Flog It! star dies aged 65
Flog It! Star Michael Baggott has passed away aged 65. The antiques expert, who was a regular feature on the BBC series, died in hospital on Monday following a heart attack.
A statement posted on his social media accounts read: "Heartbroken to share that Michael died yesterday in hospital of a heart attack following a stroke in October.
"He was a dearly loved son, brother, nephew and uncle who will be deeply and profoundly missed," it continued. "There will be a memorial service in the coming weeks, the details of which will be shared here."
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Michael Baggott (@baggottsilver)
The news of his passing comes after it was announced that he had been hospitalised in October after a stroke.
Friends and colleagues in the industry paid tribute to Michael in the comments. Antiques Road Trip star Timothy Medhurst was among those paying tribute: "Such a sad post to see, an oracle of knowledge - always happy to give a youngster in the business kind opinions on my (probably basic) questions without any hesitation."
Mark Stacey, antiques dealer expert on , Flog It! and Antiques Road Trip, tweeted: "Very sad news. I've known Michael for over '25 years' when we both worked for sothebys. I will always remember his love, knowledge of antiques, which he readily shared, my deepest sympathies to his family, rest in peace Michael no doubt with a silver spoon."
In early December, Michael left fans worried after posting on social media from a hospital bed.
The antiques specialist told fans that he had been bed-bound in hospital for five weeks after his stroke, and was feeling hydrated "at last".
He also let fans know that he was feeling "happier" and "more hopeful", thanking everyone who sent him a message.
His final social media post was on December 29 last year, when he criticised an episode of Antiques Roadshow for inaccuracy: "Expert: I can see these [don't] London in 1758. Well he must've had a [explicit] time machine because they've got the date letter for 1762 struck on them.
"You can get away with this [explicit] when I'm dead, not before," he jested.
Michael, the son of a wholesale market trader, was one of the most recognisable faces on BBC One's Flog It!.
During his career, he worked at auction house Christie's while still a university student, and led Sotheby's southern silver department for four years before becoming a private consultant.
Michael appeared regularly on the show before the BBC ended the show in 2018, after a 17-year run. The series, hosted by Paul Martin, had broadcast over 1,000 episodes before it was scrapped to make room for new commissions aiming to 'modernise' the daytime schedule.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
‘Doctor Who' Utterly Wasted Belinda Chandra
Varada Sethu's addition to the TARDIS was a jolt of energy 'Doctor Who' needed—but it bafflingly transformed her into the modern era's most squandered companion. When the latest season of Doctor Who kicked off, the most exciting thing about it wasn't even its premiere story, or what was being set up to lead towards the season's grand finale: it was the arrival of Varada Sethu as Belinda Chandra, promising to shake up the Doctor/companion dynamic in a way it hadn't been in years. But now that the season is over, and Doctor Who lies amid a litany of narrative and production messes lurching towards an uncertain future, one of its biggest of all is just how it completely and utterly wasted Belinda's character. A young nurse balancing the rigorous demands of her career with the sudden tumult of being thrust into a suitably ludicrous Doctor Who narrative—abducted by giant robots and whisked off into space to become a planetary ruler and forcibly thrust into a horrific arranged marriage—Belinda's arrival in 'The Robot Revolution' immediately bucked the trends of most Doctor Who companion debuts, especially in the modern era. After initial moments of fear and hesitation, life in the Doctor's orbit is, more often than not, too mesmerizing to resist: 45 minutes to an hour later everyone from Rose Tyler to Ruby Sunday is ready to step inside the TARDIS, remark on its interior's size, and run straight forward into adventures in time and space. And yet, while Belinda ends up in the blue box just like the rest of them, she challenges the Doctor, both from his own perspective and that of the audience, every step of the way. The Belinda of 'The Robot Revolution' isn't obstinate for the sake of it or anything, but she rightfully pushes the Doctor's assumption that his way, his default of being the person that everyone in the room should listen to unquestionably, isn't the only way. It made for a remarkable chemistry between the Doctor and Belinda, and not just for Ncuti Gatwa and Varada Sethu's own sparkling charisma (the latter certainly cannot be blamed for the narrative choices the show makes with her character), but because you really see them feel out each other over the course of the episode, figuring out where lines are drawn between them—and it's Belinda drawing the lines. The Doctor's charm offensive, which has by and large driven so many of those initial sparks in the companion/Doctor