Not just Trump: Who else wore blue at Pope Francis's funeral and was it against protocol?
However, Trump wasn't the only one drawing criticism for his choice of colour. Prince William, Jordan's King Abdullah, and Indian President Droupadi Murmu also wore blue ensembles at the somber event. Prince William wore a dark blue suit instead of black. America's former President Joe Biden who was seen in a blue tie was also criticized for breaking the protocol.
But did they all actually break the protocol? Let's find out.
It turns out, Prince William, Donald Trump, Droupadi Murmu and other attendees who didn't wear the colour black did not go against the protocol. There is no official funeral dress code mentioned on The Vatican website, and it's up to a person to decide what outfit colour they want to choose for the occasion.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Get Intel Laptops With Exclusive Student Perks
Intel Laptops | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
"Attendees wore what they considered to be appropriate attire for such a solemn occasion," a Vatican source said.
According to a well-known Italian national newspaper Il Messaggero, Vatican protocol recommends the following dress and order for Pope Francis' burial.
"For men, dark suit with a long black tie and a button of the same color on the left lapel of the jacket, where only Vatican honors can be placed. For women, a black dress, preferably long, of the same color as gloves and veil on the head, with the only allowed ornament being a string of pearls.
'These are the prescriptions for those attending the Pope's funeral, according to well-established protocol manuals that also define the seating arrangement for dignitaries and heads of state.'
While black is the traditional colour in Catholic funerals, Trump and Prince William not being Catholic may have made a different choice. Indian President Droupadi Murmu, who's a Hindu was seen in a blue sari.
Trump also received disapproval for leaving the ceremony as soon as it was over, rather than waiting until after the burial.
'Rude Narcissist': Trump Faces Fire For Breaking Protocol At Pope Francis Funeral | Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US mulls equity stakes in Micron, Samsung, TSMC after Intel deal talks
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is reportedly exploring a plan for the Trump administration to secure equity stakes in chip manufacturing companies, including Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), and Samsung. According to a report by Reuters, the US government is considering stakes in firms that receive CHIPS Act fundin g to build factories in the country. This follows Washington's ongoing talks to take a 10 per cent stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants. White House backs Intel model White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Tuesday that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel for a government stake. 'The President wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before,' she said. Lutnick told CNBC earlier that the government does not want to direct Intel's operations, but described the move as an unprecedented step that would give Washington greater influence over strategic firms. National security parallels Washington has taken company stakes in past crises to inject cash and boost confidence. Earlier this year, US President Donald Trump approved Nippon Steel's takeover of US Steel after negotiating a 'golden share' that allows the White House to block production cuts, outsourcing, or plant closures. Reuters reported that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in CHIPS Act discussions, though Lutnick is leading the process. The $52.7 billion programme, officially known as the CHIPS and Science Act, is overseen by the Commerce Department. Subsidies already flowing In 2024, the US Commerce Department approved subsidy packages worth $6.2 billion for Micron, $6.6 billion for TSMC, and $4.75 billion for Samsung to expand semiconductor production in the US. Micron is the second-largest recipient of CHIPS Act funds after Intel. Political backing The equity-stake idea is being driven by Lutnick and has found support from Donald Trump, Reuters reported. The move marks a sharp shift in how the US government seeks to protect its economic and national security interests in the semiconductor sector.
Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro reminds India of America's exorbitant privilege & diktats
Synopsis Peter Navarro's op-ed reveals the US expectation that India, to maintain its strategic partnership and trade benefits, must align its economic policies with Washington's interests. This includes purchasing American weapons without technology transfer demands and ceasing the use of dollar surpluses to buy Russian oil for re-export. Agencies Without saying anything really new, Peter Navarro has revealed something important. If India wants to keep earning dollars by selling goods and services to America, it has to recycle them as per Washington's diktats. The White House trade adviser's op-ed in the Financial Times is aimed at critics who have been shocked by the summary disdain with which President Donald Trump has alienated an ally that past administrations have spent a quarter-century cultivating. Navarro's main message: 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one.' Also Read: Who is Trump's trade guru giving gyan to India? Basically, the White House expects the same level of loyalty as it got from the Germans in 1967. Back then, the Lyndon B. Johnson administration prevailed upon Chancellor Kurt Georg Kiesinger to not exchange any of the Bundesbank's dollar holdings for gold, even though they were well within their rights to do so under the prevailing Bretton Woods arrangement. Bonn made a public pledge to not join the rebellious French who were beginning to question what Valery Giscard d'Estaing called America's exorbitant relations in the 1960s were rooted in the calculus of the Cold War. Historically, New Delhi and Washington have never been as close, yet the latter is going to decide how the most-populous nation will use its trade dollars. That means Prime Minister Narendra Modi has to buy American weapon systems without insisting on technology transfers or local production. The US has no desire to gift cutting-edge military capabilities to a country cozying up to both Russia and China, Navarro says. The second constraint is on how dollar incomes are not to be used. Recycling greenbacks from its $43 billion trade surplus with the US to buy crude oil from Russia — only to sell refined petroleum products to other countries in Asia, Europe and Africa to earn yet more dollars — was 