logo
Voice AI Is Changing How We Do Business, Starting With Loans

Voice AI Is Changing How We Do Business, Starting With Loans

Forbes5 days ago
Putting all the pieces together to secure a loan isn't easy. Back when I was a mortgage broker, much of my day was spent tracking down bank statements, W-2 pay stubs, and countless other pieces of paperwork. I kept all this in manila folders for my clients, alternating my time between sales prospecting and battling underwriters to get my loans through to closing.
The Loan Bottleneck Challenge
The many hours involved in pushing a mortgage across the finish line were daunting, the work tedious and dull, both for me and my clients. And if that's true for home loans, the problem is exponentially worse in commercial lending. Loqate, a global location data and address verification firm, cited a recent related statistic in its report from Forrester that '54% of people filling out financial application forms abandon them prior to completion, and on top of this, a recent study by SaleCycle saw financial abandonments reach an average of 76%.'
But here's what shocked me: for commercial loans, that number can jump even higher. All those abandoned loans represent entrepreneurs' dreams deferred, expansions delayed, equipment un-purchased, growth stalled. By the same token, they hint at money that's flowing into neither the pockets of loan officers nor the brokerages employing them.
An AI That Talks You Through the Loan Process?
Enter: Qualify.bot, a conversational AI meant to streamline this fractured—if not broken—process. Two young entrepreneurs, Yash Goenka and Rohan Datta, are behind the artificially intelligent platform. Their brainchild recently landed them in the Y Combinator accelerator program where they join the prestigious ranks of other startups, including Airbnb, Dropbox, Stripe, DoorDash, and more. That's also the same valuable network that a guy you may have heard named Sam Altman once ran as its president.
I had the chance to speak to Goenka and Datta about why Voice AI is upending how we do business, starting with loans. "We call abandoned applicants within minutes while they're still at their computer, still motivated," says Goenka. "Our AI will spend 45 minutes explaining what a debt service coverage ratio is without any frustration. Try finding a human who'll do that cheerfully on the hundredth call."
Instead of relying on a text bot with canned answers, their system automates the whole loan workflow. The power of talking AI agents assists borrowers from the moment they first fill out a form to when their completed application lands on an underwriter's desk. 'Think of it as your own 24/7 sales development rep, loan processor, and AI assistant, rolled into one,' Datta adds.
Why Voice AI is Different
Before delving into how Qualify.Bot works a bit more, let's discuss the phenomenon that is Voice AI. You've most likely had the annoying experience of dealing with what I will call 'dumb' automated phone agents. I even had one today that left me shouting into the receiver, 'Just connect me with a human!'
Voice AI is not that.
In May of this year, the Wall Street Journal described the next generation version this way: 'Automated voice programs are being upgraded from old-school systems with little or no AI to newer speech-to-text and text-to-speech models combined with large language models. If the technology lives up to its promise, the shift might improve the customer experience at a range of companies and reduce their costs in the process.'
"The convergence of three technologies changed everything," Datta explains. "Latency dropped below 500ms—fast enough for natural conversation. LLMs, like ChatGPT, can now maintain context across thirty-minute financial discussions. And voice synthesis became indistinguishable from humans."
While that's undoubtedly true, what's more important to this conversation is how voice AI stands to improve operations for tomorrow's companies, starting with lending. Returning to my own experiences as a loan officer, there were two major components to my job:
Voice AI, by way of Qualify.Bot, seeks to manage part one, handling the soul-sucking part of working in this business. Beyond pre-qualifying applicants and coordinating the paperwork needed to complete a loan, it also coaxes borrowers along, ensuring less of them prematurely exit the process.
If a borrower stalls in the midst of an application, for instance, because they cannot locate their EIN number—or because they simply find the whole thing too frustrating and convoluted to go on—the AI will step in. It will also happen in a more natural way than a text box pinging them with pre-programmed messages. Instead, a (natural-sounding) voice agent will call the borrower back to find out what happened and how to fix it. As you can expect, such handholding, if performed correctly, can lead to higher application completion rates and ultimately, more closed loans, a win-win scenario.
It makes sense that the lending industry is embracing such tech. Sophisticated AI seeks to alleviate the slog of paper-pushing to help businesses access the capital they need to grow. "Lending is uniquely perfect for voice AI," Goenka explains. "It's high-stakes enough that people want to talk to someone. Nobody wants to get a business loan through a chatbot. Yet it's also process-driven enough that AI can actually help. There are correct answers to questions like, 'What documents do I need?' AI can be trained to handle these perfectly."
It's important to note we're not talking about yesteryear's voice agents. Thanks to AI, they're getting better all the time. Much better. Anecdotally, I have interacted with Voice AIs that sound incredibly human, down to the nuances of person-to-person communication, even the 'ums' and 'uhs' indicating authentic-sounding exchanges. In fact, the only thing that alerted me I was talking to an AI was the unnatural pause it took between responses. Several seconds were often required, taking me out of the moment. This is but a slight hiccup that we can naturally assume will be corrected in short order.
The key part of this interaction Goenka and Datta have hit upon is the ease of voice versus text communication. Like it or not, we are no longer a literate nation. People don't read books. Sadly, they don't even read Forbes articles as much as they once did. Therefore, they have little patience with typing their way through complex commercial loan applications asking for financial statements, tax returns, and business projections. They just want someone—anyone—to solve their problem fast so they can get on to their next task.
From Loan Officer to Trusted Advisor
This represents the real utility behind Voice AI and the reason Silicon Valley, not to mention, Big Business, is betting big on it. Even so, the former loan officer in me can't help but wonder if this job will still exist in five years.
According to our young entrepreneurs, the answer is yes. As Goenka explains, 'Just like ATMs didn't get rid of bank tellers, Voice AI will not do away with the all-important human touch. In five years, AI will handle all application intake, document collection, and basic underwriting. Loan officers will shift into more strategic, high-value roles: becoming trusted advisors, closers, and relationship managers.'
A few years ago, I might've disagreed with him, so certain I was that AI would gobble up all jobs like the insatiable leviathan pundits warn us about. Not anymore. The fact is people want to do business with people. We like other humans. And we really like being more productive—any way we can. Voice AI is enabling such breakthroughs, leading to more money in the pockets of brokers, more deals for brokerages, more commercial loans, and more prosperity overall.
Now, that's a future worth celebrating.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

