logo
Local leaders speak out against Tarrant County redistricting efforts

Local leaders speak out against Tarrant County redistricting efforts

Yahoo28-05-2025
The Brief
Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare is leading an effort to redraw the county's commissioner precinct maps.
Some Tarrant County Commissioners, Fort Worth City Council members, and local mayors are opposed to the plan, arguing it's an attempt to eliminate the chances of a minority being elected.
Legal experts say redistricting to favor one political party over another is allowed, but racial discrimination is not.
FORT WORTH, Texas - Tarrant County Commissioners will soon vote on a controversial redistricting map. Not all commissioners agree on it, and some argue that it could reshape Tarrant County politics.
What we know
Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare is reportedly behind the effort to redraw the Tarrant County Commissioners Court precinct boundaries.
He and some other Republicans argue the process is more than a decade overdue.
New maps are often drawn after census data is released every 10 years. But in 2021, commissioners voted against making any changes.
They'll vote again on June 3.
The other side
U.S. Congressman Marc Veasey made a public statement on Tuesday, strongly denouncing the proposed changes.
"Let me saw it loud and clear for the people in the back. This is illegal. this is intentional racial discrimination. It still violates the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment," he said. "If you look at this map, you will see. If you look precisely at this map, you will see that it was meant to dilute black voting power and brown voting power in Tarrant County. Period. End of story."
He was joined by two Democratic Tarrant County Commissioners – Alisa Simmons and Roderick Miles – as well as several Fort Worth City Council members.
The mayors of 10 Tarrant County cities, including Fort Worth, Arlington, Mansfield, and Grand Prairie, have also signed a letter expressing their opposition to the proposed map.
"What you see in this redistricting effort today is nothing more than Tim O'Hare's continued efforts to silence the voices of those in Tarrant County who do not believe like him, to silence the voices specifically of the black and brown members of our community," said For Worth Councilwoman Elizabeth Beck.
The group called the effort ill-timed because it's the middle of the decade and, in their opinion, the census data from 2020 is outdated.
They also argued that four community meetings are not enough to give residents a chance to express their opinions on the proposed new precincts.
Dig deeper
Political analyst Bud Kennedy said that while there's nothing in the Voting Rights Act to prevent a redistricting effort that favors one political party over another, there are restrictions against racial discrimination.
"The Republicans feel like they have to do this because if they were to lose the county judge seat, along with a commissioner seat, the Democrats would flip the court," he said. "It's something you can do any time. You're supposed to use the best census information."
Kennedy is not familiar with what census data the proposed map uses but said the newest estimates would show a growing population in the northern part of the county.
He pointed out that, collectively, the opposing cities can't compete with the population boom of the county's northern voters.
"You didn't see any mayors from the Republican precincts in the north half of the county on that list (of opposing mayors). There's a reason for Fort Worth to be upset. People in Southwest Fort Worth would have to go to an Arlington commissioner for help. There's a reason for Arlington to be upset about being divided. The problem is these two big cities don't have any control with the county courthouse right now. It's Southlake, Keller, and Haslet that have control," he said.
Kennedy said if the map is approved, it will likely be challenged. But with the Supreme Court removing the requirement for pre-clearance of the redistricting map, the approved version would likely take effect while it is contested in court.
Kennedy also pointed out that Veasey has been a vocal advocate for fair redistricting at every level.
"This is right up his alley. If there is a flaw in this map, he'll find it," he said.
The Source
FOX 4's Dionne Anglin gathered details for this story at a town hall event hosted by Congressman Mark Veasey, as well as an interview with political analyst Bud Kennedy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gavin Newsom and Pete Buttigieg's Chances of Beating JD Vance in 2028: Poll
Gavin Newsom and Pete Buttigieg's Chances of Beating JD Vance in 2028: Poll

Newsweek

time21 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Gavin Newsom and Pete Buttigieg's Chances of Beating JD Vance in 2028: Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new poll shows potential 2028 presidential election matchups between Vice President JD Vance and prominent Democratic leaders as next year's midterm campaigns are on the horizon. Why It Matters Early polls, especially in crucial swing states, have gained significance as potential contenders for the 2028 presidential election begin to emerge. Even with the election still a few years away, polling could offer insight into candidate viability, voter sentiment and evolving party dynamics, particularly after the pivotal 2024 election cycle. What To Know In the poll released Tuesday by SoCal Strategies and sponsored by On Point Politics and Red Eagle Politics, California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom secured 39 percent in a potential matchup with Vance, who landed 37 percent. The survey shows 23 percent were undecided in the matchup. In a race against former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Vance trailed with 37 percent of the vote compared to Buttigieg's 41 percent. The survey shows 21 percent were undecided. The poll surveyed 700 U.S. adults on August 18. "The survey was weighted by age, gender, race, education, and 2024 vote to match the Bonfire National Voter File," the pollster noted. ESPN host Stephen A. Smith also came close to Vance in the survey, receiving 35 percent of the vote compared to Vance's 37 percent. Previous polling has shown Vance as the clear GOP primary front-runner. The field is more crowded for Democrats, as former Vice President Kamala Harris, Newsom and Buttigieg all are early top contenders. Tuesday's poll also shows President Donald Trump's overall approval rating at 45 percent versus a disapproval rating of 48 percent. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks on the state's redistricting plans at a news conference on August 14 in Los Angeles. (Photo by) California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks on the state's redistricting plans at a news conference on August 14 in Los Angeles. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Columbia University professor Robert Y. Shapiro, to Newsweek via email on Tuesday: "It is of course much too early to tell anything significant from this other than the 2028 election is likely to be close just like the last presidential elections. See the high percent undecided as well. "The data may suggest that Vance is not as strong a candidate as Donald Trump, but we would need to compare the hypothetical of Trump running for an imaginary third term against Newsom or Buttigieg. Regardless of what might happen in the midterm election, it looks like 2028 will be another nail biter..." Trump, while answering questions during a news conference on the 2028 Olympics, when directly asked if Vance is the successor to MAGA: "Well, I think most likely in all fairness, he's the vice president. I think Marco [Rubio] is also somebody that maybe would get together with JD in some form. I also think we have incredible people, some of the people on the stage right here, so it's too early obviously to talk about it but certainly he's doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point." What Happens Next Pollsters and analysts were expected to release additional national and state-level surveys in the coming months as midterm campaigning ramps up.

