
How you can earn up to 15% returns from old life insurance policies
Running a life insurance plan requires a long-term commitment. When paying premiums becomes difficult, policyholders surrender their policies, ending their life cover. A couple of new-age insure-techs have found an alternative using an old provision: Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938.
The section allows a one-time assignment in which the policyholder can assign his or her policy to an entity or an individual in exchange for some payout equivalent to the surrender value. The death benefit continues, partially depending on the agreement between the assignor and the assignee.
While Aceso Endowment Services and ValuEnable only offer it for traditional life insurance policies, Policy Exchange focuses on Ulips.
Nashik-based Rahul Mali had two traditional life insurance plans from LIC and wanted to exit one. His brother told him about the assignment feature, which is popular in Western countries. Mali reached out to Aceso Endowment Services.
"They quoted me nearly the same payout as LIC did in surrender value. Had I surrendered it via LIC, I would have had to visit my home branch physically. It was inconvenient as I work in Pune, and my hometown is Nashik. Aceso did it all online, and I got the money within 24 hours," Mali said.
In case of Ulip
, the surrender value is usually the fund value adjusted for some charges. Since there is a lock-in period of five years, if you stop paying premiums before 5 years, you don't get access to the fund value immediately, but your life cover ceases to exist. Your fund value (after adjusting for discontinuance charges) goes to the insurance company's discontinuance fund and keeps earning a basic interest rate. You get this amount after the lock-in period is over.
If you want to access your funds immediately, you can resort to a one-time assignment. "We connect an interested policyholder with a buyer who pays the fund value (on a discount) to the policyholder and remaining premiums to the insurer," said Tarun Bahri, co-founder & CEO, The Policy Exchange. 'We fix a liquidation date of each policy, typically when the five-year lock-in gets over, or longer, depending on policy features. The buyer can either liquidate the policy on the liquidation day or continue holding it till maturity. As for policyholders, their death benefit continues until the policy is running."
While policyholders can reach out to insure-techs directly, The Policy Exchange and ValuEnable have tied up with various insurance companies to connect with policyholders.
Insurance companies look at it as a retention mechanism. They connect policyholders, who have missed paying premiums or those who want to surrender, with insure-techs so that their policies continue either via one-time assignment or loan against the policy. This improves insurance companies' persistency ratios. Policies from Bharti Axa Life Insurance, Edelweiss Life Insurance and IndiaFirst Life Insurance are listed on The Policy Exchange's platform. Aceso mostly offers it for LIC policies. ValuEnable said some of top private life insurers by premiums are its clients, but refrained from sharing their names.
Also Read:
Insurance premiums are rising quickly. Here's how you can get a discount.
The entire premise of a one-time assignment rests on buyers showing interest in such policies. Since payout is less than the underlying policy value in traditional plans, the resultant internal rate of return (IRR) becomes better for the buyer/investor. In Ulips, policyholders receive less than the current fund value. This discount becomes an upfront profit for the investor, improving their IRR.
Take the case of New Delhi-based Abhinav Mohapatra, an engineering consultant. He bought two traditional life plans from ValuEnable. "Both policies will mature in 2030. The original policy period was 20 years, but I got it when only 8 years were due. I paid all the premiums in one go. I expect to get an IRR of 8%. A risk-free rate of 8% is amazing. I wouldn't get this IRR if I bought the same traditional plan afresh," he said.
New Delhi-based Abhinav Gupta bought 20 Ulip policies from The Policy Exchange. "I tested the waters with just a couple of policies in 2022. My actual IRR turned out to be better than the expected IRR. On average, I received 14-15% IRR in these policies. Factoring in long-term capital gains tax on the maturity amount, my post-tax IRR has been at least 9.5% in taxable policies," he said.
To be sure, maturity proceeds in Ulips are taxable as capital gains if the aggregate premium on all Ulips combined crosses
₹
2.5 lakh per annum. This applies only for Ulips sold after 1 February 2021. This limit is
₹
5 lakh for traditional life insurance plans.
Gurgaon-based Nitin Patnia has a structured approach to such policies. He prefers Ulips where the liquidation date is just a year or less. "This ensures that I make returns in a short span. If the Ulips that I have bought have equities as underlying investments, I will switch them to debt. If underlying debt funds are earning a yield of 6.5%, my resultant IRR becomes 13% thanks to the discounted fund value that goes to the policyholder while the full value becomes my net present value," he said.
For high-net-worth individuals, insure-techs club multiple policies in a single instrument known as pass-through certificates (PTCs), rated by credit rating agencies. They are sold through a trust set up by insuretechs.
Also Read:
In charts | The health insurance puzzle: 83% Indians aware but only 19% covered
From the buyers' perspective, there is hardly any risk because well-regulated insurance companies manage underlying investments. Policyholders on the other hand, get an exit but at a discount. Their loss (discount) is the buyer's gain. In a traditional plan, their payout is mostly the same as the surrender value by the insurance company, so policyholders have nothing to lose whether they opt for the assignment or surrender. The continuance of partial death benefit becomes an added advantage.
