
How the top tax rate became a middle-class problem
However, the number of workers liable for the additional rate is predicted to surge to 1.7 million by 2030 — more than a seven-fold rise over two decades.
The corrosive combination of inflation and frozen tax thresholds means that hundreds of thousands more earners will be dragged into paying the 45p in the pound rate, and will have to grapple with a host of other tax hits that come with it.
The additional rate of income tax is 45 per cent on income above £125,140. When introduced in 2010, it was set at 50 per cent on income above £150,000 and about 236,000 people paid it.
But HM Revenue & Customs estimates that 1.2 million taxpayers will pay the additional rate this year, and its internal forecasts, seen by Money, show that the taxman expects 1.5 million people to be paying the 45p tax rate by 2028.
By 2030 that figure will hit 1.7 million, according to analysis by the wealth manager Quilter, meaning an extra half a million people will be dragged above the threshold in the next five years.
'The number of people paying the additional rate of income tax has risen exponentially since thresholds were frozen,' said Shaun Moore from Quilter.
The top rate of income tax was reduced to 45 per cent in 2013 under the coalition government. Kwasi Kwarteng tried to abolish it outright in his doomed mini-budget of 2022, but in 2023, the threshold was reduced to £125,140 by Jeremy Hunt to be in line with the point at which you lose all your tax-free allowance. This, combined with the freeze on income tax thresholds since 2021 and rising salaries, has dragged many more into the top tax band.
By 2030 the proportion of total taxpayers paying the top rate will have jumped from 0.7 per cent to more than 4 per cent.
Had the original £150,000 threshold risen with inflation since 2010 it would be £232,000 today. If the present £125,140 threshold had kept pace with inflation since 2023 it would be £132,000 today.
'When the additional rate was introduced, it was meant for the very highest earners. That's clearly no longer the case,' said Katherine Waller, the co-founder of the wealth manager Six Degrees.
'Since then, the threshold has been significantly reduced. The fact the rate itself has fallen is a minimal concession in that broader context. A far greater proportion of the workforce is now captured — far beyond what was originally intended.'
• What is a 'comfortable' salary these days?
Waller added that many families were still adjusting to a 'new normal' of higher costs and rates. She added: 'In theory, the additional rate should apply to those with significant earnings and the corresponding lifestyle. In that context, a salary of £125,000 doesn't stretch as far as it once did.'
Polling by the think tank More In Common found that while overall life satisfaction was highest among those earning more than £100,000 a year — on average they gave their satisfaction 9.1 out of 10 — only 46 per cent said they felt 'very comfortable' financially. Another 46 per cent described themselves as 'relatively comfortable', while 7 per cent said they could cover essentials but had no room for luxuries.
Adrian Anderson from the mortgage broker Anderson Harris said: 'The general feeling I get now from clients earning £125,140 a year is that they feel worse off in real terms than they were in 2015. People face higher taxes, higher interest rates and higher basic living expenses, so they have less disposable income.'
He said that even very wealthy clients were now thinking twice about stretching their borrowing when it came to housing costs. He added: 'I used to see additional-rate taxpayers sending children to private school, but now it feels like both parents have to earn a six-figure salary to manage school fees and higher mortgage costs.'
Once your income passes £125,140, you lose nearly half of any pay rise or bonus. That's because your marginal tax rate, what you pay on any extra £1 earned, is 47 per cent — 45 per cent income tax and 2 per cent national insurance.
If you're also repaying a student loan, you typically pay another 9 per cent, bringing your total marginal rate to 56 per cent.
At the same time, various forms of government support and tax reliefs disappear above certain income levels. They are mostly gone by the time you become an additional-rate taxpayer.
Child benefit, worth £26.05 a week (£1,354.60 a year) for a first child and £17.25 a week (£897 a year) for other children, starts to be lost when one parent earns more than £60,000 a year. You lose it entirely once one parent earns £80,000.
Tax-free childcare — where the government tops up £2 for every £8 spent on certain kinds of childcare, including nursery, childminders and after school clubs — is worth up to £2,000 per child a year. Entitlement is lost once one parent earns more than £100,000 a year.
Families where one parent earns more than £100,000 also lose access to 15 or 30 hours of government-funded childcare during term time. Children aged nine months up to three years lose all their free childcare, and children aged three and four get only 15 hours instead of 30.
• How much one year of Labour has cost you
The average cost of a full-time (50 hours a week) nursery place for a child under two in England is £341.36 a week, according to the children's charity Coram. This means 30 hours of free childcare across 38 weeks of term time is worth £7,783 on average.
