Is This The Lowest Rates Rise In The Country? Whanganui Council Holds Firm On 2.2 Percent
The council is holding firm on an increase of 2.2 percent.Whanganui District Council is sticking to an average rates increase of 2.2 percent following deliberations on its draft Annual Plan.
Mayor Andrew Tripe believes it's the lowest rise in the country for the year ahead.
The plan for 2025/26 will go before the council in June to be adopted.
Tripe said the council has focused on doing the basics well, investing in core infrastructure, and involving the community in decision-making.
The big topics thrashed out by the council in this week's deliberations were creating a standalone housing entity to grow housing stock, adopting a new strategy for Whanganui, changes to fees and charges, and increasing loan repayments.
In each case, community feedback aligned with the council's preferred options.
On Thursday, the council confirmed it would:
Continue to consider a standalone housing entity
Consider all submissions and feedback to inform any minor changes ahead of adopting the draft Strategy for Whanganui
Proceed with proposed changes to fees and charges for the year ahead
Pay off an additional $590,000 of debt.
Operational budget changes have also been made since the council opened its draft Annual Plan 2025/26 for consultation.
This includes water levies set by water services authority Taumata Arowai to recover the cost of regulatory functions. These levies will take effect from 1 July, 2025 and are expected to cost around $16 per household.
Tripe said it was 'incredibly frustrating' to receive news of the levies just as the council was about to adopt its budgets for the year ahead.
'It is yet another example of central government shifting costs to local councils and communities – when it should be administered and funded at a national level.'
These levies, along with proposed Commerce Commission levies, would be incorporated into the Annual Plan budget for 2025/26 and would affect three waters rates for connected households.
To ensure full transparency, the levies would be identified on rates notices.
However, they would not increase overall rates due to additional income from other council revenue streams.
The Annual Plan will be adopted on 26 June, with the plan taking effect from 1 July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Autocar
13 hours ago
- NZ Autocar
Ford will offer affordable EVs in 2027
Ford is developing a universal EV platform that will allow it to produce affordable electric vehicles in the near future. Company boss, Jim Farley, says it is another Model T moment for Ford. Its first offering will be a new Ranger-sized electric pick-up truck at a supermini price. Evidently it shares nothing with other Ford models. The company claims to have invented a revolutionary new process for EV manufacture. Dubbed the Universal EV Platform it was part of a three-year skunkworks project. Its first product will be a double-cab Ranger-sized pick-up priced at around $US30,000. A hatchback, crossover, van and a three-bench SUV will follow, all starting for much the same price. Cost savings are made by using megacasting that reduces the amount of separate parts in the chassis by 75 per cent. It also halves the number of fasteners and welds required. The company's new scalable platform could also open up the potential for a new range of small cars, like Fiesta and Focus. The new EVs will be made at Ford's Louisville plant in the US and will be offered as global export products. But the first new Ford EV is for the domestic market. The electric pick-up will take on the likes of the inexpensive Slate Truck. The concept of a cheap pick-up is to boost sales of EVs in a market that is used to fossil fuels. The new pick-up will likely be dubbed the Ranchero, utilising a known nameplate from the past, like Capri and Explorer. Platform details are thin on the ground but the pick-up will use LFP battery cells made by Ford in Michigan. Evidently it will have generous range and will be able to power a house for up to six days, if need be. Moreover, it will be faster than a twin-turbo Mustang, offer rapid charging and feature an operating system that can be updated over the air. The new platform evidently also focuses on maximising interior space. It will feature a trunk up front. Ford says it will build three lines to create the vehicles. It will assemble the front, rear and core structure (platform, battery, seats and interior) on separate lines. They will merge for final assembly at the end. This, it says, simplifies the assembly process for the workers. Farley concluded: 'We needed a radical approach to creating affordable vehicles…but we also need to be sustainable and make money. 'There are no guarantees with this project.'
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
EJ Barrett Stands For Council To Fight 'The Cost Of Neglect' And Defend Local Democracy
Press Release – EJ Barrett In response to growing calls from candidates proposing exorbitant cuts to council spending, EJ Barrett has announced their campaign for the KaitakeNgmotu Ward in the 2025 New Plymouth District Council election, with a clear message: 'We … In response to growing calls from candidates proposing exorbitant cuts to council spending, EJ Barrett has announced their campaign for the Kaitake–Ngāmotu Ward in the 2025 New Plymouth District Council election, with a clear message: 'We can't afford the cost of neglect.' EJ brings professional experience in budgeting and finance, dispute resolution, facilitation of learning across all ages, communications, the arts, and a strong track record of working alongside young people, disabled communities, and families doing it tough. 'I'm running because our libraries, our housing, and our community spaces are on the line,' says EJ. 'There are people running on platforms to cut costs with no real plan or policies. But slashing support doesn't save money, it shifts the burden to families, social services, and future ratepayers. The cost of neglect is paid by everyone.' 'As someone who survived a lack of access to care, I can tell you for certain, the cost of care now is cheaper than the cost of crisis later.' As part of their campaign, EJ Barrett is calling for: Save Our Libraries: -Protection of public libraries, as safe, accessible resource hubs for all ages. House The People: -Affordable housing solutions, through lower barriers for community housing providers and urban subdivisions. -Build where the infrastructure already exists to reduce pressure on rates. Connected Communities: -Investment in accessible urbanisation to avoid long-term costs caused by underfunding social infrastructure EJ supports the retention of Māori wards, to ensure our democracy stays fair and representative. 'Our democracy is strongest when everyone has a seat at the table, not just the loudest or wealthiest voices,' says EJ. 'What's at stake isn't just funding. It's the future of a fair, livable, and connected district.' With a campaign slogan of 'Libraries. Homes. Communities.', EJ Barrett is inviting voters to stand up for the things that make Ngāmotu a great place to live, before we lose them to short-term thinking and political point-scoring.
