‘A family of traitors': Trump's Brazil tariffs ultimatum backfires on Bolsonaro
Beneath the museum's brutalist hulk, Marques spotted a cardboard effigy of the US president and took a picture with her phone before the Trump dummy was set on fire. 'Laranjão safado,' which translates as big orange dirtbag, she wrote under her photo on Instagram. Nearby, demonstrators hoisted a red banner into the air: 'Nice try Trump. But we're not afraid.'
The rally was a response to Trump's decision last week to launch a politically motivated trade war against South America's biggest economy in an attempt to help his rightwing ally, the former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, avoid jail.
Bolsonaro could face up to 43 years in prison if found guilty of masterminding a botched coup attempt after losing the 2022 presidential election. He is expected to be convicted and sentenced by the supreme court in the coming weeks.
On 9 July, Trump wrote to Brazil's leftwing president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, to demand that the charges against Bolsonaro be dropped and announce he would impose 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports until they were. '[This] is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!' thundered Trump, long Bolsonaro's most important international backer.
The US president apparently expected his intervention to improve the outlook for Bolsonaro, 70, who is already banned from running in next year's election. Bolsonaro's senator son, Flávio, urged Lula's administration to immediately cave in to Trump's ultimatum by offering his father an amnesty from prosecution. Flávio Bolsonaro likened Brazil's predicament to Japan's at the end of the second world war when the US's B-29 bombers blasted it into submission. 'It's up to us to show the responsibility to avoid two atomic bombs landing on Brazil,' Bolsonaro said.
But a week after Trump's tariff announcement, the ploy seems to be backfiring badly. The move has reinvigorated Bolsonaro's leftwing rivals, given Lula a bounce in the polls and sparked a wave of public anger, largely focused on the Bolsonaro clan who have spent years portraying themselves as flag-loving nationalists.
'Jair Bolsonaro couldn't care less about Brazil. He's a phoney patriot,' the conservative Estado de São Paulo newspaper fumed on Tuesday, excoriating the ex-president's apparent willingness to throw his country to the wolves if it meant saving his own skin.
The newspaper's editorial board instructed conservatives to pick their side: 'Brazil's or Bolsonaro's. The two paths are diametrically opposed.'
Eliane Cantanhêde, a columnist for the Estado de São Paulo, saw three motives behind Trump's 'indecent proposal'. He hoped to boost far-right fellow travellers in South America; retaliate against Chinese involvement in the region after the recent Brics summit in Rio; and do a personal favour to Bolsonaro's son Eduardo, who has spent recent months lobbying officials in Washington after going into self-imposed exile in the US.
But Cantanhêde believed Trump's 'megalomaniac' move had boomeranged, handing Lula a golden opportunity to recover slumping public support by posing as a nationalist defender of Brazilian coffee producers, orange growers, cattle ranchers and plane manufacturers in the face of Bolsonaro's anti-patriotic and self-serving sellout to Trump.
'Lula was on the ropes,' Cantanhêde said, highlighting the leftist's falling ratings and growing doubts over his ability to win a fourth term next year. 'Now he's all smiles.'
She said Beijing – Brazil's biggest trade partner – would also be celebrating as Washington further damaged its standing in the region. 'Trump is pushing the whole world into China's lap,' Cantanhêde said.
Nicolás Saldías, a Latin America analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit, agreed Trump's pro-Bolsonaro intercession was a boon for Lula, who has taken to wearing a blue cap bearing the slogan 'Brazil belongs to the Brazilians'.
Saldías, who is Uruguayan-Canadian, recalled how Trump's threats to annex Canada upended its recent election, helping Mark Carney's once flagging Liberal party keep power. He suspected Trump's trade war on Brazil would have a similar 'rally around the flag' impact for Lula – in the short term, at least.
'For Lula this is going to be helpful,' Saldías said, noting how his ratings had already risen and looked likely to rise further. 'This changes the game because now he's going to be seen as the defender of Brazilian nationalism, a kind of progressive nationalism.'
Having spent months dreaming Trump might help save their leader from prison, the Bolsonaros appear to recognise they have scored an own goal. One source close to the ex-president's family told Reuters: 'The thrill of catching Trump's attention soon curdled as the Bolsonaros realised the crushing weight of the tariffs tied to their cause.'
On Tuesday, Bolsonaro insisted he opposed the tariffs, which he blamed on Lula's 'provocation' of the US, and claimed he could fix at least part of the problem if given 'the freedom to talk to Trump'.
Silvana Marques, the protesting teacher, was adamant Brazilian authorities should not yield to 'crazy' Trump's demands and let Bolsonaro off the hook. 'We cannot allow this to happen,' she said, remembering the dire consequences of failing to prosecute the military leaders behind Brazil's 1964-85 dictatorship.
