logo
What is the Free Alberta Strategy that is fueling separatism from Canada? Could Alberta become a new country?

What is the Free Alberta Strategy that is fueling separatism from Canada? Could Alberta become a new country?

Time of India16-05-2025
Danielle Smith's push for Alberta separation is deeply rooted in oil politics, not just alienation-
In the days following Mark Carney's election as Canada's new prime minister, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith wasted no time in rolling out dramatic political changes. Among the most striking? Making it easier to hold a referendum — a move that could open the door for a vote on Alberta's separation from Canada.
Smith says this is about 'alienation.' But look closer, and it's clear the driving force is Alberta's oil and gas industry — and a political strategy built years ago around protecting it. That strategy, known as the Free Alberta Strategy, is now at the core of Smith's rhetoric. And it's shaping Alberta's relationship with the rest of Canada in ways that could carry serious consequences.
Is Alberta's separation debate really about oil, not national unity?
The idea that Alberta is being unfairly treated by Ottawa isn't new. But this time, the movement comes with an organized, oil-driven political plan. The Free Alberta Strategy, co-written by Smith's chief of staff Rob Anderson, U of C professor Barry Cooper, and lawyer Derek From, calls on the province to take major steps to reduce its ties to the federal government. That includes creating its own police force, leaving the Canada Pension Plan, and opting out of any federal program seen as interfering with Alberta's control over its resources.
Continue to video
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Top 10 Most Beautiful Women In The World
OMGIFacts
Undo
Anderson and his co-authors claimed in 2021 that Alberta's treatment within Canada had become 'intolerable,' blaming Ottawa for launching an 'assault' on Alberta's most valuable sector — oil and gas. Smith, a long-time ally of Anderson, brought this strategy with her into power and has been following it closely ever since.
What is the Free Alberta Strategy, and how is it shaping policy?
The Free Alberta Strategy isn't just an idea — it's a working plan. Its first priority was the Alberta Sovereignty Act, which Smith introduced as her very first legislative move. That was only the beginning.
Live Events
The next steps in the plan included pulling Alberta out of the Canada Pension Plan, creating a provincial police force, and challenging federal control over everything from environmental regulations to education. While the pension plan idea hasn't gained traction and the police force plan is moving slowly, the UCP government has made it clear that the fight is focused on energy.
A key example is Alberta's Critical Infrastructure Defence Act, which has been amended to try and block federal employees from entering facilities that track emissions data — even if those facilities are privately owned.
Alberta has also taken the federal government to court over clean electricity rules and is demanding major rollbacks on federal climate and energy laws — including a complete overhaul of the equalization system, which Alberta ties closely to its oil wealth.
Why is Danielle Smith blaming Ottawa for Alberta's energy struggles?
Oil and gas still drive Alberta's economy. A $1 shift in the price of oil can mean a swing of $750 million in the province's budget. Smith knows this — and she's leaning heavily on that fact to justify her political stance.
Smith argues that Ottawa is holding Alberta back through laws like the Impact Assessment Act, carbon tax policies, and the oil tanker ban on the B.C. coast. She's called on the Carney government to roll back nine federal laws and regulations, all of which affect oil and gas development. Her list includes:
Repealing federal environmental assessments
Removing the B.C. tanker ban
Scrapping the federal clean electricity plan
Ending the proposed emissions cap for oil and gas
Eliminating net-zero mandates for vehicles
Returning carbon tax control to the provinces
Removing the 'toxic' label from plastics
Protecting pipelines through guaranteed economic corridors
Ending what she called 'federal censorship of energy companies'
Almost every demand is tied to Alberta's oil and gas sector.
Could Alberta separation efforts backfire on the oil industry?
Danielle Smith's government insists this is about protecting Alberta's prosperity. But experts say the move could backfire — especially if Alberta were to seriously pursue separation.
In a May 5 speech, Smith criticized Canada's current energy policies, saying: 'We have the most abundant and accessible natural resources of any country on Earth, and yet we landlock them... while enabling polluting dictatorships to eat our lunch.'
But if Alberta actually separates from Canada, the problem of being landlocked could get even worse. The province would no longer have access to the national infrastructure or interprovincial support it needs to move oil and gas to other markets. It might even become more reliant on the U.S. — the 'single customer' Smith herself criticized.
As political scientist Jared Wesley pointed out, Smith's list of demands doesn't reflect a national consensus. Instead, they could stir up deeper frustrations, especially if they fail — making separation talk even more volatile.
Who is behind Alberta's separation talk, and where does Smith stand?
Alberta's frustrations with Ottawa go back over a century. But what's different now is the level of support those feelings are getting from the provincial government.
Smith succeeded Jason Kenney, a federalist who helped create the United Conservative Party but was later pushed out by more hardline elements. Smith and her advisor Rob Anderson belong to that outer flank — the side of the party that sees Ottawa as hostile and believes in taking extreme measures to protect Alberta's energy wealth.
In a recent post, University of Calgary political scientist Lisa Young described today's Alberta separatists in three groups:
True believers who want Alberta to become an independent conservative haven
Instrumentalists who use separation threats to win concessions — similar to Quebec
Skeptics who are loyal to Canada but see the debate as a negotiating tactic
The Free Alberta Strategy dismisses that last group as 'well-meaning and sincere,' but says they 'have not learned from history.'
Where does Smith fall? It's not clear if she truly wants to separate or is using the threat to pressure the federal government. Either way, the stakes are high, and the timing — during a growing trade war with the U.S. — adds even more uncertainty.
What's next for Alberta as it doubles down on oil?
Smith's government continues to shift Alberta's energy priorities. The province is scaling back support for renewable energy, pushing for more natural gas use, and reviewing its industrial carbon tax. These changes go beyond resisting Ottawa — they represent a complete shift in how Alberta wants to power its future.
But at what cost?
In her address, Smith warned of those who would try to 'divide' Albertans. Yet her government's approach suggests there's only one vision for Alberta, one that centers on oil and gas. Disagree with it, and you're seen as part of the problem.
Smith summed up her view with one line: 'Albertans are more of an 'actions speak louder than words' kind of people.'
So far, her government's actions — and the direction of the Free Alberta Strategy — speak louder than any speech.
FAQs:
Q1: What is Danielle Smith's main goal with the Free Alberta Strategy?
To protect Alberta's oil and gas industry from federal climate and energy policies.
Q2: Why is Alberta threatening separation from Canada?
Alberta feels Ottawa is hurting its economy, especially oil and gas, and wants more control.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Assembly passes amendment keeping Greater Bengaluru Authority out of municipal affairs
Assembly passes amendment keeping Greater Bengaluru Authority out of municipal affairs

