Jets reportedly agree second $100m deal in two days to lock in star CB Sauce Gardner
The Jets and Gardner agreed on a four-year, $120.4m extension through the 2030 season, according to a person familiar with the situation. The person spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity Tuesday because the agreement had not been announced.
The contract paying the two-time All-Pro an average of $30.1m a year comes a day after the Jets agreed to a lucrative extension with their No 1 wide receiver, Garrett Wilson. That deal is worth $130m, as the organization locked up two foundational players – who are both 24 – for the long-term future.
'I appreciate the Jets organization for believing in me, my teammates for the blood, sweat, & tears we put in, and JETS NATION... I appreciate y'all supporting me ... Thank you GOD,' Gardner posted to X on Tuesday.
Gardner, who turns 25 before Week 1, was the No 4 pick in the 2022 draft out of Cincinnati. He established himself as one of the league's top cornerbacks during his first two professional seasons, including being selected the AP Defensive Rookie of the Year.
After a down year by his standards, he is out to prove naysayers wrong, saying he has always been an underdog. After recently declining to say whether he wanted to be the richest player at the position, Gardner now has that distinction.
'Man, I just wanted to show my teammates, show the coaches how much I'm bought into this,' Gardner said. 'I want to win. I want to change the organization. I want to be a part of changing the organization.'
The Jets have the longest active playoff drought in the NFL, dating to a trip to the AFC championship game in the 2010 season. The organization hopes the new regime of general manager Darren Mougey and coach Aaron Glenn – himself a three-time Pro Bowl cornerback in his playing days – can lead a successful turnaround.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now Trump is blamed for $2bn surge in cost of building reservoir in drought-plagued California
California 's most ambitious water infrastructure project in nearly half a century has just become a whole lot more expensive - and President Donald Trump is being blamed for part of the staggering price surge. Planners behind the colossal Sites Reservoir, a sprawling basin that could one day provide drinking water to more than 24 million Californians have confirmed that the cost of construction has ballooned from $4.5 billion to at much as $6.8 billion. And among the reasons cited for the $2 billion spike are the Trump tariffs imposed during the early part of this year which project leaders say are still sending shockwaves through the supply chain. 'The biggest drivers of the increase included factory shutdowns during the Covid-19 pandemic and recent tariffs from President Donald Trump,' Jerry Brown, executive director of the Sites Project Authority (no relation to the former governor), told the Press Democrat. 'Increasing costs are never looked forward to, but they are something that is a fact of life.' He attributed the jump to inflation for steel, concrete, and other building materials since 2021. The revelation has ignited fresh political tensions in the Golden State, where Governor Gavin Newsom 's administration has been pushing hard to shore up water infrastructure amid escalating climate extremes. The Sites project - a reservoir so massive it would stretch 13 miles long and four miles across in Colusa County - is fast becoming a flashpoint in the long-running battle over water, money, and environmental priorities. Nearly 70 residents in Antelope Valley are expected to lose their homes as the basin swallows up swaths of Colusa County. For them, the price tag isn't measured in billions of dollars, but in broken lives and uprooted communities. 'Scores of people are set to see their homes flooded,' read a previous report on the project's local impact, which has been more than 45 years in the making. If completed, the Sites Reservoir would become California's eighth-largest, holding 1.5 million acre-feet of water, or nearly 490 billion gallons - intended primarily for use in Southern and Central California, as well as the Bay Area. Construction is still slated to begin next year with completion by 2033, Brown said. But rising costs may force tough decisions on funding and prioritization. Although the Sites project received backing from both Congress and the Biden administration, with nearly $365 million in federal grants over the past three years, the newly projected cost spike has become a political lightning rod particularly as Trump-era tariffs are now being identified as a contributing factor. On Wednesday, Brown presented the updated cost to the nine-member State Water Commission, which has already set aside $875 million in Proposition 1 bond funds for the project. Commissioner Daniel Curtin said 22 water agencies have committed planning money, with 16 more on a waiting list seeking extra water capacity. 'The rubber hits the road when the money comes,' Curtin said. 'But it sounds like the commitments are pretty strong.' Commissioner Jose Solorio added: 'All of the state would benefit from the construction of this project.' California Republicans have largely avoided commenting on the tariff connection, while environmental groups are using the moment to revive their long-standing opposition to the plan. 'The Sites Reservoir would harm the Sacramento River ecosystem, threaten already imperiled fish species, and release greenhouse gas pollution,' argued a lawsuit filed by conservationists, later dismissed in Yolo County Superior Court. 'The project will cause much environmental harm, which falls on the public, and a small amount of good, which primarily benefits the project investors,' added Stork, senior policy advocate at Friends of the River. 'Among other harms, the reservoir will be a major greenhouse gas emitter. A recent analysis estimated that Sites would emit the equivalent of 80,000 gasoline-powered cars each year.' Opponents lost their appeal last year, but they aren't backing down. 'It's not surprising,' said Ron Stork, policy director at Friends of the River. 'Large mega-projects typically escalate in costs considerably from their initial estimates. There's a reason why these dams haven't been built yet.' Stork added, 'We'll have to see if the wealthy urban water districts in Southern California and the Bay Area want to continue to invest in this project.' He estimated that the Sites Reservoir's odds of being built now stand at 'about 50-50.' The backlash hasn't deterred Governor Newsom, who has thrown his full support behind the project as part of his broader water resilience strategy. 'We are going to need more storage projects with climate change,' said Matt Keller, a spokesperson for the Santa Clara Valley Water District, one of the project's backers. 'Our board is evaluating several different water supply projects from around Northern California and locally, and has been following this one for a while.' 'The longer we wait and the longer it takes to get this done, the more expensive it becomes,' Brown told reporters. 