Crypto Market Cycle Permanently Shifted, Says Polygon Founder Sandeep Nailwal
While the Bitcoin halving remains a significant event, its influence on the market has become less mechanical. Nailwal highlighted that market corrections in the past often followed predictable patterns, but the current cycle is evolving due to factors like institutional adoption and macroeconomic pressures. The increase in institutional investment has helped reduce volatility in the crypto market, aided additionally by new financial products like Bitcoin ETFs.
These ETFs, which allow investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin without actually holding the cryptocurrency, have also played a part in disrupting the traditional market cycle. By restricting the flow of capital to the underlying assets, these products prevent funds from rotating freely within the broader crypto ecosystem. This has altered the usual dynamics, with larger-cap assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum absorbing most of the capital, leaving smaller-cap assets with less attention.
Geopolitical events and macroeconomic factors have also contributed to the shifting landscape of the crypto market. U.S. government policies, including President Trump's executive order to create a Bitcoin strategic reserve, have legitimized the crypto space in the eyes of institutional investors. As a result, capital has flowed into established assets, contributing to a concentration of wealth in Bitcoin and Ethereum. Analysts have noted that Bitcoin's dominance has risen, now nearing 54%, a level not seen since 2021.
Despite these changes, some analysts, including Miles Deutscher, argue that the classic four-year cycle still has relevance, though it may no longer follow the same pattern. Deutscher pointed out that while the market is less volatile, the typical sequence of accumulation, rise, distribution, and fall is becoming less predictable. He suggested that market behavior is becoming more desynchronized, with Bitcoin and Ethereum leading the charge before altcoins see any significant gains. This shift, combined with the broader economic environment, suggests that the crypto market is entering a new phase where older cycles may no longer be as reliable a guide for investors.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Legendary Bear Who Called 2008 Says Bitcoin Is the Next Bubble—But His Warning Might Be Backfiring
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Peter Schiff, chief economist at Euro Pacific Asset Management, has built a career on being right about financial bubbles—and spectacularly wrong about Bitcoin. In a recent interview with David Lin, Schiff, who famously predicted the 2008 housing crisis, doubled down on his warning that Bitcoin represents the next great speculative bubble. Yet, in a twist of irony, Schiff admitted that he may have "converted more people to Bitcoin than any other human being alive" through his relentless criticism. The Case Against Bitcoin: Why Schiff Sees a Ponzi Scheme Schiff's critique of Bitcoin centers on what he calls the 'greater fool theory'—the idea that investors buy Bitcoin solely hoping to sell it at higher prices to someone else later. He argues this makes Bitcoin fundamentally similar to a pyramid scheme, where early participants profit at the expense of later ones. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . 'Bitcoin produces nothing and provides no real value,' Schiff contends to Lin on "The David Lin Report," pointing to its limited practical utility as a medium of exchange. High transaction costs and slow processing times make Bitcoin impractical for everyday purchases like buying coffee, he notes. Moreover, fewer companies now accept Bitcoin for payments compared to previous years, suggesting declining real-world adoption. Schiff also challenges the narrative that investors can still 'get in early' on Bitcoin. With roughly 5% of the global population already owning Bitcoin and widespread awareness at major conferences, Schiff argues the opportunity for massive early-adopter gains has passed. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Bitcoin vs. Gold: The Ultimate Store of Value Debate At the heart of Schiff's argument lies his belief that Bitcoin is 'the anti-gold.' While Bitcoin advocates call it 'digital gold,' Schiff dismisses this as 'digital fool's gold,' emphasizing their fundamentally different behaviors during market stress. Bitcoin tends to move in correlation with risk assets like tech stocks and the Nasdaq, rising and falling alongside them. Gold, conversely, often performs well when stocks and Bitcoin decline, serving as a true safe haven asset. Schiff told Lin that this dynamic makes Bitcoin a poor hedge against economic uncertainty. Gold's advantages, in Schiff's view, include thousands of years of monetary history, intrinsic value through industrial applications in electronics and medicine, and proven performance as a hedge against currency debasement and poor fiscal Political Risk Factor Schiff views the growing political embrace of cryptocurrency as a warning sign. He argued to Lin that rising support for Bitcoin among politicians—such as proposals to establish government strategic reserves—suggests the market may be nearing a peak. In his view, many of these lawmakers are "bought and paid for by Bitcoin special interests" seeking campaign contributions and voter support. Schiff warns that funding government Bitcoin purchases through money printing would trigger 'massive inflation' while misallocating capital away from productive industries. Schiff's Alternative: Tokenized Gold Rather than dismissing digital assets entirely, Schiff proposes 'tokenized gold'—digital tokens representing ownership of physical gold stored in secure vaults. This approach would combine the transaction speed and divisibility of digital currencies with the intrinsic value and stability of gold. Read Next: Kevin O'Leary Says Real Estate's Been a Smart Bet for 200 Years — Image: Shutterstock This article This Legendary Bear Who Called 2008 Says Bitcoin Is the Next Bubble—But His Warning Might Be Backfiring originally appeared on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Harvard economist admits he was wrong about Bitcoin
