Vinod Khosla says Windsurf's founders abandoned their team: 'I definitely would not work with their founders next time'
Varun Mohan and Douglas Chen nearly struck a deal to sell the company to OpenAI for $3 billion before it suddenly fell through.
Then, the two decamped to Google DeepMind, leaving the rest of the company scrambling. Windsurf's remaining executives struck a deal with another AI startup, Cognition, the following weekend, which its new CEO, Jeff Wang, described as "crazy."
Now, legendary venture capitalist Vinod Khosla has weighed in on the drama, criticizing the founders' decision to leave. Khosla Ventures is an investor in Cognition.
"Windsurf and others are really bad examples of founders leaving their teams behind and not even sharing the proceeds with their team," Khosla said in an X post. "I definitely would not work with their founders next time."
Khosla's remarks were in response to a clip from "The Twenty Minute VC" podcast featuring Cognition founder Scott Wu, who said, "There's an unspoken covenant that as a founder, you go down with the ship."
"And I think that, for better or worse, it's changed a bit over the last year, and I think it's a bit disappointing to be honest," Wu said.
One X user suggested Khosla's response was hypocritical, prompting him to expand further on Sunday.
"Absolutely not hypocritical about it. I would not work with the WeWork founder either! Working without trust is a sure way to be unhappy," Khosla said on X.
"I honestly asked myself if I made $1b on this 'deal', would I accept it and be quiet or fight for the rest of the team? Or give part of my money to the rest of the team? Hard to say without being in the situation but I feel I'd definitely fight for those left behind," he added.
Khosla, Mohan, and Chen did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
Wang, who previously served as head of business at Windsurf, recounted on X on Saturday his experience informing the Windsurf staff that not only had the OpenAI deal fallen through, but its two cofounders had left.
"The mood was very bleak," Wang wrote. "Some people were upset about financial outcomes or colleagues leaving, while others were worried about the future. A few were in tears."
Still, Wang praised Mohan and Chen. He said they were "great founders and this company meant a lot to them, and it should be acknowledged that this whole situation must have been difficult for them as well."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Marathon at F1 speed': China bids to lap US in AI leadership
Beyond dancing robots and eager-to-help digital avatars, Shanghai's World AI Conference saw China stake its claim to global artificial intelligence leadership and frame itself as a clear alternative to the United States. Assumptions that the US was far ahead in the fast-moving field were upended this year when Chinese start-up DeepSeek unveiled a chatbot that matched top American systems for an apparent fraction of the cost. With AI now at the forefront of the superpowers' tech race, the World AI Conference (WAIC) that ended Tuesday saw China set out its case to take charge on shaping its global governance too. China, the United States and other major economies are "engaged in a marathon at Formula One speed", said Steven Hai, assistant professor of tech innovation at Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University. "Which country will attain the upper hand can only be assessed dynamically over the course of development." China and the United States dominate the AI sector -- only 10 to 15 percent of models developed in recent years were built without either's participation, according to Epoch AI, a non-profit research institute. While US companies like Google and OpenAI are still industry-leading, the institute labelled 78 percent of Chinese models "state-of-the-art" compared to 70 percent of models built with American participation. Beijing's stated aim is to become the world's leading AI "innovation centre" by 2030. "Now China is neck-and-neck with the United States in terms of core tech, that play (for global leadership) is more relevant than ever," said Tom Nunlist, associate director for tech and data policy at Trivium China. "With a solid AI offering and the US turning inward, the question is will Beijing's vision gain greater global traction?" In May, Microsoft's Brad Smith told the US Senate that "the number-one factor" in the tech race "is whose technology is most broadly adopted in the rest of the world". - 'Sovereign AI' - China's offer is technical and economical. "One of the biggest differences (with the US sector) is that most of the leading models in China... are open-weight and open-source," former Google CEO Eric Schmidt told an audience at WAIC. That means they can be adapted by other countries to fit their own needs, said George Chen, partner at Washington-based policy consultancy The Asia Group. "We already see some countries like Mongolia, Kazakhstan, even Pakistan are trying to adopt the DeepSeek model to build their own," he said. "China has a chance to win in the aspect of sovereign AI to export its model to those countries." The comparative low cost of Chinese technology -- software but also hardware, for example through firms like Huawei -- will be a big factor, especially for developing countries, Chen added. On Monday another Chinese start-up, Zhipu, announced its new AI model -- also open-source -- would cost less than DeepSeek to use. In June, OpenAI accused Zhipu of having close ties with Chinese authorities and noted it was working with governments and state-owned firms across Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Africa. "The goal is to lock Chinese systems and standards into emerging markets before US or European rivals can," it said. Washington has moved to protect its lead in AI, expanding efforts to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China in recent years. "While limiting China's share of the global AI hardware market, (these measures) have accelerated indigenous innovation and led Chinese firms to exploit regulatory loopholes," said assistant professor Hai, referring to "rife" smuggling and circumvention. - Issues of trust? - Other challenges to homegrown firms include the closed nature of the Chinese internet, and "general issues of trust when it comes to using Chinese tech", Trivium's Nunlist said. At WAIC, China sought to present itself as a responsible power. Premier Li Qiang emphasised the risks of AI and pledged to share technology with other nations, especially developing ones. His remarks contrasted sharply with US President Donald Trump's aggressive low-regulation "AI Action Plan" launched just days before and explicitly aimed at cementing US dominance in the field. China released its own action plan at WAIC, following a meeting attended by delegates from dozens of countries. Li also announced the establishment of a China-led organisation for international AI cooperation. However, China's foreign ministry did not respond to a request from AFP for details on the set-up of the organisation -- including any international participants -- and several foreign delegates said they had not been briefed on the announcement beforehand. Analyst Grace Shao wrote it was clear AI was still in its "infancy stage". "You can sense that vibrant energy but also the immaturity of the space," she wrote on Substack. "There just shouldn't be a definitive conclusion on who is 'winning' yet." reb/oho/kaf Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