Otago Daily Times
04-08-2025
- Otago Daily Times
How NZ's tax system compares with other countries
By Susan Edmunds of RNZ In recent months, Treasury, Inland Revenue and an organisation representing accountants have suggested New Zealand needs a rethink of its tax settings. Inland Revenue said taxes would have to increase to cope with an ageing population and CPA Australia said a capital gains tax should be considered. But do you know how much the average person in New Zealand pays, and how that compares to other countries? Infometrics calculated the average tax bill of a household with two median income earners, earning $72,900 per person before tax, not including any Working for Families credits. Chief executive Brad Olsen calculated that they would pay $39,800 to the government, made up about $14,100 in income tax each, and $11,600 in GST. They might pay another $3800 a year in local government rates. "Central government still collects the vast majority of money from households - at still over 90 percent of total funds collected by central or local government going to the Beehive coffers. The proportions have shifted slightly, in 2023 when we ran this same exercise, around 93 percent of tax or rates collected went to central government, and 7 percent to local government. "In dollar terms, we estimate that our median household scenario would be paying around $985 more a year in rates than in 2023, but $3182 more in income tax and GST." Rates rises were more noticeable because households received a direct notice in the mail telling them what they had to pay, Olsen said. "In contrast, most households don't track - or get a demand for - their taxes from central government. For income taxes, PAYE workers never see their income tax as their employer withholds the tax and pays it to IRD. For GST, you don't directly tally up your GST and pay it to the government - it's all part of your daily spending. The difference in how you pay - and how noticeable that payment demand is or not - does behaviourally contribute to how we talk about these various increases. "We spend a lot of time, fairly, on rates increases. That's reasonable scrutiny. But we spend a lot less time on tax payments than rates payments, even though tax payments are 10 times larger than rates payments. "That's also true, in my mind, around current discussions on rates capping. Presumably if it's good enough for central government to impose on local government, it would be good enough for central government to tax-cap itself? For every dollar of additional rates paid in the last three years, tax paid by a household has increased by $3.23." As people earn more through the PAYE system, their income tax bill increases. A report by consultancy OliverShaw in 2023 said those in the top two tax brackets at the time made up 21.2 percent of taxpayers and paid 68.5 percent of income tax in the 2021 tax year. Those earning $180,000 to $300,000 constituted less than 2 percent of taxpayers, but paid 9.3 percent of income tax. But while the dollar value of GST paid is higher for wealthier people, it may make up a smaller proportion of their income because they may save more, or put money into financial assets that do not incur GST. Some wealthier people may also be able to earn income in ways that does not attract as much tax. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said people might be surprised to see that New Zealand is among the lower-taxed countries in the OECD. On a measure of tax-to-GDP, in 2023, New Zealand had a ratio of 34 percent compared to the OECD average of 33.9 percent. He said the country was only on the higher side of average because many countries had some significantly lower taxes on specific things, such as Ireland's low corporate tax rate. On an income tax wedge basis, New Zealand was third-lowest in 2024, behind Chile and Colombia on a comparison of total tax as a percentage of labour costs. This reflects the impact of Working for Families credits. "There is no right or wrong number when it comes to taxes," Eaqub said. "If we want less public service, we pay less tax, if we want more public services, we pay more." He said many countries had much higher tax bills - France has tax at almost 44 percent of GDP, Denmark at 43.4 percent and Italy at 42.8 percent. "Italy has to but that's why younger people are leaving. There's a cost - if you tax a lot and make younger people poor they might go somewhere else. You can't arbitrarily increase taxes if you're not giving the value people are looking for. You need to maintain the legitimacy of the tax system." New Zealand workers tend to shoulder more of the tax bill than those in other countries, because income tax on individuals makes up such a large proportion of the total tax take. "We have big areas where we don't have any tax," said Council of Trade Unions policy director and economist Craig Renney. "There are no capital taxes, no social security taxes. It means New Zealand's taxation structure looks very different to the majority of developed economies around the Western world. We tend to over-emphasise GST and PAYE. Labour is a smaller share of tax in other jurisdictions." Any conversation about tax changes needed to get away from winners and losers and instead encourage people to consider what outcomes could be gained from higher revenue, he said. "The way we historically structure tax conversations does not help." New Zealand's corporate tax rate is now one of the highest in the OECD, at 28 percent. NZ Initiative chief economist Eric Crampton said reducing the government's structural deficit would require a mix of reducing spending, boosting economic growth and increasing taxes. "I would focus on spending before looking at taxes. Increasing revenue to cover the cost of current spending should depend on decent evidence that current spending delivers substantial value. "If the government demonstrated that higher tax revenue was needed, increasing GST while shifting income tax rates and thresholds to compensate could make sense. Inland Revenue has been looking at different options for ensuring lower-income households would not be made worse off if GST increased. GST captures spending that comes from income that is harder to tax when it is earned, including income from capital gains, as well as spending by tourists. "But first priority ought to be ensuring value-for-money in spending, especially where an ageing population increases fiscal pressure."
