Six people injured and lorry overturns in serious crash
Emergency services rushed to the A420 at Tog Hill at around 11am on Thursday, July 24 after a crash between a blue Volvo XC90, carrying five occupants, and a red Scania tipper truck.
One of the occupants of the car was taken to hospital with potentially life-threatening injuries, while the other passengers suffered injuries which are not believed to be life-threatening or life-changing.
The lorry driver also received medical attention for an injury which is not thought to be life-threatening or life-changing.
Avon and Somerset Police has launched an investigation into the crash and are appealing for anyone with information to contact them.
A spokesperson for South Gloucestershire Neighbourhood Policing Team said: "The A420 is closed today, Thursday 24 July, between its junction with Bath Road at Wick and the A46 Cold Ashton roundabout following a serious injury collision at the Tog Hill crossroads.
"Freezinghill Lane is also closed between Bath Road and the A420, and Gorse Lane is closed between the A420 and the A46.
"Motorists are urged to seek alternative routes, as the road is blocked for collision investigation and recovery of the vehicles involved, including an overturned lorry which has shed its load."
An Avon and Somerset Police spokesperson said: "We're investigating a serious injury collision between a car and a lorry on the A420 at Tog Hill. Emergency services were called to the scene shortly after 11am on Thursday 24 July.
"A blue Volvo XC90 with five occupants was involved in a collision with a red Scania tipper truck at the A420 crossroads with Freezinghill Lane and Gorse Lane. One of the five occupants of the car is in hospital with injuries currently described as potentially life-threatening.
"The four others' injuries are not currently believed to be either life-threatening or life-changing. All are understood to be adults, and their immediate next of kin are aware. The truck driver also required medical attention for an injury not currently described as either life-threatening or life-changing.
Read more
Air ambulance called after person injured in crash
Pedestrian hospitalised after crash with car on busy A-road
Key advice given as 'network issues' leave patients unable to make 999 calls
"The A420 remains closed between its junction with Bath Road at Wick and the A46 Cold Ashton roundabout. Freezinghill Lane is also closed between Bath Road and the A420, and Gorse Lane is closed between the A420 and the A46.
"Collision investigation continues and specialist recovery will be needed for the lorry which has overturned and shed its load. Please continue to use alternative routes.
"If you were travelling in the area at the time and have any journey-cam footage, or any other information which could help our investigation, please call 101 and give the reference 5225208754."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Car and Driver
3 hours ago
- Car and Driver
Cadillac Vistiq vs. Volvo EX90 Tested: Three-Row Electric SUVs Compared
Three-row SUVs have been one of the lagging segments in the switch to EVs, but that's starting to change as new entrants join the field. The Cadillac Vistiq and the Volvo EX90 are both recent additions, entering at the pricey end of the spectrum. Vistiq starting prices range from $79,090 to $98,190 across four trim levels. The EX90 spans $81,290 to $90,640, and it too has a four-model lineup. Our representative Vistiq was the Sport, which starts just $500 above the base Luxury trim and came in at $82,215 with options. Our EX90 was the Twin Motor Performance Ultra with an as-tested price of $94,640. This content is imported from Third party. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site. view exterior photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver Exterior and Interior Neither EV's exterior styling breaks significant new ground for its maker. Instead, they fit right in with the familial look. Unless you're looking at the EX90 from the front, where you find a body-colored fascia where the grille typically would be, the vehicle is a virtual doppelgänger for the gas-powered XC90, which has seen only minor styling tweaks in its decade on the market. The Vistiq doesn't have a gas-engine counterpart in the Cadillac lineup, but it has a lot of Escalade vibes—it's only if you see it next to Cadillac's range topper (whether in standard or battery-electric IQ form) that you realize the 'Slade is a full order of magnitude larger. view interior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver