Elizabeth Warren opposed Jerome Powell. Now she worries Trump will fire him
And she is not OK with that.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, warned that Trump might remove Powell before his term expires.
'I'm worried about President Trump trying to find a pretext to fire Jerome Powell,' Warren told The Independent as the Senate finished votes for the week on Thursday.
Around that time, Trump was visiting the Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building. In recent weeks, Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Kevin Hassett, Trump's chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, have criticized Powell for running over budget for rennovations for the building.
The president cannot fire the Federal Reserve chairman, whose term expires in May, without cause. But some fear that Trump might use the renovations as that cause to fire Powell.
In a rather remarkable exchange, Trump told reporters, with Powell by his side, that the cost of the renovations was about $3.1 billion, which Powell corrected in real time.
When Powell saw the costs Trump presented, Powell said that the president had included the cost of another renovation.
'You just added in a third building,' Powell said. 'It was built five years ago.'
Trump has ramped up his criticism of Powell in recent months because Powell has refused to lower interest rates, calling Powell ' a stupid person.'
Powell has taken a wait-and-see approach to the effects of the global reciprocal tariffs on the larger financial market, saying that they will spike inflation and slow economic growth.
After Trump's meeting with Powell, he reiterated his desire for Powell to lower rates after visiting.
'Our country is booming, and the interest rate is a final little notch,' he told reporters. But Trump stopped short of saying that he wanted to sack Powell.
'I would love to see it completed, I don't want to put that in this category,' he said.
Historically, the Federal Reserve has sought to avoid politics as it seeks to fulfill its dual mandate of maintaining low employment and stable prices. Its chairman serves a four-year term that overlaps presidential administrations.
But in recent months, Trump has taken aim at Powell, even questioning who nominated him, despite the fact Trump tapped Powell in 2017 to run the central bank to replace Janet Yellen.
Warren in the past has criticized Powell, voting against his initial confirmation in 2018 and then again in 2022 when Joe Biden renominated him.
At the time, Warren called him a ' dangerous man.' In the past, she criticized his lax approach to oversight of the financial system. After the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, Warren said ' Congress handed Chair Powell the flamethrower that he aimed at the banking rules.'
But Warren has defended Powell in the name of independence of the central bank, which for more than a century has been a central tenet of the Federal Reserve.
'I strongly believe in transparency and better oversight for the Fed, but Donald Trump has been beating the drum for months to try to fire Jerome Powell, which he cannot legally do,' she told The Independent in an interview last week. 'No one is fooled into thinking that Trump and his henchmen are suddenly really interested in the cost of plumbing and painting for a 90-year-old building.'
Warren also said that she wants to see lower interest rates as well, but blamed Trump's tariffs for interest rates remaining high.
'I've pushed for a long time for the Fed to reduce interest rates,' Warren said. 'But Fed Chair Powell, said last month he would have reduced interest rates back in February. except for the chaos that Donald Trump is causing.'
Earlier this month, Powell said that the Federal Reserve would have cut interest rates if not for Trump's reciprocal tariffs.
'There is one person who is responsible for those high interest rates and his name is Donald Trump,' Warren said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Boeing St. Louis defense workers set to strike from Monday after rejecting latest offer
Aug 3 (Reuters) - Union members who assemble Boeing's (BA.N), opens new tab fighter jets in the St. Louis area rejected the U.S. planemaker's latest contract offer on Sunday and will strike at midnight on Monday, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers union (IAM) said. "IAM District 837 members ... deserve a contract that reflects their skill, dedication, and the critical role they play in our nation's defense," the union's Business Representative Tom Boelling said. Boeing said it was ready for the action. "We are prepared for a strike and have fully implemented our contingency plan," Boeing Air Dominance vice president and general manager Dan Gillian said in an emailed statement to Reuters. "We're disappointed our employees in St. Louis rejected an offer that featured 40% average wage growth," he added. Boeing's original proposal included a 20% general wage increase over four years and a $5,000 ratification bonus, as well as more vacation time and sick leave. The union had rejected the offer, saying it was insufficient. Last week, Boeing sent a new contract offer to the union with some minor compensation changes that would benefit senior union members, according to the company. The offer also kept current overtime policies, which Boeing had proposed modifying in the last contract offer. The workers assemble Boeing's fighter jets and the MQ-25, an aerial refueling drone being developed for the U.S. Navy. Boeing's defense division is expanding manufacturing facilities in the St. Louis area for the new U.S. Air Force fighter, the F-47A, after it won the contract this year. The upcoming strike by the union, representing 3,200 employees, would be much smaller than the one Boeing was hit with last fall, when 33,000 machinists at Boeing's commercial plane division walked out for nearly two months. That strike ended with approval of a four-year contract that included a 38% wage increase.
