Rubrik's CEO let 800 employees sit in on board meetings — and he says it supercharged the company
Most CEOs keep board meetings private.
But for the first seven to eight years of building the data management firm Rubrik, Bipul Sinha let every employee in.
"We put the board meeting in a large conference room," the CEO and cofounder said on an episode of "The Logan Bartlett Show" published Friday. "We let people sit on the ground if needed."
"People could ask questions, so it was not a webinar style," Sinha said. "We've had situations where people actually asked hard questions in the middle of the board meeting."
As many as 800 staff members tuned in to some of these sessions, Sinha said.
"It is a direct result of this idea of transparency that really created alignment and velocity," the former venture partner at Lightspeed said.
"Everybody knew where we are going and what needed to be done," he added.
Sinha cofounded Rubrik in 2014. The company went public in April last year and is worth $19 billion.
The meetings, Sinha said, were his way of showing there were "no sacred cows" and "no information control."
"Everybody can demand answers, and when people demand answers, then people also become very responsible, they take it very personally," he said.
The format wasn't without friction. Some VCs and executives were initially skeptical, Sinha said.
"It was a little non-intuitive for them initially," Sinha said. "Sometimes you don't realize how many people are on the call, and we would have discussions about an individual," he added.
Eventually, Rubrik had to close the meetings to employees "because of the IPO and other activity," Sinha said.
Sinha did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
Rubrik isn't the only company that has pushed for more transparency in high-stakes meetings.
At Blackstone, senior leaders make it a point to involve junior staff during the private equity firm's deal meetings.
"We'll go around in many of these committees and ask the most junior people in the room, 'hey, what do you think?'" Blackstone President Jon Gray said earlier this year. "We want them to articulate why they have conviction."
An associate who interned twice at Blackstone told Business Insider that juniors were encouraged to make their presence known. A senior leader said to him that "rank doesn't matter here."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI CPO says the company's engineers only get faster as ChatGPT gets better at coding
For OpenAI, improving the programming capabilities of its AI is a self-reinforcing loop — as ChatGPT gets better at coding, its engineers get faster too. That's according to Kevin Weil, the chief product officer of OpenAI, who was recently asked by podcaster Azeem Azhar why the company had focused so much on AI coding tools from a "commercial perspective." "It's really important to us because if we can speed up coding, if we can make, you know, every engineer more effective, we also make ourselves more effective," Weil said in the interview. "And so we can build even faster." The AI company has also demonstrated a willingness to make acquisitions to bolster its efforts. Earlier this year, OpenAI acquired Windsurf, a startup that produced a popular AI coding tool, for a reported $3 billion. Weil said OpenAI is particularly focused on programming for a number of reasons, including that it's a relatively concrete task, which makes it easier to determine improvement in model performance as opposed to something more subjective, like writing. "It's also a relatively gradable task — you can tell, like in math or other things, if you get the answer right," the CPO said. Engineers are also evidently well-acquainted with coding processes, which Weil said makes it easier to train the models. "It's also something that our engineers are familiar with," he said. "So, it's a problem space that they understand and have good intuition for." OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment by Business Insider prior to publication. The market for AI coding tools itself is big, Weil added, and rife with people who are largely more willing to start experimenting with new technologies before most of the general public. However, concerns persist in the developer community that AI, rather than acting solely as a tool to increase existing programmers' productivity, could one day be used to replace them entirely — particularly when it comes to early-career coders. "It's also a huge market," Weil said, adding, "It's also a market full of early adopters — you know, technologists leaning into this." Add to that a lack of stringent regulation when compared to other industries, Weil said that coding becomes "a really interesting" market to innovate in. "It's also, you know, relatively sort of open and unregulated," the OpenAI CPO said. "It's not like trying to go into health or something where, you know, there are all kinds of other things you have to do."
