
Lack of investment by UHI Perth among reasons for aviation firm's collapse
A lack of investment by UHI Perth is among the reasons for the failure of a Perth aviation business with 28 staff, the administrator has claimed.
Based at Perth Airport, Air Service Training (Engineering) is one of the longest-operating civil aviation training organisations in the world.
The company entered administration on April 10 with debts of more than £1 million.
A new report by administrator Shona Campbell, of Henderson Loggie, provides new detail on the reasons behind the business failure.
The report said there had been a 'material' decline in student enrolments, particularly among self-funded international candidates.
This was attributed to tightening visa restrictions, licensing challenges and global market competition.
It also noted the failure to replace the income of a significant Middle Eastern military training contract.
There was the additional challenge of rising operating costs.
The lack of investment by UHI Perth was also emphasised. It stated there was 'limited capacity' to reinvest in training assets and marketing.
It adds: 'The business entered administration due to sustained financial losses, inability to replace major revenue streams, and a lack of investment required to remain competitive in a changing aviation training market.'
The report shows a decline in turnover during the 2023/24 year. Sales were almost £2m in 2022 and 2023 but revenue fell to £1.6m in the year to July 31 2024.
The 2023/24 year showed a large pre-tax loss of £359,000. The company continued to lose money in the 2024/25 year.
The administrator's report said: 'Management accounts for the period ending April 10 2025 showed turnover of £1.275m and a net loss of £172,354, resulting in the company becoming balance sheet insolvent.'
Directors, including UHI Perth principal Margaret Cook, who stepped down last month, explored a sale of the business.
The report adds: 'Once those negotiations failed to provide a satisfactory outcome, the directors concluded that the company was insolvent.'
After the administration started, UHI Perth provided funding to the administrator to allow some BSc courses to be completed to the end of the 2024/25 academic year.
However, the report notes 'there are a number of students that had pre-paid for courses, or whose sponsoring employers had pre-paid for courses, that have not been fulfilled by the company.'
The administrator arranged the auction of assets in the business, including helicopters. This auction raised a six-figure sum.
It is estimated that employees are owed £375,000 for redundancy pay in lieu of notice. More than £1 million is owed to unsecured creditors.
It is expected there will be a partial payment made to unsecured creditors at the end of the administration process.
A spokesperson for UHI Perth responded to the administrator's comments about lack of investment.
She said: 'UHI Perth provided support to AST within the limits of what was legally and financially permissible for a publicly funded charity.
'We are not permitted to use public money to subsidise commercial operations, including those of wholly owned subsidiaries such as AST.
'This meant that the level of investment required to reposition AST in a highly competitive and rapidly evolving global market was not achievable without significant external funding.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Courier
2 days ago
- The Courier
Lack of investment by UHI Perth among reasons for aviation firm's collapse
A lack of investment by UHI Perth is among the reasons for the failure of a Perth aviation business with 28 staff, the administrator has claimed. Based at Perth Airport, Air Service Training (Engineering) is one of the longest-operating civil aviation training organisations in the world. The company entered administration on April 10 with debts of more than £1 million. A new report by administrator Shona Campbell, of Henderson Loggie, provides new detail on the reasons behind the business failure. The report said there had been a 'material' decline in student enrolments, particularly among self-funded international candidates. This was attributed to tightening visa restrictions, licensing challenges and global market competition. It also noted the failure to replace the income of a significant Middle Eastern military training contract. There was the additional challenge of rising operating costs. The lack of investment by UHI Perth was also emphasised. It stated there was 'limited capacity' to reinvest in training assets and marketing. It adds: 'The business entered administration due to sustained financial losses, inability to replace major revenue streams, and a lack of investment required to remain competitive in a changing aviation training market.' The report shows a decline in turnover during the 2023/24 year. Sales were almost £2m in 2022 and 2023 but revenue fell to £1.6m in the year to July 31 2024. The 2023/24 year showed a large pre-tax loss of £359,000. The company continued to lose money in the 2024/25 year. The administrator's report said: 'Management accounts for the period ending April 10 2025 showed turnover of £1.275m and a net loss of £172,354, resulting in the company becoming balance sheet insolvent.' Directors, including UHI Perth principal Margaret Cook, who stepped down last month, explored a sale of the business. The report adds: 'Once those negotiations failed to provide a satisfactory outcome, the directors concluded that the company was insolvent.' After the administration started, UHI Perth provided funding to the administrator to allow some BSc courses to be completed to the end of the 2024/25 academic year. However, the report notes 'there are a number of students that had pre-paid for courses, or whose sponsoring employers had pre-paid for courses, that have not been fulfilled by the company.' The administrator arranged the auction of assets in the business, including helicopters. This auction raised a six-figure sum. It is estimated that employees are owed £375,000 for redundancy pay in lieu of notice. More than £1 million is owed to unsecured creditors. It is expected there will be a partial payment made to unsecured creditors at the end of the administration process. A spokesperson for UHI Perth responded to the administrator's comments about lack of investment. She said: 'UHI Perth provided support to AST within the limits of what was legally and financially permissible for a publicly funded charity. 'We are not permitted to use public money to subsidise commercial operations, including those of wholly owned subsidiaries such as AST. 'This meant that the level of investment required to reposition AST in a highly competitive and rapidly evolving global market was not achievable without significant external funding.'