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Assembly passes amendment keeping Greater Bengaluru Authority out of municipal affairs

Bengaluru: The Greater Bengaluru Governance (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which clarifies that the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) will not interfere in the functioning of municipal corporations in line with the 74th amendment of the Constitution, was passed in the assembly after much debate. Deputy chief minister and Bengaluru development minister DK Shivakumar , who piloted the bill Monday, said the bill was only to ensure "clarity and prevent disputes in future". "Though the Bill was passed earlier, some people had filed petitions in court," said Shivakumar. "We have now made it clear in this bill that GBA will not interfere in matters of municipal corporations that come under the 74th amendment of the Constitution." You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru | Gold Rates Today in Bengaluru | Silver Rates Today in Bengaluru He explained that under the existing law, GBA had powers to intervene in affairs of municipal corporations. "A PIL was filed alleging municipalities were being brought under govt control," he said. "Although the court did not uphold the PIL, we moved this amendment to avoid confusion in future. Municipalities will function independently and will not be under govt control." He went on to say that mayors and corporators elected directly by the people will have complete authority. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Find your car's value online in minutes. Spinny Click Here Undo "Today, we may be at the helm, tomorrow we may not — but there should not be scope for dispute. That is why we removed the provision (allowing govt control)," Shivakumar said. Reiterating his stand, Shivakumar said: "I do not want others to indulge in politics over Bengaluru's future, nor will I. Municipalities will have powers of taxation, financial autonomy, reservation, elections. The 74th amendment is fully protected. Congress will never allow Rajiv Gandhi's historic amendments to be diluted." Insisting that his heart beats for local bodies, Shivakumar said: "When I was urban development minister, we ensured the Belur Declaration along with then revenue minister MY Ghorpade. At that time, each panchayat received only Rs 1 lakh in grants. During SM Krishna's tenure, this was raised to Rs 5 lakh, and later 27 departments were brought under panchayats to empower them." On Satish Reddy's (BJP) claim that certain villages in their constituencies were not included, Shivakumar said: "If we include villages now, panchayat members would automatically become municipal corporators, which could invite objections. Therefore, we will first conduct elections within existing municipal limits, and later, after discussions with all of you, we will decide on expanding boundaries." Highlighting financial imbalances between different zones, Shivakumar said: "Mahadevapura collects the highest tax revenues, whereas other parts of Bengaluru do not generate as much. But one municipality's money cannot be transferred to another — if we do so, it would violate the 74th amendment again. In such cases, the govt must provide financial support. We have only brought this amendment for the welfare of municipalities. Our purpose is to ensure that when other parties form the govt in the future, they cannot misuse it to bring municipalities under govt control." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

'Trump used trade in a very powerful way as leverage': White House again claims US President ended India-Pak conflict
'Trump used trade in a very powerful way as leverage': White House again claims US President ended India-Pak conflict