Your personal allowance — the £12,570 chunk of income you can earn tax-free each year — starts to be cut once you earn more than £100,000 a year too. For every £2 earned above the threshold, you lose £1 of allowance. It's fully withdrawn by £125,140, when you begin paying the highest rate of tax.
This gives workers earning between £100,000 and £125,140 a marginal income tax rate of 60 per cent. With 2 per cent national insurance and 9 per cent student loan repayments, the effective marginal rate could be 71 per cent, leaving you just 29p from every extra £1 earned. And that's before you factor in any lost childcare help.
Additional-rate taxpayers also get no personal savings allowance, meaning they pay income tax on any interest from savings, unless the money is held in an Isa. Higher-rate payers can earn £500 a year in interest tax-free and basic-rate payers £1,000.
The income you can earn each year from dividends before paying tax has also slashed from £2,000 in 2022-23 to £500. Additional-rate taxpayers pay 39.35 per cent on anything they make over this threshold (compared with 33.75 per cent for higher-rate taxpayers and 8.75 per cent for basic-rate taxpayers).
A similar clampdown has happened on capital gains tax (CGT), which is charged on profits made from the sale of most assets. You used to be able to make up to £12,300 a year tax-free, but this was cut to £6,000 in April 2023 and halved again in April 2024. Higher and additional-rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent CGT on gains made above £3,000 a year, while basic-rate taxpayers pay 18 per cent.
The final blow comes when earnings hit £200,000. At that point, workers begin to lose their £60,000 annual pension allowance, the maximum they can contribute to a pension each year while still receiving tax relief.
The Treasury said: 'We are protecting payslips for working people by keeping our promise to not raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT. That's the Plan for Change — protecting people's incomes and putting money into people's pockets.'
• 'My reward for being a good saver? A £1,000 tax bill'
Many high earners mitigate the tax burden by keeping their taxable income below key thresholds. This is usually done by saving more of your income into a pension, because all the thresholds above are based on your 'adjusted net income', which is your annual earnings (including bonuses) minus pension contributions and donations made to charities through Gift Aid.
Jason Hollands from the wealth manager Evelyn Partners said additional-rate taxpayers often sacrificed bonuses or pay rises in exchange for increased employer pension contributions. 'Pension contributions are exempt from income tax and national insurance,' he said. 'This can help keep earnings below £125,140.'
In many cases, it's worth going further. The most punitive cliff-edge comes at £100,000, where multiple benefits are lost and the personal allowance begins to reduce. As a result, some additional-rate taxpayers keep their income below this level through large pension contributions.
'It all depends on your living costs and personal circumstances,' said Chris Etherington from the accountancy firm RSM UK. 'If you're on £130,000 a year and have young children, it may make sense to cut your taxable income to below £100,000 to keep free childcare hours and your tax-free allowance. But it could make day-to-day cash flow tighter.'
Calculations from RSM UK show that someone earning £130,000 would pay £44,703 in income tax. If that person paid enough into their pension to keep their income below the £100,000 threshold, they would pay £11,271 less in income tax.
If they had a young family they could actually end up with more disposable income as a result because they would keep their childcare benefits. The 30 free childcare hours for two children under three would be worth £15,566 a year on average if they were in full-time, and tax-free childcare would be worth £4,000. Combined with the tax saved, that's £30,837, more than making up for the £30,000 saved into their pension, which has the potential to be boosted by tax relief and employer contributions.
If income from savings, investments or property are pushing you over the £125,140 threshold and you are married or in a civil partnership, it could be worth transferring ownership of the assets to your partner if they are in a lower tax bracket. Transferring assets between spouses is tax-free, and so it could reduce the household's overall tax bill.
Sean McCann from the wealth manager NFU Mutual said: 'One other area not to overlook is gifts made to charity via Gift Aid. These reduce your income and, in some circumstances, can help restore some or all the tax-free allowance and lower your tax bill.'
Other tax-efficient investment options include venture capital trusts (VCTs) and enterprise investment schemes (EIS). These are government-backed schemes designed to encourage investment into small, early-stage companies.
If you hold a VCT for five years and an EIS for three, you can claim 30 per cent income tax relief for each year. However, these are high-risk, niche products, so it's worth seeking financial advice before you make any moves.