Edinburgh Live
4 days ago
- Edinburgh Live
World's richest royals have higher net worth than Bill Gates and Elon Musk combined
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info While the British Royal Family's wealth is estimated to be around £69 billion, they are far from the wealthiest royal family in the world. In the UK, the Royal Family's wealth stems from tangible assets such as properties, as well as the value of the family brand. The Duchy of Cornwall and the Duchy of Lancaster estateincludes land, property and other assets that belong directly to the Sovereign. Meanwhile, the Savoy Hotel and Somerset House are part of the Duchy of Lancaster estate, with net assets totalling approximately £652.8 million ($755.4m). King Charles' personal fortune is estimated at about £559.6 million ($772 million), making him the 258th wealthiest person in the UK. READ MORE - Kate Middleton's royal title 'almost went to someone else' before 'intervention' READ MORE - Kate Middleton's down to earth response when asked 'who are you' by school child However, the world's richest Royal family, the House of Saud, has net worth four times greater than Elon Musk and Bill Gates combined, the Mirror reports. The ruling Royal family of Saudi Arabia, with a staggering net worth of £1.1 trillion ($1.4 trillion). In comparison, the world's richest man, Elon Musk, has a net worth of £264.8 billion ($304 billion), while Microsoft mogul turned philanthropist, Bill Gates, has a net worth of £81.5 billion ($105 billion). (Image: (Image: Getty)) (Image: (Image: Getty)) The House of Saud's net worth is so vast that it is estimated to be roughly 16 times that of King Charles's family, reports the Express. The Saudi Arabian Royal family's eye-popping wealth, largely derived from vast oil reserves, affords them a life of luxury that includes grand palaces, private jets, extravagant yachts and a highly lucrative art collection. This immense wealth among Middle Eastern Royal families has been a common feature in many regions, despite monarchies having previously held limited authority under the Ottoman Empire. However, following its collapse after World War I, these monarchies have seen their power and wealth skyrocket. The majority of this wealth is due to the exploitation of valuable resources found within the region, with Gulf monarchies in particular continuing to prosper. Consequently, Royal families from the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia are living a dream-like life. The Saudi Royal family alone consists of around 15,000 members, with the lion's share of wealth being held by approximately 2000 relatives. King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, who has been at the helm since his reign began in 2015, currently heads the family. His most famous son and apparent heir, Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MBS, is also the current Prime Minister of Saudi Arabia and is widely regarded as the country's de facto ruler. The Royal Saudis, with their immense wealth, have made a number of extravagant purchases over the years. These include properties scattered around the globe like France's Chateau Louis XIV, bought by MBS for a whopping £235 million, and other lavish acquisitions such as Leonardo da Vinci's Salvator Mundi painting for £349.6 million and a staggering £392 million yacht - mere pocket change for such affluence.


