Trump fires jobs data commissioner after dismal report
Trump, in a post on his social media platform on Friday, alleged the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was appointed by former president Joe Biden, should be fired.
He provided no evidence for the charge.
"I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump said on Truth Social.
"She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified."
After his post, Labour Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director.
"I support the president's decision to replace Biden's commissioner and ensure the American people can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS," Chavez-DeRemer said.
Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added in July and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated.
McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and became the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in January 2024. Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired. The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants.
Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from 125,000, and for June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent.
"No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers," Trump wrote.
"She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes."
The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets. The disappointing figure sent US market indexes about 1.5 per cent lower Friday.
While the jobs numbers are often the subject of political spin, economists and Wall Street investors — with millions of dollars at stake — have always accepted US government economic data as free from political manipulation.
US President Donald Trump has removed the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported.
Trump, in a post on his social media platform on Friday, alleged the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was appointed by former president Joe Biden, should be fired.
He provided no evidence for the charge.
"I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump said on Truth Social.
"She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified."
After his post, Labour Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director.
"I support the president's decision to replace Biden's commissioner and ensure the American people can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS," Chavez-DeRemer said.
Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added in July and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated.
McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and became the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in January 2024. Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired. The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants.
Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from 125,000, and for June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent.
"No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers," Trump wrote.
"She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes."
The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets. The disappointing figure sent US market indexes about 1.5 per cent lower Friday.
While the jobs numbers are often the subject of political spin, economists and Wall Street investors — with millions of dollars at stake — have always accepted US government economic data as free from political manipulation.
US President Donald Trump has removed the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported.
Trump, in a post on his social media platform on Friday, alleged the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was appointed by former president Joe Biden, should be fired.
He provided no evidence for the charge.
"I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump said on Truth Social.
"She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified."
After his post, Labour Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director.
"I support the president's decision to replace Biden's commissioner and ensure the American people can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS," Chavez-DeRemer said.
Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added in July and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated.
McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and became the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in January 2024. Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired. The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants.
Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from 125,000, and for June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent.
"No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers," Trump wrote.
"She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes."
The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets. The disappointing figure sent US market indexes about 1.5 per cent lower Friday.
While the jobs numbers are often the subject of political spin, economists and Wall Street investors — with millions of dollars at stake — have always accepted US government economic data as free from political manipulation.
US President Donald Trump has removed the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported.
Trump, in a post on his social media platform on Friday, alleged the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was appointed by former president Joe Biden, should be fired.
He provided no evidence for the charge.
"I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump said on Truth Social.
"She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified."
After his post, Labour Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director.
"I support the president's decision to replace Biden's commissioner and ensure the American people can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS," Chavez-DeRemer said.
Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added in July and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated.
McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and became the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in January 2024. Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired. The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants.
Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from 125,000, and for June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent.
"No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers," Trump wrote.
"She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes."
The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets. The disappointing figure sent US market indexes about 1.5 per cent lower Friday.
While the jobs numbers are often the subject of political spin, economists and Wall Street investors — with millions of dollars at stake — have always accepted US government economic data as free from political manipulation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
33 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Trump ‘leading' the way in scrapping net zero after axing Biden-approved wind farm
Institute of Public Affairs Research Fellow Mia Schlicht discusses Donald Trump scrapping one of America's largest wind farms approved by former president Joe Biden. 'I think it's a fantastic decision by Trump, I mean Trump is waking up to the delusion that is net zero,' Ms Schlicht told Sky News Digital Presenter Gabriella Power. 'He is leading the way on this … there are so many companies now withdrawing their agreements to set up, particularly offshore wind farms. 'It is mainstream Australians and people all across the world who will get hit the hardest when they are the ones who are forced to pay for them.'