You might soon be able to use Gemini Live on top of other apps (APK teardown)
You might soon be able to use Gemini Live on top of other apps (APK teardown)

Android Authority

timea minute ago

  • Android Authority

You might soon be able to use Gemini Live on top of other apps (APK teardown)

Tushar Mehta / Android Authority TL;DR Google is testing more upgrades to Gemini Live's floating interface before its launch. The upgrade now enables support for contextual cards within the floating interface. This will allow you to seamlessly switch between an app and Gemini Live seamlessly, thanks to a collapsible interface. Google Gemini is destined to fully replace Google Assistant on Android phones by the end of this year. Preparing for that transition, Google is continually upgrading the chatbot's functionality, with a special emphasis on Gemini Live, which allows real-time conversations and a freer exchange of information compared to the standard interface. In this pursuit, Google is also optimizing the Gemini Live's interface, and today, we're looking at another step in this direction in the form of a sleeker and less obtrusive Gemini Live UI. In recent months, we have witnessed Google experiment with a compact Gemini Live interface that occupies only a portion of the screen. Now, we're seeing more updates to the overlay, which is now gaining support for other apps through extensions. The standard Gemini has supported extensions for apps such as Google Calendar, Keep, Maps, and Tasks for a long time, and Google recently rolled out support within Gemini Live. Besides these, we've also seen a feature where context cards from these apps show up in Gemini Live to make information easier to understand, though support for those has yet to roll out. But now, we're seeing cards show up in a cleaner format with a condensed Gemini Live interface. This interface allows Gemini Live to provide you with any helpful information while taking up less space. In contrast, the current Gemini Live UI covers the entire screen and limits usability. Here's what the interface looks like. Notably, the sleeker Gemini Live interface isn't live yet, and we were able to tweak internal settings in version 16.32.48 of the Google app to enable it. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. While the primary benefit of this new interface is to ensure that Gemini Live takes up less space, it also brings a fundamental advantage over the current method of using it. Presently, when you tap back (or use gesture navigation) to close Gemini Live, it takes you back to the standard Gemini chatbot interface. That means you must go back once more to close Gemini fully and return to the app you were using earlier. Even then, you might end up back on your phone's homepage. This is what the floating Gemini Live UI could abate, by allowing you to easily resize Gemini Live and return to the app in the background or interact with it intermittently, especially if you are using Gemini Live to feed information into that app. As you can see in the images above, the upgraded floating interface for Gemini Live lets you view notes from Keep or explore a location in Maps using cards. Along with the other apps, we also see the Pixel Weather app being supported via extensions in Gemini Live. As with other experimental features, it is difficult to comment on whether and when Google might release this to a broader audience. But Google is already testing a floating interface for the regular Gemini chatbot in beta, and we can anticipate the same for Gemini Live. ⚠️ An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. Follow

