logo
German Election Set to Shrink World's Largest Parliament

German Election Set to Shrink World's Largest Parliament

Bloomberg18-02-2025
By Tom Fevrier Chris Reiter
With 735 seats, Germany's Bundestag is the largest elected parliament in the world. It'll get significantly smaller after the election on Sunday as the result of an overhaul of the voting system that has been in the works since the last effort fell short five years ago. Difficulties in reaching consensus on the reform are a glimpse of possible discord facing the next government as it tries to revive Europe's largest economy.
The current Bundestag is 23% larger than its 598-seat base due to complex procedures that aim to balance local representation with national political support. As a result, costs for the lower house of parliament climbed to €1.24 billion last year, roughly 25% more than in 2020. The growing costs associated with hundreds of additional lawmakers jars with the need to reduce bureaucracy and streamline decision making.
At the vote, Bundestag seats will be capped at 630. While that's a step forward, the number is still 32 seats above the base. The legislation was also partially watered down in court after being contested by parties including the poll-leading Christian Democratic Union as well as the Left, which is fighting to maintain its place in the chamber.
It's clear to see why it was so contentious. If the rules were applied to the 2021 election results, the Bundestag would've been cut by 105 seats. The Bavarian center-right Christian Social Union — an ally of the CDU — would've lost the biggest share of seats in the chamber, as it was allowed to keep three so-called overhang seats, which skewed proportionality.
How the New Voting System Would've Changed Parliament
Difference between each party's seat share in the 2021 election and its seat share according to the new voting system, in percentage points
Here's how it all works
When Germans go to the polls, they cast two votes: the first one for a local candidate and the second for party preference. The latter is ultimately what matters for the makeup of the Bundestag. Olaf Scholz's Social Democrats, for instance, won the last election by getting 25.7% of the second votes, beating the CDU/CSU bloc's 24.2%.
Because of the system, parties can end up with more seats than they would be entitled to based solely on their share of the national vote. These extra representatives are known as 'overhang seats.' To restore proportionality based on the second vote, 'leveling seats' were introduced in 2013 and were granted to other parties to balance out the overhang.
How Parliament Ballooned
Number of additional seats in the Bundestag, by federal election year
That meant the more overhang seats from local winners, the more leveling seats were needed to balance them out. In other words, the solution created a new problem, leading to a surge in the number of lawmakers in the last two election cycles.
Legislation in 2020 sought to trim seats by not balancing out as many as three overhang seats, but that failed mainly because the CSU won so many districts in Bavaria.
The 2023 electoral law will now focus on proportional representation. Overhang and leveling seats have been abolished, and local candidates will only win a spot in parliament if there are sufficient party votes to back the seat.
How the New Voting System Plays Out
How reform affects smaller parties
Initially, the government eliminated the threshold that allows parties to enter parliament if they have candidates leading in three or more districts, the so-called 'basic mandate' clause.
This was criticized by the Left, the CDU and the CSU for being unfair to smaller parties. In June 2024, the German Constitutional Court reinstated the 'basic mandate' clause for lack of a better solution, resulting in the current system.
That could be good news for some parties. Recent polls project that the business-friendly Free Democrats and the new far-left splinter party BSW will fall below the 5% threshold for representation in the Bundestag. They could still make it in then, if they can secure at least three districts.
That's not unheard of. In 2021, the Left managed to make it into the Bundestag despite getting just 4.9% of the second votes.
If it sounds complicated, it's because it is. But at least Germany will have a smaller Bundestag now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘South Park' mocks Trump all the way to the bank
‘South Park' mocks Trump all the way to the bank

