How AI is rewriting the rules of election campaign in India
This is a representational image generated by Artificial Intelligence (Pic credit: Grok)
Elections in states like
Bihar, Kerala, West Bengal
, and
Tamil Nadu
are still months away but the new-age digital campaigners already have their tasks cut out. These crucial elections are bound to see much more evolved and innovative use of artificial intelligence, already a dominating force in the past elections.
The battle for votes is no longer confined to crowded rallies and roadshows; it's increasingly unfolding on screens, powered by algorithms, data, and AI.
Gone are the days when victories were secured through thundering speeches, meticulously planned propaganda, and rallies packed with promises and handshakes.
Today, the
digital realm has emerged as the new battleground
, and the strategists shaping public opinion often operate in lines of code rather than through sheer charisma. Consider the viral AI-generated posters:
Prime Minister Narendra Modi reimagined as a Marvel-style superhero, former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal cast as a Harry Potter-like figure
.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency
Planet Spark
Learn More
Undo
This is an AI-generated image shared by BJP on its social media account.
AAP shared a video on X during Delhi elections, where it featured former Delhi chief minister as Harry Potter.
The faces are familiar, yet the force behind these captivating campaigns is the unseen hand of Artificial Intelligence.
AI is no longer a distant frontier—it is the present
, deeply embedded in the machinery of the world's largest democracy. And with a young, tech-savvy electorate at the helm, India is rapidly embracing this technological revolution in its political arena.
These images were shared by BJP on X. This reflects how AI can be used to boost diplomatic relations between two countries.
India's stand on AI
Artificial Intelligence has quietly yet powerfully infiltrated the war rooms and strategy sessions of
Indian politics
. The central government, under Prime Minister Modi's leadership, has actively championed the development of a "unique marketplace-based model to ensure broad accessibility" of AI technologies. This national vision underscores the importance placed on AI's potential across various sectors.
Recently, in a podcast with American podcaster Lex Fridman, PM Modi underlined India's growing role in AI and said, "No matter what the world does with AI, it will remain incomplete without India."
He added that India's vast talent pool is its greatest strength, saying, "Artificial intelligence is fundamentally powered, shaped, and guided by human intelligence, and that real intelligence exists abundantly in India's youth."
Narendra Modi: Prime Minister of India - Power, Democracy, War & Peace | Lex Fridman Podcast #460
Decoding the digital campaign
The 2024 general elections served as a watershed moment, showcasing the extensive and innovative ways in which political parties are leveraging AI tools.
Political communication strategist Devesh Singh, in a conversation with TOI, spoke about this transformation and said,
"Indian political parties are harnessing AI to revolutionise campaign strategies, focusing on personalisation, content creation, and voter engagement"
.
He also provided a detailed breakdown of the AI strategies employed by various parties:
BJP
Deployed '
Bhashini
' on the NaMo app for real-time translation of PM Modi's speeches into eight regional languages, including Kannada and Odia, reaching non-Hindi voters. In Varanasi, BJP used AI to generate personalised WhatsApp videos addressing voters by name, linking to specific schemes like PM-KISAN. They also launched an AI chatbot, NaMo AI, to answer voter queries on policies.
Congress
Released a satirical deepfake video, "
Chor
," superimposing Modi's face on a singer, shared with its over 6 million Instagram followers (now over 7 million followers) to allege corruption. In Karnataka, Congress used AI to create localised social media ads targeting youth with messages on unemployment, tailored to district-level job data.
DMK
Employed deepfake technology to resurrect M Karunanidhi, featuring him in campaign videos endorsing M K Stalin, evoking nostalgia in Tamil Nadu.
AIADMK
Used AI-generated audio of the late Jayalalithaa in campaign rallies in Chennai, rallying supporters with her iconic voice.
TDP
Introduced an AI anchor, '
Vaibhavi
', delivering Telugu YouTube updates on party promises, and used AI to analyse voter sentiment in Andhra Pradesh constituencies.
