
Unfamiliar To Westerners: Why We Eat With Our Hands And Why It's Not ‘Uncivilised'
A video of Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old Democratic nominee for New York City's mayoral race in 2025, eating biryani with his bare hands has gone viral. But instead of focusing on the biryani or the man behind it, the internet has turned the spotlight on something else entirely – how he ate.
While this simple, culturally-rooted act should have gone unnoticed, the comment section tells a different story. Flooded with racist, derogatory remarks – many from Western users – the video has sparked a larger conversation around cultural ignorance and the ongoing stigma associated with eating with hands.
Zohran says his worldview is inspired by the 3rd world while eating rice with his hands pic.twitter.com/FDaQfcNSJv — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 29, 2025
But Zohran Mamdani, son of acclaimed academic Mahmood Mamdani and veteran filmmaker Mira Nair, wasn't committing a crime. He was simply eating biryani the way he has likely done his entire life. In South Asian households, eating with hands isn't just common, it's meaningful.
A Sacred Act, Not a Strange One
Long before forks and knives entered Western dining rooms, ancient civilisations -from Egyptians and Mesopotamians to Greeks and people of the Indus Valley – ate with their hands. In India, this method is rooted in sacred traditions. The Vedas and Upanishads regard eating with hands as a mindful ritual that connects the body, mind, and food.
Geography and Cuisine Go Hand in Hand
Culturally and geographically, Indian food lends itself to this style – think fluffy rice, soft rotis, and richly spiced gravies best enjoyed by mixing and scooping with fingers. Every bite becomes personal, tailored to taste and texture.
On the other hand, Western cuisine, often structured and mild, lends itself to knives and forks. But even in the West, hand-eating was once the norm. Forks appeared in southern Europe only around the 11th century, and it wasn't until the late 18th century that Americans began regularly using them. Earlier, spoons and hands were standard.
Dining etiquette, particularly the use of cutlery, evolved not from hygiene but hierarchy. During medieval times, aristocrats used utensils as status symbols, and books like The Courtier turned etiquette into a class divider. Fast forward to today, and similar notions are being recycled on social media as 'proper" table manners.
Hygiene Is Not the Issue, But Ignorance Is
Critics often reduce eating with hands to a hygiene issue, but this ignores a long-standing tradition rooted in mindfulness, respect, and community. As cultural anthropologist Dr Aditi Verma explains, in Indian society, dining practices reflect deeper values – purity, gratitude, and social etiquette. Washing hands before and after meals has always been a part of the process, making cleanliness an intrinsic part of hand-eating, not an afterthought.
Even beyond the plate, gestures made with the right hand in Indian culture reflect reverence, be it while exchanging money, offering something, or simply greeting someone. These aren't just habits; they're symbols of heritage and belonging.
So, whether you prefer forks, chopsticks, or your fingers, the real takeaway is this: how someone eats is a reflection of who they are and where they come from. And there's no one right way to eat. As long as it's clean and respectful, let people enjoy their food, especially if it means finishing a good biryani by licking your fingers with joy.
view comments
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
13 minutes ago
- NDTV
The Vice Presidents of India I Know
I still remember that muggy morning in Delhi fourteen years ago. For the first time ever in my life, I was meeting a person holding a high constitutional office. The then Vice President of India, Mr Hamid Ansari. It was my first day in Parliament. After being sworn in, he called some of us rookies for an informal chat over coffee. The conversation flowed. Noticing that it had been well over 15 minutes, he asked us to come home soon to continue our chat. We went over a few days later. Exciting. A person holding the second-highest constitutional office in India, finding the time to meet MPs who were 'newbies'. Hamid Ansari had a long and distinguished career as a diplomat. Chief of Protocol to Government of India, High Commissioner to Australia, Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador to Afghanistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. Then the thirteenth Vice President of India. What is lesser-known of this Kolkata-born, is that he was a middle-order wicket-keeper batsman who won a college cap. In fact, as the Ambassador to Iran, he introduced cricket to the staff of the Indian Embassy, and it is said that he popularised the sport in that country. As the Chairman of Rajya Sabha, Mr Ansari introduced many innovations in the Council of States. When Parliament was in session, he used to host a coffee meeting everyday from 10.30 to 10.55 am. This informal catch-up with floor leaders and chief whips of parties helped the Opposition and the Treasury Benches to try and reach a consensus on the order of play for the day. As Chairman, Mr Ansari had one rule cast in stone: no bill to be passed in the din. This ensured that the government of the day could not bulldoze legislation, Mr Ansari must get full credit for changing the timings of Question Hour and Zero Hour. For over six decades, Question Hour started at 11 am, followed by Zero Hour at 12 noon. The Chairman noticed that Question Hour would often be disrupted because members wanted to raise crucial issues at the start of the day. In 2014, Mr Ansari reversed the timings and since then, Zero Hour starts at 11 am (members raise issues of 'urgent public importance'), followed by Question Hour at 12 noon in Rajya Sabha. His approach to the role as the Chairman is best exemplified by what he said: 