
Over 90 flights with more than 20,000 flyers had to be diverted: Qatar Airways CEO details how airline managed Iran missile crisis
He described the crisis as 'an operational crisis few airlines will ever encounter, and one that 'challenged the very core of what it means to run a global airline'.
The airspace closure snowballed into a major international disruption, given Qatar Airways' extensive network and Doha being a mega hub airport, where thousands of passengers transit daily. Iran's missile attack—in retaliation of American airstrikes at its nuclear facilities—led to other West Asian countries including the UAE, Bahrain, and Kuwait also shutting down their airspaces for a few hours, which deepened the disruption further.
'At the time (of the airspace closure), over 90 Qatar Airways flights carrying more than 20,000 passengers to Doha, were forced to divert immediately. 25 flights diverted into airports across Saudi Arabia, 18 into Turkey, 15 into India, 13 into Oman, and 5 into the United Arab Emirates. The remaining aircraft were re-routed to major hubs including London, Barcelona, and others across Europe, Asia, and the Middle East,' wrote Al Meer, terming the Qatari airspace closure as 'unexpected and unprecedented'.
'At around 18:00 local time on Monday, 23 June, an unexpected and unprecedented closure of Qatari airspace forced Qatar Airways to suspend global operations with immediate effect. Shortly after, airspace was also closed in Bahrain, the UAE, and Kuwait. Hamad International Airport (Doha), one of the world's busiest and most connected global hubs, was brought to a standstill, with almost 100 aircraft en route to Doha, several already on approach to our runways, and others lining up for departure,' he said.
Scale of the disruption
With all departures from Doha suspended until past midnight (Qatar time), the airline's 'routine, seamlessly synchronised global operation' was instantly scattered into dozens and dozens of disrupted flight scenarios across continents, 'each with their own complexities and requirements'.
According to Al Meer, over 10,000 passengers were already in transit at the Doha airport when the disruption began, finding themselves caught in the middle of 'one of the most severe and complex operational challenges in modern aviation history'.
'Around the world, some of our flight crews had timed out of legal operating hours. Most of our fleet, including A380s carrying more than 450 passengers each, were now out of position, some grounded at airports with curfews. Several flights had to wait for clearance to re-enter restricted regional airspace. Aircraft routing plans were rewritten in parallel with passenger itineraries. Over 151 flights were immediately disrupted. Every part of the operation had to adapt in real time — without precedent, and without pause,' Al Meer wrote in the letter.
He added that the priority for Qatar Airways was clear—to care for passengers impacted by the unprecedented situation, and to restore its global operations 'as safely and swiftly as possible'.
Crisis mitigation efforts in Doha
Once the Qatari airspace reopened shortly after midnight on Tuesday, the diverted aircraft began returning to Doha over the course of several hours. As a result, the number of passengers in transit at the Doha airport ballooned to over 22,000 by 5 am (Qatar time).
'As an airline, our business continuity plans were activated, and our teams coordinated on hard resource planning, catering, ground transport, hotel accommodation, and real-time alignment with passenger movements, immigration, customs, and every airport stakeholder. Over 4,600 customers were provided hotel accommodation, using approximately 3,200 rooms across Doha. Many of these passengers received onward boarding passes for their rescheduled flights before even leaving the terminal—allowing for a smoother re-entry once our operations resumed,' the Qatar Airways CEO said.
Meanwhile at the Doha airport, Qatar Airways group teams got busy rebooking journeys, and even manually rebuilding complex travel itineraries—some involving other airlines, and even expired visas. The airline also decided to increase capacity to destinations with 'high volumes of displaced passengers'.
'Contact centre resources were scaled up to cope with global demand. We quickly established a flexible travel policy, allowing passengers who had not yet started their journeys to make changes or refund their bookings without fees. Across our global stations, ground handlers and partners moved quickly, supported by live coordination between our airport and airline operations control centres,' Al Meer said.
Resumption of normal flight operations
On Tuesday, Qatar Airways operated a total of 390 flights as it worked to restore the integrity of its flight schedule. Around 20,000 passengers from its disrupted flights were cleared within 24 hours, with more than 11,000 resuming their journeys on the morning of June 24, while the remainder departed through the evening that day and the morning of June 25. According to Al Meer, after that, there were no passengers from diverted flights that were still stranded.
'Within just 18 hours, our scheduled operations had resumed. Wave by wave, the system began to stabilise. By the end of Tuesday, more than 58,000 passengers had departed Doha—moved not by chance, but by a coordinated effort from across the Qatar Airways Group to fulfil our responsibility during this unprecedented disruption,' Al Meer said.
