India's triumph at Brics: PM unites summit against terrorism, pushes reforms
The declaration called for decisive action against UN-designated terrorists and those who fund or shelter them—an implicit reference to Pakistan's role in cross-border terrorism. Speaking at a press conference, Dammu Ravi, Secretary (Economic Relations) in the Ministry of External Affairs, said India's diplomatic efforts ensured that Para 34 of the declaration captured a united stand against terrorism, including those who 'abet, finance, covertly or overtly.'The reference to the 'cross-border movement of terrorists' served as a direct nod to India's longstanding concerns. The PM said that 'victims and supporters of terrorism cannot be weighed on the same scale,' and called for sanctions on those who aid terrorists. All 11 Brics members and partner countries expressed solidarity, marking a diplomatic win for India.However, China's dual role drew criticism. While Beijing joined the condemnation of the Pahalgam attack, it continues to shield Pakistan by blocking UN designations of Pakistan-based terrorists. PM Modi's pointed remark against those offering 'silent consent' to terrorism for political gain appeared to target this inconsistency. Though Chinese Premier Li Qiang led the delegation in place of President Xi Jinping, India's assertive diplomacy ensured that terrorism remained central to the summit's focus.Beyond the security agenda, India led the charge for reforming global institutions. The PM called for a 'multipolar and inclusive world order' and stressed the need to overhaul the UN Security Council, IMF, World Bank, and WTO to reflect current global realities. According to Dammu Ravi, Para 6 of the declaration 'strongly endorsed' this demand, and highlighted the roles of India and Brazil in elevating the voice of the Global South.India also advanced a proposal for a Brics science and research repository to secure critical mineral supply chains and develop responsible AI, in line with its commitment to sustainable development. In bilateral talks with countries like Malaysia, Cuba, South Africa, and Vietnam, the Prime Minister promoted collaboration in digital infrastructure such as UPI and the integration of Ayurveda.advertisementAs India prepares to assume the Brics leadership in 2026, PM Modi's leadership at the summit has cemented its image as a global advocate against terrorism and a proponent of equitable governance. While challenges remain, especially with China's contradictory actions, the summit outcomes marked a strong endorsement of India's priorities.- Ends
IN THIS STORY#BRICS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
UNESCO tag for forts sharpens political focus on Marathi pride
New Delhi: UNESCO's inclusion of 'Maratha Military Landscapes' in its World Heritage List has added another layer to the Centre's push for Maratha heritage and identity, coming as Maharashtra heads for crucial local body elections later this year. The recognition of 12 Maratha forts — 11 in Maharashtra and one in Tamil Nadu — follows the Centre's grant of classical language status to Marathi ahead of the 2024 Maharashtra assembly polls, a long-pending demand that became central to the BJP-led alliance's victory, political observers said. The opposition has hit out at what it calls "headline-grabbing cultural optics" designed to mask governance lapses. The cultural thrust was also evident when the Indian Navy dropped the colonial-era St George's Cross in 2022 for an ensign inspired by Chhatrapati Shivaji. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai PM Modi on Saturday described the UNESCO listing as a moment of national pride. "Every Indian is elated with this recognition. These Maratha military landscapes include 12 majestic forts, 11 of which are in Maharashtra and one in Tamil Nadu. When we speak of the glorious Maratha empire, we associate it with good governance, military strength, cultural pride and emphasis on social welfare. The great rulers inspire us with their refusal to bow to any injustice. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo I call upon everyone to go visit these forts and learn about the rich history of the Maratha empire," Modi posted on social media. Earlier, when Modi unveiled the Navy's redesigned ensign in Sept 2022, he had said, "Till now the identity of slavery remained on the flag of Indian Navy. But from today onwards, inspired by Chhatrapati Shivaji, the new Navy flag will fly in the sea and in the sky." BJP's calibrated emphasis on Maratha symbols reflects a larger strategy of cultural nationalism being woven into state politics. By granting Marathi classical language status ahead of the 2024 assembly elections and now amplifying Unesco's recognition of Maratha forts, it has sought to embed itself in the emotive terrain of Maharashtra's regional pride. For BJP, which has historically faced challenges in breaking the Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress stronghold over the "Maratha pride" vote, these gestures are a bid to redraw the political map and secure urban and semi-urban Marathi voters. Yet critics argue such symbolism risks crowding out governance debates on agrarian distress, urban infrastructure gaps and unemployment, issues that resonate in local polls. The classical language status for Marathi, granted in early 2024, had been a longstanding demand from cultural bodies and political groups for over a decade. Earlier govts cited procedural hurdles, but NDA cleared the proposal months before state elections, helping it tap into a potent mix of linguistic pride and historical identity. With civic polls due, heritage and identity are again becoming political battlegrounds.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Shooting the messenger