Hollands added: 'A six-figure salary has less wow factor than it did in the past, and a great many additional-rate taxpayers won't feel especially wealthy because the cost of living, higher mortgage costs and growing tax burden mean that the disposable income that can be used on the nice things in life won't be what it was in the past.'
Suman Paul earns more than £126,000 a year, which should make him an additional-rate taxpayer. But Paul, an NHS consultant from Warrington in Cheshire, avoids the 45 per cent top rate of tax by making sure his income stays below the £100,000 cliff-edge.
This means he keeps his tax-free personal allowance and still gets tax-free childcare for his daughter.
'Once you cross the £100,000 mark you start getting into marginal tax rates of 60 per cent, so that is one very inefficient tax trap that I want to avoid,' said Paul, 39. 'My daughter is also three and a half so we have to pay for nursery. We use the government's tax-free childcare scheme that gives you £2 for every £8 you spend. If we lose that, it would cost us more than £1,000 a year.'
To manage his income, Paul pays for a car through his employer via salary sacrifice. It costs him £6,000 a year, which gets deducted from his salary pre-tax and reduces his taxable income. He also pays about £1,000 a month into his NHS pension and puts extra into his self-invested personal pension to bring his adjusted net income down further.
Despite having an income that pushes him above the additional-rate threshold, Suman doesn't feel as if he lives a life of luxury. He said: 'It's a middle-class life. I can afford my mortgage, but my take-home pay does not feel like a lot.
'After paying all the fixed costs — mortgage, childcare, pension, car costs, bills — our disposable income is about £1,000 a month. And my wife is also a working professional. If I was a single earner, it would be much harder.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Met Police urged to drop facial scanning at Notting Hill Carnival
Civil liberty and anti-racism groups have called on the Metropolitan Police to drop plans to use live facial recognition (LFR) technology at this year's Notting Hill a letter to Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley, 11 organisations described LFR as "a mass surveillance tool that treats all Carnival-goers as potential suspects and has no place at one of London's biggest cultural celebrations".They said the decision to reintroduce the technology at Carnival was "deeply disappointing" and argued it could be "less accurate for women and people of colour".The Met Police says LFR is accurate and balanced across ethnicity and gender, and insists it will help keep people safe. The groups - which include Liberty, Big Brother Watch and the Runnymede Trust - highlighted an ongoing judicial review brought by Shaun Thompson, a black Londoner who says he was wrongly identified by the system and letter states: "There is no clear legal basis for your force's use of LFR. No law mentions facial recognition technology and Parliament has never considered or scrutinised its use."Notting Hill Carnival is an event that specifically celebrates the British African Caribbean community, yet the [Metropolitan Police] is choosing to use a technology with a well-documented history of inaccurate outcomes and racial bias." The letter also raised concerns over a 2023 National Physical Laboratory study, which found the NeoFace system used by the Met was less accurate for women and people of colour depending on the algorithm that has been study's authors found the system could show bias at lower thresholds, though at the higher settings the Met says it uses, performance was found to be equitable across ethnicity and thresholds are confidence levels the system uses to decide a match - lower ones flag more people but risk more mistakes and bias, while higher ones are stricter and more said there was no legal obligation for the force to avoid the lower thresholds, and argued policing resources would be better spent on safety measures at the Assistant Commissioner Matt Ward, who is leading this year's policing operation at the carnival, said LFR had led to more than 1,000 arrests since the start of 2024 and that independent testing showed the system was "accurate and balanced with regard to ethnicity and gender" at the thresholds used by the Met. Notting Hill Carnival takes place next weekend and has previously attracted up to two million people. It has come under increased scrutiny after two people were murdered at last year's event. Mr Ward said the force had received the letter and would respond in due course."Carnival's growing popularity and size creates unique challenges. Around 7,000 officers and staff will be deployed each day," he said."Their priority is to keep people safe, including preventing serious violence, such as knife crime and violence against women and girls."It is right that we make the best use of available technology to support officers to do their job more effectively."Mr Ward said the LFR cameras will be used on the approach to and from Carnival and not within the event boundaries. He said they will "help officers identify and intercept those who pose a public safety risk before they get to the crowded streets".BBC News has contacted the carnival's organisers for comment.


