logo
EXCLUSIVE Calls for staff vaping rooms at work: Behavioural science expert says forcing vapers to go to same area as smokers outside is 'totally barbaric'

EXCLUSIVE Calls for staff vaping rooms at work: Behavioural science expert says forcing vapers to go to same area as smokers outside is 'totally barbaric'

Daily Mail​29-06-2025
Forcing people who vape to huddle outside in doorways with smokers is 'totally barbaric', behavioural science guru Rory Sutherland has claimed.
The vice chairman of advertising giant Ogilvy called for designated vaping rooms in offices so workers trying to quit cigarettes can stay away from temptation.
He also accused politicians and campaigners of a having 'knee-jerk' desire to ban vaping, which he described as his 'salvation' because it stopped him relapsing into cigarettes.
'It probably came from a lot of middle-class people who didn't have a lot of smokers in their milieu,' he said. 'The chattering classes probably saw vaping as a kind of reversal because their own social set doesn't have many smokers.
'But it seems extraordinary that people who are well-intentioned [want to ban it]...with so little evidence to the contrary.
'[The law] is being formulated by people who are not only non-smokers but probably have never smoked.'
Mr Sutherland's analysis of how human behaviour affects society and influences marketing have made him a cult social media star, with 240,000 followers on TikTok.
Speaking on the Smokeless Word podcast, he said he had a row with his bosses at Ogilvy, which inspired the TV series Mad Men and whose clients have included Rolls Royce, Dove soap and BP.
Mr Sutherland's analysis of how human behaviour affects society and influences marketing have made him a cult social media star, with 240,000 followers on TikTok
'They said we're going to ban vaping,' he said. 'Why can't you have a vaping room in the office? There's no legal prevention on this. It's bull****. People say it's illegal, it's not.
'By forcing the vapers to go outside and stand with the smokers you are exposing people to temptation.
'It's like holding a meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous in a pub. You wouldn't do that, would you? Forcing vapers to go and stand outside next to the smokers strikes me as totally barbaric.'
He added that the best thing the Government can do sometimes is 'just stand back and get out of the way'.
'The balance of probabilities is that this is harm reduction, at least,' he said. 'We should at least give it a fair watching-brief trial and see what happens.'
Smoke-free legislation was introduced in England in 2007, banning smoking in nearly all enclosed workplaces and public spaces, following similar bans in Scotland and Wales.
The rules also put an end to smoking rooms which had provided a haven for smokers at work until then.
They were so prolific that one of them was used as the setting for the BBC sitcom The Smoking Room, which starred Peep Show's Robert Webb and ran from 2004 to 2006.
The TV show ran from 2004 to 2006, but had to close when the smoking ban came into force
Then-Public health minister Caroline Flint launched a 100-day countdown to a ban on smoking in public places at a Wetherspoon pub in London Victoria station on March 22, 2007
Employers now have a legal obligation to make sure no smoking occurs on the work premises and in certain workplace vehicles.
And although employers aren't required to provide smoking shelters or designated smoking areas, if they do it must be outdoor and not fully enclosed.
But the smoking ban does not cover vapes, meaning employers have varying rules on using them at work.
Since June 1, disposable vapes have been banned in the UK. With the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, the government also aims to ban tobacco products for anyone born after January 1 2009, and bring in further restrictions on the advertising and sale of vapes.
Politicians have called for shops selling vapes to be licensed like alcohol outlets to prevent them getting into the hands of children.
Caroline Johnson MP, a paediatric consultant, said: 'The market for selling vapes and other nicotine products needs to be tightened. If people needed a licence to sell vapes, it would make it easier to enforce the law, because they could immediately lose their licence if they sold them to children.'
'I would also like to see a restriction on vaping in public places, to match smoking. People may say it's 'nanny state', but most people don't want to live in a candy floss and blueberry-scented fog.'
In a recent nationwide poll, think-tank Britain in Focus found most people are concerned by the number of youngsters puffing on brightly coloured disposable vapes, and shocked to learn that shops do not already need a licence to sell them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kneecap rapper faces month-long wait over whether terror charge is thrown out
Kneecap rapper faces month-long wait over whether terror charge is thrown out

The Independent

time13 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Kneecap rapper faces month-long wait over whether terror charge is thrown out

