Labor's signature Hecs debt relief will be introduced to parliament this week. Here's what it means for you
Almost nine months later, the key election promise will be among the first pieces of legislation the federal government introduces when parliament returns on Tuesday.
Here's what you need to know about how it will work, who it will help, and what's missing.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
If the legislation passes, 20% of student debt will be wiped from the 3 million Australians with outstanding loans, equivalent to around $16bn according to the federal government.
The minimum repayment threshold will also be raised from $54,000 to $67,000, which is expected to save the average debt holder about $680 a year, and reduce the amount low income earners have to pay.
The measures are being sold as providing cost-of-living relief for young Australians, who hold the bulk of student debt.
Speaking to the media on Wednesday, the education minister, Jason Clare, said the average Australian with a student debt would have about $5,500 shaved off their loans. For Australians on an average income of $70,000, he said the bill would reduce the minimum amount they were required to repay by about $1,300.
'It'll take a lot of weight off the shoulders of a lot of young Australians who are just out of uni … looking to move out of home or save up to get a mortgage,' Clare said.
'You don't start paying off your university degree until your degree starts to pay off for you.'
Students have broadly welcomed the changes, while arguing they don't go far enough.
The president of the National Union of Students, Ashlyn Horton, said cutting debt was a 'long overdue move' that indicated Canberra 'might finally be listening' to concern about the rising cost of degrees.
But she said the bill 'doesn't come close to fixing the structural mess that got us here'.
'The core problem remains: students are still paying some of the highest fees in the Oecd under a system that punishes them for choosing the 'wrong' degree,' she said. 'That system has a name – the Job-Ready Graduates package (JRG) – and Labor has left it untouched.'
The Coalition's widely canned JRG scheme drastically increased the prices of arts degrees, which cost $50,000 as of 2024, to incentive students into other courses.
The Greens and the Coalition haven't confirmed whether they will support the Labor bill but sources have suggested it would be unlikely for them not to back it, given the demand for cost-of-living relief.
On Sunday, the shadow education minister, Jonathon Duniam, indicated the Coalition wouldn't block the bill in parliament despite still holding some concerns.
'We're not really in the business of standing in the way of cost-of-living relief … [and] it is one of those things that Australians wanted, they voted for,' he said.
'We've expressed our concerns. Australians have had their say. We've got to move on.'
While proving to be a popular policy among voters, the bill has been critiqued for not addressing the root of student debt – which is indexation and the rising cost of degrees.
Analysis conducted by the parliamentary library for the Greens and provided exclusively to Guardian Australia shows the 20% cut will be reduced to just 8% since Labor entered office when accounting for indexation since the 2022 election.
That's despite the federal government's changes to indexation by tying Hecs/Help debts to whatever is lesser out of the wage price index (WPI) or consumer price index (CPI).
For instance, a student debt balance of $30,000 in 2022 would have had their debts rise to $33,454 before the student debt reduction as a result of indexation. Following the 20% cut, their debt would drop to $26,763, and with 2025 indexation, rise to $27,619 – just 7.9% less than in 2022. The modelling assumes no repayments had been made.
The Greens' deputy leader and spokesperson on higher education, Mehreen Faruqi, said 'Labor crowing about a small one-off debt reduction won't fix the enormous burden of uni fees or student debt that keeps growing every year'.
'Of course any student debt relief is better than none, but we are demanding all student debt be wiped and a return to free uni and Tafe, funded by taxing big corporations,' she said.
Clare has flagged that more will be done in Labor's second term to reform the higher education sector, but it may not happen fast.
This year, the federal government is planning to introduce legislation to improve the integrity of the international education system, and to permanently establish a new Australian tertiary education commission.
The independent body was a recommendation of the Universities Accord, handed down early last year. A priority of the commission will be reforming the pricing of degrees, including introducing needs-based-funding into higher education, as is being rolled out at primary and secondary schools.
On Wednesday, Clare confirmed that part of its work on funding would be assessing the JRG package, without a timeframe for reform.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Significant gap' between Australian companies' climate commitments and how they actually invest, analysts find
Investment analysts have uncovered what they say is a 'significant gap' between the climate commitments of major Australian companies and how they actually spend their money. A report from climate consultancy group Pollination included analysis of the public climate disclosures of 12 major Australian companies, looking especially at their decisions on how and where to spend capital. 'What we've found is a significant gap between ambition and action,' said Richard Proudlove, the director of corporate engagement at the Investor Group on Climate Change, which commissioned the research. IGCC's members manage some $35tn of assets globally. Proudlove said the report was the first 'deep dive' on whether Australian companies 'are actually backing their net zero commitments with real investment'. The companies analysed were AGL, BHP, BlueScope Steel, Dyno Nobel, Orica, Qantas, Origin, Rio Tinto, Santos, South32, Woodside and Woolworths. All those companies have been targeted for engagement by investors as part of a project called Climate Action 100+. But the report does not single out individual companies, or name which companies had performed better than others. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Researchers at Pollination assessed companies against eight criteria related to capital investment, and found only one 'achieved high alignment' in more than half the criteria. For example, one criteria asked whether a company was moving capital away from fossil fuels. A company with no policy to phase out the use of oil, gas and coal and no meaningful cuts in investments would have 'low alignment'. A company with public commitments on fossil fuels, and that had cut fossil fuel spending and quantified the financial implications of those decisions, was in 'high alignment'. Only three out of eight applicable companies on that question were in 'high alignment', with three assessed as being in 'low alignment'. The report, called Financing Australia's Corporate Climate Transition, also describes a framework and set of guiding principles for companies on how they source, manage and spend capital. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Zoe Whitton, the managing director at Pollination Group, said: 'Companies are announcing capital expenditure numbers, but our analysis shows these disclosures don't provide enough detail for investors to assess whether the capital is sufficient or appropriately targeted to achieve their stated decarbonisation goals.' The Australian government is expected to announce its 2035 emissions reduction target by September, and is also working on detailed plans to reduce emissions across six different industry sectors. Whitton said: 'Without clear policy frameworks like sectoral pathways, companies lack the guidance they need for effective capital allocation, and investors can't properly evaluate their transition strategies.' Proudlove said the level of ambition articulated in the government's plans and in the target would influence the capital investment decisions of many Australian companies. 'We're in a year where the Australian government needs to ratchet up its [climate goals] with a 2035 target. It's important that's an ambitious target. 'The detail in those [industry sector] plans and the ambition of the climate targets is an essential signal for investors and companies to commit.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Anthony Albanese Government considers four-day work week
By The Albanese government has not ruled out the possibility of a four-day work week, following union claims that shorter hours could boost national productivity. The French-style idea is expected to be discussed at a three-day productivity roundtable in August, where strategies to tackle Australia's weak economic growth will be debated. Major business groups have already submitted their proposals to the roundtable, advocating for a corporate tax cut as a means to revive faltering productivity. Meanwhile, the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) are pushing for a better work-life balance. AMWU national secretary Steve Murphy argued that reducing work hours through options such as a four-day week, a nine-day fortnight, or a 35-hour week could be key to improving productivity without reducing pay. 'Where we would like it to get is that there is a much more healthy balance between time at work and time with your family and time for leisure than what it is right now,' Mr Murphy said. On Sunrise on Tuesday, Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek (pictured) declined to rule out the four-day week when asked directly by host Monique Wright. 'Could we be seeing a four-day working week?' 'Well, we'll listen to all views respectfully,' Plibersek said. 'The Treasurer's roundtable on productivity, I think is a great way of bringing unions and business and other groups together to discuss how we make our economy stronger and more productive. 'What we won't be doing to improve productivity is ask people to work longer for less. We want to invest in our people, boost training, invest in technologies and new ways of working, make sure that we're playing to our competitive advantages as a nation. 'That's how we boost productivity.' Speaking about the upcoming productivity roundtable, Mr Albanese said he wanted businesses, unions and civil society to put forward practical measures that have 'as broad a support as possible'. 'If you had a choice between, do you have less things with more support, or more things with less broad support, then I'm in favour of the former,' Albanese said. Representatives from the Australian Council of Trade Unions have received four of 24 invitations to the upcoming economic reform roundtable. The roundtable will also include delegates from the Business Council, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and the Australian Industry Group, among others.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Former judge's excuse for leaking confidential material from Bruce Lehrmann inquiry
A former judge's decision to leak confidential material from an inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann 's criminal prosecution was an attempt at transparency not an act of corruption, his lawyers say. Walter Sofronoff KC has asked the Federal Court to toss a March finding by the ACT Integrity Commission that the former judge engaged in serious corrupt conduct. The commission's probe stemmed from Mr Sofronoff's leaks to a journalist. But the watchdog's adverse finding was a 'serious offence against the administration of justice', Mr Sofronoff's barrister Adam Pomerenke KC said during a hearing on Monday. Mr Sofronoff was not corrupt, malicious or dishonest, the barrister told Justice Wendy Abrahams. Rather, he genuinely believed he was acting in the public interest by sending documents like witness statements to the media. 'Even if Mr Sofronoff was wrong in his view, the fact remains that he genuinely and honestly held it,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'At worst it could be characterised as an erroneous attempt to ensure accuracy and transparency in the public discourse.' Mr Sofronoff chaired a board of inquiry into the ACT's criminal justice system after Lehrmann's controversy-plagued prosecution. The former Liberal staffer was accused of raping then-colleague Brittany Higgins in a ministerial office at Parliament House in 2019. A 2022 criminal trial was abandoned without a verdict due to juror misconduct. Lehrmann lost a defamation lawsuit he brought over media reporting of Ms Higgins' allegations but has appealed a judge's finding the rape claim was true on the balance of probabilities. The Sofronoff-led inquiry found the ACT's top prosecutor, Shane Drumgold, had lost objectivity over the Lehrmann case and knowingly lied about a note of his meeting with broadcaster Lisa Wilkinson. Mr Drumgold resigned and launched a legal challenge to the findings in the ACT Supreme Court. It found the majority of the inquiry's findings were not legally unreasonable, but it struck down an adverse finding about how Mr Drumgold cross-examined then-Liberal senator Linda Reynolds during Lehrmann's criminal trial. In March, the ACT Integrity Commission also found the majority of the inquiry's findings were not legally unreasonable. But it found Mr Sofronoff's behaviour during the inquiry gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias and he might have been influenced by the publicly expressed views of journalist Janet Albrechtsen. Mr Sofronoff repeatedly messaged the News Corp columnist and eventually provided her an advance copy of his probe's final report. Mr Pomerenke told the Federal Court on Monday the ACT corruption body had admitted it made an error in finding Mr Sofronoff might have engaged in contempt. The claimed contempt stemmed out of leaks to the media despite directions made to parties during the inquiry to suppress certain documents. But the notion that the head of an inquiry could be in contempt of himself was 'absurd and irrational', Mr Pomerenke said. This concession was enough to toss the findings against his client, he told the court. Any individual error could not be 'disentangled' from the final finding that the former judge engaged in serious corrupt conduct, the barrister said.
