logo
Republicans plow ahead with anti-abortion agenda in states where voters approved constitutional amendments

Republicans plow ahead with anti-abortion agenda in states where voters approved constitutional amendments

NBC News12-04-2025
Even as Republicans swept into power in Washington in last year's elections, abortion rights supporters found success at the ballot box across the country. But that hasn't deterred abortion opponents.
Republican lawmakers have moved forward this year with bills to restrict abortion in more than half of the states where voters passed constitutional amendments in November to protect or expand reproductive rights.
They've also advanced bills in a bevy of states that would make if more difficult for groups to place similar measures on the ballot in the future. Those efforts extend to three states where amendments to enshrine a constitutional right to an abortion fell short last November.
'The abortion industry's attempts to completely deregulate their industry via ballot measures is putting women and girls in danger,' Kelsey Pritchard, the director of state public affairs for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said in an email. 'Republican leaders in states with pro-abortion ballot measures should be doing all that they can to protect health and safety protections for women and girls.'
Reproductive rights groups say the actions — even if ultimately unsuccessful — amount to an overt rejection of the desires of voters on the issue of abortion.
'Even when their voters made their support of abortion access extremely clear with these ballot amendments, Republicans are still willing to trample them,' said Yari Aquino, who helps advise candidates for EMILY's List, a national group that backs Democratic women who support abortion rights.
Aquino suggested that if conservatives' efforts continue, Democrats would be wise to keep abortion rights at the center of their platform heading into next year's midterms.
'This is why abortion rights and reproductive rights continue to be such a salient issue,' she said.
In Arizona, where voters overwhelmingly chose to enshrine abortion rights in their state constitution five months ago, Republicans in the state Legislature have advanced bills that would create new restrictions on the use of abortion-inducing drugs. Those include the requirement that a doctor must examine a patient before the patient can obtain the drugs. Another bill would ban doctors in the state from introducing abortion care to their patients as a prospective treatment option.
The bill proposes punishing doctors and practices who 'promote' abortion care as a potential treatment option by stripping them of any contracts or funding from any state agencies.
Critics argue the bills are a 'backdoor' way to eliminate Medicaid funding for any practice that even mentions abortion to a pregnant patient.
'Arizonans spoke their voice. They used their voice to say what they wanted,' said Arizona state Rep. Stephanie Simacek, a Democrat who has co-sponsored multiple bills that seek to protect or expand abortion rights. 'This is just another way for [Republicans] to push exactly what they did not get.'
'It's a backdoor way for them to try to come in and overrule the voice of the people here in Arizona,' she added.
Republicans in Missouri are teeing up a ballot measure that would reverse the one voters approved in November that effectively protected abortion rights until fetal viability and undid a near-total abortion ban on the books.
Conservative lawmakers in the state have also introduced legislation that would allow Missourians to wipe out most all of their tax bill if they donate what they owed in state income taxes to pregnancy resource centers, which reproductive rights advocates say are designed to steer pregnant women away from abortions.
In Montana, where voters enshrined abortion access into the state constitution, GOP lawmakers responded by introducing a bill that seeks to make traveling to or from the state for an abortion later in pregnancy a crime punishable by up to five years in prison. The bill, which compared that action to human 'trafficking,' was eventually tabled.
In Colorado, where abortion had already been legal through fetal viability, voters passed a measure to formally enshrine those rights. Republican legislators there introduced a bill that would make bringing a minor to the state for an abortion a felony crime.
Voters in Kentucky, a Republican stronghold that has a near-total ban on abortion, rejected an initiative in 2023 to amend the state constitution to explicitly state that there isn't a right to abortion.
Republican lawmakers still passed a bill that abortion advocates said further narrowed the medical exceptions that had been allowed under the existing abortion ban. Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear vetoed the bill, but Republicans in the Legislature used their supermajority to override it.
Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers in at least 15 states have advanced bills in recent weeks that would make it more difficult for proposed constitutional amendments to qualify for the ballot.
In Arizona, Missouri and South Dakota, legislators are attempting to raise the threshold for passage for ballot measures to 60% from a simple majority.
In those states, as well as Montana, Nebraska, Florida and Arkansas, Republicans have also advanced bills that create more onerous signature requirements for proposed amendments to qualify for the ballot. (Voters rejected amendments to enshrine abortion rights in the constitution in 2024 in Florida, Nebraska and South Dakota.)
Groups that advocate for reproductive rights and for ballot measures said these actions are an effort to roll back voters' rights.
'Ballot measures have been a lifeline to working people in red and purple states, allowing them to make change even when politicians fail to represent their interests. Legislators are trying to systematically take that power away,' Kelly Hall, the executive director of the Fairness Project, a nonprofit organization that helps progressive groups advance citizen-led ballot initiatives, said in a statement.
'This is their playbook,' Hall said, adding that when 'politicians know they can't win with voters on the issues, they try to change the rules of the game.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JD Vance accused of 'lying about Scotland' as US Vice President set for stay at luxury Ayrshire estate
JD Vance accused of 'lying about Scotland' as US Vice President set for stay at luxury Ayrshire estate

