Trump mulls using defense powers to fund rare-Earth projects
The Trump administration is developing a plan to use Cold War-era powers to prioritize and fund rare earth projects it deems critical to national security, people familiar with the matter said.
Officials are discussing using the Defense Production Act to tap financing, loans and other means for rare earths element-related projects, including mining, processing and other downstream technologies to bolster the U.S.'s capability to build a domestic supply chain, the people said. A specific course of action or a timeline have yet to be finalized, the people said.
MP Materials Corp., the sole domestic producer of rare earths, would be a prime beneficiary. Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg is working to line up funding for the company, people familiar with that matter said. The Nevada-based mineral processor has received millions in funding from the Defense Department.
MP Materials rose as much as 17% to $29.96 at 3:45 pm in New York, the highest on an intraday level since March 14.
A spokesman for MP Materials declined to comment. Representatives for the White House and the Pentagon didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in a congressional hearing this week said that MP Materials 'is a great example of a place where we can partner with industry' and that Feinberg is focused on sourcing rare earth supply.
The U.S. currently lacks the so-called mine-to-magnet capability at scale, and invoking the emergency authority will give the Defense Department and other agencies tools to speed up sourcing that severely lags China's dominance in the industry. The urgency has only increased since Beijing flexed its rare earths capacity as leverage in trade talks with Washington over the past month.
Beijing's decision to block exports of rare earths focused Trump administration attention on China's dominance in processing the materials used in semiconductors, jet engines and other technology, and it's stoked a surge of interest in rapidly developing U.S. supply chains.
'This is a wake-up call for America,' Interior Secretary and National Energy Dominance Council Chairman Doug Burgum told Bloomberg News in a June 1 interview. 'We are so exposed, right now — precariously exposed — to China's grip on not just the mining, but the processing. They're mining all over the world, but they control 85% of the processing.'
An existing U.S. stockpile is 'massively insufficient' Burgum said, adding that billions of dollars could be needed to build a bigger mineral reserve.
The latest discussions come more than two months after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to boost production of critical minerals that encouraged faster permitting for mining and processing projects.
White House Efforts
While that order encompassed rare earths, one of the people familiar with the matter said issuing a new directive is essentially a chance for Trump to publicly message that he's countering Beijing on a U.S. vulnerability that's inflamed trade tensions between the world's largest economies.
At the National Energy Dominance Council, David Copley is leading work on the rare-earths issue and has been tasked with coordinating most efforts related to critical minerals, people familiar with the matter said.
Copley, a former executive with the mining company Newmont Corp., has been receiving proposals for how the U.S. can quickly build out its own critical minerals supply chains and lists of potential shovel-ready projects the government can quickly invest in through DPA and other funding avenues.
Copley's role has taken on new prominence as a result of Elon Musk's efforts to downsize the federal bureaucracy that have led to a wave of buyouts, resignations and retirements at key federal offices working on supply chain issues.
The Trump administration revived Biden-era efforts to create a domestic supply chain for rare-earth magnets after China in April clamped down on exports of the materials, Bloomberg News reported last week.
As part of the effort, officials solicited proposals to bolster domestic supplies of the magnets within the next six to 12 months as pressure mounted that China's recent retaliation was putting serious pressure on the Pentagon's stockpiles, as well as the inventories of U.S. automakers and some aerospace-related companies.
___
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stocks Calm on Mideast De-Escalation Reports
Get a jump start on the US trading day with Matt Miller, Katie Greifeld and Sonali Basak on "Bloomberg Open Interest." Relative calm returned to global markets, with stocks climbing and oil sinking as fears subsided that Israel's war against Iran would escalate into a wider conflict. And President Trump's family unveils a new Trump-branded mobile phone service called "T1 Mobile" that will rely on pre-existing wireless networks and hardware. And is manufacturing coming back to the US? We'll talk to the CEO of the manufacturing company Flex on what could be a factory revival in North America. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
G7 leaders seek to contain Israel-Iran conflict
The Group of Seven summit has begun in Canada with world leaders scrambling to contain the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, with US President Donald Trump reiterating his call for the two countries to start negotiating. "They should talk, and they should talk immediately," he told reporters. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said all G7 leaders agree they "have to find a way to de-escalate the situation" in the Middle East because the Israel-Iran conflict risks inflaming the "tinderbox" of the Gaza Strip and hurting the global economy. Starmer said he had spoken to Trump about the issue, adding "the risk of the conflict escalating is obvious, I think, and the implications, not just for the region but globally, are really immense, so the focus has to be on de-escalation". .@POTUS is officially welcomed by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to the G7 Summit — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 16, 2025 German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told reporters on Monday ahead of the summit beginning in the Canadian Rocky Mountains that Germany is planning to draw up a final communique proposal on the Israel-Iran conflict that will stress that "Iran must under no circumstances be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons-capable material". But as Trump met with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, he also stressed it was a mistake to remove Russia from the organisation in 2014 and doing so had destabilised the world. He also suggested it could be a good idea to add China to the G7. The US president also seemed to put a greater priority on his planned emphasis on addressing his grievances with other countries' trade policies. "Our primary focus will be trade," Trump said of his talks with Carney. This year's G7 summit is full of combustible tensions and it is unclear how the gathered world leaders can work together to resolve them. Trump already has hit several dozen countries with severe tariffs that risk a global economic slowdown. There is little progress on settling the wars in Ukraine and the Gaza Strip, and now a new conflict between Israel and Iran. "We're gathering at one of those turning points in history," Carney said. "The world's more divided and dangerous." But as the news media was escorted from the opening session, Carney could be heard as he turned to Trump and referenced how his remarks about the Middle East, Russia and China had already drawn attention to the summit. "Mr President, I think you've answered a lot of questions already," Carney said. Trump wants to focus on trade although he may have to balance those issues with the broader need by the G7 countries - which also include France, Italy and Japan - to project a united front. Leaders who are not part of the G7 but have been invited to the summit by Carney include the heads of state of Australia, India, Ukraine, Brazil, South Africa, South Korea, Mexico and the United Arab Emirates. The G7 briefly expanded to the G8 with Russia as a member, only for Russia to be expelled in 2014 after annexing Crimea and taking a foothold in Ukraine that preceded its 2022 invasion of the country.