The airline's operations stabilised further on June 25 with the operation of 578 flights. According to data from Cirium, an aviation analytics company, Qatar Airways normally has between 523 and 547 daily flights, depending on the day of the week.
Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Holster hand' or hidden rage? Body language expert reveals chilling reason behind Putin's gesture after Donald Trump's bomber flyer
The wait is finally over, as the most anticipated meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin took place in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday, August 15, 2025. The meeting grabbed the attention of fans for political reasons, but this is not the only thing that everyone's talking about. According to UNILAD, a body language expert has sparked fresh debate after analysing a chilling hand gesture made by Putin following a tense moment involving Donald Trump. The incident occurred after Trump authorised a show of force by flying nuclear-capable bombers over Putin's location. According to the expert, Putin's subtle but deliberate gesture, captured on camera, may indicate suppressed rage, a calculated threat or an attempt to reassert dominance in a high-stakes geopolitical standoff. The analysis has since gone viral, with many interpreting it as a veiled warning amid rising global tensions. WATCH: Deplorable Trump clapping for a murderous war criminal. What a disgrace to our country's ideals. Trump always shows his true colors around Putin by selling out America and our allies. Even past Republican presidents like Reagan & Bush always stood up to tyrants.… When Donald Trump met Vladimir Putin Following nearly three hours of high-level discussions, both presidents held a brief conference where former US President Donald Trump expressed cautious optimism about the outcome. "We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there," Trump stated, describing the talks as 'extremely productive.' He noted that while several key points had been agreed upon, only a few issues remained unresolved. Trump added that he planned to make follow-up calls to update others on the progress, signalling potential movement toward a broader understanding between the two leaders. "Some are not that significant. 'One is probably the most significant,' he added. On Friday, both leaders touched down at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska's largest military installation, where they disembarked from their respective aircraft and greeted each other with a handshake on the red carpet. As they walked side by side across the tarmac, the skies above roared with a display of four F-35 fighter jets and a B-2 Spirit stealth bomber flying overhead. Vladimir Putin's hand gesture 'reveals' chilling details, as per experts According to celebrity psychic and body language expert Inbaal Honigman, Putin appeared to respond with a subtle and deliberate hand gesture. He told UNILAD that as fighter jets drew closer overhead, Putin reacted noticeably faster than Trump, picking up on the sound well before his American counterpart. Though the flyover may have come as a surprise to the Russian leader, while likely anticipated by Trump, footage shows Putin sharply turning his gaze toward the noise. A B-2 strategic bomber, escorted by four F-22 Raptor fighters, just flew over Trump and is the very bomber that took part in the mission to destroy Iran's nuclear program, which was hidden in fortified bunkers.A hint that Putin's bunker won't save him? Most striking, however, was his body language: his so-called 'holster hand' visibly tensed and stiffened over his pocket, a subtle yet telling signal of heightened alertness or underlying tension. "Putin is known for his famous 'Gunslinger Gait', meaning he's always walked with one hand swinging loosely, while the other is still, as if ready to draw a weapon at a moment's notice. This is believed to be part of his KGB training. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump administration unveils stricter subsidy rules for wind, solar projects
The US Treasury Department on Friday unveiled stricter rules for how solar and wind projects can qualify for federal tax subsidies that President Donald Trump's new tax and spending law is phasing out over the next two years. The revisions change longstanding definitions for what it means for a project to be considered under construction by requiring developers of big solar arrays and wind farms to complete physical work rather than simply show that they have invested capital. The changes are in response to an executive order Trump issued last month directing the Treasury Department to restrict tax credit eligibility unless a substantial portion of a facility is built. Since taking office in January, Trump has repeatedly sought to stall development of wind and solar energy, calling them unreliable, expensive, and overly dependent on Chinese supply chains. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act , which Trump signed into law last month, requires projects to begin construction by July of next year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for a 30 per cent tax credit and bonuses that can push the subsidy even higher. Under the new rules, which will affect projects that start construction as of September 2, utility-scale projects will be required to show substantial and continuous physical work to be eligible for the credits. They will still have four years to claim the subsidies. For the last decade, project developers had also been able to "safe harbor" projects for four years by incurring 5 per cent of total costs before a credit expired or stepped down to a lesser value. According to an agency document, "substantial" work does not include permitting, design or holding components in inventory. Small projects of under 1.5 megawatts will still be able to use the 5 per cent "safe harbor" provision, Treasury said, a positive for the residential solar industry. A solar industry trade group said the rules would harm businesses and undermine lawmakers' intentions with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. "This is yet another act of energy subtraction from the Trump administration that will further delay the buildout of affordable, reliable power," Solar Energy Industries Association CEO Abigail Ross Hopper said in a statement. "American families and businesses will pay more for electricity as a result of this action, and China will continue to outpace us in the race for electricity to power AI."


