Andhra Pradesh's latest ask: Stand as ‘guarantor' to bring back Singapore to Amravati
Remove Ads
In a bid to bring back Singapore government and investors for Amaravati capital city project, N Chandrababu Naidu-led Andhra Pradesh government has sought the Centre's support in standing as an informal guarantor for the state.Naidu has revived his pet project of a new capital city at Amaravati and has been scouting for investments. He had recently led a high-level delegation to Singapore in end of July. According to sources, Singapore government wants an assurance from the Centre that Amravati capital project has its support.Government officials said this is a way to gauge that the project has the Centre's 'blessings'. Andhra Pradesh IT minister Nara Lokesh met external affairs minister S Jaishankar on Monday to seek the Centre's support. Sources said that if Singapore government comes back to the table, a tripartite agreement will be signed with Andhra government, Singapore government and World Bank as partners. A framework is being discussed to oversee this cooperation which will include officials of the two governments and may have Centre's representative. Speaking after the meeting with Jaishankar, Lokesh said, 'We are hopeful of bringing Singapore government and investors back to Amaravati capital city project. We are yet to finalise the contours of this cooperation. We have sought the Centre's support in pushing this initiative through.'In 2015, a joint venture between Andhra Pradesh government and Singapore Consortium was floated and was known as Amaravati Development Partners. The state Cabinet adopted Swiss Challenge procurement model in June 2015, which came under judicial scrutiny as Indian companies alleged that the process was tailored to favour the Singapore Consortium. As the state government started the process of land pooling to acquire land, the collaboration process lost considerable steam with senior officers incharge from Andhra Pradesh not even attending joint meetings. With YSRCP government under Jagan Mohan Reddy in power, the entire project was stalled. Singapore's reluctance to come back to the table for Amaravati 2.0 comes from the fact that government officials received a lot of flak back homefor this failed partnership. A study on Amaravati being a failed experiment was conducted by Singapore and is now presented as a case study.Naidu partnered with Singapore to bring the country's experience in city design, project management and urban governance to build Amaravati. The Singapore government's Urban Redevelopment Authority and Surbana Jurong prepared Amaravati's Master Plan, which is still being used for Amaravati 2.0.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a few seconds ago
- Time of India
Fixed, floating or hybrid: Which home loan interest rate regime works best
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The interest rate remains fixed for the first three years, helping borrowers plan their outflows better. After this period, the loan automatically moves to a floating regime, linked to the company's internal reference rate. Interest rate starting at only 7.40%* p.a. Borrowers can also opt for a premature switch to a floating rate in the first 3 years as well – by paying nominal conversion charges. Borrowers can even prepay during the fixed period without penalty (if using their own funds). Those who prioritise stability above all else may prefer fixed for a limited duration. Those willing to ride market cycles might lean towards floating. And those who want assurance in the short term and opportunity in the long term could find a hybrid loan especially useful, particularly in today's low-rate environment. Buying a home is a key milestone for most Indian families, and a home loan often plays a central role in turning that aspiration into reality. While most borrowers focus on eligibility, loan amount, or EMI affordability, an equally important decision often gets less attention: what kind of interest rate regime to home loans in India are offered either on a fixed or floating rate. Each comes with advantages and tradeoffs. But in recent years, a third structure, hybrid loans, has emerged, aiming to give borrowers the best of both home loans offer a predetermined interest rate for a set period, typically a few years, before they reset. The biggest advantage here is stability. Borrowers know exactly what their EMIs will be during that phase, which makes budgeting fixed rates are often slightly higher than floating rates at the time of borrowing. And once the reset date arrives, the interest may be revised in line with prevailing market rates. In effect, fixed-rate loans provide peace of mind in the short term but may not remain immune to market shifts over the full home loans are linked to benchmarks such as the repo rate. This means the interest payable can go up or down depending on market borrowers, the attraction is obvious; if interest rates fall, EMIs reduce or the tenure shortens. Over a long repayment horizon, this can translate into significant savings. On the other hand, if rates rise, monthly payments increase. Floating loans, therefore, require borrowers to be comfortable with some level of the two extremes lies a relatively new option: the hybrid interest rate loan. This structure keeps the interest rate fixed for an initial period and then transitions to a floating logic is straightforward. The early years of a home loan are when repayment discipline matters most. A fixed rate in that phase provides stability and predictability. Later, once borrowers are more financially settled, the loan shifts to floating, allowing them to benefit from any downward movement in market fixed or floating loans, hybrid loans are not widely available. They are a more recent innovation, designed specifically for borrowers who want a balance between certainty and interest rate environment makes hybrid loans especially compelling. Home loan rates are at a low in recent years, with the starting range at around 7.40%-8.35% per annum for eligible salaried borrowers. For those availing a hybrid loan now, this means the opportunity to lock in that highly competitive practical terms, borrowers can secure predictable EMIs at a time when rates are attractive, while still retaining the option to benefit from any future softening once the loan shifts to floating. In volatile economic conditions, that combination of early certainty and later flexibility can be a significant example of a hybrid loan available is the Bajaj Housing Finance Limited Dual Interest Rate Home Loan. Here are some things to consider about this offering:This structure illustrates how hybrid loans can address the needs of borrowers who don't want to choose between predictability and flexibility, especially at a time when borrowing costs are on the lower benefits of the Dual Interest Rate Home Loan include:There isn't a single 'right' answer. It depends on individual India's mortgage market evolves, borrowers are beginning to see that the choice is not just fixed or floating. Hybrid models are redefining how home loans can be structured, offering a balanced approach for those seeking both certainty and interest rates hovering at a relatively low point, the timing is especially favourable. For borrowers stepping into homeownership now, the ability to freeze today's competitive rates for the next few years, and then benefit from potential future reductions, makes hybrid loans a smart alternative worth considering.