AI technology తో చంద్రబాబు న్యూస్ | AI Anchor Vaibhavi, | Artificial Intelligence| tdp official
CPI (M)
Launched an AI anchor, '
Samata
', for Bengali voters, sharing policy explainers on WhatsApp. In Kerala, they used AI to generate posters highlighting local issues like coastal erosion.
AAP
In Delhi, AAP deployed AI-driven chatbots on WhatsApp to engage voters on free electricity and water schemes, with tailored responses based on user inputs.
YSRCP
In Andhra Pradesh, YSRCP used AI to create hyper-local video ads showcasing Jagan Mohan Reddy's welfare schemes, segmented by rural and urban voters.
Singh further emphasised the sheer scale of AI's deployment, saying, "
Over 50 million AI-generated robocalls mimicking politicians' voices, including Modi and Rahul Gandhi, were made, discussing local issues like irrigation in Maharashtra or healthcare in Bihar. These examples highlight AI's role in scaling personalised, emotionally resonant campaigns, though ethical concerns around misinformation persist
."
Expert's view on AI's role in Indian politics
Power of personalisation
A key aspect of AI's impact lies in its ability to analyse vast datasets and identify specific voter segments for targeted persuasion. According to Singh, "
AI is enabling campaigns to segment and persuade voters with precision. AI algorithms analyse vast datasets — demographics, voting history, social media activity, and consumer patterns — to create granular voter profiles based on age, caste, religion, income, or regional concerns.
" This detailed understanding allows for the crafting of highly personalised messages delivered through various digital channels like WhatsApp, robocalls, and social media.
For example:
BJP in Uttar Pradesh sent WhatsApp messages to farmers, referencing specific PM-KISAN payments they received, with calls to vote for Modi.
Congress in Rajasthan used AI to target women voters with ads on the Mahila Samman Yojana, customised by district-level literacy rates.
AAP in Punjab analysed social media sentiment to send personalised messages to urban youth about education reforms.
This level of personalisation extends to addressing voters by name and referencing local issues or personal benefits, with AI chatbots like BJP's NaMo AI providing tailored policy details in response to individual inquiries.
AI has been levelling the playing field
Avesh Singh, head of digital communication at I-PAC, told TOI, "
So far, AI has been levelling the playing field. Previously, only larger parties were able to produce a higher volume of content or react quickly, but now, with the help of AI, smaller parties can scale their content generation capabilities more easily.
"
"
However, in the future, as AI platforms begin to focus more on the business side, this shift may benefit those with greater funding
," he added.
Do AI-generated images and memes impact political narratives?
AI-generated images and memes are potent tools for shaping narratives and influencing voter perception, leveraging emotional appeal and virality. In 2024:
Congress's "Chor" deepfake video, portraying PM Modi as corrupt, reinforced negative narratives among its base, gaining traction on Instagram.
DMK's Karunanidhi deepfake videos in Tamil Nadu evoked nostalgia, strengthening voter loyalty.
BJP shared AI-generated memes in Gujarat, depicting Rahul Gandhi as disconnected, amplifying perceptions of weak leadership.
AAP used AI-crafted posters in Delhi, showcasing Kejriwal's welfare schemes with vibrant visuals, resonating with urban voters.
"
These visuals drive engagement through humour or sentiment but can spread misinformation — for example, a fake Rahul Gandhi resignation video in 2024, though limited to 9,000 views, fueled false narratives. In rural areas, with 76.32 per cent adult literacy, voters are particularly vulnerable to unverified content, eroding trust in media. Campaigns must weigh the persuasive power of AI content against risks of backlash and declining credibility
," Devesh Singh said.
Expert's views on how AI-generated images and memes are potent tools for shaping narratives.
The integration of Artificial Intelligence into election campaigns marks a significant turning point. From multilingual outreach and hyper-personalised messaging to the creation of visually arresting digital content, algorithms are undeniably reshaping the strategies employed by political parties.