relationship, simply does not work on Belinda. It all culminates in a brilliant final moment in that debut episode to set the tone going forward: calling him out for invading her privacy, for not thinking to ask people consent, for brazenly trying to dazzle her in the same way he'd clearly dazzled many people before her. There is clearly some part of Belinda that likes the Doctor; she's not actively horrified or disdainful of him, but she makes it clear he crosses lines, and the world he operates in (or rather worlds) are dangerous. She wants home, and the only thing that stops that is the fact that they can't get there—the adventures along the way aren't her signing up for this dazzling new life, but a necessity to get what she wants. It's a shame then, that this version of Belinda by and large stops existing halfway through her season of Doctor Who. Of course, she was always going to soften in her appraisal of the Doctor the longer she spent with him, but the show plays an awkward balancing act where both Belinda moves on from this challenging almost inorganically—arguably she is totally fine with traveling with the Doctor by the end of the second episode, 'Lux,' but even after the darkness of 'The Well' an episode later she is truly into the default companion mode—and because the season then also starts suddenly having to balance in dedicating its limited runtime to episodes about Ruby like 'Lucky Day,' or 'The Story and the Engine,' where Belinda is barely part of the narrative. For many of the other thorny narrative issues it has, by the time the season is heading into its endgame in 'The Interstellar Song Contest,' the version of Belinda we get there, where her reaction to the Doctor crossing a distinct moral line in aggressively torturing his 'foe' in Kid, is far from the woman who called him out for scanning her without asking her in 'The Robot Revolution,' willing to effectively rubber-stamp the Doctor's actions as a moment of duress. Which would be disappointing, but fine if Doctor Who replaced that initial skeptical archetype with anything, but instead Belinda is pushed into a void, a generic 'companion.' We don't learn anything about her, really, other than the fact that she wants to get home. But all that is before the real injustice comes in the two-part season finale. In its first part, 'Wish World', Belinda is transformed by the reality imposed by Conrad—the asshole villain weirdo who stalked Ruby in 'Lucky Day'—onto the earth into the Doctor's matronly wife. The reality is presented by the text as aberrant and dystopian, a world where every woman exists to be a good daughter, a good wife to her husband, and then a willing mother dutifully raising the next generation of daughters to follow in that exact same mold. In 'Wish World,' Belinda's one-note definition as mother to her and the Doctor's child, Poppy, is reflective of Conrad's retrograde views about women, filing them down into a single trait that is subservient to a traditionalist, conservative patriarchal power balance. The fact that Belinda, Poppy's mom, is not Belinda, the Doctor's companion that we've followed over the course of this season, is meant to be disturbing, to be something we want her to break free of and recognise the trap she, the Doctor, and the rest of the world in. 'The Reality War' instead decides that reducing Belinda to this singular trait—altered reality or otherwise—is Good, Actually. The second Belinda is freed from Conrad's world, her sole dramatic trait is reminding us that she is Poppy's mother and that that is all that she cares about, regardless of the chaos beginning to unfold around her on the Doctor, to the point that she literally tells him that she can't help him in his fight against the Rani. The episode metaphorically and literally shoves her in a box so Ruby can take on the primary companion role, safeguarding her and Poppy from any reversions to the original reality that might render the latter erased as quickly as she was wished into being. She's only allowed out the box when the day is saved, and again, she reverts to this matriarchal character, both when it initially seems like she, the Doctor, and Poppy might travel together, and then when Poppy vanishes from reality and the Doctor choses to sacrifice his life to bring her back. There is a lot of 'Reality War' that is an absolute mess, but little of it feels quite as insulting as what it does to Belinda's character. Having a character for whom motherhood is important is not the issue here; there is plenty that could've been done with a companion that's a mother (we certainly got a particularly involved version of that with Amy's arc in the Steven Moffat era!). It's that Doctor Who essentially took the Belinda it had—who, by episode count and other narrative decisions, had already been losing her sense of an arc—wiped her clean, and then metaphorically stamped 'mom' on her forehead, and left her like that for the episode's final act. An act that is now our farewell to the character, one that even attempts to retroactively 'reveal' that Belinda's arc was always about returning home to Poppy via a series of flashbacks to prior scenes from the season altered