Sydney Morning Herald
40 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
A telling moment has revealed the path Trump is on, and it's scary
If you heard the news last week that Donald Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the head of the United States' Bureau of Labor Statistics, and responded with a shrug, you probably weren't alone. Wasn't this just another instance of the United States president attacking someone whose findings he didn't like? Not according to experts from across the political aisle, who have raised the alarm that this move represents a different threat altogether. Even from Trump. Speaking with host Samantha Selinger-Morris on The Morning Edition podcast, our international and political editor Peter Hartcher talks about what history tells us happens once a country's leader starts controlling facts. Click the player or watch the video below to listen to the full episode, or read on for an edited extract of the conversation. Selinger-Morris: We know, certainly I know now more than I did before, after reading your column, that reliable statistics are absolutely crucial to democracy, right? So walk us through this. Why so? Hartcher: Well, there are the specifics, like what should interest rates be set at, but the much bigger picture and why this is such a telling moment, I think, is that if you have agreed points of reality, if you can agree on some official data, then you have a starting point and perhaps even an ending point for debate and policy. Loading But if nothing is fixed, nothing is agreed and everything is subject to political manipulation, which presumably everybody will now suspect the numbers in future will be because Trump will no doubt appoint eventually a politically reliable, trustworthy figure to run this bureau… so even if that person does the job honestly and punctiliously, there will forever now be a suspicion over the numbers produced by that bureau. Now there will be compensating. Things will happen. Private sector outfits will try to produce their own estimates, that's exactly what happened in China when the Chinese government was plainly fudging their figures to make growth look better than it was. And in fact, it was the former premier of China, Li Keqiang, who said, 'Oh, don't worry about the GDP figures'. He said, 'They're man-made.' And he himself proposed an alternative formula for trying to measure... growth in the Chinese economy while ignoring the official statistics. And he became the premier. So this is a well-established pattern in autocratic societies. It's not in the US. That's why it's a big story, because it's part of the tendency of the Trump administration to drive the US into an autocratic mindset and political system, depriving the country of objective reality and objective facts so that everything can then be subject to manipulation and redefinition by the leader, who in an autocratic system becomes the only source of reality. He's not there yet. He's a long way from that. But that's the course he's on. This is a real marking point, I think. And he still has nearly three and a half years to go.
The Age
40 minutes ago
- The Age
A telling moment has revealed the path Trump is on, and it's scary
If you heard the news last week that Donald Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the head of the United States' Bureau of Labor Statistics, and responded with a shrug, you probably weren't alone. Wasn't this just another instance of the United States president attacking someone whose findings he didn't like? Not according to experts from across the political aisle, who have raised the alarm that this move represents a different threat altogether. Even from Trump. Speaking with host Samantha Selinger-Morris on The Morning Edition podcast, our international and political editor Peter Hartcher talks about what history tells us happens once a country's leader starts controlling facts. Click the player or watch the video below to listen to the full episode, or read on for an edited extract of the conversation. Selinger-Morris: We know, certainly I know now more than I did before, after reading your column, that reliable statistics are absolutely crucial to democracy, right? So walk us through this. Why so? Hartcher: Well, there are the specifics, like what should interest rates be set at, but the much bigger picture and why this is such a telling moment, I think, is that if you have agreed points of reality, if you can agree on some official data, then you have a starting point and perhaps even an ending point for debate and policy. Loading But if nothing is fixed, nothing is agreed and everything is subject to political manipulation, which presumably everybody will now suspect the numbers in future will be because Trump will no doubt appoint eventually a politically reliable, trustworthy figure to run this bureau… so even if that person does the job honestly and punctiliously, there will forever now be a suspicion over the numbers produced by that bureau. Now there will be compensating. Things will happen. Private sector outfits will try to produce their own estimates, that's exactly what happened in China when the Chinese government was plainly fudging their figures to make growth look better than it was. And in fact, it was the former premier of China, Li Keqiang, who said, 'Oh, don't worry about the GDP figures'. He said, 'They're man-made.' And he himself proposed an alternative formula for trying to measure... growth in the Chinese economy while ignoring the official statistics. And he became the premier. So this is a well-established pattern in autocratic societies. It's not in the US. That's why it's a big story, because it's part of the tendency of the Trump administration to drive the US into an autocratic mindset and political system, depriving the country of objective reality and objective facts so that everything can then be subject to manipulation and redefinition by the leader, who in an autocratic system becomes the only source of reality. He's not there yet. He's a long way from that. But that's the course he's on. This is a real marking point, I think. And he still has nearly three and a half years to go.