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Trump used trade in a very powerful way as leverage': White House again claims US President ended India-Pak conflict

White House said Trump used trade as leverage to end the conflict between India and Pakistan. The White House again claimed US President Donald Trump ended the conflict between India and Pakistan -- despite repeated rejection from New Delhi. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt detailed the conflicts that President Trump resolved in the past few months as she spoke at great length about Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and also the European leaders. 'We've seen it with the end of the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have resulted in a nuclear war if we had not had a President who believed in the strength and the leverage that comes with the job of being the President of the United States of America,' Leavitt said, detailing the seven global conflicts. Leavitt was asked which peace deals Trump is most proud of. Leavitt said she would have to ask President Trump for the answer but she's certain that Trump is proud of each one of them. After mentioning Armenia-Azerbaijan and Rwanda and the Republic of Congo, the White House spokesperson mentioned India and Pakistan and said, "President Trump used trade in a powerful way as a leverage to bring that conflict to an end." Leavitt made another mention of India as she spoke about tariffs. 'The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end,' she added. Trump imposed a 50 per cent tariff on India to be effective from August 27. A US team was set to visit India for negotiations, but it reportedly deferred the visit. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent also accused India of 'profiteering' by reselling Russian oil. In an interview with CNBC, Bessent said India is reselling and making a profit. "This is what I would call the Indian arbitrage -- buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product. They'sve made $16 billion in excess profits -- some of the richest families in India," he said.

Acquisition of another 97 Tejas, 6 AEW&C aircraft gets CCS nod
Acquisition of another 97 Tejas, 6 AEW&C aircraft gets CCS nod

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Acquisition of another 97 Tejas, 6 AEW&C aircraft gets CCS nod

New DELHI: India on Tuesday gave the final nod for acquisition of another 97 indigenous Tejas fighter jets and six advanced airborne early-warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft or "eyes in the sky", collectively worth around Rs 85,500 crore, which will be crucial to tackle the collusive and 'fused' challenge from China-Pakistan in the years ahead. The PM-led cabinet committee on security (CCS) approved the Rs 66,500 crore deal for 97 "improved" Tejas Mark-1A fighters to be produced by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), which will add to the 83 such single-engine light combat aircraft already ordered from defence PSU under a Rs 46,898 crore deal inked in Feb 2021, top sources told TOI. "The first two jets of the 83 ordered earlier are fully ready. The final weapons firing trials (including Astra air-to-air missiles) are slated for Sept. With the order for another 97 jets, HAL will be able to expand and stabilise its supply chains," a source said. Faced with flak from IAF chief Air Chief Marshal A P Singh for huge delays in deliveries, HAL has promised to progressively scale up production to 20 Tejas per year, and then to 24-30 per year, with the third production line now fully functional in Nashik to add to the two existing ones at Bengaluru, apart from private sector supply chains. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Keep Compliance Easy With These Identity Governance Tools AskLayers Learn More Undo The project for six AEW&C aircraft, which will entail mounting active electronically scanned array antenna-based radars, electronic and signal intelligence systems on second-hand Airbus-321 planes bought earlier from Air India, in turn, will cost Rs 19,000 crore. "All six AEW&C aircraft will be delivered by 2033-34," the source said. Timely induction of the 180 Tejas Mark-1A fighters is needed to stem rapid depletion in the number of IAF fighter squadrons (each has 16-18 jets), which will go down to its lowest-ever figure of 29 squadrons next month after retirement of the 36 old MiG-21s still in service. IAF, incidentally, is authorised 42.5 combat squadrons. Pakistan now has 25 fighter squadrons, and is slated to get at least 40 J-35A fifth-generation stealth jets from China in the near future. China, of course, has more than four times the number of fighters, bombers and force-multipliers as compared to India. In the AEW&C arena, which are required to boost surveillance capabilities along the borders as well as help direct friendly fighters during air combat with enemy jets, India lags far behind even Pakistan. IAF currently has just three Netra AEW&C Mark-1 planes, with indigenous sensors mounted on Brazilian Embraer-145 jets for 240-degree radar coverage, and three Israeli 'Phalcon' radars mounted on Russian IL-76 aircraft. The new AEW&C project will involve the A-321 narrow-body aircraft first being "hardened and modified" in Spain and then being equipped with an antenna in the nose in addition to the main dorsal antenna to give 300-degree radar coverage. To make up numbers, defence ministry in March also accorded the initial "acceptance of necessity" to a separate project for six Netra Mark-1A on Embraer-145 jets, with more advanced technologies than the first three Mark-1 aircraft. On the Tejas front, IAF till now has got 38 of the first 40 Tejas Mark-1 fighters ordered for Rs 8,802 crore under two contracts inked in 2006 and 2010.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store