Like many Brazilians, Marques took a dim view of how – as she saw it – the Bolsonaros had encouraged Trump to wage economic war against their own country.
'They're a family of traitors,' she said. 'And the Americans must be thinking: are we really going to have to pay 50% more for the things we import from Brazil just to defend this worn-out old horse?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
a few seconds ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course unlikely to host The Open due to 'logistical' issues say R&A
The R&A held meetings with Donald Trump's son Eric to discuss the possibility of a return to Turnberry. US President Donald Trump's Turnberry course won't be hosting The Open any time soon with R&A officials saying logistical challenges remain. The Ayrshire venue's iconic course last hosted the event 16 years ago - five years prior to Trump purchasing the famous resort. While 120,000 spectators attened the 2009 Open, that figure swelled to 250,000 for Royal Troon last year with a further increase expected at Portrush with this year's championship getting underway today. R&A chief executive Mark Darbon insists the infrastructure in and around Turnberry simply isn't up to the required standard to mee the demands of hosting the prestigious event. He said: "We love the golf course - we've not taken it out of our pool of venues - but we have some big logistical issues there. "You've seen the scale of the set-up here (Royal Portrush) and there's some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry."
NBC News
a few seconds ago
- NBC News
New U.S. assessment finds American strikes destroyed only one of three Iranian nuclear sites
WASHINGTON — One of the three nuclear enrichment sites in Iran struck by the United States last month was mostly destroyed, setting work there back significantly. But the two others were not as badly damaged and may have been degraded only to a point where nuclear enrichment could resume in the next several months if Iran wants it to, according to a recent U.S. assessment of the destruction caused by the military operation, five current and former U.S. officials familiar with the assessment told NBC News. The assessment, part of the Trump administration's ongoing efforts to determine the status of Iran's nuclear program since the facilities were struck, was briefed to some U.S. lawmakers, Defense Department officials and allied countries in recent days, four of those people said. NBC News has also learned that U.S. Central Command had developed a much more comprehensive plan to strike Iran that would have involved hitting three additional sites in an operation that would have stretched for several weeks instead of a single night, according to a current U.S. official and two former U.S. officials. President Donald Trump was briefed on that plan, but it was rejected because it was at odds with his foreign policy instincts to extract the United States from conflicts abroad, not dig deeper into them, as well as the possibility of a high number of casualties on both sides, one of the current officials and one of the former officials said. 'We were willing to go all the way in our options, but the president did not want to,' one of the sources with knowledge of the plan said. In a speech in the hours after they took place, Trump called the strikes he directed 'a spectacular military success' and said, 'Iran's key enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' The reality as gleaned through intelligence so far appears to be more nuanced. And if the early findings about the damage inflicted to Iran's nuclear program hold up as more intelligence comes in, the United States could find itself back in a conflict there. There have been discussions within both the American and Israeli governments about whether additional strikes on the two less-damaged facilities could be necessary if Iran does not soon agree to restart negotiations with the Trump administration on a nuclear deal or if there are signs Iran is trying to rebuild at those locations, one of the current officials and one of the former officials said. Iran has long said its nuclear program is purely for peaceful, civilian purposes. The recent assessment is a snapshot of the damage U.S. strikes inflicted amid an intelligence-gathering process that administration officials have said is expected to continue for months. Assessments of Iran's nuclear program after the U.S. strikes are expected to change over time, and according to two of the current officials, as the process progresses, the findings suggest more damage than previous assessments revealed. That assessment remains for now the current thinking on the impact of the strikes, officials said. 'As the President has said and experts have verified, Operation Midnight Hammer totally obliterated Iran's nuclear capabilities,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told NBC News in a statement. 'America and the world are safer, thanks to his decisive action.' In a statement of his own, chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said: 'The credibility of the Fake News Media is similar to that of the current state of the Iranian nuclear facilities: destroyed, in the dirt, and will take years to recover. President Trump was clear and the American people understand: Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were completely and totally obliterated. There is no doubt about that.' He added, 'Operation Midnight Hammer was a significant blow to Iran's nuclear capabilities thanks to the decisive action of President Trump and the bravery of every man and woman in uniform who supported this mission.' Destruction and deterrence The U.S. strikes targeted three enrichment sites in Iran: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. U.S. officials believe the attack on Fordo, which has long been viewed as a critical component of Iran's nuclear ambitions, was successful in setting back Iranian enrichment capabilities at that site by as much as two years, according to two of the current