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

JD Vance accused of 'lying about Scotland' as US Vice President set for stay at luxury Ayrshire estate

Vance and his family are on a private holiday to the UK and are expected to arrive in Scotland on Wednesday. JD Vance has been accused of "lying about Scotland" as the US Vice President prepares to arrive for a private holiday in Ayrshire. ‌ The Republican is expected to land at Prestwick airport on Wednesday before transferring to the nearby Carnell Estates at Hurlford, which is known for offering its guests high-end shooting and fishing excursions. ‌ Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie stayed at Carnell House, which dates from the 14th century, while filming World War Z in Glasgow in 2013. ‌ Vance and his family were in Kent last week, where they stayed at Chevening House, the official residence of the foreign secretary, before spending time in the Cotswolds. But his previous comments made about buffer zones outside abortion clinics in Scotland have not been forgotten by some Scots politicians. Green MSP Gillian Mackay told the Record: "JD Vance has made a career of spreading misinformation and sowing mistrust in order to gain power and influence. The Vice President's absurd lies haven't just been about eating cats and dogs in Ohio - he has lied about Scotland." ‌ The Republican politician was previously branded an "eejit" by Mackay following his claims over buffer zones around abortion clinics. Vance used a major speech in Munich in February to wrongly suggest Scots could face prosecution for praying in their own homes. The Vice President attacked what he viewed as an erosion of free speech across Europe. ‌ And he pointed to the recent introduction of buffer zones around Scottish abortion clinics as an example of the kind of crackdown he feared. The law, passed by a majority of MSPs at the Scottish Parliament last year, prevents any public protests or vigils from taking place within 200m (656ft) of 30 clinics around the country. But it does not prohibit anyone from praying within their own homes - a false claim repeatedly amplified by some social media accounts in recent months. ‌ Mackay continued: 'Earlier this year, JD Vance made false claims on an international stage about Scotland's buffer zones law, which prevents harassment and intimidation of patients outside abortion clinics, a bill proudly passed by the Scottish Greens. "Now, while his extremist government is attacking LGBTQ+ and women's rights, illegally arresting innocent civilians on the streets, arming Israel's genocide in Gaza and wrecking our climate, he thinks that he can peacefully run away from it all to enjoy a holiday in our country. "Let's set this clear - the toxic misinformation of JD Vance is a threat to democracy and freedom around the world." Vance said at his speech in February: Vance said: "This last October, the Scottish Government began distributing letters to citizens whose houses lay within so-called 'safe access zones', warning them that even private prayer, within their own home may amount to breaking the law. "Naturally, the Government urged readers to report any fellow citizens suspected guilty of thought crime. In Britain, and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat."

