&w=3840&q=100)
Rising dairy demand may worsen global nutrition and climate risks
Consider demand. There's more than half a billion people under the age of four in developing countries, and about a third of them suffer from stunting — short stature that's associated with health, educational and economic problems in later life. Most could benefit from the policy first proposed by Scottish nutritionist John Boyd Orr in the 1920s: provision of dairy products to give them a more nutritionally rich diet.
That's one of the main pillars of Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto's newly introduced free-school meals program, as my colleague Daniel Moss has written. Similar programmes have been set up in many states in India, as well as South Africa and Kenya.
In terms of human welfare, we should be welcoming this trend. Dairy products are relatively expensive, and we consume more of them as we rise above the most basic subsistence levels. If South Asia, Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa are likely to see booming consumption over the coming decade, as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development forecast last week, it's largely a positive symptom of their long-awaited economic development.
Europe alone represents a quarter of global output, and highly perishable dairy products aren't much sold across borders. The total worldwide trade in whole milk powder or WMP, for instance — after a decade when China's hunger for baby formula upended the global dairy industry — accounts for about 2 per cent of raw milk. Even that limited commerce has been sufficient to upset local supply chains. In New Zealand, often likened to the Saudi Arabia of dairy thanks to its dominance in exports, demand from Southeast Asian importers drove WMP prices to a three-year high in May, while butter inflation is running above 50 per cent.
With trade providing only limited relief, we're most likely to see shortages, as rising demand from developing countries is met with limited increases in supply. The world's milk deficit will hit 30 million tonnes by 2030, the International Dairy Federation warned in April. The IFCN Dairy Research Network, a separate group, still sees a 10.5 million tonne shortfall by the same date. That dairy drought will push prices beyond the reach of those who most need it.
Climate change makes all of this worse. Rising temperatures will mean it is even harder for tropical and subtropical countries to be self-sufficient: Extreme heat can cut milk production by as much as 10 per cent, according to a study in the journal Science Advances earlier this month.
Milk is also a major culprit in global warming, as well as a victim of it. Dairy cattle emissions, mostly from methane-dense burps as cows digest grass, amount to 2.1 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, equivalent to what's caused by two-thirds of all cars. The shift to more production in developing nations will make this even worse. Pollution for each kilogram of raw milk in Africa and South Asia is three to four times higher than in developed countries, because the mechanized, intensive dairy farming practiced in the rich world has a far lower carbon footprint.
What can be done to fix this? Wealthy nations whose appetite for plant-based alternatives appears to be wavering should recommit to their shift away from livestock-based food. Far too much of our limited capacity to sustain dairy production is still being hogged by affluent populations who've grown so jaded that we now use milk for luxuries like body-building supplements, as much as for basic nutrition.
Relatively prosperous developing countries like China and Brazil can also up their game by moving to more intensive farming. They could get by with a third of their current dairy herd if they raised yields to developed-world levels.
In India, the biggest dairy producer, the benefits could be even greater. Thanks to religious objections to the slaughter of cows after they stop producing, there are more than five million stray cattle roaming the streets, spreading disease, attacking people, getting hit by traffic, and fueling organized crime. A smaller, more intensively raised herd would shrink this bovine epidemic. Greater dairying of buffalo, which already produce about half of India's milk and aren't considered sacred, would also help.
