Police race action plan for England and Wales could be sidelined, monitor says
The Independent Scrutiny and Oversight Board (ISOB) fears that local forces have not been adequately prepared to take over responsibility for the plan when central police funding and oversight ends at the end of March next year.
It is the ISOB's last year of oversight, raising concerns about whether there will be adequate scrutiny of the plan, which aims to tackle prejudice directed against the public and officers.
Abimbola Johnson, the chair of the ISOB, said: '[The plan] was developed by the police itself, which to their credit was done in 2020 under the Conservative government, which didn't prioritise work that looked at anti-racism. But it also meant that there wasn't that central government oversight of the programme and there never has been.
'Without that happening and then without the central [policing] team, there are questions as to how it's going to remain a priority. What's going to be the impetus to continue to invest in this work?'
The ISOB's annual report, published on Thursday, says: 'As it stands, the programme is not ready to be handed over to local forces and national police leads.'
Among the concerns are that the plan's aims are not clearly understood across policing and forces do not fully understand what is required of them.
The report welcomes the development of a 'maturity matrix', a first-of-its-kind public-facing dashboard to track anti-racism delivery against outcomes at force level, by the College of Policing and the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC). But the ISOB expressed concerns that it was not yet operational.
'It makes things more transparent but it's a very, very complex piece of work and that requires them to start training officers on how to use it, making sure that non-police bodies know how to access it, making sure that it speaks for them in a way that helps them with their work around accountability,' Johnson said.
Continuing concerns identified by the ISOB include racial disparities in stop and search, use of force and workforce outcomes. They also include poor data collection on ethnicity, limiting the ability to track progress or to spot harm.
In the report, the chief constable of Avon and Somerset police, Sarah Crew, says: 'Acknowledging institutional racism is only the starting point. What matters is what we do next, and whether our actions match our intentions.'
The ISOB wants the Home Office to take a hands-on approach with local forces to ensure a focus on anti-racism, address data gaps, create an inspection framework to assess compliance with the plan and coordinate expert-led scrutiny of it.
The plan's programme director, Alison Heydari, a temporary deputy assistant Met commissioner, said black representation among police officers was up 25%, dismissals for discrimination had quadrupled and race disparity had fallen in relation to a range of police powers since the plan was launched.
But she added: 'More must be done, especially as local forces take greater ownership of the plan from next year. The police race action plan is a long-term commitment that policing must continue, which will benefit all the communities we serve.'
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Racism has no place in policing and it is vital that forces reflect the diverse communities they serve. We support the aims of the police race action plan and are committed to working with police leaders to ensure necessary progress is made.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britain urged to let hero Afghans bring their families to UK after major data leak put thousands at risk
The government has been urged to let hero Afghans granted sanctuary in Britain bring their loved ones to the UK after a major data breach put the lives of up to 100,000 people at risk from the Taliban. More than 50 refugee charities and lawyers have written to Yvette Cooper, urging her to make it easier for Afghans who were allowed to relocate to the UK due to British links to bring family members – many of whom are at risk of reprisals – with them. The pleas come after revelations of a 'catastrophic' data leak at the Ministry of Defence in February 2022, which involved the details of thousands of Afghans who said they were in danger from the Taliban and had applied for sanctuary in Britain being shared online. The dataset, inadvertently sent out by a member of the armed forces, included the personal details of applicants to the MoD's Arap resettlement scheme, which allows Afghans who supported British troops to seek sanctuary in the UK. The leak was covered up by a superinjunction, which was lifted in July after The Independent challenged the draconian legal order at the High Court. Ms Cooper has now been told the government 'has no time to waste' if it 'wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality'. Charity workers and solicitors, including from Asylum Aid and modern slavery charity Kalayaan, told Ms Cooper: 'The UK government has a moral responsibility to the Afghan people who continue to suffer, including now as a result of the data leak and have no choice but to seek safety elsewhere. 