Four must-see charts following USDA's latest data drop: Braun
NAPERVILLE, Illinois, June 12 (Reuters) - Another month, another fresh set of numbers.
While the U.S. Department of Agriculture's monthly supply and demand report on Thursday did not shake things up too much versus trade expectations, there were some adjustments – and lack thereof - that are certainly worth a closer look.
USDA raised 2024-25 U.S. corn exports on Thursday, perhaps by a bit more than expected. The new 2.65 billion-bushel target would be the second-best on record.
But there is an argument for an even higher number. As of June 5, total U.S. corn sales for export in 2024-25 covered 98% of USDA's forecast, which is about as good as it gets.
In the previous 18 years, there were eight instances where sales coverage by this date exceeded 95%. In seven of those eight years, final exports were higher than what USDA had estimated in June.
The record volume year of 2020-21 is the one outlier, which could raise concerns about additional increases for 2024-25 given how strong the expectations already are. But there is no evidence that this is necessarily a limiting factor.
Right before the 2025-26 U.S. wheat marketing year began on June 1, cumulative pre-season export sales had reached a 12-year high. But as of June 5, the 5.9 million-metric-ton total was only an eight-year high for the date.
The shift can be explained. Large, unshipped balances at the end of a marketing year sometimes get rolled over to the new one.
Still, the 2025-26 progress is impressive. Total sales now cover 26.3% of USDA's freshly increased, full-year export forecast of 22.45 million tons. That portion is a 12-year high and compares with a five-year average of 21.9% by this same date.
Although U.S. wheat exports are expected to hit five-year highs, they may still lack on the world stage. The United States is seen accounting for 10.5% of global shipments in 2025-26, down slightly from the prior year and the third-lowest share in decades.
Forecast discrepancies between USDA and its Brazilian counterpart Conab have been in focus over the past year or so, but those deviations took a new turn this month.
Conab on Thursday increased its 2024-25 Brazilian soy crop estimate to 169.6 million tons from 168.3 million last month. For an unprecedented 13th consecutive month, USDA left its projection unchanged at 169 million.
That marks the first time in eight years that USDA's estimate is lighter than Conab's. However, the two numbers are very close, as are the two agencies' figures for Brazil's 2024-25 soybean ending stocks.
This means they may have found synchrony on both supply and demand assumptions, though the agencies may have to revisit pending the outcome of Brazil's in-progress soy export program.
On the corn side, Conab increased its 2024-25 Brazilian harvest outlook while USDA's was unchanged. USDA's projection sits 1.4% above Conab's, the smallest discrepancy in four years.
Global corn stocks and stocks-to-use are still expected to hit respective 12- and 13-year lows in 2025-26, though the numbers tightened further on Thursday with a reduction in old-crop stocks.
The 2025-26 stocks-to-use figure of 18.7% is down from 19.7% a year earlier and 22.3% in 2023-24.
That is above the 12% to 15% levels seen between 2010 and 2013, a period of high grain prices and ongoing supply struggles. But it still suggests there is not a ton of play in the global corn numbers, and major exporters' crops must meet expectations.
That includes a record U.S. crop target, and things are off to a decent start. That recently sent new-crop CBOT corn futures to six-month lows, and prices are at five-year lows for the date.
A big test is coming on June 30. Not only will USDA reveal more information about current U.S. stockpiles, but volume expectations for the 2025-26 U.S. corn harvest could be completely reset if the acreage survey offers a surprise.
Such a surprise would not at all be … surprising. Corn acreage has landed outside the range of trade predictions in four of the past six Junes, meaning this month could conclude with some volatile trade.
Karen Braun is a market analyst for Reuters. Views expressed above are her own.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Retailers Accepting Crypto Payments – With Instant Settlement in Cash: By Shane Rodgers
Cryptocurrency payments are gaining interest in the retail world, from luxury watches to fast food. As consumers express interest in paying with digital assets, businesses see a means of gaining a larger customer base. With a new generation of crypto payment solutions now available, businesses can accept crypto seamlessly, converting it instantly to their local currency. The merchants never touch the crypto, so there is no need to worry about crypto volatility, wallets to manage, or compliance headaches. A Shift in Retail Payments Consumer desire to use crypto at checkout is growing fast. The numbers back it up: 65 million Americans now own crypto, and according to Capital One, 80% would like to use it for everyday purchases. These consumers may be shopping for luxury items, but they also want to pay for groceries, plane tickets, and even fast food with digital currency. What's more, crypto users typically spend twice as much as those using traditional cards. Retailers are responding. In the United States alone, over 6,000 merchants already accept Bitcoin payments, and a Deloitte survey reveals that 85% of retailers see crypto as a tool to engage new audiences. Early Adoption Across Sectors The pay by crypto option isn't just theoretical — businesses are already seeing the impact. PDX Beam has been piloting its payment gateway with dozens of merchants across diverse industries, from diamond sellers to luxury car dealerships. By offering crypto-based payment these businesses are accessing a new demographic of spenders. One international fast-food chain is launching a crypto payment pilot in ten Miami-Dade locations, part of its expansive U.S. presence of 6,800 outlets. These tests could soon bring crypto payments to the mainstream of fast-food transactions. Beyond individual retailers, major retail payment players behind the scenes are getting involved. A $7.5 billion financial institution has signed a deal to process crypto payments, while a private equity group is using PDX Beam to enable crypto transactions for its portfolio of retailers. Eliminating Crypto Exposure for Merchants For most merchants, the biggest worry is dealing with crypto's price swings and the operational headaches of managing digital assets. PDX Beam's modern crypto-to-cash gateway eliminates that concern entirely. When a customer pays in crypto, the system instantly converts it to local currency and deposits the funds directly into the merchant's account — usually within seconds. Retailers don't touch the crypto themselves, meaning there's no exposure to volatility and no need to maintain separate crypto accounts. Plus, because these payments settle on blockchain