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump administration denies daily quota for immigration arrests
In a new court filing, attorneys for the Trump administration denied the existence of a daily quota for immigration arrests, despite reports and prior statements from White House officials about pursuing a goal of at least 3,000 deportations or deportation arrests per day. In May, reports from both the Guardian and Axios revealed that during a meeting with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) leaders on 21 May, the White House adviser Stephen Miller and the Department of Homeland Security secretary, Kristi Noem, demanded that immigration agents seek to arrest 3,000 people per day. Following that report, Miller appeared on Fox News in late May and stated that 'under President Trump's leadership, we are looking to set a goal of a minimum of 3,000 arrests for Ice every day.' He added that Trump 'is going to keep pushing to get that number up higher each and every day'. However, in a court filing on Friday, lawyers representing the US justice department said that the Department of Homeland Security had confirmed that 'neither Ice leadership nor its field offices have been directed to meet any numerical quota or target for arrests, detentions, removals, field encounters, or any other operational activities that Ice or its components undertake in the course of enforcing federal immigration law.' The filing is part of an ongoing lawsuit in southern California, where immigrant advocacy groups have sued the Trump administration, accusing it of conducting unconstitutional immigration sweeps in the Los Angeles area. In mid-July a judge issued a temporary restraining order barring immigration agents from detaining individuals based on factors such as race, occupation or speaking Spanish anywhere in the central district of California, which includes Los Angeles. On Friday, an appeals court upheld that order. Politico reported that during a hearing earlier this week in the case, the justice department lawyers were pressed on the reports regarding the alleged arrest quota, and a judge reportedly asked whether it was a 'policy of the administration at this time to deport 3,000 persons per day?'. An attorney for the justice department, Yaakov Roth, reportedly responded 'Not to my knowledge, your honor' per Politico. And in the government's filing on Friday, the attorneys for the government said that the allegations of that the 'government maintains a policy mandating 3,000 arrests per day appears to originate from media reports quoting a White House advisor who described that figure as a 'goal' that the Administration was 'looking to set''. 'That quotation may have been accurate, but no such goal has been set as a matter of policy and no such directive has been issued to or by DHS or ICE' the attorneys added. The discrepancy was first reported by the Los Angeles Daily News and Politico. Neither DHS or Ice immediately responded to a request fro comment from the Guardian. In a statement to Politico, a White House spokesperson did not directly respond to questions about the discrepancy, but said that 'the Trump Administration is committed to carrying out the largest mass deportation operation in history by enforcing federal immigration law and removing the countless violent, criminal illegal aliens that Joe Biden let flood into American communities.' A justice department spokesperson told the outlet that there is no disconnect between the DoJ's court filings and the White House's public statements. The spokesperson added that 'the entire Trump administration is united in fully enforcing our nation's immigration laws and the DoJ continues to play an important role in vigorously defending the president's deportation agenda in court.' At various points during his 2024 election campaign, Trump claimed that he would target between 15 and 20 million people who are undocumented in the US for deportation. As of 2022, there were 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the US.
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US Boeing defense workers slated to strike after rejecting latest offer
More than 3,200 unionized workers who assemble Boeing's fighter jets in the St Louis area rejected Boeing's latest offer on Sunday and will strike at midnight on Monday, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers union said. 'IAM District 837 members ... deserve a contract that reflects their skill, dedication, and the critical role they play in our nation's defense,' the union's business representative, Tom Boelling, said. Last week, Boeing sent a new contract offer to the union with some minor compensation changes that would benefit senior union members, according to the company. The offer also kept current overtime policies, which Boeing had proposed modifying in the last contract offer. The union had rejected the previous offer, saying that the offer was insufficient. Boeing did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment outside regular business hours. The workers assemble Boeing's fighter jets and the MQ-25, an aerial refueling drone being developed for the US navy. This would be the first strike that Boeing has faced at its St Louis defense hub since 1996. Boeing's defense division is expanding manufacturing facilities in the St Louis area for the new US Air Force fighter, the F-47, after it won the contract this year.