view interior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver These two SUVs may be priced similarly, but the serving sizes are not quite the same. Both fall broadly into the mid-size realm, but Cadillac dishes out a three-row with a bigger, American-size footprint, while Volvo hews to a more Euro scale. The Caddy sits astride a 4.3-inch-longer wheelbase and stretches 7.3 inches longer overall. It's also more than two inches taller and wider. view exterior photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver Volvo leans harder than ever into the Scandinavian modern aesthetic with the EX90's interior and bolsters the design with well-considered materials that have a quality look and feel. This is a great place to sit. But then Volvo torpedoes the functionality by going with an EV-cliché ultraminimalist driver interface. Nearly all switchgear is contained within the touchscreen, including the climate controls and the positioning of the side mirrors and steering wheel. If you dare look at the screen for more than a second or two—as you must—you get a beeping admonishment to keep your eyes on the road. Fortunately, that nagging can be switched off. The Cadillac's interior is nicely styled, and while its materials look pleasant, they don't push the envelope in the way the Volvo does. The Vistiq requires lots of interaction with its touchscreen, but there's also a rotary controller, physical switches for the mirrors, and four window switches rather than just two. Both cars have a glass roof, but Cadillac provides an actual shade, so the interior doesn't bake in the sun (that's not much of a consideration in Sweden, perhaps). Overall, the Volvo interior is prettier and has more interesting materials, but the Cadillac's is roomier and easier to live with. view exterior photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver Cadillac Vistiq Cadillac Vistiq Sport HIGHS: Blazingly quick, accomplished suspension tuning, superior value. LOWS: Longer braking distance, lower skidpad grip, slower max charging rate. VERDICT: Who needs an Escalade? We loved the Volvo's natty-looking woven-cloth seats, but the EX90's narrow front chairs were less comfortable than the Cadillac's. The EX90's second row is accommodating if not overly huge, and the seats tilt and slide for access to the third row. That third row, however, is miserly in its space for feet, knees, and legs. Second-row passengers will have to scoot their seats forward if you're going to get anyone bigger than a middle-schooler in the way back. view interior Photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver view interior Photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver The Vistiq's greater size is immediately apparent when you slide behind the wheel. The large front seats are more comfortable than the Volvo's narrow chairs. The Caddy feels wider and roomier both up front and in the second row, and passenger-volume measurements bear that out. Even here, however, the third row disappoints, lacking legroom, kneeroom, and footroom unless the second row slides forward halfway, although it's not as cramped as in the EX90. The bigger car also had the edge in cargo space, with the Vistiq offering 15 cubic feet behind the third-row seat to the EX90's 13, and a max of 80 cubic feet with all rear seats folded, beating the EX90's 71 cubes. view exterior photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver Powertrain and Performance The EX90 came brandishing its higher-zoot powertrain with 510 horsepower and 671 pound-feet of torque (versus the 402-hp base unit). All Vistiq models have the same output: 615 horsepower and 649 pound-feet, available in the Velocity Max drive mode. The Caddy's higher pony count translated to quicker acceleration, with a rather absurd 3.6-second 60-mph time, a half-second ahead of the Volvo. And yet, unlike some high-horsepower EVs, the Vistiq doesn't give the impression of frenetic acceleration, and its measured accelerator response may be preferable in a vehicle that often carries a load of passengers. Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance Ultra HIGHS: Art-house interior, impressive athleticism, speedy charging. LOWS: All-touchscreen interface, stingy third row, slim-fit driver's seat. VERDICT: The three-row Volvo, gone electric. Both cleared the all-important 300-mile EPA range bogey, with the Cadillac adding five miles for good measure (although higher-trim Vistiqs are 300 even). And in our 75-mph real-world highway range test, both cars managed a 250-mile result. Unsurprisingly, their battery sizes are nearly the same at 107 kWh for the Swede and 102 kWh for the American. view exterior photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver The Cadillac has a 400-volt architecture, and its peak DC fast-charging rate is a claimed 190 kilowatts, which is slower than the Volvo's 250 kilowatts. For AC charging, Volvo provides an 11.0-kW onboard charger, while at Cadillac, buyers can upgrade the standard 11.5-kW charger to a 19.2-kW unit. Like other GM EVs, the Vistiq allows the driver to hold the left paddle for one-time max regen without switching modes. The EX90 offers auto regen, no regen, or one-pedal mode, with the driver using the touchscreen to choose. view exterior photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver Driving Experience Neither EV is hindered by its three-ton-plus curb weight—a distressingly typical metric—and both of these EVs acquit themselves well in the ride and handling department. Our sample Volvo boasted more sophisticated suspension hardware than the Cadillac, with dual-chamber air springs (included with the Ultra spec) and adaptive dampers. It rides well and stays nice and flat around corners, with the selectable Performance all-wheel-drive mode imparting a feeling of athleticism. Some drivers found the controls touchy, however. The Cadillac has a real sense of substance from behind the wheel. The chassis is very well tuned and features standard adaptive dampers, although air springs are reserved for the Premium Luxury and Platinum trims. Yet even without them, the Vistiq exhibits good body control and appropriate steering effort—not overly sporty but nicely buttoned down. The ride in the default Tour mode is great but somewhat less so in Sport. view interior Photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver Cadillac Vistiq view interior Photos Andi Hedrick | Car and Driver Volvo EX90 Both EVs are quiet, but the Volvo puts a bit more cotton in your ears, as we measured 66 decibels at 70 mph versus 67 for the Cadillac. And the Winner Is . . . These two EVs were closely matched. The Cadillac eked out a victory, but in many categories, the two entrants' scoring was right on top of each other. So were the results in the all-important range test, reflecting their near-identical EPA figures. Despite being a lower-spec trim level, the Vistiq packs more features and amenities, and its lower price was also an advantage. The Cadillac also had a more usable third-row seat, quicker acceleration, and less-annoying controls. The Volvo's wins were in chassis performance (with its superior grip and shorter stopping distances), interior design and materials, quietness, and ride quality. Either SUV is an accomplished and upscale family hauler for those ready to take the EV plunge. Michael Simari | Car and Driver Want to see these vehicles' specs side-by-side? Check out the Cadillac Vistiq & Volvo EX90 on our new compare tool. Compare Cars Specifications Specifications 2026 Cadillac Vistiq Sport Vehicle Type: front- and rear-motor, all-wheel-drive, 6-passenger, 4-door wagon PRICE Base/As Tested: $79,590/$82,215 Options: Radiant Red Tintcoat paint, $1225; 6-passenger seating with second-row captain's chairs, $800; black roof, $600 POWERTRAIN Front Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC Rear Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC Combined Power: 615 hp Combined Torque: 649 lb-ft Battery Pack: liquid-cooled lithium-ion, 102 kWh Peak Charge Rate, AC/DC: 11.5/190 kW Transmissions, F/R: direct-drive CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilink Brakes, F/R: 13.5-in vented disc/13.6-in vented disc Tires: Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season 285/45R-21 113H M+S TPC Spec 3194MS DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 121.8 in Length: 205.6 in Width: 79.8 in Height: 71.0 in Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 62/54/35 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 80/43/15 ft3 Curb Weight: 6226 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 3.6 sec 100 mph: 9.1 sec 1/4-Mile: 12.1 sec @ 114 mph 130 mph: 16.8 sec Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec. Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 3.8 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 1.8 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 2.3 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 132 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 176 ft Braking, 100–0 mph: 362 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.80 g Interior Sound Idle: 29 dBA/1 sone Full Throttle: 72 dBA 70-mph Cruising: 67 dBA/21 sone C/D FUEL ECONOMY AND CHARGING Observed: 75 MPGe 75-mph Highway Range: 250 mi EPA FUEL ECONOMY Combined/City/Highway: 86/93/78 MPGe Range: 305 mi -- 2025 Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance Ultra Vehicle Type: front- and rear-motor, all-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 4-door wagon PRICE Base/As Tested: $90,640/$94,640 Options: Bowers & Wilkins premium audio system, $3200; 22-inch 5-spoke Aero wheels, $800 POWERTRAIN Front Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC, 241 hp, 310 lb-ft Rear Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC, 268 hp, 361 lb-ft Combined Power: 510 hp Combined Torque: 671 lb-ft Battery Pack: liquid-cooled lithium-ion, 107 kWh Peak Charge Rate, AC/DC: 11.0/250 kW Transmissions, F/R: direct-drive CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: control arms/multilink Brakes, F/R: 15.8-in vented disc/15.4-in vented disc Tires: Pirelli Scorpion MS F: 265/40R-22 106H M+S VOL R: HL295/35R-22 111H M+S VOL DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 117.5 in Length: 198.3 in Width: 77.3 in Height: 68.8 in Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 58/51/21 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 74/36/14 ft3 Front Trunk Volume: 2 ft3 Curb Weight: 6083 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 4.1 sec 100 mph: 11.2 sec 1/4-Mile: 12.9 sec @ 106 mph Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec. Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.3 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.5 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 3.2 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 116 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 167 ft Braking, 100–0 mph: 346 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.86 g Interior Sound Idle: 29 dBA/1 sone Full Throttle: 69 dBA 70-mph Cruising: 66 dBA/20 sone C/D FUEL ECONOMY AND CHARGING Observed: 70 MPGe 75-mph Highway Range: 250 mi Average DC Fast-Charge Rate, 10–90%: 127 kW DC Fast-Charge Time, 10–90%: 43 min EPA FUEL ECONOMY Combined/City/Highway: 81/83/78 MPGe Range: 300 mi C/D TESTING EXPLAINED Reviewed by Joe Lorio Deputy Editor, Reviews and Features Joe Lorio has been obsessed with cars since his Matchbox days, and he got his first subscription to Car and Driver at age 11. Joe started his career at Automobile Magazine under David E. Davis Jr., and his work has also appeared on websites including Amazon Autos, Autoblog, AutoTrader, Hagerty, Hemmings, KBB, and TrueCar. This content is imported from Third party. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
Motor Trend
4 hours ago
- Motor Trend
Tested: The 2025 Volvo EX30 Performance Copies Tesla's Worst Habit
Pros Wicked quick acceleration Fun to drive Funky, stylish interior Cons Where's the $36K version? Dismal range and unremarkable charging Too small for most American car buyers Tesla's influence shows up everywhere in the 2025 Volvo EX30. You see it in the speedometer relegated to a corner of the infotainment touchscreen. You see it in the gear selector stalk that doubles as the cruise control switchgear. And you see it in the credit-card-style key that's meant to be a backup to using your phone for unlocking and starting the vehicle. All of this is cost-saving minimalism cleverly passed off as modernism, an art that Tesla—and now Volvo—has nearly perfected in its pursuit of making attainable (and profitable) EVs. The Volvo EX30 fails to deliver its promised affordability and range, costing nearly $10K more and achieving only average range in MotorTrend tests. Despite its performance and design, it's a niche luxury EV rather than the mainstream, budget-friendly option initially promised. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article. Read Next Of all the parallels between the EX30 and a Tesla, the strongest similarity is one that no automaker should imitate: the mile-wide gap between what the automaker originally promised and the car it eventually delivered. Just two years ago, Volvo introduced the EX30 as the cheap and cheerful cure for too-expensive EVs with a $36,245 starting price and 275 miles of range. Yet the only EX30 you can buy in the U.S. right now and for the foreseeable future costs nearly $10,000 more than that and landed well short of 200 miles in MotorTrend's Road-Trip Range test. Volvo set out to build the $35K EV that Tesla has long teased and appears to have come to the same conclusion: It can't be done. (Chevy