
3.5% Excise Tax on transfers: What Trump's bill means for global Indians, Poonam Mirchandani decodes
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
President Trump and the Republican Government introduced a new bill 'The One, Big, Beautiful Bill', on May 12th 2025, which was approved by the House of Representatives by a 215-214 vote on May 22nd 2025 and is expected to be placed before the Senate later this month.Amongst the many changes proposed by the Government, one key change is introduction of Excise Tax of 3.5% (originally proposed as 5%) which shall be levied on any remittance amount transferred from United States of America ('Remittance Transfers')This change is applicable for all senders of such Remittance Transfers . The only exception being US Citizens or Nationals, subject to such remittance being undertaken by them through a 'qualified remittance transfer provider'.The Bill introduces parameters for qualified remittance transfer provider, which is an entity who enters into compliance agreement with the government agreeing to verify the status of remitter as citizen or national of US ('verified United States sender')If the sender is an individual, credit shall be available for aforesaid taxes paid subject to the verified United States sender mentioning his/her social security number as well as that of spouse (if sender is married) in return of tax for the taxable yearWhat this means simplistically, is that when any person who does not qualify as a verified United States sender, makes a Remittance Transfer, the remittance transfer provider will deduct a sum of 3.5% on the amount of transfer before completing the transaction.The interesting part is that the Government has also introduced a secondary liability on the remittance transfer provider if they fail to make such deduction and deposit it with the authorities every quarter, they will be liable to pay the unpaid taxes personallyTherefore, every immigrant including Green card holders, immigrants on visas like H1B, L1, L2 etc. all will be impacted by this Remittance Transfer Excise Tax. In fact, even US Citizens if they don't make remittance through a qualified remittance transfer provider will have to pay this taxWhat the bill does not clarify is the definition of 'sender' for the purpose of this proposed Remittance Transfer excise tax.Though the anti-conduit rules have been extended to remittance transfers, there is no clear provisions on whether corporates, entities, who hold accounts in US and make Remittance Transfers will have to pay this taxThe proposed Bill also does not clarify on how inter correspondent banking transfers be treated especially for international investors who are not US citizen or resident or Green Card holders or any other category of resident alien, but own investments through US brokers and US banks.Though industry insiders are of the view that the tax will be only applicable for remitters who are resident in the US at time of transfer, how the qualified remittance transfer provider will distinguish such an international investor will be a key point of deliberation.It will be interesting to see how the law will shape up soon, as Senators work on developing changes to the Bill prior to placing it before the Senate later this month for approvalThe Bill does mention the Effective Date for this new Remittance Transfer Excise Tax as being with respect to transfers made after December 31, 2025. Similarly, tax credits, if available, shall apply to taxable years ending after December 31, 2025 NRIs historically have remitted funds earned in the US either back to India or invest them outside the US. In both scenarios, they will now have to pay 3.5% Remittance Transfer Excise Tax on any amounts which they remit after December 31, 2025This may activate a stream of outflow of money from US accounts by NRIs and other immigrants to their home countries or locations outside US to sidestep trigger of aforesaid tax.We anticipate families initiating planning for historical funds prior to the changes being implemented as well as restructuring their present account holdings outside US.However, post December 31, 2025 this window gets closed especially for individuals who generate regular income in US, who will have no choice but to pay this taxOn a separate note, the Bill puts at rest a constant debate on the sunset clause for US Estate and Gift Tax Exemption amount.Under the proposed Bill, the original exemption amount of USD 5,000,000 has been substituted with USD 15,000,000 making it effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.This will be a relief for many US Persons who are concerned that the current limits of USD 13.99 million will stand reduced to the original number of USD 5 million.With the introduction of the revised provisions this fear will lay at rest as the government now has proposed scaling up the base limit to USD 15 million with future adjustments for inflationGiven the constantly evolving cross border legal and tax landscape, Indian HNIs and family businesses need to reassess their global financial planning . As cross-border tax regimes tighten, having structured, compliant platforms becomes critical.The US will continue to be a desired location for Indians while the UK remains a viable wealth gateway, particularly with recent Free Trade Agreement (FTA) gains, but each jurisdiction now carries unique tax implications that must be managed prudently and in a compliant manner with proper planning and advice.(The author is MD, Wealth Planning & Family Solutions, LGT Wealth India): Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Dow briefly hits record high on UnitedHealth boost; Trump-Putin meeting in focus
