Non-profit run by 23andMe co-founder gets court approval to buy the genetic testing company
Anne Wojcicki's bid to buy 23andMe, the genetic testing company she co-founded nearly 20 years ago, has received the court green light.
That means Wojcicki's non-profit TTAM Research Institute will purchase "substantially all" of San Francisco-based 23andMe's assets for $305 million US (about $416 million Cdn). The transaction — which arrives more than three months after 23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy — is set to officially close in the coming weeks.
"I am thrilled that TTAM will be able to build on the mission of 23andMe to help people access, understand and benefit from the human genome," Wojcicki said in a statement Monday. She later added that, "the future of health care belongs to all of us."
The sale, which was approved by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brian C. Walsh on Friday, marks the end of a months-long bidding war between TTAM and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals — a biotech company that had previously agreed to buy most of 23andMe's assets for $256 million US in May. But Wojcicki's non-profit later topped that offer, winning the final round of bidding held last month.
Under the deal, TTAM will acquire 23andMe's signature "Personal Genome Service" provided through the company's saliva-based DNA testing kits — as well as research operations and its Lemonaid Health subsidiary, a telehealth services provider that 23andMe previously planned to wind down.
Wojcicki had worked to take 23andMe private for some time. With the company struggling to find a profitable business model since going public in 2021, she's maintained that it would operate better outside market pressures. But that endeavour proved to be tumultuous — notably in September of last year, when all of 23andMe's independent directors resigned from its board citing a "clear" difference of opinion with Wojcicki on the company's future following drawn-out negotiations.
Leading up to 23andMe's March bankruptcy filing, subsequent efforts from Wojcicki to acquire the company were unsuccessful. And when 23andMe filed for Chapter 11 in late March, Wojcicki resigned as CEO — noting at the time that she was stepping down to be "in the best position" as an independent bidder.
Now that Wojcicki's non-profit will acquire 23andMe, it's unclear whether the co-founder will step back into the CEO seat. But despite stepping down from the top post months ago, Wojcicki has remained on the company's board throughout the bankruptcy process.
Beyond financial strains leading up to 23andMe's bankruptcy, privacy concerns related to customers' genetic information also emerged — dating back to even before the bankruptcy process, notably with a 2023 data breach. But concern what new ownership could mean for 23andMe users' personal data has bubbled up in recent months.
The genetic testing business had about 13 million customers at the time of its sale hearing, court documents note.
WATCH | 23andMe customers urged to delete personal data:
23andMe customers urged to delete personal data
3 months ago
Duration 1:44
Roughly 15 million customers who used the genetic testing company 23andMe are being urged to take steps to delete their personal data and protect their privacy. Cybersecurity experts say that DNA data could be sold as part of a restructuring or sale after the company filed for bankruptcy protection.
In June, 27 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit seeking to block the sale of personal genetic data by 23andMe without customer consent. And in a memorandum opinion outlining his approval 23andMe's sale to TTAM on Friday, Walsh acknowledged these states' objections to the acquisition — but that noted many had since been resolved. Still, California, Kentucky, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah "remain actively opposed to the sale."
In a statement to Politico on Monday, California Attorney General Rob Bonta's office maintained that 23andMe's sale "does not comply" with genetic privacy law in the state — and said it was "disappointed" with the court's approval, adding that it was evaluating next steps.
The Associated Press reached out to Bonta's office for further comment on Tuesday.
When announcing its intended sale to Wojcicki's non-profit last month, 23andMe confirmed that TTAM "has affirmed its commitment" to comply with the company privacy policies and applicable law. That means TTAM will honour existing policies around consumer data, the company said, which includes allowing users to delete their data and "opt out" of research.
All customers will be emailed at least two business days before the acquisition closes — with details on TTAM's privacy commitments and instructions on how to delete data or opt out of research, 23andMe said. The company added that TTAM will offer customers two years of Experian identity theft monitoring at no cost.