The Hindu
a few seconds ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court hearing on Presidential Reference: Elected State governments at the mercy of Governors' whims
The Supreme Court on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) asked the Centre if elected State governments were at the mercy of the whims and fancies of Governors, who could fail Bills by merely withholding assent for them. A Presidential Reference Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai was testing a submission made by the Centre, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, and Kanu Agarwal, that State Bills would lapse if Governors withheld assent to proposed laws presented to them for approval under Article 200 of the Constitution. Presidential Reference hearing updates | August 20, 2025 'So, are Governors being given total powers to sit in appeal over the elected representatives? This way, if Bills are failed by Governors, governments formed by majority will be at the mercy of their whims and fancies,' Chief Justice Gavai quizzed Mr. Mehta's interpretation of Article 200. Mr. Mehta responded that the power of a Governor to withhold assent was meant to be used sparingly and only in extraordinary situations, especially when a State Bill frustrated the very democratic will of the nation, or violated fundamental rights, or was repugnant to an existing Central law. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal interjected to point out that if a Governor had the power to lapse a Bill by withholding assent, the same logic would apply to the President of India under Article 111. 'The President can also withhold and fail Bills passed in the Parliament,' Mr. Sibal submitted. The Solicitor General argued that a Governor had 'four' options under Article 200 — grant assent to the Bill; withhold assent to the Bill due to which the proposed law lapses; reserve the Bill for consideration to the President. But in case the Governor exercises the 'fourth' option to return the Bill to the State Assembly, which re-passes the Bill, the Governor is bound to grant assent. He could not withhold the Bill though he could refer it to the President on the ground of repugnancy. High Constitutional authorities, including the President and Governors, were presumed to act within the law and uphold the dignity of their offices, Mr. Mehta said. Governors were not 'nobodies', he submitted. They were representatives of the President, who was bound by the aid and advice of the Union Cabinet, which represented the interests of the nation. 'Governorship is not a sanctum for retired politicians,' Mr. Mehta said. The Chief Justice asked the Solicitor General whether, over the years, the expectations of the Founding Fathers and Mothers regarding these Constitutional functionaries had actually been fulfilled. 'Governors and the elected Ministers of the States are expected to function in harmony, are they?' the Chief Justice queried. Justice Narasimha reasoned that Constitutional interpretation by courts could not be idealistic. Judicial review had to take into account the present day realities. Governors and Speakers were idealistically considered high offices, presumed to function within the law, but the flood of litigation said otherwise. The judge referred to the cases filed in the apex court under the anti-defection law (the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution). The Tenth Schedule was introduced with the best intentions and with ideal expectations about the high office of the Speaker, Justice Narasimha said. But views had changed over the years. 'Constitutional interpretation cannot be static,' Justice Narasimha observed. The Chief Justice said the outcome of the litigation in many Tenth Schedule cases had been 'operation success, patient dead'. Mr. Mehta enumerated instances when Governors were not bound by the aid and advice of the State Cabinet. One of these instances was the Governor's application of discretion to decide which party or political front had a majority to form a government in a State. 'We have seen how, in some cases, the Governors have exercised their discretion and end up in litigation in the apex court,' the CJI responded. The Solicitor General dismissed them as 'aberrations'. It was 'hazardous to interpret the Constitution based on aberrations', Mr. Mehta said.
India.com
a few seconds ago
- India.com
'India is a global power, Trump's sanctions will only....': Russia praises India amid pressure from US for purchasing Russian oil
Russia-India relations India-Russia relations: In a significant development amid the recent tensions between India and US on the issue of Indian exports to US and import of Russian crude oil, Charge d'Affaires of the Russian Embassy in India Roman Babushkin has said that India is a global power with a diversified foreign policy. Adding that India is a leading economic country, Babushkin said that Russia remains committed to resolve any problems even during challenges. Here are all the details you need to know about what the Charge d'Affaires of the Russian Embassy has said on India-Russia relations and the recent geopolitical tensions. What Russian Embassy said on Putin-Trump Alaska meet and its impact on India? 'There are so many rumours and speculations about this summit in Alaska, which took place on the 15th of August. In fact, it was a breakthrough development, because you would see the leaders of the leading global powers sitting together and having a very warm, deep and very prolonged conversation. The agenda was a diversified one. We are absolutely not about to link it to just one particular question. We talk about the restoration of relations between Russia and the US. And for that, rebuilding trust is one of the most significant tasks', Roman Babushkin was quoted as saying on the Alaska as per a report carried by news agency ANI. Roman Babushkin also said that Russia-India have been facing this problem of sanctions for many years, but their trade is only growing. Story Highlights Russian Embassy has indicated that Russia-India trade is growing despite all concerns. It has also indicated that Russia remains committed to resolve any problems even during challenges. On Russia-US relations, Charge d'Affaires of the Russian Embassy in India said that rebuilding trust is one of the most significant tasks. What Russia thinks on US imposing more tariffs on India? 'And as far as we heard here in the mission after this meeting, which was, according to assessments by President Trump, very successful and very positive, I think I heard that he decided not to impose an extra 25 per cent on India, according to media reports. I didn't see other reports,' he stated on the Trump tariffs on India.
