
New Yorkers 'Accelerating' Florida Move Plans After Mamdani Victory
Zohran Mamdani's surprise victory at New York City's Democratic mayoral primary last week has stunned the metropolis's wealthy buyers, who are reportedly looking to buy properties in other, more favorable locations—especially in Florida.
"Within a day of the primary results, we had serious inquiries from buyers in Manhattan and Connecticut," Isaac Toledano, CEO & Co-founder of BH Group, one of South Florida's most active luxury developers, told Newsweek. "One asked about the Ritz-Carlton Residences in West Palm Beach, the other about the West Pompano Beach Hotel & Residences," he said.
For many wealthy buyers looking into relocating from New York City to Florida, the idea of leaving the Big Apple is more than a Plan B in case Mamdani wins the mayoral election later this year. It is a strategic investment they are doing right now.
"A few weeks ago, we sold two penthouses at the Ritz-Carlton Residences in Hammock Dunes near St. Augustine for a combined $20 million, which set records for Palm Coast and all of Flagler County," Toledano said.
"One of those buyers was from New Jersey. He already had a part-time home in Florida but decided he wanted to be here full-time. I can't say if that particular transaction was because of everything leading up to the election, but it's another clear sign that people across the country are choosing to plant roots here," he added. "When conversations start moving that fast, it tells you people aren't just paying attention. They're preparing to make real decisions."
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva
"We've seen more interest, especially from clients who were already keeping an eye on Florida," Peggy Olin, CEO of OneWorld Properties, an expert leading sales and marketing for some of South Florida's top luxury towers and working closely with international and out-of-state buyers, told Newsweek.
"Mamdani's victory seems to have accelerated those conversations. People are asking more questions about timing, taxes, and long-term lifestyle changes. It's less about panic and more about planning. They're being proactive."
What Does Mamdani Have To Do With It?
Jay Batra, a real estate entrepreneur and the principal of Batra Real Estate, a full-service real estate brokerage in New York City and Miami, is perfectly positioned to notice this shift in interest between New York and Florida in the wake of Mamdani's victory.
"We're seeing a noticeable pause among luxury buyers in New York City, many of whom are redirecting their search to more tax-friendly, lifestyle-driven markets like Miami and South Florida," Batra told Newsweek. "With political and economic uncertainty in NYC, high-end clients are increasingly turning to South Florida for both primary and investment properties."
For Batra, it is Mamdani's radical rent agenda, which has promised New Yorkers rent freezes, that is scaring wealthy buyers.
"Our clients who own buildings across NYC are deeply concerned about the rent freeze tied to Mayor Mamdani's agenda. Landlords are facing mounting pressure—with high taxes and operating costs, it's becoming unsustainable to hold properties without the ability to adjust rents," he said. "Many are now evaluating out-of-state investments as a safer, more profitable alternative."
In his campaign, the 33-year-old mayoral hopeful has also proposed to reform the New York City's tax system to tax "richer and whiter" neighborhoods more, a promise that is likely to scare wealthy investors off.
"High-end buyers value stability above all else," Toledano said. "The moment politics feel unpredictable, they start exploring other options," he added.
For many wealthy investors, the Democratic mayoral primary signaled that there are a lot of unknowns about the city's future. "Whether it's taxes, safety, or the overall business climate, uncertainty makes people uneasy. No one wants to wake up one morning and feel their investment or their family's security is at risk," Toledano said. "They want peace of mind, and they're ready to make a change to find it."
"When political narratives shift, especially around taxes, wealthy buyers take notice. These are people who've spent their lives building something, and they want to protect it," Olin said. "Mamdani represents a vision for the city that some high-end buyers feel may no longer align with their values or financial goals. It's not a reaction out of fear but out of wanting more control over their future."
Why Florida?
There are several reasons why wealthy investors may be looking to Florida as an alternative—including that the state has a thriving and well-established luxury market.
"They're looking for the best of the best. Buyers at this level don't want to compromise on location, design, or quality of life. Branded residences are part of the appeal because they offer strong amenities and a lifestyle people can rely on," Toledano said.
"If you're spending several million dollars on a home, you expect security, service, and long-term value. That's why we're seeing interest not only across South Florida but also in places like Hammock Dunes and on the West Coast in Naples. People feel confident they're making a solid investment in a place they'll enjoy living."
There is also, of course, the fact that Florida has a favorable tax environment—no state income tax, and lawmakers are making ongoing efforts to lower property taxes for homeowners, if not to abolish them entirely.
