Committee advances bill that would prohibit the state from seizing Wabanaki land
Passamaquoddy Tribal Rep. Aaron Dana testifies in support of prohibiting eminent domain on tribal lands before the Judiciary Committee on April 4, 2025. (Photo by Emma Davis/ Maine Morning Star)
The Judiciary Committee advanced legislation on Wednesday to prevent the state from being able to seize Wabanki land for public use without consultation, though amended it in a way that appears to assuage at least some of the concerns raised by Gov. Janet Mills' administration.
The committee voted 10-4 in favor of an amended version of LD 958, incorporating a proposed amendment from the Maine State Chamber of Commerce that the prohibition would only apply to current tribal trust lands, meaning land for which the federal government holds the legal title of on behalf of a tribe, and not land that may be put into trust in the future.
Earlier in April, the governor came out in opposition to the bill, with her legal counsel citing the inability to predict the future needs of state government and uncertainty over the future location of tribal trust land, as the Wabanaki Nations are still eligible to acquire more under the 1980 Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act.
This thinking was why some on the committee did not back the plan. Sen. David Haggan (R-Penobscot) said he cast an opposing vote because he believes the power of seizing private property for public use, a principle known as eminent domain, is vital for government to properly function.
The vote did not fall along party lines. Haggan was among the three Republicans who voted against the legislation — also including Reps. Rachel Henderson of Rumford and Mark Babin of Fort Fairfield — with Democratic Rep. Dani O'Halloran of Brewer joining them in opposition.
While the Judiciary Committee may often be known to complicate matters, Rep. Adam Lee (D-Auburn), who voted for the legislation, argued this issue is straightforward.
'Our relationship with the Tribes is a government relationship and we should not be able to take their land, full stop,' said Rep. Adam Lee (D-Auburn).
The relationship between the Wabanaki Nations and the state is complicated by the 1980 Settlement Act, which has overall resulted in the Wabanaki Nations being treated more akin to municipalities than sovereign nations.
LD 958 is the next piecemeal change lawmakers and Wabanaki leaders are seeking to make to afford the Tribes greater sovereignty. While incremental alterations to the Settlement Act have been made in recent years, sweeping change has so far failed due to opposition from Mills, a Democrat.
Mills did not respond to a request for comment about the amendment by the time of publication.
The U.S. government's authority to exercise eminent domain is restricted by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which requires just compensation for land taken, as well as some federal laws.
The 1834 federal Indian Nonintercourse Act prohibited land transactions with tribes unless authorized by Congress. However, the Settlement Act specified that that federal law was not applicable to the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Penobscot Nation.
LD 958 would amend the Settlement Act to prohibit the state from exercising eminent domain on current trust and reservation land, which is protected under federal law, though fee land — private property for which the owner owns the title — would still be subject to the state taking.
The bill would also amend the 2023 Mi'kmaq Nation Restoration Act to make this change for the Mi'kmaq Nation, which wasn't included in the Settlement Act.
As advanced by the Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, the bill was also amended at the request of Wabanaki leaders to remove the portion that had stipulated how the Tribes could reacquire land with such proceeds, which Passamaquoddy attorney Corey Hinton criticized as a paternalistic process. Instead, the bill now simply points to the federal takings process.
LD 958 now heads to the Maine House of Representatives and Senate for floor votes.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says China ‘Not Easy' as Trade Talks to Resume Tuesday
(Bloomberg) -- Supply Lines is a daily newsletter that tracks global trade. Sign up here. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. NYC Mayoral Candidates All Agree on Building More Housing. But Where? US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Trade talks between the US and China will continue into a second day, according to a US official, as the two sides look to ease tensions over shipments of technology and rare earth elements. Representatives for both nations ended their first day of negotiations in London after more than six hours at Lancaster House, a 19th century mansion near Buckingham Palace. The talks concluded around 8 p.m. London time. The advisers will meet again Tuesday at 10 a.m. in the British capital, the official said. 'We are doing well with China. China's not easy,' Trump told reporters at the White House on Monday. 'I'm only getting good reports.' The US delegation was led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The presence of Lutnick, the former Cantor Fitzgerald CEO, underscored the importance that export controls are playing in these discussions. Bessent told reporters in London they had a 'good meeting' and Lutnick called the discussions 'fruitful.' The Chinese delegation was led by Vice Premier He Lifeng, who left without commenting to the media. With him was Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and his deputy Li Chenggang, the country's trade representative. Wang has become a fixture in the entourage of President Xi Jinping on overseas trips since he was appointed in 2020, while Li is a veteran trade bureaucrat and was previously ambassador to the World Trade Organization. The Ministry of Commerce can be seen as the counterpart to both the US Department of Commerce and the Office of the Trade Representative. The US signaled a willingness to remove restrictions on some tech exports in exchange for assurances that China is easing limits on rare earth shipments, which are critical to a wide array of energy, defense and technology products, including smartphones, fighter jets and nuclear reactor rods. China accounts for almost 70% of the world's production of rare earths. Specifically, the Trump administration is prepared to remove a recent spate of measures targeting chip design software, jet engine parts, chemicals and nuclear materials, people familiar with the matter said. Many of those actions were taken in the past few weeks as tensions flared between the US and China. Trump was noncommittal about lifting export curbs, telling reporters 'we'll see' when asked about the possibility of such a move. 