Trump Mobile's latest ads ditch Android reality for a golden iPhone fantasy
Trump Mobile's latest ads ditch Android reality for a golden iPhone fantasy

Android Authority

timea minute ago

  • Android Authority

Trump Mobile's latest ads ditch Android reality for a golden iPhone fantasy

Trump Mobile on X TL;DR Trump Mobile's marketing materials now show a gold iPhone embossed with the carrier's branding and the American flag. The device looks nothing like the T1 Phone, which the company is currently taking orders for on its website. Trump Mobile seems to have pulled a classic switcheroo, promoting a shiny iPhone in its ads instead of the Android phone it's actually selling. Move over, reality, there's a new 'gold' standard in smartphone marketing, and all credit goes to Trump Mobile. The Trump organization's mobile carrier kicked off with a flashy gold, Android 15-based 'T1 Phone,' but now, it looks like the company is headed in a different direction. This elusive T1 Phone is nowhere to be seen in Trump Mobile's latest marketing materials and ads posted across social media platforms like X. Now, the ads feature what appears to be a gold-embossed iPhone 16 Pro. Let's be clear, this phone does not exist. Trump Mobile on X In June this year, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump unveiled Trump Mobile with a gaudy $499 gold Android phone called the T1 Phone, complete with MAGA slogans and a $47.45 monthly plan. The phone was advertised as 'proudly designed and built in the United States,' a line that still features in the official press release of the company, even though shortly after launch, the 'Made in the USA' claims vanished from the site. Now the phone is just 'designed with American values in mind.' Trump Mobile Details about the specs also changed with time. The screen size shrunk from 6.78 inches to 6.25 inches, the RAM dropped, and the phone itself still looks suspiciously like a rendered mock-up, not a real device. Unsurprisingly, the T1 Phone is nowhere to be seen in Trump Mobile's marketing materials. Recent ads posted on X show a gold iPhone 16 Pro-looking device embossed with the words 'Trump Mobile' and the American flag. There's no T1 branding in sight. So, is Trump Mobile now selling custom iPhones? The answer is very, very likely a big no. Trump Mobile on X The gold iPhone shown in Trump Mobile ads is almost certainly a creative, and a misleading one at that. For obvious reasons, this Trump-branded iPhone is not mentioned on the company's website. What's even more bizarre is a Trump Mobile ad that shows a man actually holding this anomaly of an iPhone in his hand. The company could have achieved this using a case on an existing iPhone or perhaps some cinematic tricks. But even here, the T1 Phone is nowhere to be seen. Looks like Trump Mobile has pulled a classic switcharoo. But don't fall for the flashing gold iPhone renders and patriotic symbols. While the T1 Phone is still very much a mystery, it certainly won't look anything like this gleaming iPhone. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. Follow

Founder fraud isn't an outlier: it's a design flaw
Founder fraud isn't an outlier: it's a design flaw