officials. Much of the administration's public messaging about the strikes has focused on Fordo. In a Pentagon briefing they held in response to reporting on an initial Defense Intelligence Agency assessment that concluded that Iran's nuclear program had been set back by only three to six months, for instance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, talked extensively about the strike at Fordo but not the strikes at Natanz and Isfahan. U.S. officials knew before the airstrikes that Iran had structures and enriched uranium at Natanz and Isfahan that were likely to be beyond the reach of even America's 30,000-pound GBU-57 'bunker buster' bombs, three of the sources said. Those bombs, which had never been used in combat before the strikes, were designed with the deeply buried facilities carved into the side of a mountain at Fordo in mind. As early as 2023, though, there were indications that Iran was digging tunnels at Natanz that were below where the GBU-57 could reach. There are also tunnels deep underground at Isfahan. The United States hit surface targets at Isfahan with Tomahawk missiles and did not drop GBU-57s there, but it did use them at Natanz. White House officials pointed NBC News to a closed-door briefing conducted in late June by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who told lawmakers that Iran's nuclear program was 'severely damaged' and that several key nuclear facilities were 'completely destroyed,' according to an administration official's description of the briefing. Ratcliffe said the only metal conversion facility at Natanz, required for nuclear enrichment, was destroyed to the point that it would take 'years to rebuild,' according to a White House official who was authorized to describe some contents of the classified briefing. Ratcliffe also said that the intelligence community believes the strikes buried the vast majority of enriched uranium at Isfahan and Fordo and that thus it would be extremely difficult for the Iranians to extract it to resume enrichment, according to the official. The United States has not seen indications that Iran is trying to dig out the facilities, two officials said. As NBC News has reported, the Israeli government believes at least some of Iran's highly enriched uranium remains intact but buried beneath the Isfahan facility, according to a senior Israeli government official who briefed reporters in Washington last week. The official said, however, that Israel considers the material effectively unreachable, because it is watching and will conduct new strikes if it believes Iran is trying to dig up the uranium. The official also said Israel believes Iran's nuclear program has been set back by up to two years. Similarly, even if the targeted Iranian nuclear sites were not completely destroyed, U.S. officials and Republican advocates of the operation believe it was a success because it has changed the strategic equation for Iran. From their point of view, the regime in Tehran now faces a credible threat of more airstrikes if Israel and the United States believe it is trying to revive clandestine nuclear work. Asked late last month whether he would consider bombing Iran again if intelligence reports concluded Iran can enrich uranium at a level that concerns him, Trump said: 'Sure. Without question. Absolutely.' Iran's air defenses have been largely destroyed, making it all but impossible for Iran to defend against further strikes on facilities in the future, the White House official said. 'It was made clear that Iran no longer has any more [air defenses], so the idea that they can easily rebuild anything is ludicrous,' the White House official said. The 'all-in' plan Beginning during the Biden administration, as early as last fall and into this spring, Army Gen. Erik Kurilla, the head of U.S. Central Command, had developed a plan to go 'all-in' on striking Iran, according to a current U.S. official and two former officials. That option was designed to 'truly decimate' Iran's nuclear capabilities, in the words of one of the former officials. Under the plan, the United States would have hit six sites. The thinking was that the six sites would have to be hit repeatedly to inflict the kind of damage necessary to completely end the program, people familiar with the thinking said. The plan would also have involved targeting more of Iran's air defense and ballistic missile capabilities, and planners projected it could result in a high number of Iranian casualties. U.S. officials expected that if that were to take place, Iran would target American positions, for example in Iraq and Syria, a person familiar with the plan said. 'It would be a protracted air campaign,' the person said. Some Trump administration officials believed a deeper offensive option against Iran was a viable policy, two of the former officials said. Trump was briefed on the so-called all-in plan, but it was rejected ultimately because it would have required a sustained period of conflict. The history During his first term, in 2018, Trump pulled the United States out of a 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers that was negotiated during the Obama administration. The agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, imposed strict limits on Iran's nuclear program in return for an easing of economic sanctions. Under the deal, Iran was a year away from obtaining enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb. After Trump withdrew from the accord and reimposed sanctions, Iran flouted restrictions on its uranium enrichment. Before the June airstrikes, the regime had enough fissile material for about nine to 10 bombs, according to U.S. officials and United Nations inspectors. Trump has since sought a new agreement with Iran that would block it from developing nuclear weapons. Indirect talks between U.S. and Iranian officials failed to clinch a deal before Israel launched airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Security guards at asylum seeker hotel in Essex were ambushed at a bus stop during violent anti-immigration protests, police reveal as community anger continues