'China has been ripping off the United States for many years,' the US president said, while adding that 'we want to open up China.' The Trump administration expects that 'after the handshake' in London, 'any export controls from the US will be eased and the rare earths will be released in volume' by China, Kevin Hassett, head of the White House's National Economic Council, told CNBC earlier in the day Monday. Hassett's comments from Washington were the clearest signal yet that the US is willing to offer such a concession, though he added that the US would stop short of including the most sophisticated chips made by Nvidia Corp. used to power artificial intelligence. 'The very, very high-end Nvidia stuff is not what I'm talking about,' Hassett said, adding that restrictions would not be lifted on the Nvidia H2O chips that are used to train AI services. 'I'm talking about possible export controls on other semiconductors which are also very important to them.' Chinese shares trading in Hong Kong entered a bull market, as some investors expressed hope the talks signaled a cooling of trade tensions. In the US, traders drove stocks higher, with the S&P 500 within 2% of its February peak. The first round of negotiations since delegations from the countries met a month ago is aimed at restoring confidence that both sides are living up to commitments made in Geneva. During those discussions, Washington and Beijing agreed to lower crippling tariffs for 90 days to allow time to address a trade imbalance that the Trump administration blames on an unfair playing field. Despite that truce, trade didn't recover in May, with Chinese exports to the US dropping by the most since the start of the pandemic and imports from the US down by almost 20% in May. A phone call last week between President Donald Trump and Xi appeared to give fresh momentum to reaching a deal. US-China trade tensions escalated this year as Trump hiked duties on Chinese goods, prompting retaliation from Beijing. That's led to pain in both economies, including uncertainties for businesses trying to navigate sudden changes in trade policy. --With assistance from Meghashyam Mali, Mackenzie Hawkins, Jennifer A. Dlouhy, James Mayger and Alan Wong. (Adds details on the Chinese delegation from sixth paragraph and trade data in second-last paragraph.) New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again What America's Pizza Economy Is Telling Us About the Real One America Cast Itself as the World's Moral Leader. Not Anymore ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Group hoping to 'veto' Maine budget intends to collect signatures at polling places Tuesday
Jun. 9—Activists hoping to overturn the state's $11.3 billion continuing services budget are expected to gather signatures at polling stations around the state Tuesday as they rapidly approach their deadline to qualify for the November ballot. Democrats, including Gov. Janet Mills, have urged people not to sign the petition, saying that simply getting enough signatures could force the government to shut down this summer even if voters ultimately reject the proposal this fall. A group of legislative Republicans, led by Rep. Gary Drinkwater, R-Milford, filed paperwork for a people's veto initiative to overturn the partial budget shortly after it was passed in a mostly party-line vote in March. They have until 5 p.m. on June 18 to submit at least 67,682 signatures to qualify for the ballot. The budget passed in March contains enough funding to sustain existing services into the new fiscal year that begins July 1, while the Legislature continues to debate a second budget bill with additional spending and taxing proposals. It wasn't clear how many signatures the budget opponents have gathered so far. But Rep. Shelley Rudnicki, R-Fairfield, said in a brief interview at the State House last week that signature gathers are planning to be at polling places Tuesday, when voters head to the polls to cast ballots on school budgets, local ballot questions and municipal and school office holders. Rudnicki said she didn't have an update on the number of signatures collected so far or on the group's chances of gathering enough to qualify for the ballot. Neither Rudnicki nor Drinkwater responded to follow-up requests for interviews last week. Mills and others are warning that the signatures alone could force a government shutdown this summer. That's because submitting the required number of signatures would halt the implementation of the budget until it's decided by voters. Mills in April urged people not to sign the petitions, citing the "devastating" effects of a prolonged government shutdown. "It would risk closure of Maine schools, hospitals, nursing homes, public colleges and universities, municipal offices, and bring road construction projects to a halt," Mills said. "I urge Maine people to not sign the petition for this initiative, and avoid the serious consequences it would cause." Republicans have downplayed that concern, however. They argue that Democrats could avoid a shutdown by resuming negotiations and passing a new bipartisan budget that addresses issues raised by Republicans, including welfare reform and Medicaid costs. The push for a referendum came after efforts to reach a bipartisan compromise on a supplemental budget fell apart and Democrats moved to pass a baseline two-year budget without any Republican support. The language of the ballot question, should it qualify, would ask: "Do you want to stop most state government operations and programs, including new and ongoing state funding for cities, towns, and schools, by rejecting the state's two-year budget?" Copy the Story Link
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Catch up on the latest state budget decisions in the Maine Legislature