rails, they help reduce the risk of chargeback fraud, offering merchants an extra layer of security. Lower Fees and Instant Settlement Another major benefit is the fees associated with crypto payments. While traditional card payments come with fees that can reach 3-4% for standard transactions and up to 7% in high-risk sectors (including cannabis stores), crypto payments bypass these intermediaries, lowering transaction costs to less than half Visa/MC charges. Settlement speeds are another major advantage. Credit card transactions can take days to clear, but crypto payments through these new gateways settle in real time or the same day — helping retailers improve cash flow. Positioning for the Future The shift toward crypto payments isn't slowing down. Big banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are launching crypto products, and the U.S. government is laying the groundwork for regulations that will support the growing digital asset economy. Worldpay forecasts that crypto spending worldwide will more than double by 2030, from $16 billion to $38 billion. For retailers, the takeaway is clear: crypto payments aren't a passing trend. Consumers want to use it, and with modern gateways eliminating risk and complexity, merchants can meet this demand safely and efficiently. By enabling crypto transactions without ever directly handling digital assets, retailers can meet the needs of this new generation of shoppers who are living increasingly digital-first lives.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
CVS under investigation for sending text messages to customers lobbying against proposed bill
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has launched an investigation into CVS, probing whether or not the company has been improperly using its customers' personal information to send text messages lobbying against a state law. She said she also plans to issue the company a cease-and-desist letter to halt the texts, according to ABC News. Lawmakers debating the failed bill at the center of the controversy shared images of CVS's texts during a hearing on Wednesday. 'Last minute legislation in Louisiana threatens to close your CVS Pharmacy — your medication cost may go up and your pharmacist may lose their job,' one text said, according to the Associated Press. The bill would have prohibited companies from owning both pharmacy benefit managers and drug stores. CVS owns retail pharmacies as well as CVS Caremark, which is one of the nation's top three pharmacy benefit managers, meaning the law would have directly affected its business. CVS Caremark and other pharmacy managers essentially act as middlemen by purchasing prescription drugs from manufacturers and determining the terms for how those drugs are distributed to customers. In 2024, the Federal Trade Commission issued a report saying that the managers "may be profiting by inflating drug costs and squeezing Main Street pharmacies." In Louisiana, CVS's text messages included links to a draft letter asking lawmakers to reject the legislation. 'The proposed legislation would take away my and other Louisiana patients' ability to get our medications shipped right to our homes,' the letter read. 'They would also ban the pharmacies that serve patients suffering from complex diseases requiring specialty pharmacy care to manage their life-threatening conditions like organ transplants or cancer. These vulnerable patients cannot afford any disruption to their care – the consequences would be dire.' State Representative Dixon McMakin said CVS was "lying" and using "scare tactics" to oppose the legislation. CVS reportedly sent "large numbers" of texts to state employees and their families to lobby against the legislation, according to Murrill in her statement. Amy Thibault, a spokesperson for CVS, told ABC News that the texts were sent out in response to a last-minute amendment to the bill on Wednesday without holding a public hearing about the change. 'We believe we have a responsibility to inform our customers of misguided legislation that seeks to shutter their trusted pharmacy, and we acted accordingly,' Thibault said in an email to the broadcaster. 'Our communication with our customers, patients and members of our community is consistent with law.' The bill failed to pass the state Senate, which decided not to take it up for the 2025 session.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US judge blocks State Department's planned overhaul, mass layoffs
June 13 (Reuters) - A federal judge in California on Friday temporarily blocked the U.S. State Department from implementing an agency-wide reorganization plan that includes 2,000 layoffs. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco during a virtual hearing said her May ruling barring federal agencies from laying off tens of thousands of employees at the direction of President Donald Trump applies to the planned overhaul announced by the State Department last month. U.S. Department of Justice lawyer Alexander Resar said in response that the State Department would not issue layoff notices that were scheduled to go out on Saturday. The State Department had argued that its reorganization plan submitted to Congress last month predated a February executive order and subsequent White House memo directing mass layoffs, placing it outside the scope of Illston's decision. The ruling came in a lawsuit by a group of unions, nonprofits and municipalities. The State Department and lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Trump administration has already asked the U.S. Supreme Court to pause Illston's May decision while it appeals. Illston blocked about 20 federal agencies, including the State Department, from carrying out plans to downsize and restructure at Trump's direction, pending the outcome of the lawsuit. But the department told Congress in late May that it still planned to notify about 2,000 employees this month that they were being laid off and would reorganize or eliminate more than 300 bureaus and offices. The State Department in May said it would undertake its reorganization plan by July 1, and has not commented about the potential impact of the lawsuit. In a court filing on Friday, Daniel Holler, the deputy chief of staff to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, said the agency's plan was crafted by Rubio and a small group of advisers to streamline operations and not in response to any directive from Trump. Illston, in her May decision, said the White House cannot order the restructuring of federal agencies without authorization from Congress. The ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that was spearheaded by Trump ally Elon Musk, the world's richest person, who had a swift and acrimonious falling out with the Republican president last week. Musk on Wednesday said he regretted some of the comments he had made about Trump in social media posts and deleted some of them, including one signaling support for Trump's impeachment.
