Exclusive: Russia's Sberbank warns of economy overcooling, says key rate below 15% would spur growth
ST PETERSBURG, June 18 (Reuters) - The Russian economy could cool down excessively due to high interest rates and may face difficulties returning to a growth path, Alexander Vedyakhin, First Deputy CEO of Russia's largest lender, Sberbank, said in an interview with Reuters.
"There is a danger of the economy overcooling and that we may not be able to come out of this slump, and further growth could be very restrained," Vedyakhin said ahead of Russia's main economic conference in St Petersburg, starting on Wednesday.
Vedyakhin projected a growth rate of between 1% and 2% in 2025, below the government's more optimistic projection of 2.5%.
"The wisdom and sensitivity of the regulator and all economic and financial authorities are required to stop inflation and prevent such a sharp decline in production," Vedyakhin added.
He said the key interest rate could come down to 17% from the current 20% but a lower rate was needed for Russia to return to a path of growth. He also argued that the rouble is currently overvalued.
The central bank hiked the key rate to 21% last October seeking to bring down inflation in the overheated economy, which is focused on military needs. With inflation starting to come down, it then cautiously cut the rate by 1 percentage point on June 6.
"My sense is that, most likely, the central bank's key rate could be around 17% by the end of this year. I don't think the сentral bank will sharply reduce the rate as there is a risk that inflation could rise again," Vedyakhin said.
Vedyakhin argued that only a key rate below 15%, a level that equals the EBITDA margin of many of Sberbank's clients, would help to resume investment and revive economic growth.
"An intelligent investor with such an EBITDA margin could undertake new projects. I believe that a rate below 15%, that is, roughly speaking, 12-14%, is already a good level for the economy to start reviving, growing, and moving forward," he said.
On the exchange rate, Vedyakhin said: "In the view of our analysts, the rouble is currently overvalued. If everything were relatively balanced, given the current oil prices and macroeconomic factors, it should be at the level of 90-95 per dollar."
The central bank's official rate for Wednesday was 78.7135 roubles per dollar.
The rouble surprised the markets by rallying over 40% against the dollar this year, despite low oil prices, which had been falling until mutual attacks by Israel and Iran changed market sentiment.
Vedyakhin said that factors such as high interest rates, a thin domestic forex market, logistical difficulties, payment problems and sales of foreign currency from the fiscal reserve, were behind the rouble's strength.
"A high real interest rate increases the demand for rouble savings instruments, so there is no point in buying dollars. It is important to understand that the demand for dollars in Russia is small," he added.
Sberbank's corporate loan portfolio will grow by 9-11% in 2025, a slowdown compared to the 19% growth in 2025, but the number of loans that had to be restructured remains low, he said.
"In the first half of the year, the growth rates will be lower due to the high interest rates. However, I hope that the second half will delight us with higher growth rates. We are currently maintaining our forecast for the year at 9-11%," he said.
Vedyakhin said that energy and other exporting companies faced an ideal storm of low global oil prices, strong rouble and logistical difficulties due to Western sanctions but no loan restructuring procedures were launched.
He said that the bank had to restructure loans for some real estate developers, but stressed that the situation was difficult mostly for inefficient firms which did not create a safety cushion during the bumper years.
"Only the strongest, with the maximum accumulated level of capital, and the most operationally efficient will survive," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
38 minutes ago
- Sky News
No sign of cost of living crisis end amid big consequential geopolitical shifts
Is the cost of living crisis over? If you're looking purely at the annual inflation data, the numbers us journalists, not to mention politicians and economists, tend to focus on, the answer might seem like: probably, yes. Sure, the rate is, at 3.4% in May, higher than the Bank of England's 2% target. But it's far below the double-digit peaks experienced in 2022. Plus, the Bank itself thinks prices are likely to drop back down towards 2% in the coming year or two, even assuming a few more interest rate cuts. End of story, right? Well, not quite. Because look a bit deeper into the numbers and you notice a couple of important things. The first is that whether the cost of living squeeze is over really depends on how you slice up the numbers. Look in a slightly different way and actually this is still an ongoing crisis for millions of families around the country. To see what I mean, recall that when economists talk about inflation, they are really referring to something quite specific. The rate at which the average level of prices across the economy (actually, it's a shopping basket of representative goods) has changed over the past year. And the change in that level over the past year is indeed 3.4%. But look back a bit further, say the past four years, and the rate of change is 25%. Why looking back makes sense Both of these numbers are accurate. They are both expressions of inflation, except that one is for a single year and the other is for a four-year period. But when you're going to the supermarket, or buying a big ticket item like a computer or a car, are you really thinking back over a 12-month horizon or, perhaps, thinking back further? For a lot of people, that four-year horizon feels much more representative of their everyday lives and retail decisions than the one-year horizon. True: the fact that it's up 25% is largely because of the enormous rise in prices in 2022 amid the energy