One thing is certain, though: Exhorting poor countries to give up the nutritional benefits of dairy that their richer peers have enjoyed is repugnant, and bound to fail. If we want to reduce milk's carbon footprint, we're going to need to produce it more efficiently, rather than hoping the problem will just go away.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Trump's tariff deadline nears: Where US trade deals stand
With US President Donald Trump's August 1 tariff deadline approaching, the US has announced a series of trade deals. Originally rolled out in April, Trump's sweeping tariffs were twice postponed to allow time for negotiations. Now, with days left, pressure is mounting on nations to reach final agreements or face steep levies. 'The August First deadline is the August First deadline — it stands strong, and will not be extended,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Earlier in July, he'd described the date as 'firm, but not 100% firm.' But on July 9, two days before the original deadline, he signed an executive order pushing it to August 1. The initial plan included a blanket 10% tariff on nearly all imports and up to 50% for select countries. Formal warning letters were sent to over two dozen world leaders, with many tariffs echoing April's rates, but some were increased significantly. Here's where major US trade relationships stand: On July 30, Trump announced a deal with South Korea imposing a 15% tariff on its exports. In return, South Korea agreed to buy $100 billion in US energy products and invest $350 billion in US-controlled projects. These investments [are] 'owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as president,' Trump said, as per AP. A July 27 framework with the EU reduced a threatened 30% tariff to 15% on 70% of European exports, including pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and automobiles. The remaining 30% is still under discussion. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said both sides agreed to zero tariffs on certain 'strategic' goods. Trump cited $750 billion in European energy investments over three years, plus a nonbinding pledge of an additional $600 billion. On July 22, Japan agreed to a 15% tariff on its exports, down from a proposed 25%. Trump said Japan committed to investing $550 billion in the US and opening its market to American autos and rice. Japanese automakers, including Toyota and Honda, welcomed the relief after months of 25% tariffs on vehicles and parts. However, other nations fear it may give Japan a competitive edge. Following a July 22 meeting with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Trump announced a slight tariff cut to 19%, just below the earlier 20% threat. In exchange, US goods would face no tariffs in the Philippines. Marcos said his country was considering options , including a tariff-free regime for US cars, though full terms remain unclear. On July 15, Trump said tariffs on Indonesian goods would be lowered to 19%, while US exports would be largely duty-free. A White House fact sheet confirmed over 99% of US products would qualify. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto said negotiations are ongoing to further reduce tariffs. Trump's July 2 deal with Vietnam allows US goods duty-free entry. Vietnamese exports will face a 20% tariff, down from a proposed 46%. Additionally, the US will impose a 40% 'transshipping' tax to block Chinese goods routed through Vietnam. A May 8 deal with the UK lowered US tariffs on British autos, steel, aluminum, and more, while the UK reduced duties on items like olive oil and wine. Implementation lagged until June, when Trump hiked global steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%. The UK was exempted from that hike but still faces a 25% tariff, making it the only country with partial relief. In May, the US and China agreed to reduce peak tariffs, 145% on Chinese goods and 125% on US goods, to 30% and 10%, respectively, during a 90-day truce. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said China pledged to ease restrictions on rare earth minerals vital to American manufacturing. China confirmed that the US would lift some 'restrictive measures.' On July 29, officials met in Stockholm to discuss extending the August 12 deadline for new tariffs. While extension plans were explored, no decision was announced. (With inputs from AP)


India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Meet Indian-origin richest man in Indonesia, shares close connection with Lakshmi Mittal, his net worth is Rs 725000000000, name is…, his business is…
While many Indians have relocated abroad to start new lives, few have achieved phenomenal success abroad. Sri Prakash Lohia is one such name. A visionary entrepreneur, he left India with his father over 50 years ago and settled down in Indonesia, where he eventually developed a business empire. Who is the richest Indian-origin businessman in Indonesia? Born in Kolkata on August 11, 1952, Sri Prakash Lohia is the son of Mohan Lal Lohia and Kanchan Devi Lohia. Out of four siblings, he made a move to Indonesia in 1973 that changed his life. It was there that he established Indorama Synthetics. It was in 1976 when Indorama began to produce spun yarns, and thus started the foundation of what is now recognized as an international business empire. Sri Prakash Lohia went to Delhi University to pursue his higher education. According to Forbes, Lohia is an Indonesian citizen and currently resides in London, United Kingdom. His primary source of wealth comes from the petrochemicals industry. How is he connected to steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal? Lohia got married to Seema Mittal, the sister of steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal. The couple has been blessed with 2 kids, a son, Amit Lohia, and a daughter, Shruti Hora. Sri Prakash Lohia, founder of Indorama Corporation, is known as a king in the petrochemical world. His company is a global leader in polyester and packaging. According to Forbes, his net worth is $8.7 billion. S P Lohia, the founder of Indorama Corporation, established PT. Indo-Rama Synthetics along with his father, Mr. M.L. Lohia, in 1975. He has over four decades of industrial experience and sits on the boards of various companies of the Group. He is also the Chairman of Indorama Ventures Public Company Limited (listed on the Thai Stock Exchange), as per the Indorama Corp. website. Indorama is a global producer of essential materials, which includes fertilizers, polymers, fibers, yarns, and medical gloves.


News18
16 hours ago
- News18
Not Tourism Or Massage Parlours, This Is Thailand's Biggest Revenue Source
While Thailand often makes headlines for its beaches, nightlife, and now a renewed border dispute with Cambodia, the full picture of its economy tells a different story. Tourism might be its most visible face, but the real financial backbone of this Southeast Asian country lies elsewhere. A closer look at the numbers reveals that although tourism contributes around 20 percent to Thailand's GDP, other sectors outpace it in economic weight. From rice fields to car factories, Thailand's economy is anything but one-dimensional.