, who was pregnant at the time, told the committee the 'traumatising' meeting affected her 'so deeply' that she 'decided to kill myself' while driving home from the meeting. Two weeks later, she also suffered a miscarriage, after she was told her baby son's 'heart stopped beating'. 'I pulled over to write final goodbyes to my children and my partner. I emailed my supervisors so they knew I hadn't done anything wrong,' she said. 'A call from my husband stopped me taking my life I was pregnant at the time of these incidents.' Dr Allen told the committee 'further bullying and threats' continued after she launched a workplace complaint following the meeting, and alleged the chief people officer 'implied' she had 'mental health problems and dismissed the dysfunction of council'. She was also told by ANU Pro Chancellor Alison Kitchen that her 'position was untenable' and that she had a 'duty to resign all because I had no confidence in the council'. While Ms Bishop and Prof Bell were invited to the inquiry, they were unable to attend. ANU chief operating officer Jonathan Churchill said Ms Bishop was unable to attend the inquiry due to commitments as the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy on Myanmar, while Prof Bell was 'on sick leave' with the flu. Neither Ms Bishop or ANU Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell attended the inquiry. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia While he didn't make specific reference to the claims, he said 'a number of the statements' made against ANU did 'not appear to be correct'. 'We have listened carefully to the proceedings from earlier today and the allegations made against the university. We take what has been said very seriously,' he said. 'We will examine all of the statements made and respond with particularity in writing to those assertions.' He also withdrew from commenting on allegations put forward by Dr Allen, adding that it could compromise the current grievance procedure launched by Dr Allen. Prior to Mr Churchill's appearance, inquiry chair and Labor senator Leah Blythe said that should ANU's representation not be able to 'answer senators' question' the inquiry would 'reserve our right to recall those witnesses at a later date'. 'Our inquiry goes till December, so I'm sure we will be able to find a time which is suitable for all, if that is required,' she said. In a statement during questioning, Greens' higher education spokeswoman Mehreen Faruqi said she was 'shell shocked and shaken' by Dr Allen's comments, and questioned Prof bell and Ms Bishop's future at the university. 'I feel no other pathway here but for Vice Chancellor Bell and Chancellor bishop to resign or be sacked,' she said. mental health helplines

How will Albo's Palestine pledge work?
How will Albo's Palestine pledge work?

Perth Now

time10 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

How will Albo's Palestine pledge work?