California GOP rep's town hall descends into chaos
California GOP rep's town hall descends into chaos

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

California GOP rep's town hall descends into chaos

A California Republican faced the music of an angry crowd of constituents screaming in opposition to President Donald Trump's agenda during a town hall event in his district. Representing northern California's northeastern corner, Doug LaMalfa, is the latest GOP lawmaker to get viciously booed back home this year. 'That's a lie!' one agitated attended yelled. Other's blurted out that the lawmaker was an '[expletive]' and another labeled him as 'shameless.' Several lawmakers have now been viciously jeered at while facing their constituents and trying to tout what the GOP sees as victories within Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' his sweeping tax cut and spending bill that was signed into law last month. The Republican was also grilled about Trump and whether Congress will force the administration to release files on [sexual] offender Jeffrey Epstein . 'The speaker of the House released you guys so you didn't have to deal with releasing the files,' one woman reportedly charged. 'You all left.' LaMalfa admitted it's a 'bad look' for the documents to continually be 'suppressed.' One constituent demanded that LaMalfa 'apologize to the farmers.' The lawmaker shot back that he had no intention of doing so. After the demand, the lawmaker immediately pivoted to speaking about 'due process for Ghislaine Maxwell, due process for the people on January 6...' before the crowd erupted in chaos. Many of those in the crowd were concerned about the cuts to social services contained within the Trump-backed bill, particularly to Medicaid and public broadcasters. '[Expletive]' one constituent screamed while the congressman was talking about the bill. Photos of the town hall show that the event hall in Chico, California, full with some attendees lining the walls. Many held red paper that they waved in disapproval. Since the president has come back into power and taken drastic action slashing federal jobs with DOGE and deporting over a hundred thousands migrants many who oppose the Republican, many Republican town halls have devolved into chaos. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., was also met by a combative crowd earlier this month when talking about the multi-trillion dollar package. The Nebraskan similarly faced a raucous crowd that labeled him a 'liar.' LaMalfa's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Washington finds itself at centre of Trump maelstrom as National Guard arrive
Washington finds itself at centre of Trump maelstrom as National Guard arrive

Western Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

Washington finds itself at centre of Trump maelstrom as National Guard arrive

It comes after the White House ordered federal forces to take over the city's police department and reduce crime in what the president called — without substantiation — a lawless city. The influx came the morning after Mr Trump announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the department. The US president's bid to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement (Alex Brandon/AP) He cited a crime emergency — but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. The president holds the legal right to make such moves, up to a point. It remains unclear as the week unfolds how visible and aggressive the federal presence in Washington will be, how it could play out, who would be targeted, and how long it might last. On Monday, Washington mayor Muriel Bowser said Mr Trump's freshly announced plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and call in the National Guard was not a productive step. It is unclear how visible and aggressive the federal presence in Washington could be (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) She laid out the city's case that crime has been dropping steadily and said Mr Trump's perceived state of emergency simply does not match the numbers. She also flatly stated that the capital city's hands are tied and that her administration has little choice but to comply. 'We could contest that,' she said of Mr Trump's definition of a crime emergency, 'but his authority is pretty broad'. Ms Bowser made a reference to Mr Trump's 'so-called emergency' and concluded: 'I'm going to work every day to make sure it's not a complete disaster.' While Mr Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back', Ms Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. Washington mayor Muriel Bowser said crime in the city had been dropping steadily (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) Ms Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Mr Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Mr Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Ms Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasising common ground with the Trump administration on issues such as the successful effort to bring the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the District of Columbia. She watched with open concern for the city streets as Mr Trump finally got his military parade this summer. It's a power play and we're an easy target Clinique Chapman, DC Justice Lab Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives has evolved. Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Mr Trump has followed through on months of what many DC officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. The new standoff has cast Ms Bowser in a sympathetic light, even among her long-time critics. 'It's a power play and we're an easy target,' Clinique Chapman, chief executive of the DC Justice Lab, said. A frequent critic of Ms Bowser, whom she accuses of 'over policing our youth' with the recent expansions of Washington's youth curfew, Ms Chapman said Mr Trump's latest move 'is not about creating a safer DC. It's just about power'. Ms Bowser contends that all the power resides with Mr Trump and that her administration can do little other than comply and make the best of it. Protesters demonstrate against Mr Trump's planned use of federal law enforcement and National Guard troops in Washington (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) For Mr Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. 'Let me be crystal clear,' attorney general Pam Bondi said during Mr Trump's announcement news conference. 'Crime in DC is ending and ending today.' Mr Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office: He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store