Fast Company

timea minute ago

  • Fast Company

Founder fraud isn't an outlier: it's a design flaw

Another month, another founder accused of fraud. This time it's Christine Hunsicker of CaaStle, indicted on July 18 for allegedly falsifying financial records, misrepresenting profits, and continuing fraud even after her removal by the board. According to reports, before meeting with an audit firm, she searched online for the terms 'fraud,' 'created an audit firm fake,' and 'JP morgan 4m records faked'—an apparent reference to fraud charges related to yet another disgraced founder, Charlie Javice of Frank. These incidents are no longer outliers. They're becoming a pattern, and the startup world has yet to confront what that the pattern reveals: The startup ecosystem is designed to encourage deception. Risk-taking and self-confidence We all know that most founders share a penchant for risk-taking and a healthy sense of self-confidence. But couple these characteristics with the relentless assault of pressures that constitute daily startup life, and you have a recipe for trouble. Risk-taking slips into recklessness, and confidence metastasizes into outright narcissism. Lying is the norm. Particularly during the early stages, a 'Growth at All Costs' imperative means that startups feel obliged to pursue aggressive growth to secure high valuations and attract continuous investment rounds. This pressure can lead founders to inflate metrics, fabricate success, or conceal failures to maintain investor confidence. Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX secretly transferred customer funds to his trading firm, Alameda Research, concealing these movements and misleading stakeholders. From optimism to deception A 'Fake It Till You Make It' culture means that what starts as harmless optimism can easily escalate into deliberate deception. Founders initially omit negative details, then progressively falsify data to uphold illusions of success. Nikola founder Trevor Milton exaggerated product capabilities, even staging videos of a nonoperational electric truck rolling down a hill. The brutal demands of fundraising result in constant pressure to secure funding and maintain operational cash flow, which often pushes founders to compromise ethically. The necessity to present a highly favorable narrative to investors encourages fraudulent embellishments. Combined with a lack of oversight and governance, especially in early-stage startups, this leaves founders unchecked, increasing opportunities for fraud. Early investors and boards often fail to provide rigorous oversight due to limited motivation or expertise. A gradual process White-collar fraud is always a gradual process. No one jumps straight into the deep end of the criminality pool. Law enforcement officials have a '10:10:80' rule of thumb when it comes to white-collar fraud: 10% of people would never commit fraud, 10% of people are actively seeking out opportunities to commit fraud, and 80% of people have the potential to commit fraud if the timing and circumstances are right. The vast majority of these founders probably started in the 80%, along with most of the rest of us. It often begins with minor embellishments aimed at securing initial investment. Successful deception attracts further funding, creating a self-reinforcing cycle. But as the discrepancies between reality and claims widen, founders face intensified pressure to maintain their narratives, resorting to increasingly severe fraud to conceal earlier lies. Witness Christine Hunsicker's continued deception even after her board had essentially kicked her out of her company. Seismic consequences The consequences of all this founder misbehavior can be cataclysmic. They extend well beyond the direct financial losses to investors. Broader investor confidence deteriorates, leading to reduced funding availability for legitimate startups. Employees suffer job losses, reputational damage, and psychological distress. Customers can experience direct harm, as in Theranos's false medical test results. The broader innovation ecosystem becomes risk-averse, slowing innovation due to increased regulatory scrutiny and cautious investment behaviors. Potential time bombs To mitigate this deadly cocktail of ego and pressure, we first need to understand that all founders are potential time bombs: the same traits that help them secure money, talent, and press are the ones that can eventually lead to their undoing. The old method was pretty straightforward: fire the founder, and replace them with a manager. But that only leads to zombie companies that stifle innovation in the crib. Startup founders are constantly being gaslit. They're being flattered as geniuses and world-changers on a daily basis. Many of their direct reports are sharp, canny careerists who only want to share good news. It's easy to see how people can lose perspective and start believing their own hype within the 'emperor's new clothes' environment of a startup. These people need perspective in order to curb the worst tendencies of startup culture. Every founder should cultivate a 'star chamber' of mentors who are removed from the everyday persecutions of the startup in question (perhaps an older CEO, or a colleague from an accelerator program, or a startup blogger you admire). They need advice from people whom I call 'models of values': transparency, accountability, and ethical leadership. Many boards are sadly hopeless at this, because they're complicit in the success (at all costs) of the startup. Oversight and accountability On the stick side of the carrot and stick approach, however, these people also need oversight and accountability. Their boards and investors must actively engage in governance roles, monitoring company practices and demanding transparency. They need to ensure financial transparency and operational integrity through audits and detailed reference checks. To prevent the next Hunsicker, Javice, Bankman-Fried, or Holmes, we need to confront the cultural rot at the core of startup life. We still need ambitious entrepreneurs to drive innovation, but not within a system that rewards deception and punishes transparency. Unless we change the rules of the game—by rethinking incentives, strengthening oversight, and investing in founder development—we'll keep producing brilliant visionaries who become cautionary tales.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store