'The 2022 data breach directly exposed Afghans still in the country to a risk of reprisals they were not even aware of, and the High Court, in lifting the superinjunction, recognised that its imposition may have increased the risks these people face.' The letter continued: 'Poor decision-making could yet again have exposed Afghans to serious harm, with many of these people having clear UK family ties'. They added: 'It is essential that those who were resettled under Arap and ACRS are able to live in safety and are given a fair opportunity to reunite with their families.' Unlike asylum routes, Afghans using Arap cannot sponsor family members to come to the UK under refugee reunion rules. The same applies to those relocated under ACRS, designed to help those who supported British values, such as journalists or women's rights activists. However, some may be able to make a separate immigration application. But charities and rights groups say these family routes are very restrictive and can often involve 'extremely costly application fees and require copious, specific documentation'. Decision-makers often refuse these applications from Afghan families, leading to lengthy appeals. Lib Dem MP Wendy Chamberlain, chair of the all-parliamentary group for Afghan women, said: 'There is already anecdotal evidence of reprisals on family members by the Taliban - the Home Office has no time to waste if the government wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality. 'The Home Office desperately needs to take a pragmatic and compassionate approach to allowing Afghans resettled in the UK to be reunited safely with their families. It is clear that these schemes have been seriously mis-handled, culminating in the recent exposure of the 2022 data leak.' In one recent case highlighted by The Independent, a security guard who worked for the British embassy in Kabul for almost two decades has been unable to bring his two eldest sons to the UK. Hamidullah Fahim and his wife Zaghona were brought to Britain with two young children in December 2023, but he couldn't bring his two eldest sons, who are now in their 20s. He said that his family is struggling with being separated, saying: 'We want to do whatever we can to be reunited with them and to let the Home Office know of the injustice that has been carried out in our case'. Isaac Shaffer, at Refugee Legal Support, said it was 'critical' that the government sped up decision-making on Arap cases in light of the data breach. He explained that most of the people he was helping 'have waited over a year for a final decision on their Arap application and have remained in hiding throughout; in constant fear, and in extraordinarily precarious circumstances', adding: 'Knowledge of this data breach has only exacerbated this fear and uncertainty'. James Tullett, CEO at charity Ramfel, who helped co-ordinate the letter, said: 'The government has acknowledged that the people they have resettled need protection and yet this offer of support comes with the heavy price of separation from family. 'Allowing Afghan families to reunite won't solve all the problems associated with the data leak, but it will make a monumental difference for the affected families'.
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
London mayor announces 8,000 new properties completed
The mayor of London has claimed he is tackling the city's housing crisis "head on" as he announced that more than 8,000 new homes have been started via his Land Fund, five years ahead of Sadiq Khan said the fund provided flexibility for City Hall to provide financing for projects, which includes buying land, to "unlock" more mayor also reported that last year saw London complete just over 11,600 homes, with nearly 6,700 of them "affordable homes for social rent and equivalent".The City Hall Conservatives said "this is a clearly a smoke-and-mirrors announcement by the mayor to distract from his housing failures". City Hall said the initial target to start 8,000 homes by March 2030 had now been surpassed, with 8,283 starts as of the end of March May the mayor and the government announced a cut of more than 6,000 homes to the affordable homes programme, for 2021-2026, from the previous range of 23,900 to 27,100 reduction – with a new target range of between 17,800 and 19,000 – represented a cut of 22%.Lord Bailey, City Hall Conservatives' housing spokesman, said: "Khan's own government have set him the target of building 88,000 homes a year, in recognition of the acute housing crisis in London which is driving our rents and mortgages up."Today he's proud to be announcing that he's only met one eighth of that target."We want this government to succeed, for the sake of our city and our country - but Labour have clearly failed."Lord Bailey said "just 2.5% of his promised affordable homes" were completed despite receiving almost £9bn from the last added: "We need to move away from talking about 'housing starts' - you cannot live in a start, only a completion." The Mayor's Land Fund, established by Sir Sadiq in 2017, is made up of more than £736m - with £486m provided by the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local provides various types of investment and has a range of investment opportunities alongside commercial fund has provided land acquisition finance to help the Peabody Trust deliver nearly 1,000 homes on the former Holloway Prison site in Islington; bought surplus land on hospital sites capable of delivering up to 1,000 homes across Enfield and Haringey; and supported City & Docklands with finance for build-to-rent Sadiq said: "We know there is more work to do to fix the housing crisis in London. I'm pleased that the government has committed to work with me to establish the City Hall Developer Investment Fund to unlock further housing in London."I will continue to work closely with them to secure even more national support to help build the level of new housing London needs, as we build a better, fairer London for everyone."Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said the housing crisis "has stopped our young people from achieving the dream of homeownership, especially in London".She added: "That's why we welcome the mayor of London pushing ahead to build these homes, and we will continue to work hand-in-hand with him to deliver on our stretching target of 1.5 million homes."
