
Secret chatbot use causes workplace rifts
More employees are using generative AI at work and many are keeping it a secret.
Why it matters: Absent clear policies, workers are taking an "ask forgiveness, not permission" approach to chatbots, risking workplace friction and costly mistakes.
The big picture: Secret genAI use proliferates when companies lack clear guidelines, because favorite tools are banned or because employees want a competitive edge over coworkers.
Fear plays a big part too — fear of being judged and fear that using the tool will make it look like they can be replaced by it.
By the numbers: 42% of office workers use genAI tools like ChatGPT at work and one in three of those workers say they keep the use secret, according to research out this month from security software company Ivanti.
A McKinsey report from January showed that employees are using genAI for significantly more of their work than their leaders think they are.
20% of employees report secretly using AI during job interviews, according to a Blind survey of 3,617 U.S. professionals.
Catch up quick: When ChatGPT first wowed workers over two years ago, companies were unprepared and worried about confidential business information leaking into the tool, so they preached genAI abstinence.
Now the big AI firms offer enterprise products that can protect IP and leaders are paying for those bespoke tools and pushing hard for their employees to use them.
The blanket bans are gone, but the stigma remains.
Zoom in: New research backs up workers' fear of the optics around using AI for work.
A recent study from Duke University found that those who use genAI "face negative judgments about their competence and motivation from others."
Yes, but: The Duke study also found that workers who use AI more frequently are less likely to perceive potential job candidates as lazy if they use AI.
Zoom out: The stigma around genAI can lead to a raft of problems, including the use of unauthorized tools, known as "shadow AI" or BYOAI (bring your own AI).
Research from cyber firm Prompt Security found that 65% of employees using ChatGPT rely on its free tier, where data can be used to train models.
Shadow AI can also hinder collaboration. Wharton professor and AI expert Ethan Mollick calls workers using genAI for individual productivity " secret cyborgs" who keep all their tricks to themselves.
"The real risk isn't that people are using AI — it's pretending they're not," Amit Bendov, co-founder and CEO of Gong, an AI platform that analyzes customer interactions, told Axios in an email.
Between the lines: Employees will use AI regardless of whether there's a policy, says Coursera's chief learning officer, Trena Minudri.
Leaders should focus on training, she argues. (Coursera sells training courses to businesses.)
Workers also need a "space to experiment safely," Minudri told Axios in an email.
The tech is changing so fast that leaders need to acknowledge that workplace guidelines are fluid.
Vague platitudes like "always keep a human in the loop" aren't useful if workers don't understand what the loop is or where they fit into it.
GenAI continues to struggle with accuracy and companies risk embarrassing gaffes, or worse, when unchecked AI-generated content goes public.
Clearly communicating these issues can go a long way in helping employees feel more comfortable opening up about their AI use, Atlassian CTO Rajeev Rajan told Axios.
"Our research tells us that leadership plays a big role in setting the tone for creating a culture that fosters AI experimentation," Rajan said in an email. "Be honest about the gaps that still exist."
The bottom line: Encouraging workers to use AI collaboratively could go a long way to ending the secrecy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Historians chase Grand Avenue's hidden past
A group of Des Moines historians have launched a book project to document Grand Avenue's history — from Model T assembly lines to governors' mansions — and they're calling on the community to help fill in the gaps. Why it matters: They're uncovering never-before-told insights into the city's expansion, class divides and urban evolution that connect the past to the present, DSM historian and filmmaker Kristine Bartley tells Axios. State of play: Grand stretches nearly 17 miles from the State Fairgrounds in DSM through several western suburbs. The book will explore the area between 17th and 56th streets — a corridor renowned for its early apartment buildings, Gilded Age mansions, civic landmarks and the legacy of prominent families over generations. Behind the scenes: Research began years ago through a team at the DSM Historical Society, which approached some of the authors of a recent book about Woodland Cemetery to write and complete the project. The intrigue: The current team has launched additional research and continues to seek descendants of early property owners to uncover historic triumphs and tragedies, lead author Mary Christopher tells Axios "We're trying to find tidbits that people don't know about already," she said. Zoom in: Researchers recently obtained family history and photos of a home that once stood on the site of the iconic William O. and Mattie M. Coffee House — now the headquarters of Financial Integrators — before it was built near 42nd Street and Grand in the early 1900s. Another section will highlight how four homes along Grand were part of Des Moines' support network for Japanese Americans resettling from World War II internment camps. What we're watching: Whether researchers reveal untold stories or secrets behind well-known histories, such as Central Campus' automotive past and Terrace Hill.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump reportedly wasn't informed in advance about Ukraine's drone strike on Russian bombers