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sally Rooney vows to use royalties to support Palestine Action despite terror ban
Novelist Sally Rooney has vowed to continue supporting Palestine Action 'in whatever way I can' using royalties from BBC adaptations of her books. The Normal People author, 34, publicly reaffirmed her support for the direct-action group, which was designated a proscribed terrorist organisation by the Home Office last month. It means showing support for the group is illegal under the Terrorism Act in the UK, punishable by a maximum of 14 years in prison. In an impassioned piece published in the Irish Times, the writer hit out at the arrest of more than 500 'brave individuals' holding placards declaring 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' in London's Parliament Square last weekend. 'In this context I feel obliged to state once more that – like the hundreds of protesters arrested last weekend – I too support Palestine Action,' she wrote. 'If this makes me a 'supporter of terror' under UK law, so be it. My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets. 'In recent years the UK's state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees. 'I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can.' She said she would happily publish the same statement in a UK paper, but noted that would now be illegal. Ms Rooney accused the British government stripping its citizens of basic rights and freedoms 'in order to protect its relationship with Israel'. 'The ramifications for cultural and intellectual life in the UK – where the eminent poet Alice Oswald has already been arrested, and an increasing number of artists and writers can no longer safely travel to Britain to speak in public – are and will be profound,' she added. Ms Oswald, 58, who won the TS Eliot prize in 2002 and was professor of poetry at the University of Oxford, was among those detained in central London last week. Afterwards, she said her motivation for taking part included the very personal experience of giving online poetry classes regularly to young people and children in Gaza. Half of the protesters arrested and now facing potentially life-changing terror convictions were over 60, Metropolitan Police figures show. Home secretary Yvette Cooper this weekend defended the decision to ban Palestine Action, insisting it is more than 'a regular protest group'. Ms Cooper said counterterrorism intelligence showed the organisation passed the tests to be proscribed under the 2000 Terrorism Act with 'disturbing information' about future attacks. 'Protecting public safety and national security are at the very heart of the job I do,' she wrote in The Observer. 'Were there to be further serious attacks or injuries, the government would rightly be condemned for not acting sooner to keep people safe.' Protesters have vowed to continue defying the ban as Huda Ammori, the group's founder, brings a legal challenge to the High Court in November.


The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Construction should be a career that you can build a life on
Re your editorial (The Guardian view on construction workers: the country needs more of them, fast, 13 August), as a bricklayer with decades of experience, I see the skills shortage in the construction industry as the result of years of neglect. The problem is not only attracting new people, but keeping them in the trade once they see the reality of working conditions. Most site bricklayers are self-employed subcontractors. We don't get pensions, holiday pay, or sick pay. If you're ill or injured, you simply don't earn. That insecurity pushes many skilled people out of construction entirely. On top of that, wages have barely moved in years – in fact, the rates many bricklayers receive today are lower than four years ago. Large housebuilders often pay good rates to main contractors, but by the time it filters down to the bricklayer, they can end up with far less. If the UK is serious about meeting its housing targets, we need more than training schemes. We need to make construction a job you can build a life on – fair pay directly to the tradespeople, proper benefits, and conditions that match the skill and physical demands of the work. Until that changes, we'll keep losing good people faster than we can train them, no matter how much money is thrown at OrdPeterlee, County Durham Large construction firms routinely depend on multiple levels of subcontracting, involving an ecosystem of small and medium-sized enterprises that source labour through a myriad of different routes. Those who do the work are often unsure of their own employment status. People working alongside each other frequently have very different terms and conditions, or indeed, no written terms and conditions at all. Career paths do exist, but only in sheltered pockets. The fractured nature of the employment model brings obvious advantages to 'employers' in terms of low overheads. But training is invariably seen as someone else's problem. Many small firms would much prefer to invest in direct employment and apprenticeships, but such investment isn't feasible given the competitive dynamics of the marketplace. This is the end point of the industry's 40-year quest for modernisation. Simple solutions are few and far between. But the first step for policymakers is to recognise the highly fissured nature of the construction employment GreenProfessor of construction management, University of Reading There are plenty of decent tradespeople out there and, of course, some not so good. Yes, we need to bring in more for the future, and I've no problem with them having formal qualifications. But that doesn't make a tradesperson. I got my City & Guilds in carpentry in 1997. As I understand it, once my Construction Skills Certificate Scheme card runs out, it won't be renewed unless I make a significant spend to get an NVQ. I've been in the trade for over 30 years, and I've diverged my skill base significantly past carpentry alone, all learned on the job. Currently, I have no problem getting work, as I'm fairly adept at most building trades. A rush to have only the formally qualified working on site will be counterproductive. As a self-employed tradesperson, if my work isn't to standard, I cannot work. I'm 51, still fit. If Labour is going to achieve its goals, people like me are StringerKing's Lynn, Norfolk Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.