has proven otherwise.) Trading Value for Performance It's a shame that the launch turned into a bait and switch because the $46,195 Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is awesome in its own right. Imagine an electric Volkswagen GTI with 422 hp and 400 lb-ft of torque, and you'll have a pretty good idea of what it's like to drive. Presented with a gap in traffic or an empty roundabout, the EX30 rockets through with an exuberance that matches its Moss Yellow paint. It is not, however, a rowdy little hooligan of a hatchback as the specs suggest. Exercising characteristic restraint, Volvo delivers all that oomph as a shove rather than a gut punch. The EX30 launches with the faintest scrape of spinning tires, and power builds linearly over the first 20 or so mph. Hitting 60 mph in 3.2 seconds has never felt so civilized. When the EX30 zips past the quarter-mile mark in 11.8 seconds, it does so up against the 112-mph speed limiter that Volvo rolled out across its lineup five years ago in the name of safety. Similarly, the EX30 steers and turns and tackles bumps capably without ever feeling overtly aggressive. Its 110-foot stop from 60 mph and 0.87 g of cornering grip are decent for a 4,190-pound vehicle on all-season tires but hardly the makings of a four-door sports car. For a Volvo, that's perfect. The EX30 Twin Motor Performance is fun to hustle and pleasant to commute in, making it a great daily driver. How to Make a Cheap Car Feel Expensive The danger of buying the expensive version of a cheap car is that so much of a car is designed and engineered for the lowest-priced model. That's the story of the Ford Maverick. At $33,000, it feels like a value. In a $43,000 model, you can't ignore the flashing and exposed edges on many of the injection-molded plastic parts. Like the Maverick, the EX30 uses texture and color to turn cheap interior materials into eye candy. Unlike Ford, Volvo has engineered the fit and finish so that those materials also look and—where it matters—feel expensive. The sense of quality is furthered by the cabin's thoughtful and innovative design. The glove box drops from the center of the dash to give the front passenger more kneeroom. Instead of a conventional center console, a bin slides out from below the fixed center armrest with a clever, independently sliding top plate that allows you to allocate the space for cupholders or catchall storage. As noted at the beginning of this story, it's not hard to find where Volvo has cut cost from the bill of materials. Look at how simple the climate vents are. The front doors have been stripped of nearly all electronics, with the driver and passenger sharing two window switches in the center console to control all four windows. The front speakers all live in a soundbar running across the top of the dash, which unfortunately takes a toll on the audio system's sound quality. What would have been easily justified trade-offs in a $36,245 EX30 are tougher to swallow at our test car's $48,395 sticker price, but the cabin is ultimately an industrial design masterpiece. Funky and original, the EX30 feels like the spiritual successor of the quirky 2008–2013 Volvo C30. The EX30's petite size reinforces the connection with that decade-old Volvo. The four-door EX30 measures about an inch shorter than the two-door C30 (and 5 inches shorter than the Toyota Corolla hatchback). As a result, the rear seats are only functional if your kids have the anatomy of a Squishmallow and emptying a full Costco cart into the EX30's 12.4-cubic-foot cargo hold will test your Tetris skills. The most consequential cost-cutting measure naturally shows up in what's the most expensive part of any EV, the battery. The EX30's lithium-ion pack stores 64.0 kWh of electricity, less than the late (but soon-to-be-resurrected) Chevrolet Bolt EV. Officially, the Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is rated for a reasonable 253 miles on a full charge. At a steady 70 mph in the real world, though, we achieved an impractical 180 miles. That 29 percent gap between the window sticker and our measurement (which admittedly only looks at 95 percent of a full charge) makes the EX30 one of the worst performers in the MotorTrend Road-Trip Range test. Its fast-charging performance is similarly underwhelming. Power peaks at 153 kW and quickly tapers off, delivering enough juice in 15 minutes to cover just 87 miles at 70 mph. Given the EX30's size, limited range, and mediocre charging, there are far better options at this price point—pretty much any EV at this price