On July 1, the UN Special Rapporteur for human rights in Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese, released a report detailing the companies that benefited from Israel's invasion of Gaza. The Italian legal expert blamed some 48 firms — many of them American — for partaking in what she called an 'economy of genocide' and warned that they risked complicity in war crimes by using the territories of Gaza and the occupied West Bank as a testing ground for new technology. Ultimately, she called upon these companies to stop doing business with Israel and sought to bring them to trial at the International Criminal Court (ICC). A week later on July 9, the U.S., a staunch Israel ally, sanctioned Ms. Albanese, with the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, accusing her of spreading 'unabashed anti-Semitism' and undertaking a 'campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel'. Israel, which had already banned the lawyer from the country following a March 2024 report that blamed it of genocide in Gaza, has rejected the latest report as 'groundless'. Special Rapporteurs are independent investigators employed by the UN to examine specific issues. They do not fall under the jurisdiction of the UN Secretary-General but come within the ambit of the UN Human Rights Council. The U.S., by virtue of not being a signatory of the Rome Statute of 1998 that established the ICC in 2002, and having quit the UN Human Rights Council since Donald Trump's return to office earlier this year, holds little sway over Special Rapporteurs and ICC judges. This leaves sanctions as the primary response for unfavourable decisions directed at the country. The curbs on Ms. Albanese would prevent her and family members from travelling to the U.S. and freeze any assets in the country. The measures should hardly come as a surprise for the lawyer. From ICC's Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan to the four judges who issued arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for 'crimes against humanity' in Gaza, sanctions have been Donald Trump's preferred tool to counter moves deemed damaging towards his country and its ally. Albanese's fight Since taking up the job in 2022, Ms. Albanese has been vocal about Israeli occupation and the plight of Palestinians in Gaza. She has pressured other countries to sanction Israel, denounced the U.S. President's plan to 'take over' Gaza, encouraged ICC action against the Israeli Prime Minister and even condemned Italy, Greece and France for letting Mr. Netanyahu use their airspace on his way to Washington earlier this week. Many times, this outspoken nature has provided fodder for her critics, who flagged her 2014 remark about a 'Jewish lobby' in Washington that influences the U.S. government's decisions. In her latest endeavour, Ms. Albanese has named companies ranging from arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin to tech giants Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, and Google's parent company, Alphabet Inc., for helping track Gazans. Part of the list are firms such as Caterpillar, HD Hyundai and Volvo that provide equipment used to bulldoze houses in Gaza. Rental portals and Airbnb are named for aiding illegal settlements. A Chinese agricultural company, as well as French bank BNP Paribas and the U.K.'s Barclays also find mention among others. Tying them together are the world's two biggest asset management firms, BlackRock and Vanguard — both U.S.-based firms that have invested in multiple companies on her list. She argues in her report that corporate firms are bound to ensure rights are not violated through direct action or business partnerships. Thus, Ms. Albanese may be trying to recreate the clamour that was raised when private companies were engaged in trade with the apartheid regime in South Africa. Whether the report creates sufficient noise to reach the customer's ear and make a difference will only be revealed over time. Nevertheless, Ms. Albanese has brushed aside the sanctions, saying, 'the powerful punishing those who speak for the powerless, it is not a sign of strength, but of guilt.' Much like the British punk-rock duo Bob Vylan, whose chants of 'Death to IDF' at the Glastonbury Music festival last month sparked backlash from Western governments, Ms. Albanese, too, in her reaction, refused to divert attraction from the crisis at hand, saying 'All eyes must remain on Gaza, where children are dying of starvation in their mothers' arms, while their fathers and siblings are bombed into pieces while searching for food'.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
As UNSC president, Pakistan looks to up ante on Kashmir issue
File photo: Pakistani deputy PM and foreign minister Ishaq Dar (Picture credit: AP, ANI) NEW DELHI: As the month-long Pakistan presidency of the UNSC nears its business end, Islamabad is gearing up to organise an open debate on unresolved disputes around the world, looking to follow it up with a resolution urging member-states to use mechanisms available to them for pacific settlement of disputes. While the motive behind convening this signature event under the UN's maintenance of international peace and security agenda is to highlight the Kashmir issue, it's unlikely Pakistan will name J&K for fear of getting the resolution vetoed. UNSC resolutions need nine votes to pass, including concurrence of all five permanent members. Pakistani deputy PM & foreign minister Ishaq Dar will travel to New York to chair the event on July 22, which will likely be briefed by secretary general Antonio Guterres too. According to the Security Council Report, Pakistan aims to adopt the resolution urging full use of all Chapter VI mechanisms. Article 33 of the Chapter states that the parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall seek a solution by, among other things, mediation and arbitration. However, the same Article also says the parties can seek a solution through "other peaceful means of their own choice". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Monster Hunter Wilds – Exclusive Discounts! Shop Now Undo "Generic resolution which will most likely be conceptual in nature will focus on general principles not specific issues to avoid any objections," says Syed Akbaruddin, former Indian ambassador to the UN. Pakistan also knows that, except China, all other permanent members continue to maintain that Kashmir is a bilateral issue. While underlining the Council's role in maintaining peace and security, many member-states stress any such attempt can't undermine a State's sovereignty or invoke settlement agreements without the consent of both parties. The open debate follows closed consultations called by Pakistan on May 5 to discuss India-Pakistan tensions after Pahalgam terrorist attack. Pakistan will also convene another signature event under its presidency, hoping to strengthen cooperation between the UN and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a 57-member body that has repeatedly expressed support for Islamabad's Kashmir agenda.