A member of rap trio Kneecap faces a month-long wait to find out whether his terrorism charge will be thrown out. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was once again greeted by hundreds of fans as he arrived at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Wednesday for a three-hour hearing. Prosecutors allege the 27-year-old displayed a flag in support of proscribed terror organisation Hezbollah at a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, in November last year. During Wednesday's hearing, his defence team argued the case should be thrown out, citing a technical error in the way the charge against him was brought. Brenda Campbell KC told the court the Attorney General had not given permission for the case to be brought against the defendant when police informed him he was to face a terror charge on May 21. She said consent was given the following day, but that meant the charge falls outside of the six-month time frame in which criminal charges against a defendant can be brought. Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove said permission was not required until the defendant's first court appearance and that permission did not need to be sought in order to bring a criminal charge. Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring adjourned the case until September 26, when he will rule on whether he has the jurisdiction to try the case. Hundreds of Kneecap supporters waving flags and holding banners greeted O hAnnaidh as he arrived at court alongside fellow bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh. Demonstrations in support of the rapper were organised outside the court building in London, as well as in Dublin. The Metropolitan Police imposed conditions limiting where the demonstration outside the court could take place, saying they were needed to 'prevent serious disruption'. A man was detained by police outside the court building because of a placard he was holding following the hearing. Surrounded by officers, he told reporters his hand-made sign made no reference to any proscribed organisations. O hAnnaidh was swamped by photographers as he arrived, with security officers taking more than a minute to usher him into the court building. Supporters greeted the Kneecap rapper with cheers as he made his way from a silver people carrier to the building. Fans held signs which read 'Free Mo Chara' while others waved Palestine and Irish flags before the rapper's arrival at court. Chants of 'Free, free, Mo Chara' could also be heard over a megaphone, which was repeated by the crowd. Mr O Caireallain and Mr O Dochartaigh sat at the back of the courtroom with three others as O hAnnaidh confirmed his name, date of birth and address to the court at the start of the hearing. In response to the Met imposing conditions on the protest, Kneecap described the move as a 'calculated political decision' that was 'designed to try and portray support for Kneecap as somehow troublesome'. The court previously heard the 27-year-old defendant is 'well within his rights' to voice his opinions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, but the alleged incident at the O2 Forum was a 'wholly different thing'. O hAnnaidh, of Belfast, is yet to enter a plea to the charge and is on unconditional bail.

Reeves' ‘mansion tax' would stall home sales and fuel exodus of super-rich, experts warn
Reeves' ‘mansion tax' would stall home sales and fuel exodus of super-rich, experts warn

The Independent

time13 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Reeves' ‘mansion tax' would stall home sales and fuel exodus of super-rich, experts warn

Property experts have warned that Rachel Reeves ' plans to levy a so-called 'mansion tax' on high-value properties would stall housing sales and add to the exodus of the super-rich from the UK. Mortgage brokers and financial planners have rounded on the chancellor after reports she is considering hitting the owners of expensive properties when they sell to plug a £40bn hole in the public purse. The mooted plans would see higher-rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent of any gain in the value of their home, while basic rate taxpayers would be hit with an 18 per cent levy. Currently, capital gains tax is not paid on the sale of primary residences. Proposals being considered for the autumn budget, the private residence relief would end for properties above a certain threshold, sources told The Times. The threshold is said to still be under consideration, but a £1.5 million starting point would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973. Financial adviser Scott Gallacher, director at Rowley Turton, said a level of £1.5m would prevent most older homeowners, particularly those who bought properties in the 80s and 90s, from selling houses. He added that the plans would 'kill off the upper end of the property market' and be difficult to implement. Mr Gallacher said: 'It would be insane if it creates a cliff edge in that properties over £1.5m are subject to Capital Gains Tax on the entire gain, as properties sold at £1.49m would incur no CGT whereas £1.5m might be a six-figure bill. If it's only on gains above £1.5m, then the CGT raised would be minimal, as potentially you'd be exempting six or even seven-figure gains.' He added: 'Homeowners, especially older ones, who perhaps bought their houses in the 1970s or 1980s, would be daft to sell and incur a huge CGT liability. Instead they would be incentivised to hold on to the home until they die and pay no CGT.' Meanwhile Simon Gerrard, chairman of Martyn Gerrard Estate Agents, warned the plans would leave families who bought homes in London more than a decade ago facing 'eye-watering' tax bills. 'Meanwhile, those who are actually wealthy know how to bypass these moves and won't pay it,' he said. He told The Independent: 'After the deadline passes people will simply not sell their homes. The property market above the threshold will die until Labour are voted out and the policy is repealed under a more sensible government.' Laith Khalaf, head of investment analysis at AJ Bell, said the tax-free nature of primary residences is 'deeply embedded in the psyche of homeowners'. He warned: 'A mansion tax set at high level would naturally cause people to worry it was just the thin end of the wedge, and the next time the government needs a bit of money they could just lower the threshold. 'It would also be an impediment to mobility in the housing market, as those with properties which might fall foul of the tax would be inclined to sit on them for longer, leaving a log jam in the housing ladder below them.' And critics warned the tax change would add to the reported exodus of super-rich individuals fleeing Britain. 'I can see a lot of families in London being caught with this higher tax bill, and it may push more wealthy tax contributors to exodus the UK, which is already a problem following the Chancellor 's last budget,' said Stephen Perkins, managing director of Yellow Brick Mortgages. The Treasury was asked to comment.

Newcastle United hit back at Alexander Isak's social media statement
Newcastle United hit back at Alexander Isak's social media statement

The Independent

time13 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Newcastle United hit back at Alexander Isak's social media statement

Newcastle United have rejected striker Alexander Isak 's claim that he was promised a summer exit, stating he remains under contract. Isak accused the club of 'broken promises' and declared 'trust is lost', asserting that a transfer is now in everyone's best interest. The club issued a strong statement denying any such commitment and indicated that the conditions for a sale, including a rejected £110m bid from Liverpool, would not be met. Isak has not featured for Newcastle in pre-season or their opening league match, reportedly due to a thigh injury, and is training separately. The dispute comes as Newcastle began the season without a recognised striker, having failed to secure other transfer targets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store