While the human element of leadership and grassroots connection remains vital, the efficiency and scalability offered by AI in data analysis, targeted communication, and content generation are proving to be powerful new forces in the battle for votes. The digital battlefield has arrived, and algorithms are increasingly calling the shots.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
Hina Khan On 11 Years Of Modi Government: 'We Will See Developed India Soon'
Last Updated: Hina Khan believes that India can become a developed country, a vision she credited to the iconic leader Narendra Modi. As the country marks 11 years under the iconic leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, actress Hina Khan shared that India has become very powerful and that the country is now better than before in 'every field". Talking exclusively to IANS about 11 years of Modi government and his leadership, Hina told IANS: 'From my limited experience, I feel that India is very powerful." She added: 'In areas like infrastructure, technology, space, medicine, Ayushmaan Bharat, poverty reduction, defence, and the economy — we are better than before." The 37-year-old actress believes that India can become a developed country, a vision she credited to the iconic leader Narendra Modi. 'India can also become a developed country, and that too in our lifetime. To be very honest, it was our Prime Minister who first envisioned this dream. And with the way development and improvement are happening, I personally believe that we will be able to see a developed India soon," she said. In other news, Hina, on June 4, announced that she has finally tied the knot with Rocky Jaiswal. She took to Instagram, where she made the announcement, which featured several pictures from their special day. They wrote in the caption, 'From two different worlds, we built a universe of love. Our differences faded, our hearts aligned, creating a bond to last lifetimes. We are our home, our light, our hope and together, we transcend all barriers." 'Today, our union is forever sealed in love and law. We seek your Blessings and Wishes as Wife and Husband. #MM'sMinimalistBride #TwinFlame #OurLoveStory #SoulBound A special piece from the one and only MM". Talking about their love, Hina and Rocky initially met on the set of the popular show 'Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai'. While Hina was the lead Akshara on the show, Rocky Jaiswal was the supervising producer. First Published:
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Musk-Trump breakup exposes cracks in Wall Street's meme casino
Live Events Bloomberg You Might Also Like: Musk-Trump breakup puts billions in SpaceX contracts at risk, jolting US space program Bloomberg It took less than a day for the great Donald Trump-Elon Musk split to reshape debates over billionaire power and influence in American another level, the breakup was a reminder of something else: the perils of personality-driven investing, a growing and lucrative business for the Wall Street bankers cranking out, rapid-fire, a never-ending array of new financial products. Few have done more to fuel these gambling spirits than the president and the world's richest a matter of hours, a loosely connected web of Musk-linked trades — and a few tied to Trump — cratered as the public feud escalated. Dogecoin sank 10%; a publicly traded fund dangling SpaceX exploration for retail consumption slid 13%; leveraged bets amping up returns on Musk-related ventures lost a quarter of their value or more. Shares of Trump's media company spat — ignited by the deficit-expanding tax bill threatening Tesla's electric-vehicle subsidies — cooled on Friday and asset valuations steadied. But by then, investors had gotten the message loud and clear. 'You can go from being an incredible beneficiary one moment and then being bludgeoned the next,' said Peter Atwater, founder of Financial Insyghts. 