'the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha is not a player but an umpire in a cricket match… You become a player; you become partisan'. He is now living a happy retired life in Delhi, and has authored many books. The second Vice President I had the pleasure to interact with in Rajya Sabha was Mr Venkaiah Naidu. A seasoned parliamentarian, he had held the portfolios of Rural Development, Urban Development, Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, Information and Broadcasting, and Parliamentary Affairs as Minister. History will be kind to Mr Naidu who did not preside over the House on 20 September, 2020- the day the contentious Farm Laws were bamboozled in Parliament. He was born into an agricultural family. Perhaps there lies the answer. Whether it be his chamber or the floor of the House, Mr Naidu used to talk in the same tone with everyone - government or the Opposition. Admirable. And I must mention, whenever he hosted us in the Vice President's house, the non vegetarian Andhra food was terrific. Equal credit must go to Mrs Naidu for being such a wonderful host. He once jokingly told us that he might be the chief outside, but at home he had a Home Minister! Mr Naidu loved delivering snappy one-liners. On students going abroad for higher studies, he quipped, 'learn, earn, and return'. When asked if he had aspirations to become Rashtrapati, he wittily replied that he was happy being Ushapati (husband of Usha, Mrs Usha Naidu is his wife). Then there was the famous line, 'The Left can never be right'. While he had a great sense of humour, he was also very sentimental, often getting visibly misty-eyed when emotive issues were discussed in Parliament. The fourteenth Vice President of India, Mr Jagdeep Dhankar. The subject of a column. Someday.


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
No double standards in fight on terror: PM
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday asserted that there is no room for double standards in the fight against terrorism and, in a reference to the activities of Khalistani elements in the UK, that extremist forces cannot be allowed to misuse democratic freedoms. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his British counterpart Keir Starmer in the UK. (PTI) India's drive against terrorism, the activities of pro-Khalistan elements and the return of economic offenders and fugitives wanted by New Delhi figured in the talks between Modi and his British counterpart Keir Starmer, foreign secretary Vikram Misri said. Following one-on-one and delegation-level talks with Starmer at Chequers, the British prime minister's country residence 50 km northwest of London, Modi thanked the UK for its strong condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack. 'We are unanimous that double standards have no place in the fight against terrorism. We also agree that forces with extremist ideology cannot be allowed to misuse democratic freedoms,' Modi said at a joint media interaction, speaking in Hindi. 'Those who misuse democratic freedoms to undermine democracy itself, must be held to account,' he said, referring to the activities of pro-Khalistan elements that have threatened Indian diplomats and facilities in Britain. Modi also said that the agencies of both countries will continue their cooperation and coordination on the extradition of economic offenders. He also referred to peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific, the conflict in Ukraine and the situation in West Asia, and said: 'We support the restoration of peace and stability as soon as possible. Respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries is imperative. The demand of today's era is development, not expansionism.' Modi conveyed his condolences to the families of more than 50 British citizens who were among the 260 people killed in the crash of Air India flight 171 in Ahmedabad on June 12. Ahead of the PM's arrival in the UK, there was a controversy over bungling in identifying the remains of at least two Britons killed in the crash. Foreign secretary Vikram Misri told a media briefing that Modi and Starmer had expressed their commitment to strengthen the global fight against terrorism. There was also convergence between the two sides on collaboration to combat terror. 'It was noted that extremism and radicalisation pose a threat to both societies and there was a need to enhance collaboration to deal with terrorism, extremism and radicalisation,' he said. Misri said the Indian side had shared its views on the activities of extremists in the UK. 'We've noted the fact that they are increasingly active and…continue to threaten the safety and security of our diplomatic missions and personnel, inciting violence against our leaders and diplomats,' he said. 'We have engaged at several levels on these matters with our UK counterparts and…we have received cooperation as well on these matters, including during this specific visit,' he added. Modi sought the UK's cooperation to bring to justice economic offenders and fugitives from Indian law, Misri said. Several high-profile economic offenders wanted by India, such as former liquor baron Vijay Mallya and diamantaire Nirav Modi, are currently in the UK. Other fugitives whose extradition has been sought by India include arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari, criminal Iqbal Mirchi's wife Hajra Memon and their sons, and criminals Asiq Iqbal Memon and Junaid Iqbal Memon. Referring to legal processes related to the extradition of these offenders, Misri said: 'We expect that those legal processes will be taken to their conclusion in an expedited manner so that justice can be served.' A memorandum of understanding (MoU) was signed by India's Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Britain's National Crime Agency to bolster cooperation in combating corruption, serious fraud and organised crime. Misri said this agreement will institutionalise existing cooperation between the two bodies.