Ulip policyholders, however, must do their risk analysis. The less you get compared to the fund value, the better the policy will be for investors, but not you. There are no regulations around how much you get unlike traditional plans. You must compute how much you will get after five years from the insurance company if you stop paying premiums today. If the amount is similar to what the insure-tech has quoted (after calculating the net present value), it is fine, otherwise assignment may not be a wise idea. Consider regulatory risks as well.
"Buyout as a proposition doesn't work for Ulips because policyholders are paid lower than the fund value which we don't think is fair," said Satprem Mohanty, co-founder, ValuEnable. 'Moreover, giving an exit via buyout to ULIP policyholders during the lock-in period is definitely not in line with the intent of existing regulations. For Ulips, loan against policy is a much better option to provide emergency liquidity."
One-time assignments are emerging as a win-win—insurers improve persistency, buyers earn attractive returns, and policyholders retain some death benefit while accessing liquidity. The trend is still new but should pick uppace going forward.
Also Read:
Who gets the insurance payout—nominee or legal heirs?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US techie describes 'ghost-like' interactions with Indian colleagues: ‘No face, no voice'
An American man shared his confusion over so-called 'odd behaviours' displayed by his Indian colleagues while they work remotely for a US-based tech company. In a Reddit post on the r/IndianWorkplace, the anonymous user sought to understand if cultural differences could explain what he found unusual in his Indian coworkers. The man highlighted specific behaviours that stood out to him every time his team interacted with the Indian workers, including them keeping their cameras off during Zoom video calls and rarely participating in small talk during meetings. 'In fact, I have never seen two of their faces, on video or a photo,' he wrote. 'I hate to say this, but it feels at times like we are working with ghosts, no face, no voice. Their profile picture are the default initials.' He noted that although the company encourages participation, the Indian employees often stay silent even when directly asked about projects. 'Very few questions are asked… Is asking for clarification or questions viewed as someone not being knowledgeable in their role? American work culture encourages asking questions,' he said. The post drew a flood of responses from Indian users, many of whom acknowledged that the described behaviour reflects differences in workplace culture. "Indian workplaces are Darwinian; the person who asks too many questions can be seen as someone who is questioning authority and lacks knowledge," said one of them. Others explained that camera-off culture is common due to shared home spaces or discomfort with being on video. "Most of us are either shy or uncomfortable turning on the camera (some people might get conscious of their appearance). I used to be like this. If not turning on cameras is creating problems or disrupting company culture, it should be communicated and discouraged politely. However, if given a choice, I am pretty sure most would choose not to turn on the camera," an Indian user explained.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
India successfully tests AI-enabled light machine guns in high-altitude terrain
In a step towards enhancing autonomous combat capabilities, India on Monday successfully tested an artificial intelligence-enabled light machine gun (LMG) system in high-altitude terrain. Developed by Dehradun-based defence firm BSS Material Ltd., the AI-powered Negev LMG underwent trials in collaboration with the Indian Army at an altitude of 14,000 feet, officials advanced weapon system demonstrated its ability to autonomously identify and engage targets in challenging mountain environments, a crucial advantage for operations along India's rugged border trials, focused on functionality and accuracy, are part of a broader push to modernise the armed forces through indigenous innovation under the 'Make in India' and 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat' initiatives. According to BSS Material, the AI-integrated system maintained stable target acquisition, adaptive fire control, and semi-autonomous surveillance throughout the trials. Engineers said the weapon's core lies in a sophisticated multi-sensor AI module capable of automatic target detection, friend-foe classification, and real-time technological features include:Thermal and optical sensor fusion for precision targetingBallistic compensation for wind, range, and temperature variablesEncrypted remote command compatibilityThe AI-powered Negev system is designed for deployment in high-risk or logistically challenging environments. It can be used for base defence, convoy protection, and perimeter security where constant threat levels require rapid response but troop deployment remains the modular nature of the system, BSS engineers noted that the AI module is platform-agnostic and can be integrated with a wide range of weapon systems, from light machine guns to anti-drone solutions. Deployment options include tripods, remote weapon stations (RWS), unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), and static test followed Operation Sindoor, where Indian weapons outperformed their Pakistani counterparts in field conditions. With the integration of AI in weapons like the Negev, India aims to extend its strategic reach into remote and high-risk zones with reduced dependence on manpower.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Lalithaa Jewellery files IPO papers with Sebi; seeks to raise Rs 1,700 crore
NEW DELHI: Jewellery chain Lalithaa Jewellery Mart has filed preliminary papers with markets regulator Sebi seeking its approval to raise Rs 1,700 crore through an Initial Public Offering (IPO). The Chennai-based company's proposed IPO is a combination of a fresh issue of shares worth Rs 1,200 crore and an offer-for-sale of equities valued at Rs 500 crore by M Kiran Kumar Jain, according to the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP). The issue includes a reservation for a subscription by eligible employees, and a discount is being offered to such employees. As per the draft papers filed on Friday, proceeds from the fresh issue to the tune of Rs 1,014.50 crore will be used for setting up new stores, and a portion would be utilised for general corporate purposes.