'Anytime you are investing in something that is as crowded as these Elon Musk-related vehicles, you are going to be either the beneficiary or the victim of his standing.'The breakup drama was backdrop to a comparatively sleepy week in regular markets. The S&P 500 ended the week 1.5% higher, while the extended FANG index — which doesn't include Tesla — hit a record. The dollar touched its lowest level in about two years. Ten-year Treasury yields jumped more than 10 basis points this week, as Friday's jobs data eased concerns about an imminent economic for the casino crowd on Thursday, things got ugly. These investors aren't just trading stocks or crypto, they're paying for proximity to dominant personalities. Tesla is a financial avatar for Musk's ambitions. Trump's political resurgence reverberates across his media company, his fast-expanding crypto empire and MAGA-theme products across the broader industry. Each post, endorsement and headline is a chance to pull capital into the retail investment hasn't just drawn in risk junkies — it's built an entire product architecture, from speculative bets to more conventional funds tied to the fortunes of billionaire Musk. Vehicles like Baron Partners Fund and the Ark Innovation ETF got caught up in the selloff before markets rebounded on sharp rout — its worst week since 2023 — was fueled by projections that the company faces a $1 billion hit to full-year profit, if it loses a tax credit from Trump's bill. Meanwhile, the president's businesses pushed deeper into the financial ecosystem. His media company was one step closer to launching the Truth Social Bitcoin ETF, the latest in a string of crypto-linked assets and 'MAGA'-themed investment those with the nerve to dive into the newfangled, the gains have been eye-popping at times. A closed-end fund with Space-X exposure, Destiny Tech100 Inc., surged about 500% in just a month after the Nov. 5 election. Dogecoin went from 15 cents to above 43 cents in November, when Ark surged by 26% in less than two spirits have run high since the pandemic but soared anew after Trump buddied up with Musk on the campaign trail and won the White House, backed by the $250 million the Tesla founder spent on the meme ethos was cemented when Musk's program to cut government spending took its name from a crypto token born as a canine-themed joke.'I put him in the separate category of the Zeus of personality cults, beyond anything that has ever happened,' said Jay Hatfield, CEO of Infrastructure Capital Management. 'We've never had anybody running a major company like him.'The result has been a speculative spasm that, until this week, was often insulated from old-school markets convulsed by Trump's on-again-off-again tariff threats. An element of the craze that infuriates Wall Street's old guard — the near-impossibility of forming a valuation case around things like crypto tokens and public vehicles for private holdings — proved a virtue at a time of rampant economic uncertainty.'Retail traders — the bro trade component of retail — they've never really cared much about fundamentals,' said Dave Mazza, Chief Executive Officer at Roundhill Investments who in February launched a Tesla-focused product. 'These folks really believe in the narrative on stocks like Tesla and Palantir Technologies Inc. Some of these names are really dependent upon a dream premium and not what they actually do for business.'Another case in point: 16% of ETFs launched this year offer single-security strategies that use either leverage or options overlay, according to Bloomberg Intelligence's Athanasios Psarofagis. That's a record. Many target retail investors who trade aggressively, take on higher risk, and use them for dip buying.'The rise of degen leverage and derivative products on the highest profile stocks makes a mockery of the idea that the market is 'allocating capital' in any rational way,' says Dave Nadig, an ETF industry expert. 'It's immensely profitable. That's why very few people are even suggesting there are any issues in ETF land.'