'deeply corrosive of the world's efforts to isolate Putin's war economy,' Navarro says. It has to stop. The tone of the piece suggests that the Trump administration is making a calculated bet. However much Modi tries to flex his muscles against US hegemony, he really can't afford to put $87 billion in annual exports to America at risk of a prohibitive 50% tariff from Aug. 27. Without dollars from its single-largest export destination, how will India pay for the $109 billion it spends on everything from power equipment to kitchen appliances from China? Or buy more from it, as Beijing is bound to insist?One way to square the circle may be to give the Chinese equity stakes in local joint ventures, so that some of their $91 billion bilateral trade surplus comes back as investment. This may well happen. According to a Bloomberg News report this week, India's biggest tycoons — from Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani to JSW Group's Sajjan Jindal — have been pursuing under-the-radar deals with Chinese firms that have the most mature and cost-efficient technology in renewable sectors like electric vehicles and lithium-ion Washington sending a natural ally into the arms of its biggest rival? Not really. At best the fraught relationship between the two Asian giants will normalize. After their border clashes five years ago, New Delhi actively suppressed investment proposals from the bigger economy next door. The Modi government announced, with some pride, that between April 2020 and December 2021, China's share in total foreign direct investments into the country had fallen to only 0.43%. Although that would change now, there's little risk of India moving into China's strategic sphere, not after Beijing's liberal defense assistance to Islamabad in the recent India-Pakistan military conflict. Washington's orbit is hard to escape. To see why, it's illustrative to look back at the early days of the India-Russia oil trade after the start of the Ukraine war. Back then, there was a great deal of chest-thumping in New Delhi that Moscow will agree to sell crude for rupees. Russian importers would then pay rubles to buy tea and other stuff from India. The rupee-ruble transactions were supposed to be relayed over SPFS, the Russian alternative to the SWIFT messaging system, the 'financial data panopticon' through which Washington surveils global trade and I noted in April 2022, any such deal wasn't in India's long-term interest. Bypassing SWIFT would help Russia, whose banks faced Western sanctions. New Delhi had nothing to gain. Ultimately, the rupees-for-oil trade didn't even work out. The Russian exporters got tired of holding funds in a non-convertible currency in Indian bank accounts. So refiners went back to buying crude with dollars and dollar-linked UAE dirhams, placing India squarely in the grip of the mighty greenback even as discounted Urals crude came to account for more than a third of its imports, from barely 1% before the Ukraine war. Had the benefits of cheaper oil flowed to local motorists, the middle class would have been all for standing up to Trump. That isn't the case, and Modi has to appease voters now with a long-overdue cut in consumption Chinese have done the same Russian oil trade, and yet the US has singled out India for exemplary punishment. That isn't hard to explain. Not all sides of this relationship are equal. While advanced economies like the US 'are more exposed to China as a supplier, China is becoming less reliant on them as a market,' concludes a new study by Federal Reserve economist Florencia Airaudo, and her coauthors. Control over hard-to-replace inputs, such as rare earths, graphite, and battery materials gives Beijing leverage, they note. New Delhi has no such bargaining chips. The dollars India garners from exporting textiles, carpets, gems and jewelry, shrimp, and software code are its to spend, but not entirely freely. As Navarro reminded the critics of the sudden US-India estrangement, America's exorbitant privilege comes in many hues.
Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Andhra Pradesh's latest ask: Stand as ‘guarantor' to bring back Singapore to Amravati
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a bid to bring back Singapore government and investors for Amaravati capital city project, N Chandrababu Naidu-led Andhra Pradesh government has sought the Centre's support in standing as an informal guarantor for the has revived his pet project of a new capital city at Amaravati and has been scouting for investments. He had recently led a high-level delegation to Singapore in end of July. According to sources, Singapore government wants an assurance from the Centre that Amravati capital project has its officials said this is a way to gauge that the project has the Centre's 'blessings'. Andhra Pradesh IT minister Nara Lokesh met external affairs minister S Jaishankar on Monday to seek the Centre's support. Sources said that if Singapore government comes back to the table, a tripartite agreement will be signed with Andhra government, Singapore government and World Bank as partners. A framework is being discussed to oversee this cooperation which will include officials of the two governments and may have Centre's representative. Speaking after the meeting with Jaishankar, Lokesh said, 'We are hopeful of bringing Singapore government and investors back to Amaravati capital city project. We are yet to finalise the contours of this cooperation. We have sought the Centre's support in pushing this initiative through.'In 2015, a joint venture between Andhra Pradesh government and Singapore Consortium was floated and was known as Amaravati Development Partners. The state Cabinet adopted Swiss Challenge procurement model in June 2015, which came under judicial scrutiny as Indian companies alleged that the process was tailored to favour the Singapore Consortium. As the state government started the process of land pooling to acquire land, the collaboration process lost considerable steam with senior officers incharge from Andhra Pradesh not even attending joint meetings. With YSRCP government under Jagan Mohan Reddy in power, the entire project was stalled. Singapore's reluctance to come back to the table for Amaravati 2.0 comes from the fact that government officials received a lot of flak back homefor this failed partnership. A study on Amaravati being a failed experiment was conducted by Singapore and is now presented as a case partnered with Singapore to bring the country's experience in city design, project management and urban governance to build Amaravati. The Singapore government's Urban Redevelopment Authority and Surbana Jurong prepared Amaravati's Master Plan, which is still being used for Amaravati 2.0.