'Even though it is costing more, it is still something we need to do badly.' He compared Sites to a savings account for future droughts: 'People look at all the water running through rivers in wet winters and say why can't we save more of that?' Proponents argue that Sites is uniquely positioned to capture 'excess water from major storms' and store it for drier years, which are increasingly common as global temperatures rise. But for critics, the project epitomizes the high environmental and social cost of mega-infrastructure in an era of climate uncertainty. 'It's very difficult to justify the expense and environmental costs of big surface storage infrastructure projects,' said John Buse, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. 'The Sites Reservoir will cause far more harm than good.' Ironically, the project's price hike comes after a rare string of wet winters that have filled existing reservoirs to capacity. Shasta Lake and Lake Oroville both overflowed for a third consecutive year in 2025. Had the reservoir already existed, Brown noted, Sites could have captured runoff from the past two wet winters. 'It would have filled to the top,' he said, adding that it would have diverted only about 3% of Delta flows during the wettest months. But experts warn that complacency is dangerous. With California's precipitation increasingly concentrated into short, intense bursts followed by prolonged dry spells, the need for storage remains urgent. 'Water scarcity is always just around the corner,' the project's website warns. Brown acknowledged that the project has drawn sharp scrutiny - but said history is on its side. 'Rarely when looked back upon 20, 40 or 60 years later are these projects regretted in terms of the benefits to society,' he said. 'These are hard decisions to make as a society, but we are building this for ourselves and future generations.'
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Microsoft to stop using engineers in China for tech support of US military, Hegseth orders review
SAN FRANCISCO, July 18 (Reuters) - Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab on Friday said it will stop using China-based engineers to provide technical assistance to the U.S. military after a report in investigative journalism outlet ProPublica sparked questions from a U.S. senator and prompted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to order a two-week review of Pentagon cloud deals. The report detailed Microsoft's use of Chinese engineers, opens new tab to work on U.S. military cloud computing systems under the supervision of U.S. "digital escorts" hired through subcontractors who have security clearances but often lacked the technical skills to assess whether the work of the Chinese engineers posed a cybersecurity threat. Microsoft, a major contractor to the U.S. government, has had its systems breached by Chinese and Russian hackers. It told ProPublica it disclosed its practices to the U.S. government during an authorization process. On Friday, Microsoft spokesperson Frank Shaw said on social media website X the company changed how it supports U.S. government customers "in response to concerns raised earlier this week ... to assure that no China-based engineering teams are providing technical assistance" for services used by the Pentagon. Earlier on Friday, Senator Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican who chairs the chamber's intelligence committee and also serves on its armed services committee, sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about Microsoft's reported practices. Cotton asked the U.S. military for a list of contractors that use Chinese personnel and more information on how U.S. "digital escorts" are trained to detect suspicious activity. "The U.S. government recognizes that China's cyber capabilities pose one of the most aggressive and dangerous threats to the United States, as evidenced by infiltration of our critical infrastructure, telecommunications networks, and supply chains," Cotton wrote in the letter. The U.S. military "must guard against all potential threats within its supply chain, including those from subcontractors," he wrote. In a video posted on X on Friday, Hegseth said he was initiating a two-week review to ensure China-based engineers were not working on any other cloud services contracts across the Defense Department. "I'm announcing that China will no longer have any involvement whatsoever in our cloud services, effective immediately," Hegseth said in the video. "We will continue to monitor and counter all threats to our military infrastructure and online networks."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Perplexity in talks with phone makers to pre-install Comet AI mobile browser on devices
July 18 (Reuters) - Nvidia-backed Perplexity AI, the startup challenging Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab with its AI-powered search engine, is in discussions with mobile device makers to pre-install its new Comet browser on smartphones, CEO Aravind Srinivas told Reuters on Friday. The move could significantly boost Perplexity's reach by capitalizing on browser "stickiness", where users tend to stick with browser apps that are pre-installed or set as default on their devices, potentially driving habitual use of the company's AI tools. "It's not easy to convince mobile OEMs to change the default browser to Comet from Chrome," Srinivas said, referring to original equipment manufacturers and highlighting the challenge of user inertia on mobile platforms. Comet, currently in beta and available only on desktops, integrates Perplexity's AI directly into web browsing, allowing users to ask questions about personal data like emails, calendars, or browsing history, and even perform tasks such as scheduling meetings or summarizing webpages. Perplexity aims to target "tens to hundreds of millions" of users next year after stabilizing the desktop version for a few hundred thousand initial testers, Srinivas said. Its efforts reflect a broader industry shift toward browsers with agentic AI capabilities, ones that need minimal human intervention to make decisions and achieve specific tasks. Reuters reported earlier this month that OpenAI is developing its own agentic AI browser, which could automate complex tasks such as booking travel or managing finances. As of last month, Google's Chrome had a market share of about 70% in mobile devices, while Apple's Safari and Samsung's browsers together commanding another 24%, according to Statcounter data. Bloomberg News reported in June that Perplexity was in talks with Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab and Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab to integrate its AI search capabilities into their devices, potentially enhancing assistants like Bixby or Siri. Perplexity has completed a $500 million investment round, which valued it at $14 billion earlier this year. Its investors include Accel, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, Jeff Bezos and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt.