News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
Exclusive-Indian Firm Shipped Explosives To Russia Despite US Warnings
The State Department did not respond to a follow-up question regarding the financial stakes held by U.S. and Spanish firms in one of the Russian recipient companies. An Indian company shipped $1.4 million worth of an explosive compound with military uses to Russia in December, according to Indian customs data seen by Reuters, despite U.S. threats to impose sanctions on any entity supporting Russia's Ukraine war effort. One of the Russian companies listed as receiving the compound, known as HMX or octogen, is the explosives manufacturer Promsintez, which an official at Ukraine's SBU security service said has ties to Moscow's military. The official said that Ukraine launched a drone attack in April against a Promsintez-owned factory. The other Russian company is a subsidiary of Spanish explosives manufacturer Maxam, which is itself controlled by New York-based private equity firm Rhone Capital. The U.S. government has identified HMX as "critical for Russia's war effort" and has warned financial institutions against facilitating any sales of the substance to Moscow. According to the Pentagon's Defense Technical Information Center and related defense research programs, HMX is widely used in missile and torpedo warheads, rocket motors, exploding projectiles and plastic-bonded explosives for advanced military systems. The HMX sale to Russian firms has not been previously reported. Russian defense manufacturers have been working around the clock for the past several years to sustain President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine, which intensified with Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022. India, which has recently forged closer ties with the United States in an effort to counterbalance China's growing influence, has not abandoned its longstanding military and economic ties with Moscow. India's trade with Russia – especially its purchases of Russian oil – has remained robust, even as Western nations have tried to cripple Russia's war economy with sanctions. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened earlier in July to hit nations with a 100% tariff if they continued purchasing Russian crude. The U.S. Treasury Department has the authority to sanction those who sell HMX and similar substances to Russia, according to three sanctions lawyers. HMX is known as a "high explosive," meaning it detonates rapidly and is designed for maximum destruction. Reuters has no indication that the HMX shipments violated Indian government policy. One Indian official with knowledge of the shipments said that the compound has some limited civilian applications, in addition to its better-known military uses. India's foreign ministry said in a statement: "India has been carrying out exports of dual-use items taking into account its international obligations on non-proliferation, and based on its robust legal and regulatory framework that includes a holistic assessment of relevant criteria on such exports." The U.S. State Department did not comment on the specific shipments identified by Reuters but said it had repeatedly communicated to India that companies doing military-related business are at risk of sanctions. "India is a strategic partner with whom we engage in full and frank dialogue, including on India's relationship with Russia," a spokesperson said. "We have repeatedly made clear to all our partners, including India, that any foreign company or financial institution that does business with Russia's military industrial base are at risk of U.S. sanctions." The State Department did not respond to a follow-up question regarding the financial stakes held by U.S. and Spanish firms in one of the Russian recipient companies. Russia's defense ministry did not respond to a request for comment. "While India has not typically been among the primary jurisdictions used for circumventing sanctions, we are aware that isolated cases can occur," Ukrainian presidential adviser Vladyslav Vlasiuk told Reuters. "We can confirm that the Russian company Promsintez has appeared on our radar in the past, including in connection with cooperation involving Indian counterparts," added Vlasiuk, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's top sanctions official. WASHINGTON WOOS NEW DELHI Reuters identified two HMX shipments sent in December by Indian firm Ideal Detonators Private Limited, both of which were unloaded in St. Petersburg, according to the Indian customs data. An Indian government official with direct knowledge of the shipments confirmed them. One shipment, worth $405,200, was purchased by a Russian company called High Technology Initiation Systems, or HTIS, the data showed. The other shipment, worth more than $1 million was purchased by Promsintez. Both purchasers are based in Samara Oblast, near the border of Kazakhstan in southern Russia, according to the data. HTIS says on its website it produces explosives for surface and underground mining and engineering projects. It describes itself there as a subsidiary of Madrid-based Maxam, which in turn is majority-controlled by Rhone Capital, a New York-headquartered private equity firm set up by former Goldman Sachs and Lazard bankers. A source familiar with Maxam's operations said the company is in the process of divesting its Russian subsidiaries and that HTIS operates independently. Ideal Detonators Private Limited, based in the Indian state of Telangana, did not respond to a request for comment, nor did Promsintez, HTIS and Maxam. Rhone Capital declined to comment. While several Indian entities were sanctioned during the administration of former U.S. President Joe Biden for supporting Russia's war effort, sanctions were applied sparingly due to geopolitical considerations, according to two U.S. officials who worked on sanctions under Biden. Under Trump, Russia-related sanctions work has slowed to a trickle, and it is not clear if the United States will take further action against Indian companies doing business with Russia's defense industry. top videos View all Washington has long sought closer relations with India to pull the South Asian country away from China. Jason Prince, a partner at Washington-based law firm Akin, said the U.S. government often prefers to communicate its concerns privately to allies and only take punitive actions as a last resort. (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - Reuters) Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 25, 2025, 08:52 IST News world Exclusive-Indian Firm Shipped Explosives To Russia Despite US Warnings Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.