The Hill

time2 days ago

  • The Hill

‘South Park' mocks Trump all the way to the bank

President Trump's newest high-profile foil is 'South Park,' the long-running animated show that has been packing episode after episode with raunchy and sometimes violent jokes about the president and members of his Cabinet. The mockery has been no-holds-barred and has included depictions of Trump in bed with Satan, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem shooting cute cartoon dogs, and Dora the Explorer giving a massage at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's resort Florida. It has not gone unnoticed. The Trump administration, seemingly in no joking mood, has issued angry statements attacking the show's creators and dismissing 'South Park' as irrelevant and out of touch. Entertainment business and political observers, however, say the fight may be breathing new life into the politically incorrect satire program and providing the comedians behind it with more fodder for their weekly shows than ever. 'This in some ways feels like two rival TV shows fighting with one another,' said Matt Sienkiewicz, chair of the Boston College Communication Department and an expert on pop culture and comedy. ''South Park' is trying to do their old school style of critique of the government, and this government has gotten so cartoonish, the back-and-forth is what makes this so significant.' The attacks on Trump also appear to have been good for ratings. The show's Season 27 premiere in late July earned Comedy Central its highest-rated episode since the late 1990s while social media platforms have been filled with clips from Season 27 in recent weeks. The White House this week declined to comment on the show's sustained attacks, but a West Wing official sought to dismiss the show's relevance after its season premiere late last month mocked Trump. 'The Left's hypocrisy truly has no end — for years they have come after 'South Park' for what they labeled as 'offense' content, but suddenly they are praising the show,' a White House spokesperson told Variety at the time. 'Just like the creators of 'South Park,' the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows.' Last week, Noem tore into the show after it portrayed her face melting off due to heavy makeup. 'It's so lazy to just constantly make fun of women for how they look. Only the liberals and the extremists do that,' Noem said. The show's creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, responded this week by publishing an alternate ending to last week's episode on social media, showing Noem walking into a pet store and killing dogs inside with a gun. Noem received criticism last year after she revealed in a book she put a family pet down after a hunting trip. Jim Mendrinos, a comedy writer and a producer at Gotham Writers Workshop in New York, suggested the Trump administration, by responding so forcefully, is handing Parker and Stone a gift. 'This administration has no sense of humor,' Mendrinos said. 'And any good comic knows if you're under somebody's skin, you're gonna burrow in. That's the essence of roast comedy and that's what they're doing here.' To be certain, 'South Park,' has a long history of mocking prominent politicians and figures on the left, from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to former President Obama. The program has sparked controversy and backlash from progressives on multiple occasions during its more than two-decade history on the air for its satirical representations of religious figures, extensive use of racist language and ribbing of climate change activists. But the recent tension with the president and leading MAGA figures comes at a unique moment both in national politics and the business of entertainment. Earlier this year, Parker and Stone signed a five-year streaming deal with Hollywood giant Paramount, which owns Comedy Central, worth more than $1 billion. Paramount is facing increased scrutiny over its relationship with the president's administration after promising to change CBS's editorial direction and canceling 'Late Night,' the show hosted by Stephen Colbert, a frequent Trump critic. With its season premiere last month, 'South Park' called out Paramount over a $16 million payment the company made to the president's foundation to settle a lawsuit against CBS News, a deal that was seen by many as a capitulation to the administration made in order to secure its recent merger with Skydance. 'Matt and Trey are incredibly talented,' Paramount's newly appointed CEO David Ellison told CNN after the episode mocking his company aired. 'They are equal opportunity offenders and always have been.' Ellison's tolerance for Stone and Parker's attacks on Trump and even his own company could have something to do with the show's newfound popularity. Longtime observers of 'South Park' noted the program has always carried a modest but dedicated following, fading from the public discourse during President Biden's administration. Some attribute this to a decline in linear cable viewership, the creation of more animated comedy shows on other networks and what some regard as a slower churn of political news over the last four years. But with Trump's return to the White House, 'South Park' has seen a ratings boom. 'This whole thing has brought the spotlight back to 'South Park' in a way it hasn't enjoyed in a really long time,' Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, a researcher and editor who authored a book on the show's impact on American pop culture. 'It seems there is a lot of dissatisfaction on the left with some institutions, including the news media, sort of soft-balling Trump and here's 'South Park' taking off the gloves.' How long the fight between 'South Park' and Trump World lasts remains to be seen, but in the short term most observers agree Parker and Stone's mission to take aim at the president is paying off in a big way. ''South Park' has always been able to do things its own way by being light on its feet and the way they've worked their contracts,' Sienkiewicz said. 'There's a lot of freedom in the financial success they've had, and they seem to pick and choose their battles carefully. There are very few others in the entertainment space that can operate like they have.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store