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's ambition collides with law on sending migrants to dangerous countries
As the Trump administration ships migrants to countries around the world, it is abandoning a long-standing US policy of not sending people to places where they would be at risk of torture and other persecution. The principle emerged in international human rights law after World War II and is also embedded in US domestic law. It is called "non-refoulement," derived from a French word for return. The issue came into sharp relief in the past month as the Trump administration has tried to deport migrants with criminal records to Libya and South Sudan, countries considered so dangerous that they are on the State Department 's "do not travel" list. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Birla Evara 3 and 4 BHK from ₹ 1.68 Crore* Birla Estates Learn More Undo "What the US is doing runs afoul of the bedrock prohibition in US and international law of non-refoulement," said Robert K. Goldman, faculty director of the War Crimes Research Office at American University's law school. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) In a recent affidavit, Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the Trump administration's efforts to send migrants to those two countries as part of a diplomatic push to improve relations. He acknowledged that the Libyan capital, Tripoli, was wracked by violence and instability. Live Events You Might Also Like: Trump administration proposes $1,000 fast-track fee for US tourist visas: memo To critics of the administration, the sworn statement shows that the United States is no longer considering whether a deportee is more likely than not to be at risk of abuse through repatriation or transfer to a third country. State Department employees were also recently told to stop noting in annual human rights reports whether a nation had violated its obligations not to send anyone "to a country where they would face torture or persecution." The State Department said in a statement that it dropped that requirement to focus the reports on "human rights issues themselves rather than a laundry list of politically biased demands and assertions." "Enforcing US immigration law, including removing those without a legal basis to remain in the United States, is critical to upholding the rule of law and protecting Americans," the statement said. You Might Also Like: Trump's ban on Harvard international students blocked by US judge A judge blocked the transfer of migrants to South Sudan, which is teetering on the brink of civil war, and the men were being held at a US military outpost in Djibouti pending more court action. The Trump administration is also in a showdown in another court over its transfer of Venezuelan deportees described as dangerous gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador without due process. "If they were sending them to Sweden, that would be a different thing than sending them to South Sudan, which is one of the most dangerous places on the planet," said Michael H. Posner, director of the Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University's Stern School of Business. Posner, who was the assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor from 2009 to 2013, said the United States could send someone from Cuba or Venezuela to another country if it had been determined at a hearing that the place was safe. "We should not be deporting people to third countries where they have no connections and where their lives will be in serious jeopardy," he said. You Might Also Like: Trump travel ban: Why is Trump banning millions from entering the US again? The White House likens its crackdown on illegal migration to combating a national security threat from a hostile enemy. It has pressed military troops into service at the southwestern border and at a small detention operation for migrants at Guantánamo Bay. But even after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the United States abided by its non-refoulement obligation for prisoners it was holding at Guantánamo Bay, during a period when it flouted international law by torturing other detainees in secret overseas prisons called black sites. In 2004, Secretary of State Colin Powell concluded that the United States would not repatriate Chinese citizens from the Uyghur Muslim minority who had been rounded up in the war against terrorism in 2001 and held at the military base at Guantánamo. The United States believed that the men would be at risk if they were sent to China. Eventually, in 2013, the State Department found other countries to take in all of the Uyghurs. In the past, State Department officials have essentially asked two questions to determine where a detainee could be sent: Would the destination be safe for the individual? Would the United States and its allies be safe if the person was sent there? US officials had to assess whether the receiving country could monitor the activities of the detainees to prevent them from endangering the United States or an ally. Officials were also required to assess whether a deportee would be subjected to torture or other inhumane treatment. The United States adopted the same approach to its efforts to send home Islamic State group members or their relatives who were being housed in camps in northern Syria. "Consistent with both long-standing policy and its legal obligations, the US government cannot send people to a country where there are substantial grounds to believe that they will be mistreated," said Ian Moss, a lawyer and a former senior counterterrorism official at the State Department. In his affidavit, Rubio accused the courts that were reviewing deportation challenges of undermining US foreign policy. He also said that plans to announce "expanded activities of a US energy company in Libya" had been postponed. Rubio did not mention whether any diplomatic agreements surrounding the proposed resettlement included guarantees about how the migrants would be treated. "If these individuals are as dangerous as the administration represents them to be," Moss said, "sending them to a conflict area or country where there is a lack of capacity to manage them undermines the national security justification," Moss said. The State Department statement referred questions about "the removals process, including screening for credible or reasonable fear," to the Department of Homeland Security . The eight men who were to be sent to South Sudan were at a holding site in Texas when they were informed of their destination. An immigration division official, Garrett J. Ripa, said in a sworn statement May 23 that none of the men declared himself afraid to go. Court records showed that an immigration officer gave the men a form that listed their intended place of deportation. None signed the document. "By not signing, people are protesting being sent to a third country in the only way they know how," said Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the migrants in the case. Administration officials had previously planned to deport one of the men to Libya, which has been so unstable that Congress has since 2015 not allowed detainees who are cleared for release from Guantánamo Bay to be sent there.
