Thousands of ChatGPT conversations accessible online despite efforts to erase them
ChatGPT
and the online AI platform remain accessible through internet searches despite attempts by ChatGPT developer
OpenAI
to erase them after what was described as a 'short-lived experiment', it has been reported.
Online investigative journalism unit
Digital Digging
said the majority of the conversations, which are preserved in their entirety, are 'harmless', but some were not.
In its report, it cites the examples of an Italian lawyer discussing how to obtain land from an indigenous community in
the Amazon
for a multinational seeking to build a hydroelectric facility, an Egyptian seeking to use AI to write critically about the country's authoritarian regime and a researcher documenting their academic fraud.
The report follows an incident at the end of last month when it became apparent that thousands of ChatGPT users were essentially ticking a box that made their conversations with the platform visible to search engines like Google without users appreciating the consequences.
READ MORE
The facility, which was described by a senior OpenAI executive as a 'short-lived experiment', was quickly disabled and some 50,000 conversations 'scrubbed' by the company.
Experts say the Digital Digger article highlights the difficulty with erasing online posts once they have initially been made publicly available. The wider incident points to issues with AI literacy among the rapidly growing number of people engaging with the technology.
The consequences can go well beyond ridicule or embarrassment, according to Pradeep Sanyal, a San Francisco-based adviser to company boards and chief executives on AI strategies.
Influencers beware, Revenue is on the prowl
Listen |
48:38
'Some posts reveal commercially sensitive information, legal strategies, political dissent in authoritarian contexts and confidential personal matters such as health conditions,' he said. 'These could lead to reputational damage, competitive disadvantage, regulatory scrutiny or even personal safety risks depending on jurisdiction.
'There have been revelations that, if tied back to the individual or organisation, could have significant consequences. The example of a lawyer discussing strategy to displace indigenous communities for the lowest possible price, for instance, is not merely embarrassing; it could have legal and ethical implications,' he told The Irish Times.
Barry Scannell, an AI law and policy partner at William Fry solicitors and a member of the Government-appointed AI Advisory Council, said his 'jaw hit the floor' when he saw some of the original material made accessible to routine Google searches.
On Monday he said that the enduring issues raised by the incident 'have shone a light on the nature of information people are sharing with AI tools, some of it deeply commercially sensitive where they look to have it help them strategise or deal with other business issues [and] some of it deeply personal, where they are treating AI like a therapist.
'Some of this reminds me of the early days of electronic communication when some people were very flippant about what they put in emails and that was sometimes shown up in discovery processes. It is certainly another reminder of the importance of companies having very clear processes and policies when it comes to their people using this technology.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
39 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Is OpenAI really worth $500bn?
ChatGPT maker OpenAI is reportedly exploring a private share sale that could value the company at $500 billion (€430 billion). Is it worth it? The bullish argument: ChatGPT already has 700 million weekly users. OpenAI is pushing into search, cloud, software and hardware. It could become the foundational platform for the AI era, like Windows was for the PC. 'This is an AI revolution, and OpenAI is the golden child,' says high-profile Wedbush analyst and AI enthusiast Dan Ives. READ MORE If you are worried about valuations, says Ives, you'd have missed every technology rally in history. The bearish argument: you can't ignore valuation, and OpenAI's has shot up from $300 billion to $500 billion, valuing it at about 25 times sales. That's rich – very, very rich. Perhaps, but frothy valuations often signal that enthusiasm, not fundamentals, is calling the tune. Fund giant GMO notes the S&P 500 is up 27 per cent since sentiment flipped in early April, but more speculative corners have gone vertical. A basket of loss-making tech stocks is up 57 per cent; AI stocks, 60 per cent; highly-shorted stocks, 68 per cent; meme stocks, 77 per cent; and bitcoin-sensitive names, 112 per cent. Animal spirits are back, and momentum is driving prices more than profits. In that context, OpenAI's valuation isn't a bizarre aberration. Rather, it's a reflection of a wider market mood, with excitement trumping caution.
Business Post
4 hours ago
- Business Post
Jack Chambers: Risk-averse civil service will not be protected
Business Post subscribers can read: • The government's new 'crisis mindset' to speed up infrastructure delivery • Why a €300m Amazon project collapse has become a warning shot for Ireland's competitiveness Jack Chambers has fired a warning shot at Irish civil servants, telling state agencies and departments they will not be 'defended or protected' if they ...
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Thousands of ChatGPT conversations accessible online despite efforts to erase them
More than 100,000 conversations between users of ChatGPT and the online AI platform remain accessible through internet searches despite attempts by ChatGPT developer OpenAI to erase them after what was described as a 'short-lived experiment', it has been reported. Online investigative journalism unit Digital Digging said the majority of the conversations, which are preserved in their entirety, are 'harmless', but some were not. In its report, it cites the examples of an Italian lawyer discussing how to obtain land from an indigenous community in the Amazon for a multinational seeking to build a hydroelectric facility, an Egyptian seeking to use AI to write critically about the country's authoritarian regime and a researcher documenting their academic fraud. The report follows an incident at the end of last month when it became apparent that thousands of ChatGPT users were essentially ticking a box that made their conversations with the platform visible to search engines like Google without users appreciating the consequences. READ MORE The facility, which was described by a senior OpenAI executive as a 'short-lived experiment', was quickly disabled and some 50,000 conversations 'scrubbed' by the company. Experts say the Digital Digger article highlights the difficulty with erasing online posts once they have initially been made publicly available. The wider incident points to issues with AI literacy among the rapidly growing number of people engaging with the technology. The consequences can go well beyond ridicule or embarrassment, according to Pradeep Sanyal, a San Francisco-based adviser to company boards and chief executives on AI strategies. Influencers beware, Revenue is on the prowl Listen | 48:38 'Some posts reveal commercially sensitive information, legal strategies, political dissent in authoritarian contexts and confidential personal matters such as health conditions,' he said. 'These could lead to reputational damage, competitive disadvantage, regulatory scrutiny or even personal safety risks depending on jurisdiction. 'There have been revelations that, if tied back to the individual or organisation, could have significant consequences. The example of a lawyer discussing strategy to displace indigenous communities for the lowest possible price, for instance, is not merely embarrassing; it could have legal and ethical implications,' he told The Irish Times. Barry Scannell, an AI law and policy partner at William Fry solicitors and a member of the Government-appointed AI Advisory Council, said his 'jaw hit the floor' when he saw some of the original material made accessible to routine Google searches. On Monday he said that the enduring issues raised by the incident 'have shone a light on the nature of information people are sharing with AI tools, some of it deeply commercially sensitive where they look to have it help them strategise or deal with other business issues [and] some of it deeply personal, where they are treating AI like a therapist. 'Some of this reminds me of the early days of electronic communication when some people were very flippant about what they put in emails and that was sometimes shown up in discovery processes. It is certainly another reminder of the importance of companies having very clear processes and policies when it comes to their people using this technology.'