U.S. President Donald Trump was not informed in advance about Ukraine's mass drone attack that allegedly hit 41 Russian aircraft across four air bases, CBS News and Axios reported on June 1, citing their undisclosed sources. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) operation, dubbed "Spiderweb," allegedly destroyed or damaged A-50, Tu-95, and Tu-22 M3 planes parked at the Belaya, Diaghilev, Olenya, and Ivanovo air bases on June 1. Kyiv has claimed it had disabled 34% of Russia's strategic bomber fleet in what is seen as one of the most daring operations during the full-scale war. The strike reportedly involved 117 drones launched from trucks hidden across Russian territory. The White House was not notified about the plans, which had been being prepared for a year and a half, Axios reported, citing a Ukrainian security official. CBS News' sources in the Trump administration also confirmed that the Trump administration was not informed. Trump is yet to comment publicly on the attack, which took place a day before the second round of peace talks between Ukraine and Russia in Istanbul. The U.S. president has repeatedly criticized Moscow for launching attacks on Ukrainian cities as he pushes for a ceasefire deal. The Kremlin continues to reject the truce backed by Kyiv, Washington, and European partners, and is reportedly preparing a new offensive this summer. Trump has also often criticized President Volodymyr Zelensky, claiming that Ukraine is at times "more difficult" to deal with than Russia. The two came into an open clash during a tense meeting in the White House on Feb. 28. Zelensky has urged the U.S. president to impose stronger sanctions against Russia if the upcoming round of negotiations fails to bring results. "If the Istanbul meeting brings nothing, that clearly means strong new sanctions are urgently needed — from the EU's 18th package, and from the United States specifically, the strongest sanctions President Trump promised," Zelensky said. Trump said on May 28 that the U.S. would soon know whether Russian President Vladimir Putin is serious about ending the war. If not, he warned, Washington would "respond a little bit differently." The U.S. president said he had not yet imposed new sanctions on Russia because he believed a peace deal might be within reach. "If I think I'm close to getting a deal, I don't want to screw it up by doing that," he said, but added he is prepared to act if Moscow stalls further. Read also: 'Russian bombers are burning en masse' — Ukraine's SBU drones hit 'more than 40' aircraft in mass attack, source says We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is D-Wave Quantum a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Shares in computer upstart D-Wave Quantum have surged in recent weeks. Investors have become increasingly optimistic about quantum computing. The company may still be small, but it's currently growing at an epic clip. 10 stocks we like better than D-Wave Quantum › If you want to become a millionaire in the stock market, look no further than the technology sector. With shares up by a whopping 1,154% over the past 12 months, D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) is an excellent example of this sector's wealth-creating potential. That said, volatility is a double-edged sword, as these massive gains often come with significant risks and volatility. Let's explore what the future may bring for this booming stock. Three years ago, the launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT marked the beginning of a new industry called generative AI, which promises to transform the way people interact with information. Now, there are rumblings that a new breakthrough, known as quantum computing, could be on the horizon. Both technologies rely on computer hardware, but that is where most of the similarities end. While generative AI focuses on creating new content based on trained data, quantum computing aims to solve incomprehensibly complex calculations at a rapid rate by using units of information called qubits, which can be in many states at once. If quantum computing proves successful, it could unlock significant efficiencies in drug discovery, materials science, and logistics. According to analysts at McKinsey & Company, the opportunity could be worth between $45 billion and $131 billion by 2040. This long-term potential is driving the excitement around early movers like D-Wave Quantum. Despite launching its initial public offering (IPO) in 2022, D-Wave is actually a relatively old company, founded in 1999 in Vancouver, Canada. It has been backed by notable figures, including Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital firm, which has also supported other strategic tech companies, such as Palantir Technologies. D-Wave is unique because it claims to sell the only commercially available quantum computers on the market. These devices, roughly the size of a walk-in freezer, utilize a process called quantum annealing to find solutions to problems by identifying the lowest energy choice among many possible options -- useful in specialized scenarios. While there is debate about whether D-Wave's system represents "true" generalized quantum computing (like what rivals like Alphabet's Google and IBM are working on), it has earned some recent scientific wins. In May, the company, alongside a team of scientists, announced that D-Wave's Advantage2 computer had managed to solve a problem faster than the Department of Energy's Frontier (the world's fastest supercomputer). This achievement sparked massive interest in D-Wave's stock and could translate to meaningful operational gains for the company. On the surface, D-Wave's growth is astounding. First-quarter revenue jumped 500% year over year to a record of $15 million, driven by the sale of its first Advantage quantum annealing computer system to a major research institution (likely Germany's Forschungszentrum Jülich). Perhaps more importantly, operating losses fell from $17.5 million to $11.3 million, which suggests D-Wave can easily scale into sustainable profitability if it maintains its triple-digit growth rate. Furthermore, with a whopping $304.3 million in cash and equivalents on its balance sheet, the company looks capable of sustaining current losses well into the future. D-Wave looks like it has all the ingredients of a potential millionaire-making stock as it enjoys tremendous growth in a brand-new industry. That said, investors who buy shares should remember that they are betting on a speculative company in an industry that very few people understand. There is no guarantee that research institutions will continue buying D-Wave's quantum annealing systems, and that means the potential for massive gains comes with the potential for significant losses if the technology doesn't live up to expectations. Before you buy stock in D-Wave Quantum, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and D-Wave Quantum wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Will Ebiefung has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, International Business Machines, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is D-Wave Quantum a Millionaire-Maker Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool