
Scotland's deficit grew by £5.1bn, Government estimate shows
For 2024-25, Scotland has a net fiscal deficit of minus £26.2 billion – an increase of £5.1 billion from the previous year – with this the representing minus 11.6% of the country's GDP.
The UK deficit for 2024-25 was minus 5.1% of GDP, less than half the rate of Scotland.
The Scottish Government report said the 'deterioration' between this year and last was in part linked to a fall in North Sea revenue, but it added: 'The difference is primarily explained by movements in non-North Sea revenue and spending, with Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK.'
Revenue in Scotland grew by 1.5% in 2024-25 to £91.4 billion.
Spending increased to £117.6 billion in 2024-25, up from £111.4 billion in 2023-24.
'As a share of GDP, public spending remained at historically high levels in 2024,' the report noted.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the figures show Scots benefit from higher public spending than the UK average – with this £2,669 more per person north of the border.
He said this 'means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas' – although he also claimed 'people in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes' for these higher spending levels.
Mr Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said voters north of the border will expect 'better outcomes' from higher levels per person of public spending (Ben Whitley/PA)
'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average.
'It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.'
Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'.
She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure.
'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.'
She also stressed the Gers statistics reflect the current constitutional arrangements, with Scotland part of the UK and 'not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy'.
Arguing the figures highlight the 'limit' of devolved powers, Ms Robison said while the Scottish Government is responsible for more than 60% of public expenditure north of the border, it only controls 'around 30% of revenue'.
The Finance Secretary told journalists: 'As an independent Scotland we would have the powers to make different choices, different budgetary results, to build a stronger economy and enable Scotland to be a fairer, wealthier and greener country.'
She pointed to Ireland, saying GDP there had grown 12.5% over the last year, with a budget surplus of 24 billion euros (£20.7 billion) in 2024.
Ms Robison hailed that as an example of 'what a small independent country, one of our nearest neighbours, is able to do with the full powers of independence'.
She said: 'What we want, through the powers of independence, is to be able to make our own decisions.
'If you look at Ireland and what they have been able to do with the powers they have, it's like night and day compared to the economic conditions of the UK economy or the Scottish economy.
'Independence is the direction we want to take because we believe it will unleash the potential, from day one, to be able to emulate some of the economic performance of many of our neighbours, whether it is Ireland, or some of our Scandinavian neighbours.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Conservative leader wins Canada byelection, regaining parliament seat
Canada's Conservative leader, Pierre Poilievre, has won a closely watched byelection in the province of Alberta, giving him a chance to return to parliament after suffering a shock defeat in April's federal election. Poilievre finished with 80.4% of the vote after Monday's election in the riding of Battle River-Crowfoot, in the deeply Conservative western province. 'Thank you very much to the great people of Battle River-Crowfoot,' Poilievre told supporters as he celebrated the victory with his family in the city of Camrose. 'If I stand before you here today, it is by the grace of God and the good generosity of so many people … Getting to know the people in this region has been the privilege of my life.' Poilievre, the leader of the opposition, lost the seat he had held for more than 20 years in April's national election. He now replaces Damien Kurek, who volunteered to resign his seat in order to give Poilievre a chance return to parliament. Without a seat in the House of Commons, Poilievre has been unable to fully serve his role as opposition leader. Instead of sparring with the prime minister, Mark Carney, during question period, Poilievre has been relegated to holding media scrums on the outskirts of parliament, diminishing his national visibility. Monday's victory, with relatively high turnout for a byelection, is likely to re-energize supporters. But Poilievre won one of the country's most Conservative-friendly seats by a narrower margin than Kurek did in April. Diminished support for the federal leader could influence members when they vote to review his tenure as the top Tory in January. The race, which had a national feel for a rural, sparsely populated riding, was also the target of the Longest Ballot Committee, a group calling for electoral reform. The movement coaxed 203 candidates to add their names to the roster, forcing Elections Canada to use write-in ballots for the first time during a federal election and to hire more staff to count ballots on election night. 'Make your vote count so that I can go to Ottawa and fight for you. Fight for your right to buy any truck or car you want. To keep your firearms, fight for farmers, oil and gas workers, and a stronger military. Fight for an immigration system that is under control and puts Canadians first,' Poilievre said in a video posted to social media on Monday, which included directions on how to correctly spell his surname. 'But before I can do any of that, I need you to get out and vote today.'


The Herald Scotland
44 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Swinney rules out SNP cabinet reshuffle before 2026 election
Speaking at an event hosted by Enlighten and Charlotte Street Partners, the SNP leader was emphatic that there would be no reshuffle of his senior ministers before voters head to the ballot box in 2026. 'I have no intention of reshuffling my team before the election,' Mr Swinney said. 'I made that clear when Mairi McAllan returned to cabinet in May. At that point, I decided actively and purposefully that I had people of experience and expertise in a number of roles which would help me deliver the government's programme before the election.' His remarks come at a time when speculation has been mounting about whether the SNP might attempt a refresh. The First Minister argued any significant shake-up of the cabinet would be counter-productive, forcing ministers to spend valuable months finding their feet rather than pressing ahead with government priorities. READ MORE: John Swinney: Rebel independence plan will not work Fury as rebel indy plan debate blocked by SNP officials 'If I put in a whole list of new faces,' he said, 'it would have taken a while to bring them up to the level of experience and knowledge that I already have focused in the cabinet. I believe stability is the best way to achieve what we have set out to do.' Since taking over the leadership, Mr Swinney has sought to present himself as a steady hand at the helm, in contrast to the turbulence of recent years within the SNP and the Scottish Government. Mairi McAllan's return to the cabinet earlier this year as housing secretary was one adjustment Mr Swinney made to his cabinet since taking office. Discussing Ms Sturgeon's memoir, Mr Swinney said: "Undoubtedly, and I've not read Nicola's book, it does chart an absolutely fascinating period in Scottish political history. One that will delight some people and really, really annoy a whole rang of other people." A significant amount of senior SNP MSPs are stepping down including Mr Swinney's deputy first minister Kate Forbes and former first ministers Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf. Speaking about the loss of SNP colleagues at the event on Tuesday evening, Mr Swinney said: "I regret the loss of a number of my colleagues because they are stepping down with a lot of experience...I'll miss them. The first minister singled out Ms Forbes' decision to step down, saying he "very much regrets" her loss, however, added he "very much understands" her reasons for stepping down for family reasons. Mr Swinney also highlighted the "climate is tough" in particular for young women in scottish politics. He added: "Particular for younger women the climate is pretty horrendous. Social media endurance is hard to bare for some and it leads public service to look pretty unattractive." Although the First Minister said he tries to be an "ally" to colleagues experiencing abuse, he "ultimately cannot protect people from what is going to happen" on online spaces and "appalling behaviour."

The National
an hour ago
- The National
SNP must not act as bystanders in run-up to next year's election
James Murphy's piece on Saturday was scathingly critical: 'The reality is that Swinney's plan isn't designed to win independence. It's designed to preserve control of the issue inside the SNP. It's self-interest wearing a saltire.' READ MORE: Every plan to achieve indy must be subject to the test of practicality On the same day, I believe Selma Rahman spoke for many thousands of SNP voters when she said: 'I'm beginning to consider myself voting fodder for the SNP, the way Labour took so many of us for granted in the past.' She'd still vote SNP in 2026, 'but the grassroots/Yes movement and civic society need to come together, speaking out with the (very broad) independence movement.' John Swinney, widely admired for personal qualities, has become rather like a coach addressing his sweating team as they collapse on the benches at half-time of a home game down 0-6: 'There's still time. We've missed chances and conceded gift goals but our tactics are sound. Don't despair! There's still time, plenty of time...' READ MORE: Supreme Court's sex ruling 'rolls back progress for all women', SNP members say And there is still time; nine months until the Holyrood election, and nine months, as we all know, is a long time if you're expecting a delivery (though it's nearly always wonderfully worth the wait). But all John is promising to deliver, as we earnestly hope for a rebirth of our nation, is a prolonged extension of expectancy. So the SNP need to stand up and sharpen up, remember their genetic responsibility and join up with other parties and agencies together to declare in their manifestos a common resolve, given the authority of a majority of the sovereign people, to leave the 1707 Travesty of Union and at last take our rightful place at the table of the world's free and independent democracies. Let's see Holyrood 2026 as more than exciting; its potential is epic. John Melrose Peebles IT is certainly correct to say that a vote for independence in a plebiscite election will not sway Starmer. It is probably true to say that dangling him by the ankles from the Forth bridge will not make him accede to a second referendum (not that I'm suggesting we try that – it would probably pollute the water if he fell). Nothing in our lifetime will make Westminster pay anything other than lip service to the democratic right of the Scots to secede from this pseudo union, so it is time to stop wasting our efforts in trying. READ MORE: Holyrood 2026 is the first step in regaining our political mojo A plebiscite election, whilst it will definitely not persuade Starmer or any other 'elected' dictator to accept our rights, will convince the rest of the world that we are being held prisoner in this farcical facsimile of a democracy. We should have withdrawn our MPs from the palace of hypocrisy when we swept the board. No, it wasn't a democratic majority but under Westminster rules it was a victory. Remember a majority of votes in this 'democracy' never happens but the chancers soldier on regardless. We should have told the world that we were open for business then, and not waited for the electorate to be disheartened by failure. I once knew a retired civil engineer who said: 'I have built bridges, roads and dams in every former British colony and they all had one thing in common with Scotland. The Raj only left either when the fighting became too hot or there was eff all left to steal!' You will never get the thief to leave your house by asking nicely. This one is going to stay until there is eff all left to steal and, given their shortage of water and greed for electricity, that could take a very long time. They won't go until we throw them out, especially given the number of 'patriots' who would rather be serfs for a price than freemen for a fortune, so, whatever we do, begging for a referendum without making it obvious that denial is going to hurt, is not going to work! Les Hunter Lanark THERE are many in Scotland who, despite the prevailing fragmentation of the efforts of popular and party political movements to emancipate us from the current multi-faceted dystopia, retain the grace to be willing, if not able yet, to fully forgive Nicola Sturgeon entirely for wasted years and squandered momentum towards a more hopeful legacy for our children. There is no doubt that her attempts at a qualified apology for errors of strategic judgement, particularly in the distracting domain of gender recognition and the debilitating 'pacts' it necessitated, have made a good start in rehabilitating her posterity. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon is still as strong a voice as ever for those in need I suspect and hope it represents the understandable human tendency to 'own up' in instalments to more extensive and wide-ranging incompetence. In the case of Nicola et al, the acquiescing to long-term devolution and substandard governance latterly are more difficult to hold hands up to, in addition to matters of judicial/political boundaries being compromised. It is counterproductive in the long run to rehash the derelictions of fallible human beings. The epithet of 'humanum est errare' and to forgive divine is apposite and also an urgent matter in Scottish politics if the current parlous state of the NHS, public health, education and mental health and the devastating inequalities that stalk the land are to be meaningfully transformed in the coming decade in an independent Scotland. While I am suspicious of political auto justifications as per Robin McAlpine's article of August 16, I nonetheless provisionally salute Nicola's gesture and wish the remnant SNP party a full return to health and vigour after their period of malaise and lack of clear vision. Andrew Docherty Selkirk