Harvard economist admits he was wrong about Bitcoin originally appeared on TheStreet. Kenneth Rogoff, an American economist and chess grandmaster, predicted that Bitcoin was far more likely to fall to $100 in 2018. Speaking to CNBC Rogoff predicted that an increase in government regulation would cause the price to fall, adding that a decline to $100 was 'a lot more likely' than a rise to $100,000. He also made bold claims that without money laundering and tax evasion, the practical applications of Bitcoin would be almost negligible. Rogoff who previously served at the International Monetary Fund, is now the Maurits C. Boas Chair of International Economics at Harvard University. Seven years later, Bitcoin has crossed that threshold past the six-figure milestone, prompting Rogoff to explain why he believes his forecast failed. Harvard economist admits his Bitcoin prediction was wrong Rogoff expressed regret that he had underestimated the demand for Bitcoin and the reluctance of regulators to intervene, but in a sarcastic tone. 'I was far too optimistic about the US coming to its senses about sensible cryptocurrency regulation; why would policymakers want to facilitate tax evasion and illegal activities?' he wrote, adding that he did not anticipate Bitcoin becoming the 'transactions medium of choice in the twenty-trillion dollar global underground economy.' While previously he stated that the Government could hinder the asset's adoption, Bitcoin has only flourished rather than floundered. Institutional investors, corporations, and governments now have major stakes in the asset. As of August 20, the US government holds around $22.48 billion in Bitcoin, as per records. Additionally, Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), launched in July 2024 to provide indirect exposure to the asset, have also fueled additional demand for Bitcoin. Over the course of 273 trading days between July 2024 and August 20, with an average of approximately $4.75 billion in transactions per day, the total trading volume comes to almost $1.35 trillion. However, Rogoff continues to argue that any demand Bitcoin has seen in the recent years, is propped up by illicit activity and regulatory blind spots rather than mainstream utility. He says: 'I did not anticipate a situation where regulators, and especially the regulator in chief, would be able to brazenly hold hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars in cryptocurrencies seemingly without consequence given the blatant conflict of interest.' Harvard economist fashes backlash from crypto community Bitcoin proponents harshly criticized his explanation. In a post on X, investor and analyst Anthony Pompliano rejected Rogoff's analysis. 'Fiat economist still doesn't understand bitcoin. Blames everyone but himself for missing it' wrote Pompliano. Moreover, in a weird twist of fate, the ivy league university, Harvard, has itself invested over $116 million in BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF (IBIT), making it the 29th largest holder of IBIT. At press time, Bitcoin stands at $112,957.69, down nearly 2% over the last day. However, the current price is still up over 85% in a year's time. Harvard economist admits he was wrong about Bitcoin first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 20, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 20, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hawkish FOMC Minutes Knocks Legs Out of Crypto Bounce
Hawkish remarks from the Federal Open Market Committee's late July meeting have — for the moment — put the kibosh on the crypto market's modest attempt at a rally on Wednesday. "A majority of participants judged the upside risk to inflation as the greater of these two risks," read the Fed minutes regarding the committee's discussion of prices versus employment. "Regarding upside risks to inflation, participants pointed to the uncertain effects of tariffs and the possibility of inflation expectations becoming unanchored." Crypto prices gave up some of their daily gains just following the release of the minutes, with bitcoin (BTC) slipping from a 0.7% advance to just barely green over the last 24 hours at $113,300. Having one of the best sessions of the majors, ether (ETH) slipped from about a 4.5% gain to just a 2.3% advance at $4,270. This particular Fed meeting, though, took place just prior to the release of the August 1 employment report, which showed not just a slow July job gain, but also contained a massive downward revision of 258,000 jobs in previously released June May data. Had these numbers been in front of the Fed at its July meeting, it's entirely possible the tone of the participants would have been far different and the result of the meeting might even have been a rate cut. Nevertheless, this week's main event remains Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's keynote speech at the Kansas City Fed's Economic Symposium in Jackson Hole. Fed chiefs over the past decade-plus have on occasion used the Jackson Hole forum to signal impending policy changes. Market participants will be watching closely to see if the doggedly hawkish Powell shows any signs of changing that stance and perhaps signaling a rate cut at the central bank's next meeting in September. The current betting says Powell will take a wait and see approach, noting that between Friday and that September meeting will be a lot more economic data, including fresh employment and inflation reports for the month of August.