Metro
7 days ago
- Metro
Meet the business behind the recent Kent 'thought crime' case
You don't need to be locked away to have your future be limited. An act as simple as entering a name into a police database can serve the same purpose. In the United Kingdom, a caution or arrest, without trial, without charge, will remain on the Police National Computer for 100 years. That record becomes a dark cloud that can hover over professionals long after the moment has passed. It may appear in hiring checks, immigration screening, licensing decisions and security clearances. It follows silently but speaks loudly. Legisia, a legal practice founded by solicitor Matt Elkins, challenges this quiet punishment. The company focuses on removing unwanted data and appealing Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) decisions. This work, grounded in law and driven by human consequences, offers not just technical relief but a path to reclaiming dignity. These records extend consequences far beyond the initial incident. Doctors, lawyers, finance workers and healthcare professionals find that a police caution, often misrepresented as merely a 'slap on the wrist', creates a criminal record appearing on background checks, preventing them from obtaining visas or work permits for countries with strict entry requirements. 'If a professional gets a record like this, it can completely ruin a valuable and hard-fought career,' Elkins notes. 'They cannot work overseas. Often clients want to move to the US, so with a caution for, say, possession of cocaine, they are never going to be able to get green cards.' According to Elkins, Legisia's police data removal services directly address these barriers. Professionals seeking international roles often face barriers due to police records, especially in countries like the United States, China and several Middle Eastern nations. Even low-level cautions or simple arrests — regardless of conviction — can trigger visa denials. Though policies vary, these records can quietly block global mobility and career progression. For those in regulated fields such as healthcare, education or law, such disclosures can lead to referrals to professional regulators. Even without proof of wrongdoing, careers can be suspended or permanently halted based on records that remain undisputed. Cautions were once informal warnings. Today, they are formal legal outcomes, digitised and retained on the Police National Computer. Unless successfully deleted or filtered under narrow disclosure rules, they remain disclosable. Police often describe cautions as minor, but their real-world impact is profound. According to Elkins, clients routinely accept cautions without realising they are permanent admissions of guilt. This disconnect between perception and consequence leaves professionals with records they never intended to carry. Legisia's expertise in police data removal becomes crucial in these cases. They help clients understand the full implications of their records and challenge them based on procedural flaws, disproportionality, misinformed consent, and under data protection laws. Most troubling are the circumstances under which some of these records are created. Elkins notes that some clients may have been pressured into accepting cautions without understanding the consequences, or where they were actually victims themselves. 'They might actually be the victim of assault. They might be the victim of a coercive relationship, having been bullied for years,' Elkins says. 'And then they find themselves getting arrested, and they often fold when they are in front of the police and end up accepting a caution.' Legisia's police data removal process involves gathering evidence to demonstrate innocence or procedural impropriety, which can reveal that clients were pressured or misinformed during the cautioning process. In a case that recently received national attention, Elkins represented retired special constable Julian Foulkes, whose caution sparked national outrage. Foulkes, from Gillingham, was detained at his home by six police officers — from the same force he had worked for as a special constable for ten years — after a comment labelled a 'thought crime' was posted on social media. After Legisia's intervention, the record was successfully deleted. The case was viewed by some as a crackdown on free speech, which has fuelled a debate on police powers. Since Legisia's successful application, Chief Constable Tim Smith rang Foulkes to apologise on behalf of Kent Police, and a full review of the case has been commenced. Elkins' focus on police data and DBS cases sets Legisia apart. While other firms offer this as one service among many, Elkins has concentrated on this area for over a decade, with 20 years of experience as a defence lawyer. This specialisation has given him insight into the varying approaches of different police forces. 'Each police force is different; they have a kind of different mentality. They do not all act the same,' Elkins explains. His expertise extends to understanding the nuances of how records are created and maintained. This depth of knowledge allows Legisia to navigate the complexities of police data management with a precision that generalist firms cannot match. The firm's police data removal success stems from this specialised knowledge. Elkins' work goes beyond statutory remedies. Many clients contact Legisia after years of living with the psychological burden of a police record. Some report shame, isolation, or missed opportunities. Others had given up on international roles, teaching careers, or security-vetted positions. Legisia's work offers not only legal redress but personal relief. Clients frequently describe the outcome as life-changing. Deletion restores reputations and opens paths once thought permanently blocked. Awareness of the consequences of police data retention is increasing. Elkins has observed rising demand for police data removal services, especially as individuals learn that records they assumed were closed remain active and disclosable. He also points to the controversy around non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs) — cases where police document behaviour perceived to be hateful but not unlawful, and the rising use of facial recognition technology. This expansion of data collection has created a wider environment in which reputational risk is greater, and police record scrutiny is more essential. In a society where data is increasingly permanent and accessible, people must be able to challenge outdated or unfair records. Legisia offers a mechanism to do so, backed by legal precision and human understanding. Elkins and his team continue to help hundreds reclaim control over their professional identities. Each deletion is not just the removal of a data entry — it is the restoration of potential, confidence, and a future. DISCLAIMER: There is no guarantee of your police record being cleared. Legisia Ltd is registered with the Information Commissioner's Office: Registration Reference ZA338412. Legisia Legal Services is not a solicitors firm but is an unregulated legal practice conducting non-reserved legal services. All cases conducted by Legisia Legal Services are led by qualified and regulated solicitors. All solicitors that are employed by, or are owners of, or are consultants to Legisia Legal Services are regulated by the SRA in their individual capacity.