Target promotes insider Fiddelke to CEO, beats quarterly estimates
Fiddelke, 49, said his three priorities are to improve the quality of merchandise, value and style that Target offers, ensure a more consistent shopper experience and to embed more technology in all parts of its business. "We need to move faster, much faster," he said.
Over the past few years, Target has grappled with a series of challenges including merchandise missteps, retail crime, and inventory management issues. In the past year especially, it has struggled to maintain consistent sales growth, faced boycotts and lawsuits related to its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices and remained reliant on sourcing from countries affected by broad-based tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump.
These pressures have weighed heavily on its stock, which has declined 27% over the past year to Tuesday's close, when many of its peers have seen gains.
The retailer has taken steps to turn itself around, including intensifying efforts to entice customers worried about the economy. These have included offering 10,000 new items starting at $1, with most priced under $20, and launching several affordable private label lines.
Still, consumers remain selective and are motivated by promotions as inflation continues to strain household budgets, Target executives noted on the call. Target said deeper discounts helped bring more shoppers into stores and boosted how much they spent. Store traffic improved from a 2.4% drop in the first quarter to a smaller 1.3% decline in the second. The average amount spent per visit also improved, falling just 0.6% compared to a 1.4% drop in the previous quarter.
Sales improved across all six main product categories: apparel, beauty, food, home furnishings, hardlines, and household essentials. The hardlines category, which includes gaming devices such as the Nintendo Switch and other electronics, performed best, growing 5% and posting its strongest results since 2021.
On tariffs and pricing, the company reiterated its stance from May, stating that price increases would be considered only as a last resort. Cornell, who has led Target for 11 years, noted progress in diversifying the company's sourcing strategy. This includes reducing reliance on store-brand products from China and leveraging Target's scale to navigate the tariff landscape more effectively.
Target reported second-quarter net sales of $25.21 billion, beating estimates of $24.93 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. Excluding items, the company reported earnings per share of $2.05, which topped Wall Street estimates by 2 cents. Like Target, home improvement company Home Depot also retained annual targets but warned of some price increases due to tariffs. Retail bellwether Walmart reports quarterly results on Thursday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Who really pays for the war in Ukraine? Kyiv, the EU and US in numbers
As transatlantic talks over Ukraine's future intensify, one topic looms large, particularly in the statements made by US President Donald Trump: Who is paying what? The debate over the billions poured into the war effort to help Ukraine fend off the Russian attacks in Moscow's all-out war since February 2022, and whether the burden is shared fairly, now sits at the centre of the ongoing diplomatic efforts. Euronews breaks down exactly who is paying what, and more importantly — how much of a burden this cost is, relative to each country. Defence spending in terms of US and EU GDP In November of last year, Ukraine's parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, approved a record military budget of 2.23 trillion hryvnias (€45.9bn) for 2025. At the time, this amounted to 26.3% of the country's GDP or 55% of its total budget. In July, the amount was revised to include an extra 412.3 billion hryvnias (€8.6m) for additional military personnel support, weapons procurement and manufacturing, bringing the total up to 31% of GDP or 67% of all central government spending. Spending as a share of the budget indicates the proportion of a government's own resources allocated to a priority, such as defence, compared to all other expenditures. Whereas spending as a share of GDP measures that same amount against the size of the entire economy—so it includes private companies and other economic activity — to show the burden on the nation's economy as a whole. While Ukraine's 2.64 trillion hryvnias (€55bn) defence budget reflects immediate survival needs, the broader war costs reveal a €700 billion total burden spanning reconstruction, humanitarian needs, and economic losses. Defence spending, though historically unprecedented, represents just one component of the war's financial impact on the country. In comparison, the EU's spending on Ukraine's defence efforts — which includes both EU direct spending and bilateral spending by member states — is around €72 billion for the three-year period, 2022-2024. In terms of percentage of GDP, that comes out at around 0.3% of EU GDP per year. The US spending on Ukrainian defence alone over the same three years has been $66.9 billion (€57.3bn), according to the State Department. This is much lower than the $300 billion figure US President Donald Trump has mentioned in the past. In terms of percentage of GDP, it amounts to about 0.08% of US GDP per year. We put together the graph below to visualise the stark differences. While it comes as no surprise that the amount spent on Ukraine's defence for economic powerhouses like the US and EU is only a sliver of their annual GDP, it puts the total, real cost of Russia's war for Ukrainians into perspective. Cost of the war in Ukraine in terms of the burden to individual citizens Another way to put the numbers into context is how much each individual citizen pays for the defence costs of Ukraine. If we were to take Ukraine's defence spending budget and divide based on a general estimate of its current population, at around 37.86 million — figures are unclear due to a large number of refugees and internally displaced Ukrainians — then we can deduce that over the 2022–2024 period, each Ukrainian effectively paid around €3,424 toward defence or about €1,312 per year. This is far higher, both absolutely and relatively, than what US or EU citizens contribute. Pinning down a firm, fixed figure for funding sent by the US to Ukraine since 2022 is difficult as funding and dispersement decisions do not neatly align with defence or spending budgets the way they did for our Ukraine calculation, but let us assume the most generous numbers. If we were to take the Kiel Institute's figure of $130.6 billion (€111.28 billion) — this includes both the defence support and humanitarian aid figures over at least three years — and split that by the US population number, then each US citizen has paid $127 (€108) per year for the defence of Ukraine. For the EU, if we once again take the Kiel Institute's estimates of total military and financial commitments at around €138 billion, then the figure for each EU citizen is around €95 per year. Now, unlike the US estimate, the figures should technically not be the same for the entire bloc because some countries contribute more to Ukraine's defence and others contribute little-to-nothing apart from the joint EU budget, like Hungary. Also, some non-EU countries in Europe such as Norway contribute to the Ukraine's defence via an additional instrument, the European Peace Facility. Most estimations of EU aid to Kyiv do not include the EPF funds. But for the sake of estimation, let us say the burden is evenly spread out. The graph below illustrates the stark difference from the known figures. Of course, it should be said that the average annual salary of a Ukrainian citizen is around €3,500 — making their contribution to the war effort equivalent to about a third of the average annual salary. The numbers above seem much less of a burden if we compare the average salary in the EU, which is around €29,600 according to Eurostat, and in the US, which is around $62,000 or €56,880. Costs of wartime destruction Ukraine faces €448.6 billion in reconstruction needs over the next decade, nearly nine times the 2025 defence budget. The World Bank's Fourth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment, released on 25 February, documented €150 billion in direct infrastructure damage. Housing damage and destruction lead all sectors at €48.8 billion, affecting 2.5 million households and requiring €71 billion for reconstruction. Transport infrastructure sustained €31.6 billion in damage, needing €66.7 billion for full restoration. The energy sector, targeted heavily in 2024, faces reconstruction costs reaching €58.2 billion. In comparison, the US and the EU have seen no direct infrastructure costs or damages due to fighting, apart from incidents related to Russian sabotage such as the damage done to subsea telecom cables in the Baltic region in December 2024. These figures capture only the economic side of the war. The far greater cost is borne in lives lost, families displaced and communities destroyed — numbers that no ledger can fully account for.
Fashion Network
3 hours ago
- Fashion Network
US retailers split on holiday prospects amid consumer caution
Overall inflation in the United States has been trending higher and economists are concerned that higher prices could be in store for consumers after a recent spike in wholesale-level inflation. Over the past few weeks, Adidas said it could launch new products at higher prices in the US, Levi Strauss said it would cut back on promotions, while Under Armour is considering bumping up prices for consumers who have the pricing power to tackle tariffs. "We are learning a lot about the health of the consumer. They are still interested in spending, but not splurging. Some of the comments companies gave months ago about not hiking prices due to tariffs... (are) proving to be more lip-service than reality," Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management said. While the broader stock market has performed well in 2025 - the S&P 500 is up more than 8% - consumer discretionary stocks have lagged, gaining only about 1%. On the other hand, TJX, parent of T.J. Maxx and Marshalls, touted a "strong start" to the second half of the year. Home Depot posted disappointing quarterly results, citing consumer hesitation on big-ticket purchases, but maintained its forecasts. "Value is very top of mind for consumers right now. They're looking to stretch their budget; they're looking to navigate inflation and uncertainty around tariffs," Target's incoming CEO Michael Fiddelke said. Target reiterated that it would hike prices as a "last resort," while Lowe's said it would remain "price competitive". Target shares slumped nearly 8% on Wednesday after the company named Fiddelke as its new CEO and kept its forecasts intact. Lowe's managed to beat earnings estimates but acknowledged that home improvement demand remains soft due to high borrowing costs. The company will continue to face challenges in the back half of the year due to high mortgage rates and cautious consumers, executives said in a post-earnings call. The Reuters global tariff tracker shows that of the more than 300 companies that have reacted to the tariffs in some manner since February 1, about 38 consumer companies have withdrawn or cut their forecasts, while about 42 have mentioned price hikes.
Fashion Network
3 hours ago
- Fashion Network
US retailers split on holiday prospects amid consumer caution
Overall inflation in the United States has been trending higher and economists are concerned that higher prices could be in store for consumers after a recent spike in wholesale-level inflation. Over the past few weeks, Adidas said it could launch new products at higher prices in the US, Levi Strauss said it would cut back on promotions, while Under Armour is considering bumping up prices for consumers who have the pricing power to tackle tariffs. "We are learning a lot about the health of the consumer. They are still interested in spending, but not splurging. Some of the comments companies gave months ago about not hiking prices due to tariffs... (are) proving to be more lip-service than reality," Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management said. While the broader stock market has performed well in 2025 - the S&P 500 is up more than 8% - consumer discretionary stocks have lagged, gaining only about 1%. On the other hand, TJX, parent of T.J. Maxx and Marshalls, touted a "strong start" to the second half of the year. Home Depot posted disappointing quarterly results, citing consumer hesitation on big-ticket purchases, but maintained its forecasts. "Value is very top of mind for consumers right now. They're looking to stretch their budget; they're looking to navigate inflation and uncertainty around tariffs," Target's incoming CEO Michael Fiddelke said. Target reiterated that it would hike prices as a "last resort," while Lowe's said it would remain "price competitive". Target shares slumped nearly 8% on Wednesday after the company named Fiddelke as its new CEO and kept its forecasts intact. Lowe's managed to beat earnings estimates but acknowledged that home improvement demand remains soft due to high borrowing costs. The company will continue to face challenges in the back half of the year due to high mortgage rates and cautious consumers, executives said in a post-earnings call. The Reuters global tariff tracker shows that of the more than 300 companies that have reacted to the tariffs in some manner since February 1, about 38 consumer companies have withdrawn or cut their forecasts, while about 42 have mentioned price hikes.