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Alaska summit: Putin hoodwinks Trump, yet again
Russian President Vladimir Putin had a broad smile on his face when the two leaders appeared before cameras. And well he might: He bamboozled his American counterpart — as anyone observing their relationship over the past two decades knew he would. Putin scored a victory the moment his feet touched American soil: With a warrant outstanding from the International Criminal Court, he can't travel to 124 of the 193 UN member nations without risking arrest. By inviting him to the US and literally rolling out a red carpet for him, Trump granted Putin a level of legitimacy denied to him by two-thirds of the world. The good news from the summit is that no deal was announced: Any such 'agreement' would simply have been another case of two foreign powers divvying up land over which they had no rightful claim, against the wishes of people who resided there. But lack of such a document is cold comfort for the Ukrainians: Trump had preemptively surrendered to Putin's most important conditions long before reaching Alaska. Barely three weeks into his second term, Trump granted Putin's greatest demand: Denial to Ukraine of the possibility of joining NATO. After the dissolution of the USSR, 14 European nations, which had been under de facto Soviet control, joined the world's most powerful military alliance, and Russia hasn't dared to invade any of them since. Ukraine was never part of NATO — and Putin has explicitly demanded that it never be offered membership. That might have been part of a deal ending the war: Russia might give up all (or at least some) of the Ukrainian territory it has seized, and in return, Ukraine might agree to set aside hopes of joining NATO. But Trump offered that up proactively, without getting anything in return: On February 12, his Secretary of Defence said, 'The United States does not believe that NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement.' One rule of negotiations is to avoid tossing away one's most valuable chip before sitting down at the table. A second key Russian demand was an end to US military aid for Ukraine, and Trump capitulated on that as well. Under President Joe Biden, the US provided more aid to Ukraine than any other nation did: 175 billion dollars' worth, the lion's share of which was military-related. Without this aid, Ukraine might not have been able to withstand the full impact of Putin's assault. In March, Trump cut off military aid cold, then played a back-and-forth game for months. In July, he permitted European nations to buy US armaments (to the financial benefit of American military contractors) and donate the weapons to Ukraine. That's somewhat better than a complete arms embargo — but nowhere near the support necessary to hold Russia off for long. While running for his current term, Trump often vowed that he'd end the Ukraine war in 24 hours. When the Alaska summit began, he'd been in office for nearly 5,000 hours; it ended with him unable to achieve a ceasefire, let alone a permanent end to the conflict. This all must come as a shock to the citizens of India. Just two weeks ago, Trump walloped them with the highest tariff rate of any nation on Earth: 25 per cent across the board, and an additional 25 per cent as punishment for buying oil from Russia. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,' he said, in purported explanation of his action. 'Because of this, I will be substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA.' A war machine whose commander he welcomed warmly, and then gave his tacit blessing to carry right on? What, Indians may ask, does Trump even want? If he's trying to stop the war in Ukraine, why doesn't he crack down on the nation that's actually causing it? Why strong-arm a friend and partner like India as a roundabout way to (maybe) put some indirect pressure on Russia, while putting no pressure whatsoever on Russia itself? While India labours under a 50 per cent tariff, the rate imposed on Russia is half that (perhaps even less — it's impossible to tell for sure). What does it all mean? Trump's goal here is simple: He's trying to bully his way into a Nobel Peace Prize. Reportedly, he even called up the Prime Minister of Norway (whose nation administers the award), likely to demand he knuckle under. That isn't how Mother Teresa, the Dalai Lama, Martin Luther King Jr, or Nelson Mandela got their wreaths. Trump believes that if he can slap his name on as many bogus peace treaties as possible, he'll be able to intimidate the committee in Oslo — hence his claim to have brokered a May ceasefire between India and Pakistan, which India has made clear was arranged without his interference. Where are we left after a whirlwind summit that achieved absolutely nothing? Exactly where we were beforehand, but with a few illusions stripped away. The first illusion was that Putin had any interest in ending his invasion of Ukraine with a deal rather than a no-terms surrender. The second was that Trump had any intention of stopping him. The writer is author of Arrow of the Blue-Skinned God: Tracing the Ramayana Through India and Mullahs on the Mainframe: Islam and Modernity Among the Daudi Bohras