point—for anyone planning on road-tripping their electric vehicle. Getting Techy Tesla's influence is palpable in the nearly button-free dashboard. The EX30 runs nearly all its major controls through a scaled-down version of the Android Automotive–based infotainment system found in the larger EX90. Thankfully the EX30 hasn't been plagued by the litany of software quality complaints owners have logged against Volvo's new flagship EV, and our reviewers took to the user interface quickly. We like that you can download apps such as Spotify and Waze directly to the 12.3-inch touchscreen and that it offers the familiar comfort of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto for those who aren't ready for such newfangled ideas. The EX30 comes in two versions, the standard Plus trim and the $1,700 Ultra upgrade that adds a 360-degree camera system, automated parking, ambient cabin lighting, a cabin air filter, LED headlights, and Pilot Assist, Volvo's conservative take on Tesla's Full Self-Driving. It can center the EX30 in its lane, slow or accelerate with traffic, and even guide the vehicle through a lane change, but all of this requires the driver to keep their hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. We appreciate a cautious, safety-first approach, but the value of Pilot Assist seems marginal compared to Ford's BlueCruise or GM's Super Cruise. Given its limited capabilities, we'd be inclined to pass on the Ultra trim to try to keep the price in check. A Lesson Learned? The Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance's straight-line speed, polished driving dynamics, and fetching design tug at our emotions, but it's hard not to feel jilted once you climb out of the driver's seat and look at the vehicle in the larger context. Volvo originally pitched the EX30 as a value play that would get more Americans into EVs. Instead, we got a tiny hot rod of a luxury car for a niche buyer. For now, the work of pushing EVs into the mainstream will have to be carried out by larger, cheaper, longer-range alternatives such as the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Ford Mustang Mach-E, and Chevy Equinox EV. Should Volvo someday figure out how to bring the entry, single-motor EX30 to America (specs for which are included on the U.S. media site), we hope it's learned an important lesson: Wait until you're shipping the cars to the U.S. to announce the price.
The Drive
10 hours ago
- The Drive
Porsche Confirms Gas-Powered Macan Replacement for 2028: TDS
The latest car news, reviews, and features. Good morning and welcome to The Down Shift , or TDS for short. The Down Shift is The Drive 's new weekday early morning quick-hit news rundown bringing the latest stories that are bubbling both overnight and in the early am hours. Grab a Pop-Tart and cup of coffee while reading TDS . Today marks the fifth installment of TDS and the first full week of the new series. Thank you to everyone that's provided feedback via the comments and email (tips@ regarding the format and content. The feedback is truly appreciated and noted. TDS is meant to be tight, light, and right, but not long, heavy, or cumbersome. This isn't in-depth reporting or a single story. TDS is a heads up heading into the day. Headlines are summarized in a single sentence accompanied by a link providing the option to go deeper for more information. The first cup of coffee is gone here, so let's get into it. 🚘 What I'm driving: Heading into the weekend with the refreshed 2025.5 Volvo XC90 T8 plug-in hybrid SUV over here and am planning to test the fuel economy when the electric juice runs out thanks to a weekend road trip up north. ⛽️ During a H1 2025 earnings call Porsche CEO Oliver Blume confirmed a gas-powered Macan replacement will arrive in 2028 with a new model name. 🐎 Ferrari's CEO Benedetto Vigna said during the company's Q2 2025 earnings call the automaker has never said it has a second or third EV in development, so there's no EVs to be delayed in an attempt to quell rumors. 🔋 Subaru is considering an electric BRZ sports car. 👨💼 Jaguar Land Rover CEO Adrian Mardell is stepping down and retiring after three years in the big chair, though a successor has not been named yet. 🌲 Mitsubishi announced the 2025 Outlander Trail Edition, which brings 'off-highway styling and equipment' to the model, though it feels like a slap in the face for the automaker that won the Paris-to-Dakar race 12 times along with four driver's championships in the World Rally Championship. Have feedback on the formatting of TDS? Send us a note: tips@