to now have Belinda add 'for Poppy' to the end of every mention of her desire to get back to Earth. That's not an actual character arc, or even an interesting recontextualization that reframes what the audience had already seen in new light. It's a literal re-write of what the audience already saw! After telling us the week prior that it was wrong for Conrad to impose, without consent, a patriarchal gender role on Belinda, Doctor Who itself has the Doctor do exactly that to Belinda, re-write all of reality to make her into a single mom. The Belinda Chandra we met in 'The Robot Revolution' doesn't exist any more, not just because the show whittled down her character into nothingness, but because the show concludes her arc by rewriting her existence so that that Belinda never existed in the first place. There's even a dark mirror in the final moments of that arc, when the Doctor does exactly to Poppy what he did to Belinda in the climax of 'The Robot Revolution': medically scan her with his alien technology without a single thought to ask if he was allowed to first. It's just that this time not only does Belinda not challenge him, she doesn't react at all. She is 'just' Poppy's mother now, with no thought or feeling given to her beyond that description. Again, a having a female character to whom being a parent is important is not the issue with what Doctor Who did with Belinda. There were so many ways the series could've given this ending to her storyline and actually organically laid out a path to it across the season. Perhaps have her slowly realize over time that something, someone is missing from her memories of her life on Earth, to struggle with the feeling that she has to get back to Earth as soon as possible while not fully grasping why, to eventually play with the reality manipulation that the finale hangs its dramatic stakes on. Instead, the show started with a completely different idea and dynamic for her—one brimming with potential it almost immediately decided not to capitalize on—before slowly but surely pushing her further and further to the fringes of its priorities over the course of the season. Belinda was never given the chance to grow and change over her time in the TARDIS, to challenge, and to be challenged by, life at the Doctor's side. Her final ending was just the last nail in a coffin Doctor Who had been building for Belinda's character as we'd known her in that first episode for a while, whether that was its narrative intent or otherwise—and ultimately just one extra failure to add to the season's list of many.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
ITV The Chase's Bradley Walsh says 'wow' after hearing contestant's impressive job
Bradley Walsh said "wow" when one player revealed what he does for a day job. Jack, Dorrett, Kim and Simon made up the team of four contestants who were keen to test their general knowledge skills on the hit ITV quiz show. Simon from Oxfordshire was first up to take on The Chaser, who in this case was Anne Hegarty aka The Governess. But first, Bradley Walsh was lost for words when he heard what the contestant does as his day job. Simon explained he had worked for 30 years in the Royal Air Force. The ITV presenter asked what rank he was, suggesting roles such as "Commander." But Simon replied: "I'm an air vice marshal." READ MORE: No fire extinguishers in block of flats where blaze broke out READ MORE: BBC series dubbed 'show of the summer' starring Scouser will be your next binge-watch Bradley Walsh was taken aback as he said: "You're an air vice marshal! No you're not." Simon joked: "I'm surprised too." Brad turned to the team and said: "Wow." He added: "An air vice marshal that's big news guys." The impressive position is a senior officer rank, above air commodore and below air marshal. It is equivalent to the rank of rear admiral in the Royal Navy or major general in the army. When the host came to terms with Simon's impressive role, he continued the regular game-play as Simon tackled the Cash Builder round. He accumulated an impressive £6,000 and bagged himself a spot in the final. Simon returned to his teammates and kickstarted the shared cash prize pot ahead of Kim's turn to take on The Governess. She gave a great performance and earned £5,000 for the team. However, her time on the ITV show came to an unfortunate end when she was caught by The Chaser. She soon heard Bradley's dreaded words: "For you, The Chase is over" and she left the show empty-handed. Dorrett was next up who hoped to make a better impression against The Governess. She proved her general knowledge skills as she joined Simon in the final and increased the prize pot to £11,000. Jack was eager to join the quizzers after he accumulated an impressive £8,000 in the Cash Builder. He gave a great performance against The Chaser and secured his spot alongside Simon and Dorrett. With the cash pot now standing at £19,000, the three quizzers tested their luck in the final chase. But their score of 17 was not strong enough to triumph against The Governess, and they were caught with just one second remaining. The Chase airs weekdays at 5pm ITV1 and ITVX