Anthony Albanese is now among a growing list of Western leaders vowing to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. The Prime Minister heralded the decision as a step toward breaking 'the cycle of violence in the Middle East' and bringing 'an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza'. Though, not everyone agrees. Since making his Palestine declaration on Monday, Mr Albanese has been both accused of 'rewarding' Hamas and praised for joining global push to realise the rights of Palestinians. His more mild critics have argued it will do nothing to end the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. For better or worse, it is historic. So, why now and how will it all work? Why now? The 'momentum towards two states', as Foreign Minister Penny Wong described it, comes amid outrage over severe civilian suffering in Gaza, where Israeli forces have spent nearly two years relentlessly pursuing Islamist militants behind the October 7 attacks in 2023. Hamas, the group responsible, runs Gaza and its operations riddle the densely populated Palestinian territory, with tunnels and armouries nestled in civilian zones. More than 60,000 have been killed in the 22 month-long conflict, according to Gazan health officials. How many of those are Hamas fighters is unclear and because foreign reporters cannot enter Gaza, figures are hard for media to independently verify. But the death toll stacks up with assessments from independent monitors and local journalists working for trusted international agencies. So too do reports that nearly 200 have starved to death due to Israel's chokehold on aid. With the Israeli government rejecting that people were starving, French President Emmanuel Macron said in late July that it was time to break the status quo and make meaningful steps toward a two-state solution – Israelis and Palestinians living within sovereign, internationally recognised borders. The UK and Canada quickly followed suit, paving the way for Australia. Though, Donald Rothwell, a leading international law expert, said 'it's clear the Albanese government had been laying the groundwork' since 2024. 'There was obviously a significant intensity about how the government sought to build and prosecute its case over the course of the last 16 days or so,' he told NewsWire. Mr Rothwell pointed to three key developments that he said likely 'accelerated' Mr Albanese's decision. The first was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announcing plans to occupy all of Gaza. Australia joined several Western countries in condemning the plans in a statement, saying that actioning them would 'aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages, and further risk the mass displacement of civilians'. The second development was Israeli settlers stepping up efforts to annex land in West Bank – the second Palestinian enclave and only territory controlled by the Palestinian Authority. The final development was a vote in Israel's parliament that showing overwhelming opposition to Palestinian statehood. Mr Netanyahu mentioned the vote in a press conference on Sunday. He told reporters the 'Jewish public is … against the Palestinian state for the simple reason that they know it won't bring peace'. 'It'll bring war,' he said. Mr Rothman said 'all those factors combined' drove the urgency. How will it work? Mr Albanese named four key commitments he secured from Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority (PA). The first two include Hamas having 'no role' in a future Palestinian state and the PA recognising 'Israel's right to exist in peace and security'. While Mr Albanese said Mr Abbas 'reaffirmed' his support for the second point, the PA has no presence in Gaza and no control over Hamas. As Mr Rothwell said, 'It's not clear to me at all as to how the Palestinian Authority can achieve that, given that it has no control or authority over Hamas in Gaza.' The PA itself is commonly criticised for its corruption, ineffectiveness and lack of elections. The last presidential vote was in 2005. It also has a radicalisation problem in West Bank and pays families of 'martyrs' – Palestinians wounded or killed in flare ups with Israel. The 'Martyrs Fund' has been heavily criticised as supporting terrorism. Mr Albanese said Mr Abbas also committed to demilitarising and holding elections, and scrapping the payments to martyrs' families as part of broader transparency reforms. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Australia will recognise Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia On election, Mr Rothwell said he could not see how the PA could hold 'fair and free elections' before the UNGA next month. Instead, he said the Albanese government and others promising to recognise Palestine are 'really trying to hold Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority to … free and true elections sometime towards the end of 2025 or early 2026'. In terms of how Australia recognises Palestine, Mr Rothwell said the Albanese government has taken an 'exceptional' pathway. A government can recognise a state at any time – it does not need to be at the UN General Assembly (UNGA). He said that in 'most instances' recognition is made official via a statement, so Mr Albanese announcing it to reporters from the prime ministerial courtyard on Monday 'was quite exceptional'. 'But then to have a two-step process, effectively saying in Canberra on the 11th of August, we're going to recognise, but then we're formally going to recognise that the UNGA … just falls into the notion of a Palestinian exception,' Mr Rothwell said. When Mr Albanese travels to the UN in New York next month, he will vote, alongside the leaders of France, the UK, Canada and several other countries, to join the 147 nations that already recognise Palestine. 'It's obviously a peak forum at which these matters can be discussed,' Mr Rothwell said. 'And in recent years, that peak forum in September has set aside some time for debate and discussion about Palestinian membership of the United Nations.' But he noted that 'the General Assembly vote is just one part of a two part process for a state becoming a member of the United Nations'. 'In the second part of that process is endorsement of that UN General Assembly vote by the Security Council,' Mr Rothwell said. Last year, a vote passed the General Assembly but was vetoed by the US in the Security Council. This has happened several times and the Trump administration is staunchly against Palestinian statehood while Hamas controls Gaza. But Mr Rothwell pointed out that statehood does not require UN membership. For example, Australia recognises Kosovo even though it is not a UN member. 'It's not exceptional that Australia recognises a state which is not a member of the United Nations,' Mr Rothwell said. 'Secondly, there are some states out there that Australia recognises who are not UN members and then membership may well be delayed or deferred or constantly blocked for a number of political reasons.' He added that 'throughout the history of the United Nations, that's not necessarily been exceptional'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store