Minneapolis leaders condemn council member's profane attack on Mayor Frey
Minneapolis leaders condemn council member's profane attack on Mayor Frey

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minneapolis leaders condemn council member's profane attack on Mayor Frey

The Brief Aisha Chughtai, the city council vice president, verbally attacked Mayor Jacob Frey during a campaign event in Minneapolis on Saturday. The video was posted on her Instagram account. Three of her colleagues condemned her remarks, calling them "outrageous" and "an extraordinary breach of decorum." MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) - Minneapolis City Council Vice President Aisha Chughtai posted a video of herself on social media saying "F*** Jacob Frey," remarks her own colleagues characterized as "inflammatory" and "disrespectful." Council member's remarks about mayor draw backlash What we know During a campaign event at the Green Room in Minneapolis on Saturday night, Chughtai said, "F*** Jacob Frey. F*** fascism. F*** Donald Trump." Her remarks drew immediate cheers from the crowd. While expressing her support for State Sen. Omar Fateh, who is challenging Frey in November's mayoral election, she said, "We're going to transform this city." Chughtai is running for reelection to her council seat, which covers Whittier and South Uptown, among other neighborhoods. Chughtai's colleagues call remarks 'extraordinary breach of decorum' What they're saying In a joint statement on Tuesday, Council Members Linea Palmisano, Andrea Jenkins and Michael Rainville said: "The council vice president's outrageous remarks are an extraordinary breach of decorum. In our time on the city council, we have never seen a council member – much less council leadership – use such inflammatory and disrespectful rhetoric toward a sitting mayor. This is the kind of behavior from the council majority and council leadership that has made it even harder to work through our disagreements for the good of the city. "We understand that it is an election year and that the council vice president is supporting one of the mayor's opponents. That is no excuse for this behavior. She owes an immediate apology to the mayor, to the council colleagues she has been trusted to lead and to Minneapolis residents who deserve better from their leaders." Mayor's office says council majority doesn't share the same values The other side In an email on Tuesday, Ally Peters, a spokeswoman for Frey, said: "The mayor believes in collaboration and the importance of setting aside politics to find common ground. Unfortunately, it's clear that the city council majority doesn't share those same values. The mayor remains focused on working together to deliver for the people of Minneapolis." Chughtai did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Council plans to introduce new 20mph limits on host of roads
Council plans to introduce new 20mph limits on host of roads

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Council plans to introduce new 20mph limits on host of roads

New 20mph speed limits are being introduced in parts of Southampton city centre. The Labour-run city council is bringing in the slower speed restriction in six roads, two years after it carried out a consultation on a much wider scheme. An opposition councillor has accused the administration of ignoring city centre residents who wanted 20mph limits on the streets where they live. The local authority's lead member for transport said the six roads had been selected for a 20mph zone after 'careful consideration', with no long-term decisions made on other routes. Southampton City Council has issued a public notice confirming the change in speed limit for Albion Place, Albion Place Bus Hub, Bargate Street, Castle Way, Castle Way Service Road and East Park Terrace. The move is due to come into operation on October 13, with proposals relating to other roads named in a 2023 traffic regulation order (TRO) not being progressed at this time. A statement of reasons published as part of a consultation two years ago said the council had committed funding to implement 20mph limits in residential areas of the city where feasible and where there was community support. Conservative group spokesman for transport Cllr Jeremy Moulton said: '20mph limits were originally envisaged for residential roads and there was considerable interest from city centre residents. 'Labour have ignored all of these people and are instead now only progressing 20mph limits on main roads and bus routes, in direct contradiction to the original aims of the policy. 'Labour always seem to ignore what local people want.' Cllr Christie Lambert, cabinet member for transport, said: 'These roads have been selected after careful consideration and with a great deal of research undertaken. 'A 20mph limit will help to reduce the risk and severity of collisions and encourages more walking and cycling across the city. This will help people, especially children, older people, and people with mobility issues to cross the roads more safely. 'No long-term decisions have been made regarding other roads that were previously listed in TROs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store