"Florida checks all the boxes. No state income tax, a strong pro-growth economy, top-tier schools and infrastructure, and a lifestyle that's hard to match. You can live near the beach, raise a family, and still feel like your investment is protected. For many buyers, that combination is powerful," Toledano said.
Will New York City Face An Exodus Of Wealthy Buyers If Mamdani Is Elected?
Toledano thinks that we're already seeing the early signs of a future exodus of wealthy buyers from New York City.
"People don't wait until after an election to make decisions about their families, their finances, or their future. A few calls today can turn into dozens or hundreds of buyers in the months ahead," he said. "If the uncertainty grows, the migration will only pick up speed."
And South Florida will continue benefiting from this hemorrhaging of wealthy buyers, he said.
"It offers a sense of security they're not feeling in New York right now. That's why I believe this summer and the rest of the year could be busier than anyone expects," he said. "The demand is there, and the interest we're seeing—from Manhattan to New Jersey to Connecticut—is proof that people are ready to move their lives and their capital here."
Should Mamdani be elected mayor of New York City and the policy concerns feared by wealthy buyers materialize, "it could push more people to act" and leave the city and the state, Olin said.
"But again, this isn't just about leaving, it's about choosing a place that feels like the right fit for the next chapter. And for many, Florida checks a lot of those boxes."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
26 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump attacks Charlamagne Tha God after radio host criticizes his presidency
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Sunday lashed out at radio host Charlamagne Tha God, saying in a social media post that the popular broadcaster "knows nothing about me or what I have done.' Trump's comments came a day after Charlamagne, whose real name is Lenard McKelvey, criticized Trump on a Fox News show hosted by Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law and former co-chair of the Republican National Committee. Asked how he would rate Trump's presidency, the radio host said, 'I wouldn't give it a good rating simply because the least of us are still being impacted the worst.' Trump said on Truth Social that Charlamagne was a 'dope' who voted for Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris. Charlamagne said he personally will benefit from tax breaks approved in Trump's tax-and spending law, but said, 'There's going to be so many people that's hurt by that bill.'' 'Anything that takes away Medicaid from people and will put people in a worse financial situation than they were previously in, I'm not for," he added. Charlamagne also predicted that 'traditional conservatives" are going to take back the Republican Party from Trump's Make America Great Again movement, citing controversy over Trump's refusal to release files related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'I think there's a political coup going on right now in the Republican Party that people aren't paying attention to,' Charlamagne said. 'I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back. I really do. I think that they know this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up, the MAGA base isn't letting this issue go and for the first time they can probably take their party back and not piss off the MAGA base. I think they're going to do that.' The Epstein case has dominated news coverage in recent weeks after the Justice Department said it will not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision has infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Officials have said Epstein killed himself in his New York jail cell while awaiting trial in 2019, but his case has generated endless attention and conspiracy theories because of his links to famous people, including Trump and other billionaires. 'Can anyone imagine the uproar there would be if I used that nickname?' Trump asked. Charlamagne told Lara Trump that his criticism of the Republican president was not new, adding that he 'gave President Biden the same hell' when he didn't think the Democrat was doing a good job.


Newsweek
27 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump 'In Denial' About Job Figures, Economy—Nate Silver
Based on factual reporting, incorporates the expertise of the journalist and may offer interpretations and conclusions. Pollster Nate Silver on Sunday called out President Donald Trump's reaction to the latest data about jobs, accusing him of "denialism" and warning that it won't help him fix the nation's slowing economy. "Firing the BLS commissioner won't prevent the effects of tariffs. But it will reduce American economic leadership and increase uncertainty for businesses, workers and investors," Silver wrote in his newsletter, referring to Trump's decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), after the agency published a weaker-than-expected jobs report for July. Silver stressed that U.S. economic data remains reliable, as it is meticulously documented and regularly revised "because measuring something as complex as the modern American economy is an incredibly challenging task." "I'm not sure exactly where firing the BLS commissioner ranks on the list of Trump-related outrages," Silver wrote. "Even if Congress does its job and McEntarfer replaced with another competent successor, this could have a chilling effect on BLS and other government agencies to operate independently." Newsweek has reached out to the White House by email on Sunday outside of normal business hours for comment. Why It Matters Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer has sent shockwaves throughout the country, with economists and Democratic lawmakers criticizing the move. Some have accused Trump of trying to "kill the messenger" over heavy revisions to May and June's job numbers, which removed 258,000 jobs previously