US-China Relationship Probably at Its Peak, Eurasia Group Says
Eurasia Group's Dan Wang says recent talks between Beijing and Washington mean we're "probably looking at the peak US-China relationship." She says "sentiment is warming up" but notes that the "relationship can deteriorate very quickly next year." Wang also tells Bloomberg Television that China might "get more concessions from the US" when it comes to tariff negotiations. (Source: Bloomberg)


Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Teaching With AI: ChatGPT Study Mode Transforms Student Learning
ChatGPT Study Mode provides students with a Socratic interface and experience designed to foster ... More active learning and idea exploration rather than just passively receiving answers. Over the last three years, generative artificial intelligence and large language models like ChatGPT have caused much concern as people speculate whether ChatGPT will replace teachers, serve as a helpful teaching assistant, or make students too lazy to learn anything. With the introduction of ChatGPT Study Mode, OpenAI strongly argues that there is a pedagogical role an AI can play productively; essentially, it can shift from being an oracle that provides answers to a Socratic mentor guiding students through a process of learning discovery. ChatGPT Study Mode As Learning Companion Traditional student interactions with ChatGPT have often involved questions that provoke direct, comprehensive responses: lengthy explanations, step-by-step solutions, or even complete essays. While experienced users have been able to use these interactions as the basis for tutoring sessions, for the vast majority, that has not been the case. This is a problem because research shows that when students use ChatGPT as a tutor, their academic performance improves. But when it was used simply to generate answers, it often hindered learning. Part of the reason for this gap between power users and typical users is the route by which students have become aware of ChatGPT. According to Leah Belsky, OpenAI's VP of Education, 'Students are adopting AI via social media, through their friends, and often ahead of teachers and parents. Given this widespread use, we set out to understand how students are using ChatGPT, and how we might make it an even better tool for education.' ChatGPT Study Mode Is Built On Learning Science What makes Study Mode different is not just tone or interface, but pedagogical design. OpenAI worked with education researchers and learning scientists from more than 40 institutions worldwide in developing the tool. These experts provided both evaluations of AI responses and model answers from skilled teachers and tutors that the AI is trained to emulate. Part of being a good learning companion is understanding what a learner already knows and what they are trying to learn. Toward that end, Study Mode is constantly assessing students and context to determine how it can best serve this role, prompting students with questions, calibrating to their level of understanding, and encouraging them to work through problems rather than simply read about them. The result is a student experience that mimics consensus good teaching. For instance, a student asking about game theory will no longer receive an instant mini-lecture. Instead, the system first asks: 'What are you trying to learn? What's your background?' This lets the AI tailor its responses not just to the topic, but to the learner. In addition to asking clarifying questions and probing a student's assumptions, it will also adapt to their pace of learning. This ensures it avoids dumping too much information at once, instead scaffolding its response to promote understanding one concept at a time. If a student tries to evade this process and just asks for the answer, the AI will resist the request and instead redirect the student to engage with the material. The goal is to help students build confidence through effort and to lower the barrier to entry for deeper academic exploration. ChatGPT Study Mode Challenges And Next Steps While Study Mode is a powerful shift, it raises important questions. For example, can educators or parents enforce its use? Not yet. Admin-level controls for schools or education platforms are not available at launch, though OpenAI confirmed it is exploring that functionality in future updates. There is also the perennial concern that students might simply toggle back to the default ChatGPT interface when they get frustrated. Belsky acknowledges this risk but argues that motivation is the stronger variable: 'If students feel confident they can learn, and if the learning experience is engaging, they are more likely to stay with it.' That sense of engagement may turn out to be the product's most important feature. Where early learning software emphasized static content and repetition, Study Mode creates an interactive, dynamic, and responsive dialogue—the kind most often found in small group seminars or one-on-one tutoring sessions. It's AI as educational dialogue, not as content delivery. ChatGPT Study Mode Captures Learning Process One of the most intriguing long-term possibilities raised by Study Mode is the opportunity to capture and analyze the dialogue between student and AI as a form of assessment. Unlike traditional testing, which evaluates static outputs, these dialogues could offer a window into how students think, how they revise their understanding, and how their reasoning improves over time. One of the most limiting aspects of traditional classroom instruction, compared to one-on-one teaching, is the inability to pay attention to everyone all the time. When there is just a single instructor and student, there is no need for written examinations because the teacher observes the learning process as it happens. The great potential for Study Mode as it develops is that as the dialogue between student and AI becomes more natural, it will be possible to capture more of the underlying learning process, rather than just the products of learning created by students. Ultimately, the process is what will illuminate understanding and confusion, and changes to the process will lead to improvement. Chat GPT Study Mode: A New Chapter In AI And Education ChatGPT Study Mode is a promising work in progress. It reflects a deliberate move away from answer automation and toward thoughtful, personalized guidance. As students and educators explore its capabilities, it has the potential to embody a vision for AI in education centered on what a student can learn rather than what the AI might say next.