Pakistan stoops to new low, stops gas supply to Indian diplomats' homes in Islamabad, instructs local vendors..., water and newspapers...
According to the latest reports, Pakistan has stopped gas supply to the homes of Indian diplomats in Islamabad. Apart from this, local gas cylinder suppliers have also been instructed not to sell gas cylinders to Indian diplomats. According to a report by India Today, Islamabad has also stopped the supply of mineral water and newspapers. Pakistan has taken this decision as a retaliatory action after India thrashed Pakistan during Operation Sindoor.
Reportedly, Pakistan's intelligence agency, ISI, is behind these acts. When was the last time Pakistan engaged in such mischief?
The last time Pakistan indulged in such malicious acts was after India carried out air strikes in response to the Pulwama attack in 2019. That time, too, Pakistani officials had harassed Indian diplomats similarly.
At that time, the Indian High Commissioner, Deputy High Commissioner, and other senior officials, including the Naval Advisor, had faced such behaviour. These incidents included constant stalking, interrogation by security personnel, and making fake phone calls. This is a violation of the Vienna Convention by Pakistan
Pakistan's decision to stop gas, water and newspapers is a violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961). According to Article 25 of the Convention, the host country must provide all facilities for the smooth functioning of the diplomatic mission.
By deliberately stopping these basic supplies, Pakistan has hindered the work of the mission and the daily life of diplomats. The purpose of the Convention is that diplomats can work without fear and interference. These actions of Pakistan are a direct attempt to create an atmosphere of fear and pressure. Protests outside the Indian High Commission in April
After the Pahalgam attack, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). In protest of the decision, a crowd of local people created a ruckus outside the Indian High Commission in Islamabad.
During this, some people also tried to jump over the gate and enter inside. Anti-India slogans were also raised. Pakistan was accused of deliberately removing security from outside the Indian High Commission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
IAF Chief Confirmed 5 Pak Jets Downed, Aviation Expert Tom Cooper Says 'Evidence' Of Even More
International military aviation analysts have backed IAF Chief Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh's claim that at least five Pakistani jets and one airborne early warning aircraft were shot down during Operation Sindoor. Renowned aerial warfare expert Tom Cooper said Singh's remarks confirm what had already been assessed in May. Cooper added there's evidence of even more Pakistani aircraft being downed or destroyed on the ground. He also endorsed Singh's statement that the IAF's S-400 missile hit a target 300 km away — calling it a historic world record and highlighting the high-risk deployment near Pakistani artillery range.#operationsindoor #iaf #indianairforce #s400 #pakistanairforce #tomcooper #airchiefmarshalamarpreetsingh #saab2000 #longestrangeshotdown #militaryaviation #indiapakistanconflict #airwarfare #toi #toibharat Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Should Intel's treatment worry Silicon Valley's powerful Indian diaspora
According to President Donald Trump, the rise of Intel Corp.'s CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, is 'an amazing story.' That's as much payoff as Tan can expect from his emergency meeting with Trump, who last week had demanded he 'resign, immediately' because he was 'highly CONFLICTED.' We don't know if Intel will be able to convince the administration to view its CEO with less disfavor. Some in Washington are concerned about Malaysian-born Tan's long history supporting and investing in the Chinese tech sector. And questions about how Intel intends to live up to government controls on the export of high-end technology under his leadership are, given this history, not unreasonable. Take a step back and ask yourself: Is there anything inherently questionable about a tech firm appointing a CEO with an eye for innovative and effective startups? At his venture capital firm Walden International, Tan invested in more than 100 Chinese companies, including an early bet on Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. Normally, this would be a count in his favor. The problem is a fear, both in Washington and in Silicon Valley, that the US and Chinese tech ecosystems are not complements but rivals. This wasn't the case in 2001, when Walden put money in SMIC. But it's certainly the general feeling today. Indian tech leaders have managed to escape similar scrutiny precisely because the tech scene here is seen as providing low-end support to US industry, not high-value competition. But how long will that be true? And what happens if it changes? New Delhi is not happy being a supporting player in the AI revolution. The country has begun to stockpile chips — compute capacity has passed 34,000 GPUs in May, according to government officials — and has already selected national champions it intends to support. Given the relative dynamism of India's startups, its tech sector will at some point produce a few success stories that challenge the dominance of US companies. That's good news for Indians. But it might make things more difficult for Indian-Americans in Silicon Valley. Across corporate America, but particularly in Big Tech, people of Indian descent have been disproportionately successful as leaders, more so perhaps than their colleagues of Chinese heritage. Think of Alphabet Inc.'s CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft Corp.'s Satya Nadella, Adobe Inc.'s Shantanu Narayen and IBM Corp.'s Arvind Krishna, for example. As Intel's troubles following its choice of Tan demonstrate, this might partly be because their home nation is not considered a strategic competitor to the US. That image is slowly changing in the Trump era. Indians in Silicon Valley have already discovered that things are bit harder now. H1-B visas, for example, are a political hot-button issue, and provided the first wedge in the relationship between Trump and Elon Musk. Trump has already made it clear that he doesn't want his backing of Big Tech to mean any jobs for Indians: 'Many of our largest tech companies have reaped the blessings of American freedom while building their factories in China, hiring workers in India and stashing profits in Ireland,' he said at a tech summit last month, adding: 'Under President Trump, those days are over.' So far, corporate leaders have not had to answer any questions about their distance from the sector back home. But the political environment will get more difficult to navigate as India's tech companies achieve greater autonomy and efficiency, and the Trump administration reworks policy. The 50 per cent tariff rate that New Delhi has been threatened with reveals how the president's mind works: He may not see India's trajectory as fundamentally different from China's, and his mercantilist soul rebels at the thought of collaborating with a future rival. An age of economic nationalism and competitive industrial policy will always be tough on cosmopolitan minorities. 'Dual loyalty' accusations gain no traction in an age of prosperous globalization, but have a long and dark history when populists seize power and turn back the clocks. The diaspora should not look at Tan's attempts to win over Trump with satisfaction or superiority. They might be next. Nor should they assume that they'll always be able to avoid similar accusations. The only reason they haven't faced them so far is that nobody thought their connections back home could ever be a problem. Here's the hard truth: India's success will mean the end of Silicon Valley's Indian-American golden age.
India.com
4 minutes ago
- India.com
IAF to become more lethal, planning to include Russia's R-37 missile in its arsenal, it is capable of...
IAF to become more lethal, planning to include Russia's R-37 missile in its arsenal, it is capable of... Russian R-37 missile : After seeing the spectacular performance of long range missiles in Operation Sindoor, the Indian Air Force (IAF) wants to add long range air-to-surface and air-to-air missiles to its arsenal. The IAF plans to include long range missiles with a range of more than 200 kilometers. According to a report, during Operation Sindoor, the Air Force used Brahmos, Scalp, Rampage and Crystal Maze missiles to target terrorist hideouts and airbases in Pakistan. The range of all these missiles is more than 200 kilometers. More to add