Two security guards working at an hotel housing asylum seekers in Essex have been left with serious injuries in what police called a 'racially aggravated' attack. The stewards, both male, were assaulted by a group of men at a bus stop on Epping's High Road, close to the town's Bell Hotel - an asylum hotel that was the target of a large anti-immigration protest at the weekend. Community anger has flared in Epping after an Ethiopian migrant was accused of a series of sexual assaults close to the hotel, just days after allegedly arriving in Britain via a small boat. A protest was staged outside the Bell days after 38-year-old Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu allegedly attacked a woman and two teenagers, during which the security staff were both ambushed. Police say the workers were 'seriously assaulted' by a group of men at a bus stop in High Road before they staggered past the protest into the hotel to get help. Video footage shared from the weekend showed a man in a white shirt walking into the hotel with a bloody head injury. Detectives are treating the attack, which left the pair with serious but not life-threatening injuries, as racially aggravated. Two days later, a man was arrested on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offence and criminal damage after allegedly shouting racial abuse at the hotel and causing damage to the building. He has been released on bail as police continue to make enquiries. In the meantime, Essex Police chiefs have pleaded for calm in the community amid rising tensions. Specifically, they have urged people not to speculate on the offences allegedly committed by Ethiopian national Kebatu, 38, in order to avoid derailing the case. Kebatu was remanded in custody last Thursday after he was charged with three counts of sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and one count of harassment without violence. He is said to have arrived in Britain on June 29 - and denies all wrongdoing. Superintendent Tim Tubbs said: 'I am acutely aware of the strength of feeling locally, specifically on an ongoing police investigation which at this stage has seen one man charged with a number of sexual offences. 'That case is continuing to progress through court and the suspect was remanded into custody after a hearing last week. 'We know there is significant discussion about this ongoing case within the community and indeed further afield. 'As the police, we must be limited in what we say whilst a criminal investigation is progressing through the courts and the last thing we want is for any public discussion to hinder an ongoing prosecution.' Supt Tubbs added that police were not seeking to curtail free speech in asking the public to moderate their views for the time being. Supt Tubbs added: 'We understand people's right to make their voices heard on issues which matter to them. We don't seek to stifle this. 'People who do this peacefully, lawfully and responsibly cause us – and the wider public – no concern. 'However, we can never and will never tolerate criminal violence of any sort and anyone identified as committing crime will be dealt with robustly. 'There will continue to be a very visible policing presence in Epping in the coming days to ensure the safety of our community. 'If you've got concerns or information you feel we need to know, please do not hesitate to contact those officers.' Following Kebatu's arrest, protesters descended on the Bell Hotel on July 13, daubing slogans such as 'This is Englad (sic)', 'Die' and 'Go Home' on the windows. They held St George's Cross flags inscribed with 'Save Our Kids' and 'Send Them Home' - met by a counter-protest organised by Stand Up To Racism, who waved signs reading 'Refugees Welcome'. Some shouted obscenities at the hotel. One was heard screaming 'Go home you c***, go home. F*** off back on your boat and go'. The anger directed at the Bell Hotel has impacted some of its residents. Migrant Ismael Wani, from Kuwait, told MailOnline he was punched in the head by a gang of men who got out of two cars and told him to 'f*** off back home'. Home Official officials began using hotels to house asylum seekers on a large scale five years ago as they struggled to cope with the ever-growing backlog of claims. Chris Whitbread, leader of the local Epping Forest District Council, said his authority had 'consistently and repeatedly' opposed the use of the Bell Hotel to house migrants, calling it 'entirely inappropriate' and 'reckless'. The Bell Hotel has been housing asylum seekers for around five years - a fact that has not gone unnoticed by right-wing activists. Julian Leppert, a local councillor who represented the anti-Islam For Britain movement and once stood for the British National Party, was accused of inciting racial hatred after he posted an incendiary video on YouTube in 2020. The video, called The Epping Migrant Hotel Scandal, claimed the Bell Hotel was being used by asylum seekers and illegal immigrants who had travelled to Britain to exploit the benefits system. Leppert - who once suggested to the Guardian he advocated for some areas being all-white - claimed that provisions from a food bank were being diverted away from local people and that the new residents of the hotel were driving a new crime wave. The one-time BNP man, who also once had to deny his car's number plate resembled the word 'Nazi' - was also asked to substantiate his claims by council bosses and was sanctioned for breaching its code of conduct when he could not do so. In response, Epping Forest District Council published a 'myth-busting' leaflet to counter 'unfounded rumours' that had circulated on social media leaving many residents 'unnecessarily alarmed'. It featured council housing portfolio holder - and Mr Whitbread's daughter - Holly Whitbread stating that the hotel had 'no negative impact on local residents'. She has since promoted a petition seeking the Bell's closure on social media. It has collected 6,700 signatures to date.