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fast-growing Swedish vibe coding startup Lovable is set to raise funding from Accel at a $1.5 billion valuation
Vibe coding, which allows novices to write code with AI, has been all the rage lately. Accel is set to lead a new funding round in Swedish vibe coding startup Lovable. The company went from zero to $17 million in annual recurring revenue in its first three months. Accel, the storied venture firm that invested early in Facebook and Slack, is set to lead a new funding round in the Swedish "vibe coding" startup Lovable at a valuation of at least $1.5 billion, according to multiple sources familiar with the deal. Vibe coding, which allows novices with limited programming expertise to create code using AI, has been all the rage lately. Market leader Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, which is also backed by Accel, is reportedly in talks for a $9.9 billion valuation and now could be deployed internally by Amazon, Business Insider previously reported. Other competitors include Cognition AI, Microsoft's GitHub Copilot, and Windsurf, which was recently acquired by OpenAI. Lovable, founded by Anton Osika and Fabian Hedin, aims to make coding even more user-friendly, enabling non-engineers to make software and applications. It has the kind of hockey stick growth that enamors tech investors, going from zero to $17 million in annual recurring revenue in its first three months with 30,000 paying customers. Lovable declined to comment on the funding round, which is still not finalized and could change. Bloomberg previously reported the valuation of the round. Only a few months ago, Lovable raised $15 million in pre-series A funding led by Creandum, a European early-stage firm. Other investors included Charlie Songhurst, who sits on the Meta board, as well as Thomas Wolf, cofounder of Hugging Face. The US has dominated funding for AI startups, something Lovable aims to change. In a blog post, the company said it "may be Europe's fastest-growing AI startup" and that it was "proving that world-class AI companies can emerge from Europe—and win on the global stage." Read the original article on Business Insider Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Wall Street is on the cusp of ending the dumbest recruiting cycle known to man, and we all could stand to benefit from it
JPMorgan and Apollo took steps to delay the early recruitment of junior bankers. The move challenges the traditional recruiting cycle for entry-level PE jobs. If successful, the switch would shake up the entire industry and benefit people outside PE. They were the shots heard round Murray Hill. Recent announcements by JPMorgan and Apollo aimed at slowing down the early recruitment of junior bankers have sent young Wall Streeters into a frenzy. First, JPMorgan threatened termination for first-year analysts accepting future-dated private-equity jobs. Then, private-equity firm Apollo delayed recruiting young bankers. Not long after, Business Insider was first to report that PE giant General Atlantic told young bankers it's also pumping the brakes. The entire episode is still unfolding, but it risks upending years of planning by people pursuing one of the most sought-after careers in finance. And the end result could be PE firms pulling from a much bigger pool of talent as opposed to the select few who zeroed in on nabbing a job in the industry years ago. The news isn't just important for your Wall Street buddy who played lacrosse in college, though. Upending the well-worn practice of PE recruiting could ultimately impact all of us. And it's not a bad thing. The power of PE Understanding the magnitude of JPMorgan's and Apollo's announcements is realizing the effort it takes to get a job in PE. Imagine you have a big test on Monday. While most of your classmates spent the weekend partying, you buckle down and hit the books so you're fully prepared. But when Monday comes your teacher postpones the test so everyone else can study more. That doesn't negate the work you did, but it definitely stings a bit. Now imagine it's not a test but the chance at a job with a base salary upwards of $150,000 that you spent years, not just a weekend, getting ready for. Starting to get the idea? Still, you might be asking yourself: Why do I care about changes to PE recruitment? (To be fair, you clicked the link, but I'll allow it.) The truth is, this impacts more people than just those who consider a Friday night at Hair of the Dog a good time. Private-equity's reach is immense, and it's only set to get bigger. At the end of last year, PE firms had $1.2 trillion in global buyout dry powder, according to Bain & Company. That's a lot of cash ready to be put to work at a time when dealmaking takes off. The industry is also evolving beyond the typical PE strategies we're used to, like bundling up smaller companies. Firms are becoming big lenders, often beating regulator-constrained banks at their own game. (Whether that's a good or bad thing remains to be seen. But that's a conversation for another day.) In short, it's a PE-backed world, and we're all just living in it. A recruiting cycle 'that serves no one' Working off the premise that private equity remains an unavoidable part of our future, the industry's hiring tactics, even at the junior level, suddenly seem a lot more important. Apollo's move could be viewed as a way to avoid picking a fight with the biggest US bank. Apollo CEO Marc Rowan's statement to BI offers some more insight. First, he alludes to JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's criticism of the early recruitment of junior bankers. "When someone says something that is just plainly true, I feel compelled to agree with it," Rowan wrote via email. He then touched on why a reset was called for. "Asking students to make career decisions before they truly understand their options doesn't serve them or our industry," he wrote. "When great candidates make rushed decisions it creates avoidable turnover—and that serves no one," Rowan added. I'm not trying to carry PE's water here, but that makes sense to me! Not only is it incredibly dumb to ask young people to commit to their next job before they start their first one, but it also limits PE firms from a recruiting perspective. Under the current framework, people vying for these PE positions tend to fit a certain profile. From prestigious universities to finance clubs to summer internships to analyst jobs, the path to PE glory doesn't leave much room for detours. That's not to say these people make bad PE employees. God knows we've got plenty of examples of those who followed that exact route to success. But who says there isn't a great potential PE dealmaker out there taking the long road, so to speak? Maybe they didn't learn about PE or realize they wanted to get into the industry until the treadmill was moving too fast for them to jump on. Wanting to be in PE for a long time doesn't make you the most qualified person to work in PE. Meanwhile, pulling from such a small, selective talent pool could put firms at risk of groupthink. If you need to tick a certain number of boxes before getting a sniff at PE, you'll likely find a lot of people who were taught to think the same way. And when it comes to investing, that rarely turns out well. Moving away from that model is also good for the rest of us. As our interactions with PE firms grow, having people on the inside who understand life outside the PE rat race can benefit us all. There are no gurantees it'll hold Full disclosure: I'm still not convinced this will ultimately change anything. We've been down this path before. A few years ago a group of PE recruiters made a pact to hold off approaching junior bankers too early … only for one of them to break the truce and try front running the others. (This is Wall Street after all.) There's also nothing stopping another PE firm, let's call them Whitepebble or LLS, from using Apollo's pause as a way to scoop up even more talent. Or for another bank, let's call them Nevermore or Wizard, from telling aspiring bankers they'll be happy to help with their PE aspirations when they're recruiting on college campuses this fall. I'm also not naive enough to think that Apollo will open up the floodgates to anyone when it eventually starts recruiting associates. Even getting a sniff at such a prestigious firm will still be an honor for only a select few. But a slight deviation from the regimented system we have in place, where committing to a long-term career before you're even considered a legal adult is almost a prerequisite, is a step in the right direction. What do you think of the change? Is it a good thing that firms are taking a pause? Or will the PE industry lose something by slowing down early recruitment? Email me at .