announced in those months. This followed the July jobs report, which reported 73,000 jobs added, which is well short of the projected 100,000 jobs. The unemployment rate also rose to 4.2 percent. The firing of a high-level labor statistician after the release of adverse economic data raised alarms about the politicization of nonpartisan agencies and reliability of official U.S. economic statistics. Experts and lawmakers stressed that the integrity of the BLS is central to public trust and informed economic decision-making. What To Know Silver, the founder of 538 and one of the most prominent polling experts in last year's presidential election, wrote in his newsletter that July's jobs report has suggested a slowing economy and "Trump is in denial about it." "Each monthly payrolls figure is actually revised three times: once in each of the first two months after initial publication (so July's 73,000 figure will be re-reported in August and then again in September) and then again each January as part of the BLS's annual benchmark revisions," Silver wrote. He argued that the jobs report often only receives attention at the initial announcement, with politicians and news media treating the figure as a simple "beat" or "bust" factor relative to the initial estimate, and that not enough attention is given to the regular cycle of "large revisions and the difficulties in estimation." "All of this feels a little too familiar: it's the same thing that happens when news organizations breathlessly report polling data without considering the margin of error and other challenges for surveys," Silver wrote. He noted that revisions during every month of Trumps' second administration have seen negative revisions, which he wrote is "actually common enough" and that it's more important to look at the trend of revision from month-to-month. Those trends help experts and analysts understand if they're seeing sampling errors or statistical biases in the numbers, which can occur also in the event of an economy facing "some sort of trauma or disruption." Silver also wrote that any attempt to undermine Trump would be better executed by reporting the lower estimates instead of revising them down later, since "revisions don't usually get as much media attention as the headline figures," and that "the May and June revisions are relatively pedestrian." "The largest change ever to an initial jobs figure ever after two months came in March 2020 as the pandemic hit American shores; initially reported as a job loss of 700,000, it was later revised to nearly 1.4 million instead," he wrote. President Donald Trump departs the White House en route to Bedminster, New Jersey, on August 1 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump departs the White House en route to Bedminster, New Jersey, on August 1 in Washington, D.C. Andrew Thomas/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Sunday: "Head of the Bureau of of Labor Statistics did the same thing just before the Presidential Election, when she lifted the numbers for jobs to an all time high. I then won the Election, anyway, and she readjusted the numbers downward, calling it a mistake, of almost one million jobs. A SCAM! She did it again, with another massive 'correction,' and got FIRED! She had the biggest miscalculations in over 50 years." Trump also wrote on Truth Social on Friday: "McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months. Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative. The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected – How did that work out? Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put "out to pasture." Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Ernie Tedeschi, the former head of Yale University's Budget Lab, wrote on X on Friday about McEntarfer's firing: "I've worked closely with Erika. I know of no economist who is more data-focused & devoted to truth in statistics. She never shied from speaking truth to power when the data were disappointing. Nothing would be worse for US credibility than political meddling in our economic data."


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Senate confirms Jeanine Pirro as US Attorney for DC
The Senate on Saturday night confirmed President Trump's pick Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. Pirro, a former Fox News host and prosecutor who served as district attorney for Westchester County in New York, was confirmed along party lines in a 50-45 vote. Sens. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) did not vote. Attorney General Pam Bondi celebrated the vote in a post on social platform X. 'Congratulations to my dear friend @USAttyPirro on her confirmation today! Jeanine is not only a wonderful person — she is a warrior for law and order,' Bondi wrote. 'I am absolutely thrilled to work side by side with my friend to keep Washington, DC safe,' she added. In a post on Saturday, Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said Pirro 'should never be a permanent U.S. Attorney.' 'She endorsed the firing of January 6 prosecutors. She recklessly spread the Big Lie to the point her *own producers* had to tell her to cool it. Ultimately, she's a rubber stamp for Donald Trump,' he wrote. The Judiciary panel gave its approval to Pirro in mid-July despite Democratic backlash. Democrats walked out of a business meeting after debate on Pirro and another controversial Trump nominee was cut short. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said in his own X post that it was 'a sad moment for the Senate and the country.' 'Republicans just confirmed Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. Yes, the same Judge Jeanine that even Fox News said was 'crazy' and had to take off the air. How can they vote to confirm these people?' the Democratic senator wrote. Pirro, who has been serving as the interim U.S. Attorney in D.C. since May, thanked Trump in a post on X 'for giving me the opportunity to bring justice to the swamp in D.C.' and she shared a message for the city: 'get ready for a real crime fighter.'