Indexes: Dow up 0.3%, S&P 500 down 0.11%, Nasdaq off 0.27% UnitedHealth surges after Berkshire Hathaway investment Bank of America shares down on Berkshire share sale Applied Materials drops on weak China demand forecast Investors monitor Trump-Putin summit at Alaska By Johann M Cherian, Sanchayaita Roy and Saeed Azhar Aug 15 - The blue-chip Dow briefly hit a record high on Friday, as UnitedHealth's shares jumped after Berkshire Hathaway raised its stake in the health insurer, while investors assessed mixed data to determine the Federal Reserve's next monetary policy move. A meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin was also on the radar, with markets hoping it could pave the way for a resolution to the Ukraine conflict and determine the outlook for crude prices. The meeting is scheduled to take place at 1900 GMT. UnitedHealth Group gained almost 14% and was on track to log its biggest daily rise since 2008 after Warren Buffett's company revealed a new investment in the health insurer, while Michael Burry's Scion Asset Management also turned more bullish on the company. Rising costs in the broader healthcare sector and about a 40% slump in UnitedHealth's shares this year have left the Dow lagging its Wall Street peers on the road to record highs. The price-weighted index last scaled an all-time high on December 4. The healthcare sector gained 1.8% on Friday and is on track for its best weekly performance since October 2022. At 2:04 p.m. the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 134.90 points, or 0.30%, to 45,046.70, the S&P 500 lost 7.43 points, or 0.11%, to 6,461.11 and the Nasdaq Composite lost 57.72 points, or 0.27%, to 21,652.95. More broadly, Wall Street's main stock indexes are on track for their second week of gains, buoyed by expectations that the Fed could restart its monetary policy easing cycle with a 25-basis-point interest rate cut in September. The central bank last lowered borrowing costs in December and said U.S. tariffs could add to price pressures. However, recent labor market weakness and signs that tariff-induced inflation was yet to reflect in headline consumer prices have made investors confident of a potential dovish move next month. "The question is, has the tariff gotten into the price of goods yet? And it appears that there hasn't," said Joe Saluzzi, co-head of equity trading at Themis Trading. Saluzzi also said while markets have largely priced in a September rate cut, investors might be overlooking risks, with low volatility and rich valuations pointing to a sense of complacency. In a mixed day for economic data, a report showed retail sales in July rose as expected, but consumer confidence and factory production numbers indicated tariffs were taking a toll on other pockets of the economy. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee was also cautionary in his remarks. Trump has said he will unveil tariffs on steel and semiconductors next week. Among other stocks that were on the move, Applied Materials tumbled 14% after the chip equipment maker issued weak fourth-quarter forecasts. Shares of Bank of America dropped 1.4% after Berkshire Hathaway reduced its stake in the second-biggest U.S. lender by 4.2% to 605.3 million shares. It still owns about an 8% stake in BofA. Intel surged 5.7% after a report said the Trump administration was in talks for the U.S. government to potentially take a stake in the chipmaker. Declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 1.22-to-1 ratio on the NYSE. On the Nasdaq, declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 1.29-to-1 ratio. The S&P 500 posted 10 new 52-week highs and no new lows, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 77 new highs and 72 new lows. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
Washington DC sues Trump administration over 'hostile takeover' of police
Washington DC's government has gone to court to stop "hostile takeover" of its police department by the Trump administration. On Friday, District of Columbia attorney general Brian Schwalb asked for an emergency order from a judge to block the federal government's new control over local law legal fight began hours after US attorney general Pam Bondi issued an order on Thursday night that gave the federal government the power to appoint a new head of the city's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD).advertisementSchwalb alleged that President Donald Trump's team is going far beyond its legal powers and breaking the rules set for the nation's CHIEF APPOINTED AS CAPITAL'S TOP COP According to the Trump administration's plan, the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Terry Cole, would take over as "emergency police commissioner" in Washington DC. Bondi said Cole would have "all powers and duties" of the city's police added that MPD staff would have to get Cole's approval before giving any orders. This created confusion about the role of Pamela Smith, the current police chief appointed by the city's mayor, Muriel leaders immediately opposed the move and filed a lawsuit to stop it. They say the decision undermines local democracy and breaks the Home Rule Act, which gives Washington DC limited AND SCHWALB CHALLENGE WHITE HOUSE MOVEMayor Bowser criticised the takeover on Thursday night. She posted on social media that "there is no statute that gives a federal official control over the District's personnel."Bowser also shared a letter from Schwalb to Chief Smith. In it, Schwalb said Bondi's order was "unlawful" and told Smith she was "not legally obligated to follow it." He instructed MPD officers to follow the orders of the police chief appointed by the mayor — not any federal takeover comes four days after Trump sent National Guard troops into the city. The president had declared a crisis of crime and homelessness in Washington defended the decision, saying the city's police needed stronger leadership to handle public safety. She claimed that Cole's appointment would make operations more effective and allow better coordination with federal OVER DC'S SANCTUARY CITY RULESThe tension grew after Chief Smith issued an order telling MPD officers to share information about people not in custody with federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).Since Washington DC is a "sanctuary city", local law still prevents police from giving immigration authorities details about undocumented people in custody. Police also cannot arrest someone solely for their immigration status or allow immigration officers to interview detainees.- EndsWith inputs from Reuters


India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
Russia killing people on the day of negotiations, no sign to end war: Zelenskyy ahead of Trump-Putin meet
Russia killing people on the day of negotiations, no sign to end war: Zelenskyy ahead of Trump-Putin meetThis is a developing story. It will be updated.- Ends