SC orders traditional archaka's service at Anjenya temple
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
In July 2018 when H D Kumaraswamy was heading the state govt, the Koppal district collector under Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997, passed an order to acquire the Anjaneya Temple and assumed power to appoint an administrator to manage the temple.
The archaka, Shri Vidyadas Babaji, challenged the takeover of the temple by govt. But the HC only allowed him to perform his duties as archaka of the temple till final adjudication of his appeal.
It also allowed him to continue with the Sanskrit Pathshala.
However, on March 15 this year, the deputy commissioner of Koppal and other officials visited the temple with the Election Commissioner and forcibly appointed another person to perform the temple rituals and harassed him to force the traditional archaka to leave the place. When he accused the officials of contempt of HC's 2018 order, the HC did not give any relief.
Appearing for the archaka, advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, informed a partial working day bench of Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta about the way the state govt was attempting to evict the archaka and take full control of the temple and oust the hereditary priest, belonging to Ramanandi community.
The bench took a serious view and directed the state officials to scrupulously adhere to the HC's interim orders, failing which contempt proceedings would be drawn against them.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The HC in its interim order on Feb 14, 2023, had directed the officials 'not to create any hindrance or obstruction to the petitioner in performing poojas, Archak duties in the said subject temple and also permit him to continue to do so without any interruption, impediment or hindrance from the respondents, its officials or anyone else.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court hearing on Presidential Reference LIVE: SC to resume hearing
The Supreme Court's five-Judge Constitution Bench to hear a Presidential Reference seeking clarity on whether fixed timelines could be imposed on Governors and President while dealing with bills passed by the State legislatures. Also read: Top court hearing on Presidential Reference highlights on August 20, 2025 Earlier, the Attorney General and the Solicitor General made their submissions on why a timeline should not be given to President and Governors on disposing of the Bills. The top court on Tuesday (August 19, 2025) questioned the Centre and the Attorney General over it. Also Read: Can Supreme Court's opinion on a Presidential Reference alter its prior ruling? The arguments briefly recalled the constitutional debates on Article 200 that deals with the powers of the Governor regarding Bills passed by the Legislature.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
T.N. CM Stalin condemns action by Assam Police against journalists Siddharth Varadarajan, Karan Thapar of The Wire
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) condemned the action of the Assam Police in issuing summons to senior journalists Siddharth Varadarajan and Karan Thapar of The Wire. In a post on X, Mr. Stalin said the summons have been issued despite the Supreme Court granting protection in a related matter only days earlier. No copy of the FIR and no particulars of the case have been furnished, leaving only the threat of arrest, he said. Sedition redux: On trampling on press freedom Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) is being misused as a substitute for the repealed sedition law to suppress independent journalism. A democracy cannot survive if asking questions is treated as sedition, he added.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Supervise ancient monuments in Mehrauli, top court tells ASI
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to consider supervising monuments located inside Delhi's Mehrauli Archaeological Park, including the 13th century 'Ashiq Allah Dargah' and the 'Chillagah of Baba Farid', a site associated with the revered Sufi saint. The court was hearing two appeals that sought directions to prevent authorities from demolishing or removing the dargah and other monuments in the Mehrauli and Sanjay Van areas. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan recalled its earlier order of February 28, which had restrained any 'constructions, additions or alterations' in the area without prior permission of the top court. 'Why do you want to demolish it in the first place?' the bench asked the counsel for the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). The DDA's counsel clarified that the authority had no objection to the dargah itself but pointed to several unauthorised structures that had cropped up nearby. 'The question which really arises is, how much of it is the protected monument and how much of it is the encroachment,' the counsel said. Emphasising that the monuments must be safeguarded, the bench said, 'That monument has to be preserved. We are only concerned with the monument.' The appellants, who had challenged a Delhi High Court order, argued that the monuments could not be treated as encroachments since they had stood in the area since the 12th century. Referring to the ASI's status report, they submitted that although the structures were not notified as centrally protected, the ASI could supervise their upkeep and maintenance. The DDA, however, maintained that its role was limited to clearing unauthorised encroachments on public land in line with the apex court's orders. The ASI has earlier noted that both shrines carry deep religious significance.