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nottingham expansion option explored in councils shake-up
Nottingham City Council is exploring further options to expand the city's boundary amid a consultation to reorganise local government. Residents of the city and the county have been asked to share their views on proposals to replace the existing council structure with two new unitary councils. Two core options currently being considered in Nottinghamshire include Broxtowe, and either Rushcliffe or Gedling, combining with the city council has a preferred option outside of those that would change the existing boundaries of neighbouring boroughs and districts. The two core options currently being considered in Nottinghamshire are known as 1b and 1e. 1b would be a new unitary authority combining Nottingham, Broxtowe, and Gedling, with a second new unitary authority for the rest of Nottinghamshire - Mansfield, Ashfield, Newark and Sherwood, Bassetlaw and Rushcliffe.1e would involve a new unitary authority combining Nottingham, Broxtowe, and Rushcliffe, with a second new unitary authority for the rest of Nottinghamshire - Mansfield, Ashfield, Newark and Sherwood, Bassetlaw and final decision has been made on a single option at this stage, and some councils could still explore additional proposals alongside the two mentioned. Deputy leader for Nottingham City Council, Ethan Radford, confirmed on Tuesday the authority was in favour of an option that would effectively see only parts of neighbouring districts combined with said: "The suggestion that the city expands into the whole of the Rushcliffe district is quite something. "There are areas and villages or towns in there that don't have a shared identity with Nottingham."He said comparatively, people living in areas in Gedling and Broxtowe, "say they live in Nottingham". He added: "Ultimately the end goal here has to be not just lines moved on a map, but services that actually are good value for money that meet the needs of people and create new authorities that actually deliver for people." The preferred option for Nottinghamshire County Council, which has been under the control of Reform since the May elections, is 1b. Council leader Mick Barton, said: "I've always said all along in the early days of this process, that I would go with the evidence and the evidence to me balances up for 1b. "That's just me personally. I'm still having discussions with my own group but I believe 1b is the best option moving forward for the residents of Nottinghamshire."I can't speak for all of the council I can only speak for my own group. He said 1b, which would combine Nottingham, Broxtowe and Gedling, was better "financially" and "per head" in respect of population figures. Leader of the opposition at the county council, Sam Smith, said he and his Conservative shadow cabinet wanted to see more options put forward for public consultation. He suggested a city council expansion that would change the boundaries of surrounding districts and boroughs, using the example of Beeston becoming part of Nottingham, but not the rest of added: "Broxtowe residents right now are not seeing options that keep them out of the city.""We must now see other options coming forward," he added. The deadline for the final proposal must be submitted to the government by 28 November. 'Cities within cities' The reforms have attracted mixed feedback among people living in the Rushcliffe Stuart Holmes believed local government reorganisation was a "waste of time and money". Asked what he thought about West Bridgford potentially combining with the city, he added: "I think it would be bad for West Bridgford, and as far as the city is concerned, they've got bigger problems."Louise Williams, a teacher from West Bridgford, said: "I often wondered why we weren't more part of the city than we tend to be. "It seems to have an exclusivity that I don't necessarily think it needs even though people like the fact that it has an exclusivity."Another resident added that if the city was to expand into areas like West Bridgford, she would hope they would still maintain separate identities. "Cities within cities - that's my idea," she said.