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Queen Camilla Reportedly 'Stays Out' Of Prince Harry And King Charles' Rift After Duke Labeled Her A 'Villain'
Queen Camilla is reportedly distancing herself amid escalating tensions between King Charles and Prince Harry, intensified by the duke's bombshell BBC interview and memoir "Spare." Sources also recently shared that Charles lacks trusted advisers who can encourage reconciliation, while Prince William reportedly opposes mending ties. Prince Harry has since been urged by royal commentators to keep a "dignified silence," warning his public comments damage trust. Queen Camilla is avoiding the growing tensions between King Charles and his estranged son, Prince Harry. According to palace insiders who spoke to People Magazine, the 77-year-old queen "stays out of" the ongoing family feud, especially after coming under heavy criticism in Harry's explosive memoir "Spare." In the book, the Duke of Sussex described his stepmother as "dangerous" and "the villain," accusing her of leaking stories to the media to protect her public image. Additionally, sources suggest the rift between Harry and his family recently intensified following a BBC interview in which Harry's remarks were seen as damaging to any remaining trust between him and his ailing father. Although the interview may not have been intended as a direct attack, royal commentator Valentine Low noted, "it would be seen as one." She added that "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." Royal expert Sally Bedell Smith also noted that both Charles and Prince William "don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Catherine Mayer, author of "Charles: The Heart of a King," echoed this sentiment, warning that "If you have that level of breach in a family, and you are estranged, you run that risk every day of having something unfathomable to deal with." According to People, Charles isn't expected to make the first move to reconcile with Harry largely because he's not surrounded by advisers pushing for reconciliation. Royal commentator Valentine Low shared that the monarch lacks a "good angel in his ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move.'" Further complicating the situation is William, who, after being heavily criticized in Harry's memoir "Spare," reportedly has no interest in repairing their relationship. Sources suggest that the Prince of Wales is firmly against any efforts to reconnect. Meanwhile, royal commentator Joe Little believes Harry's chances of mending his fractured relationship with the royal family may be slipping away, and suggests the Duke of Sussex would be better served by keeping a "dignified silence." Speaking to the PA news agency via the Mirror, Little, managing editor of Majesty magazine, described Harry's remarks about Charles' health in the BBC interview as "quite alarming," especially given Harry's admission that he hasn't spoken to his father in some time. "From what Harry is saying, despite admitting that he has not spoken to his father for some time, I thought it sent out a bit of a mixed message, really," Little said. "Is Harry suggesting that the King isn't as well as we are led to believe?" Joe Little further criticized Harry's continued tendency to air grievances publicly rather than resolve them privately. "I think for somebody who is seeking reconciliation with his father, his brother, and his family, his royal family as a whole, I think the very last thing that he should have been doing was talking publicly," Little argued. He added that Harry's repeated public disclosures have made it difficult for the royal family to place their trust in him again. "There is a great deal to be gained by maintaining a dignified silence — sadly, as we know from past events, this isn't Harry's way of doing things," he noted. Little concluded by suggesting that "Maybe lessons just haven't been learned from previous occasions where also silence would have been the very best thing to maintain." Meanwhile, Harry is reportedly exploring the possibility of legally changing his surname to "Spencer," his late mother Princess Diana's family name, in a dramatic symbolic gesture to further distance himself from the royal family. According to the Daily Mail, the Duke of Sussex is believed to have consulted his maternal uncle, Earl Spencer, about the idea during a recent visit to the UK. While the conversation was said to be amicable, sources claim the Earl ultimately advised Harry against "such a step." The change would have meant abandoning the royal surname Mountbatten-Windsor, the name currently used by both of Harry's children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. Though Buckingham Palace has remained publicly silent on the matter, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Express that the idea "deeply hurt" Charles. Quoting Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet," Fitzwilliams emphasized that "someone's family name is a pivotal and public link to the other family members." "This news will be deeply hurtful to King Charles, especially as it would have been a very public renunciation of the Royal Family only a relatively short time after he (Charles) had become king," Fitzwilliams explained.