price shock and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 3:05 But (and one can't emphasise this enough), it's not like prices went up and then went down. The prices went up and stayed up (in fact, they carried on getting more expensive). And when you look at the four-year, "recent memory" rate of inflation, it's higher in recent months than any period going back to the early 1990s. Now, economists have very good reasons for focusing on the annual rate of inflation. But by the same token, you can see why so many people scoff when they see the latest inflation data, finding it bears little resemblance to their lived experience. The problem isn't so much the data itself but the way we focus on an annual rate. Expect yo-yoing in the coming months However, even that annual rate might be in for more of a roller coaster than most economists assume. Because the second important underlying issue to remember is that we're living through big, consequential geopolitical shifts that could well be very inflationary but are really hard to model. Consider the events in the Middle East. Military conflict between Israel and Iran has already pushed the oil price up by 18% in June alone. If that price stays elevated, that will feed into higher petrol and other prices in the UK and further afield. And since no one has a clue what will happen next, you can expect that price to yo-yo around quite violently in the coming months. More broadly, it's very hard to know for sure what the impact of tariffs will be on UK inflation. The Bank of England's estimates in its latest set of forecasts suggested a reassuringly small impact on both economic growth and inflation. But no one really knows whether manufacturers will lift prices just for American consumers or for the rest of the world too. Finally, it's worth noting that in much the same way as the past few decades of globalisation were, all else equal, quite deflationary - with prices dropping as manufacturers shifted production to cheaper parts of the world, primarily Asia - the reversal of those forces could be very inflationary. Again, all this stuff is very hard to model and forecast. But we are living through a period of volatility, with significant historical shifts. It would be remarkable if that weren't reflected in the economic data, at some point.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
US unemployment claims dipped to 245,000 last week, hovering at historically low levels
The number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits dipped to 245,000 last week, hovering at historically low levels, the Labor Department said Wednesday. U.S. jobless claims ticked down from 250,000 the week before Economists had forecast 250,000. The four-week average of claims, which smooths out week-to-week volatility, rose to 245,500, the highest since August 2023. The number of Americans collecting unemployment benefits the week of June 7 slid to 1.95 million. Weekly unemployment claim are a proxy for layoffs and mostly have stayed within a healthy band of 200,000 to 250,000 since the economy recovered from a brief but painful COVID-19 recession in 2020, which temporarily wiped out millions of jobs. In recent weeks, however, claims have stayed at the high end of range, adding to evidence that U.S. job market is decelerating after years of strong hiring. So far this year, employers are adding a decent but far from spectacular 124,000 jobs a month, down from an average 168,000 last year and an average of nearly 400,000 from 2021 through 2023. The slowdown is partly the drawn-out result of 11 interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve in 2022 and 2023. But Trump's aggressive and often-erratic trade policies — including 10% taxes on imports from almost every country on earth — are also weighing on the economy, paralyzing businesses and worrying consumers who fear they'll mean higher prices. The Fed, satisfied that an inflation was coming down, cut rates three times last year. But the central bank has turned cautious in 2025, worried that Trump's tariffs will rekindle inflationary pressures. The Fed is expected to leave rates unchanged as it wraps up a two-day meeting Wednesday.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Mortgages to weigh on euro zone consumption until 2030, ECB says
FRANKFURT, June 18 (Reuters) - Rising mortgage payments will weigh on consumption in the euro zone for another five years despite a streak of interest rate cuts by the European Central Bank, an ECB study showed on Wednesday. The ECB cut borrowing costs for the eighth time in a year this month, seeking to take the brakes off a sluggish euro zone economy. Its key rate is currently 2%. But mortgage borrowers will be paying a price for the ECB's past fight against high inflation, which saw it jack up that rate from -0.5% to 4.0% in just over a year, until 2030, according to the ECB study. This is because a growing share of home loans that had a fixed interest rate at first will reset at a higher level of borrowing costs, resulting in larger monthly payments. "Other things being equal, this should further dampen consumption through rising mortgage payments, despite the ongoing easing cycle," the study's authors said. They estimated the ECB's recent rate hikes would take 1 percentage point off consumption growth between 2022 and 2030, with around a third of that effect still to come. The effect will be stronger for poorer households, who tend to have floating-rate mortgages. One in four euro zone households has a home loan. One in 10 of those will have its rate reset in the next three years and 20% by 2030. Floating rate mortgages are prevalent in Spain and, to a lesser extent, Italy, while French and German borrowers are more likely to secure a fixed rate for some time. The proportion of mortgages with a fixed rate generally rose after the global financial crisis of 2008-9 saw many households struggle to make their monthly payments. This has muted the immediate effect of ECB rate hikes but it has made it more drawn out.