23andMe reiterated those privacy policies on Monday. And Wojcicki said: "Core to my beliefs is that individuals should be empowered to have choice and transparency with respect to their genetic data and have the opportunity to continue to learn about their ancestry and health risks as they wish."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
36 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Analysts Offer Insights on Consumer Cyclical Companies: OPENLANE (KAR), Greif Class A (GEF) and Amazon (AMZN)
Analysts have been eager to weigh in on the Consumer Cyclical sector with new ratings on OPENLANE (KAR – Research Report), Greif Class A (GEF – Research Report) and Amazon (AMZN – Research Report). Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. OPENLANE (KAR) In a report released today, Jeff Lick from Stephens maintained a Buy rating on OPENLANE, with a price target of $26.00. The company's shares closed last Tuesday at $24.74. According to Lick is a 3-star analyst with an average return of 12.1% and a 51.9% success rate. Lick covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Tractor Supply, AutoNation, and Boot Barn. ;'> Currently, the analyst consensus on OPENLANE is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $24.00. Greif Class A (GEF) In a report released today, Michael Roxland from Truist Financial maintained a Hold rating on Greif Class A. The company's shares closed last Tuesday at $69.80. According to Roxland is a 4-star analyst with an average return of 6.2% and a 57.3% success rate. Roxland covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as International Paper Co, Ardagh Metal Packaging, and Graphic Packaging. ;'> Greif Class A has an analyst consensus of Moderate Buy, with a price target consensus of $71.67. Amazon (AMZN) Truist Financial analyst Youssef Squali maintained a Buy rating on Amazon today and set a price target of $250.00. The company's shares closed last Tuesday at $220.46. According to Squali is a 3-star analyst with an average return of 2.6% and a 47.3% success rate. Squali covers the Technology sector, focusing on stocks such as ODDITY Tech Ltd. Class A, DoubleVerify Holdings, and Uber Technologies. ;'> Currently, the analyst consensus on Amazon is a Strong Buy with an average price target of $243.32, a 10.9% upside from current levels. In a report issued on June 30, Evercore ISI also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a $280.00 price target.
National Post
44 minutes ago
- National Post
FIRST READING: Despite cash influx, military says it won't be functional until 2032
Article content First Reading is a Canadian politics newsletter curated by the National Post's own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here. Article content With the federal government announcing new plans to triple Canadian defence spending, the military itself is saying the organization is so overwhelmed and dysfunctional that they won't be able to meet even their current duties for at least another seven years. Article content This time last year, the Department of National Defence was estimating that by March 31, 2025, it would have 90 per cent of its forces 'ready for operations in accordance with established targets.' Article content Article content Now, a new internal report is estimating that they won't be able to meet this benchmark until the more 'realistic and achievable' date of 2032. Article content Part of the delay is due to the sudden influx of new defence spending, with the report stating that it will take time to manage the 'significant improvements' now being ordered by Ottawa. Article content But DND also details how it continues to be burdened by personnel shortages, degraded equipment and a chronic inability to obtain new kit. Article content 'There is a risk that DND/CAF will not have the right military personnel, in the right numbers, with the right competencies at the right place, and the right time,' reads a section outlining how the military may even fail to meet its new 2032 targets. Article content The shortages are most apparent when it comes to equipment. Right now, more than half of the military's aircraft, ships and army vehicles are effectively out of commission. Article content The Canadian Armed Forces maintains annual statistics on what percentage of its various vehicle fleets are considered adequate to meet 'training, readiness and operational requirements.' In the navy, air force and army, these figures are all at historic lows of 45.7 per cent, 48.9 per cent and 49 per cent, respectively. Article content Article content The new report estimates that it will be years until this can be turned around. In the air force and army, it won't be until 2032 that fleets will be 'at least 70 per cent' functional. In the Royal Canadian Navy, meanwhile, the 2032 target is set slightly lower 'at least 60 per cent.' Article content Although the navy is waiting on a 'future fleet' of new destroyers, the first vessels aren't scheduled to be completed until 'the early 2030.' In the meantime, the navy will largely remain dependent on a fleet of aging frigates that have been described as 'rapidly becoming combat ineffective.' Article content 'The degradation in materiel readiness of the aging platforms within the existing fleet will present a significant challenge to maintaining … operational readiness,' reads the report.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
U.S. House Republicans are pushing Trump's big bill to the brink of passage
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., walks at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, July 2, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) WASHINGTON — House Republicans are preparing to vote on U.S. President Donald Trump's US$4.5 trillion tax breaks and spending cuts bill early Thursday, up all night as GOP leaders and the president himself worked to persuade skeptical holdouts to drop their opposition and deliver by their Fourth of July deadline. Final debates began in the predawn hours after another chaotic day, and night, at the Capitol. House Speaker Mike Johnson insisted the House would meet the holiday deadline, with just days to go after the Senate approved the package on the narrowest of margins and Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie vote. 'Our way is to plow through and get it done,' Johnson said, emerging in the middle of the night from a series of closed-door meetings. 'We will meet our July 4th deadline.' The outcome would be milestone for the president and his party, a longshot effort to compile a long list of GOP priorities into what they call his 'one big beautiful bill,' an 800-plus page package. With Democrats unified in opposition, the bill will become a defining measure of Trump's return to the White House, with the sweep of Republican control of Congress. Tax breaks and safety net cuts At it core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in Trump's first term, in 2017, that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S.. To help offset the costs of lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a massive rollback of green energy investments. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. 'This was a generational opportunity to deliver the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history, and that's exactly what we're doing,' said Rp. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the House Budget Committee chairman. Democrats united against 'ugly bill' Democrats unified against the bill as a tax giveaway to the rich paid for on the backs of the most vulnerable in society, what one called 'trickle down cruelty.' 'Have you no shame?' said Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn. 'Have the moral courage to oppose this bill.' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries invoked the powerful history of the nation's Independence Day holiday, and asked: 'What does any of that have to do with this one, big ugly bill?' He read for nearly two hours from a binder of letters, written by people across the country explaining how the health care programs have helped their families -- and how devastating cuts would hurt. Hauling the package this far in Congress has been difficult from the start. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way in the House and Senate, often succeeding only by the narrowest of margins: just one vote. In the Senate, Vice President JD Vance broke the tie vote. The slim 220-212 majority in the House leaves Republicans little room for defections. Political costs of saying no But few GOP lawmakers have been fully satisfied with the final product. Several more moderate Republicans had reservations about the cuts to Medicaid health care and the loss of green energy credits that could derail solar, wind and other renewable projects in their districts. At the same time, conservatives, including those from the House Freedom Caucus, held out for steeper reductions. Republicans had warned the Senate against making changes to the House-passed bill, but senators put their own stamp on the final draft. The House ground to a standstill Wednesday as a handful of holdouts refused to move so quickly. One roll call dragged for some seven hours while another stalled for more than five, and Trump himself worked the phones and lashed out on social media. 'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???' Trump railed in a postmidnight vote. Trump has been threatening to campaign against those who voted against the bill, and warned starkly of political fallout that any delay was 'COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' Up all night, Johnson relied on White House officials — including Cabinet secretaries, lawyers and others — to work skeptical Republicans through the details. Lawmakers were being told the administration could provide executive actions, projects or other provisions they needed in their districts back home. 'The president's message was, 'We're on a roll,'' said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. 'He wants to see this.' And the alternative, of voting against the president, carried political costs. One House Republican who has staked out opposition to the bill, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, is being targeted by Trump's well-funded political operation. And Senate Republican Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who had been on the receiving end of Trump's lashings, announced he would not seek reelection shortly before voting against the bill. Rollback of past agendas In many ways, the package is a repudiation of the agendas of the last two Democratic presidents, a chiseling away at Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, and a pullback of Joe Biden's climate change strategies in the Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that cuts to Medicaid, which some 80 million Americans rely on, would result in lives lost. Food stamps that help feed more than 40 million people would 'rip food from the mouths of hungry children, hungry veterans and hungry seniors,' Jeffries said. Republicans say they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and applies existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to more people. It shifts more costs of the programs to the states. The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired. ___ Associated Press writers Kevin Freking, Joey Cappelletti and Matt Brown contributed. Lisa Mascaro, Mary Clare Jalonick And Leah Askarinam, The Associated Press