Entrance to the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee room in the Maine State House in Augusta. (Photo by Jim Neuger/Maine Morning Star) A budget plan is taking shape and the clock is ticking. Maine Morning Star will have regular updates as the committee tasked with setting that plan, the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, takes straw votes on what to include ahead of a final vote on the budget proposal to be sent to the Maine Senate and House of Representatives for consideration. Legislative leaders have said the intention is to complete all work by June 18, what had been the statutory adjournment date for the first regular session. Though, the Legislature is now in a special session, without a formal deadline. In March, the Democratic majority pushed through a roughly $11.3 billion, two-year budget plan without Republican support and formally adjourned in order to start the clock for those funds to become available in 90 days. Senate Republicans refused to back an alternative short-term plan that would have immediately filled the current deficit for MaineCare, the state's Medicaid program, because it did not include structural reform to the program. The budget that did pass continued funding for state services at the same level while also providing one-time funding for MaineCare and other urgent needs. But it didn't include any of the policy changes Gov. Janet Mills proposed, such as tax increases and program cuts, to address the deficit and flattening revenues. These proposals and others from lawmakers are now being weighed by the appropriations committee as it crafts the next iteration of the budget. Follow along below: 8 mins ago 10 mins ago 8 mins ago Monday morning at the State House began with more talk about taxes as the Appropriations Committee continued its line-by-lines votes on what to include in the budget. The majority of the committee voted to remove Mills' proposed tax on ambulance services, which is one of several tax increases the governor proposed as a means to address the deficit and flattening revenues. The tax on non-municipal ambulance service providers would have been equal to 6% of their net operating revenue, which the Mills administration said it would have used to leverage additional federal dollars and eventually increase MaineCare reimbursements. While Republicans on the committee said they supported removing the tax — as the minority party has made clear it will not support tax increases of any kind — they questioned how the state will deal with those shortfalls and pay for additional spending the committee has approved. One example from Monday was reallocating the cost of an emergency coordinator position that is partially funded through federal expenditures to being completely supported by the general fund. 'We're moving positions and costs into the general fund, and my only question is, where is that money coming from?' Sen. Sue Bernard (R-Aroostook) asked. 'Is it coming from more tax increases? Is it coming from cutting other programs that we haven't gotten to yet, or what?' Sen. Peggy Rotundo (D-Androscoggin), who co-chairs the committee, responded, 'As we build this budget, we will take care of that in one way or another so that the budget will balance at the end.' It is not yet clear whether the committee will support some of Mills' other proposed taxes or the cuts she proposed to health and child care programs. So far, the committee also voted out a proposed pharmacy tax. Implications from federal funding cuts were also top of mind. The coordinator position was one of several that the committee readjusted to be more reliant on state funding, though Mills made those recommendations before President Donald Trump's administration began rescinding congressionally appropriated funds. 'We have talked about the fact that if federal funds disappear, positions disappear,' Rotundo said. But some concerns about federal funding predated Trump's second term. During the public hearing for the budget bill, the Maine Emergency Management Agency said budget deficits related to federal funding had already resulted in the agency leaving two positions vacant. The committee voted to fund two positions fully with the general fund, after they'd previously been supported solely by federal dollars. 'It was important to make sure that these positions were preserved and that it was worth the investment in additional general fund dollars,' said Rep. Drew Gattie (D-Westbrook), the other co-chair of the committee. 10 mins ago During the committee's last meeting on Thursday, the majority of its members rejected a tax on Maine pharmacies the governor had proposed, while voting in favor of additional funding and rate reform for nursing homes. The pharmacy tax would have imposed a 70-cent tax on every outpatient prescription filled by Maine pharmacies, the revenue from which the Mills administration said it would use to leverage additional federal dollars and eventually increase MaineCare reimbursements. 'I haven't voted for any items,' said Republican budget lead Jack Ducharme of Madison on Thursday. 'Yet, this will be my first, because I believe that we already collect too much taxes.' With a 10-2 vote, other Republicans backed removing the tax too, though the holdouts noted that their opposition was because of a lack of clarity about the overall budget plan. 'I applaud the work of the majority in terms of removing this,' Rep. Ken Fredette (R-Newport) said. 'However, I will be consistent in reviewing the overall global budget in determining whether or not I will support it.' That sentiment was also shared ahead of the committee voting 9-3 in favor of $20 million in additional funding for nursing homes over the biennium. This includes a $6.5 million investment for rate reform to support the direct care workforce and incentivize permanent staff, which would in turn unlock $12.2 million in funding from the federal government. 'Nursing home rate reform is very important to us, however at this particular time we have not had a discussion about where additional general funds come from that we're going to need,' Ducharme said. 'In order for me to support this, even though I would historically support something like this, I want to know where the money's coming from.' Other Republicans had a different take. While Rep. Amy Bradstreet Arata of New Gloucester would also like to know where the funds are coming from, 'I feel right about supporting this,' she said. 'I might not support the entire package, but I feel better knowing that this is in there, ultimately.' Read more here.