Los Angeles Times
21 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Medicaid enrollees fear losing health coverage if Congress enacts work requirements
It took Crystal Strickland years to qualify for Medicaid, which she needs for a heart condition. Strickland, who's unable to work due to her condition, chafed when she learned that the U.S. House has passed a bill that would impose a work requirement for many able-bodied people to get health insurance coverage through the low-cost, government-run plan for lower-income people. 'What sense does that make?' she asked. 'What about the people who can't work but can't afford a doctor?' The measure is part of the version of President Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill that cleared the House last month and is now up for consideration in the Senate. Trump is seeking to have it passed by July 4. The bill as it stands would cut taxes and government spending — and also upend portions of the nation's social safety net. For proponents, the ideas behind the work requirement are simple: Crack down on fraud and stand on the principle that taxpayer-provided health coverage isn't for those who can work but aren't. The measure includes exceptions for those who are under 19 or over 64, those with disabilities, pregnant women, main caregivers for young children, people recently released from prisons or jails — or during certain emergencies. It would apply only to adults who receive Medicaid through expansions that 40 states chose to undertake as part of the 2010 health insurance overhaul. Many details of how the changes would work would be developed later, leaving several unknowns and causing anxiety among recipients who worry that their illnesses might not be enough to exempt them. Advocates and sick and disabled enrollees worry — based largely on their past experience — that even those who might be exempted from work requirements under the law could still lose benefits because of increased or hard-to-meet paperwork mandates. Strickland, a 44-year-old former server, cook and construction worker who lives in Fairmont, North Carolina, said she could not afford to go to a doctor for years because she wasn't able to work. She finally received a letter this month saying she would receive Medicaid coverage, she said. 'It's already kind of tough to get on Medicaid,' said Strickland, who has lived in a tent and times and subsisted on nonperishable food thrown out by stores. 'If they make it harder to get on, they're not going to be helping.' Steve Furman is concerned that his 43-year-old son, who has autism, could lose coverage. The bill the House adopted would require Medicaid enrollees to show that they work, volunteer or go to school at least 80 hours a month to continue to qualify. A disability exception would likely apply to Furman's son, who previously worked in an eyeglasses plant in Illinois for 15 years despite behavioral issues that may have gotten him fired elsewhere. Furman said government bureaucracies are already impossible for his son to navigate, even with help. It took him a year to help get his son onto Arizona's Medicaid system when they moved to Scottsdale in 2022, and it took time to set up food benefits. But he and his wife, who are retired, say they don't have the means to support his son fully. 'Should I expect the government to take care of him?' he asked. 'I don't know, but I do expect them to have humanity.' About 71 million adults are enrolled in Medicaid now. And most of them — around 92% — are working, caregiving, attending school or disabled. Earlier estimates of the budget bill from the Congressional Budget Office found that about 5 million people stand to lose coverage. A KFF tracking poll conducted in May found that the enrollees come from across the political spectrum. About one-fourth are Republicans; roughly one-third are Democrats. The poll found that about 7 in 10 adults are worried that federal spending reductions on Medicaid will lead to more uninsured people and would strain health care providers in their area. About half said they were worried reductions would hurt the ability of them or their family to get and pay for health care. Amaya Diana, an analyst at KFF, points to work requirements launched in Arkansas and Georgia as keeping people off Medicaid without increasing employment. Amber Bellazaire, a policy analyst at the Michigan League for Public Policy, said the process to verify that Medicaid enrollees meet the work requirements could be a key reason people would be denied or lose eligibility. 'Massive coverage losses just due to an administrative burden rather than ineligibility is a significant concern,' she said. One KFF poll respondent, Virginia Bell, a retiree in Starkville, Mississippi, said she's seen sick family members struggle to get onto Medicaid, including one who died recently without coverage. She said she doesn't mind a work requirement for those who are able — but worries about how that would be sorted out. 'It's kind of hard to determine who needs it and who doesn't need it,' she said. Lexy Mealing, 54 of Westbury, New York, who was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 2021 and underwent a double mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries, said she fears she may lose the medical benefits she has come to rely on, though people with 'serious or complex' medical conditions could be granted exceptions. She now works about 15 hours a week in 'gig' jobs but isn't sure she can work more as she deals with the physical and mental toll of the cancer. Mealing, who used to work as a medical receptionist in a pediatric neurosurgeon's office before her diagnosis and now volunteers for the American Cancer Society, went on Medicaid after going on short-term disability. 'I can't even imagine going through treatments right now and surgeries and the uncertainty of just not being able to work and not have health insurance,' she said. Felix White, who has Type I diabetes, first qualified for Medicaid after losing his job as a computer programmer several years ago. The Oreland, Pennsylvania, man has been looking for a job, but finds that at 61, it's hard to land one. Medicaid, meanwhile, pays for a continuous glucose monitor and insulin and funded foot surgeries last year, including one that kept him in the hospital for 12 days. 'There's no way I could have afforded that,' he said. 'I would have lost my foot and probably died.' Mulvihill writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Conn., contributed to this report.
